Social Media's Environmental Pollution: What's The Real Cost?

Social media has become an integral part of our daily lives, with many of us spending hours each day on various platforms. While these platforms have their benefits, they also contribute to environmental pollution in several ways. From the carbon emissions associated with our online activities to the energy consumption of data centres and servers, our social media habits are having a significant impact on the planet. Additionally, social media has become a tool for environmental advocacy, with activists utilising these platforms to spread awareness and galvanise support for climate action. This dual nature of social media presents an interesting dilemma – how can we harness the positive aspects while mitigating the negative environmental consequences? This question is particularly pertinent given the growing global focus on sustainability and the need to reduce our collective carbon footprint.

Social media's environmental cost

Social media has become an integral part of our daily lives, with platforms like Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube now part of the furniture for billions of users. However, while these platforms bring convenience and entertainment, they also come with an often-overlooked environmental cost.

The energy required to keep these platforms running is significant. Behind every social media post or video is a vast digital infrastructure, powered by data centres and servers that consume large amounts of electricity. This electricity is often derived from carbon-intensive sources such as coal, oil, and gas, meaning that each digital action contributes to global carbon emissions.

A study by Compare the Market found that using social media can contribute to the climate crisis. Every time you check your accounts, you are using energy created mainly by fossil fuels, and over the course of a year, the resulting greenhouse emissions heat up the atmosphere. While social media itself isn't damaging the planet, the research highlights our continued reliance on fossil fuels and the need for countries to transition to renewable energy sources.

The environmental cost of social media is not just about the companies and their operations, but also the behaviour of users. The more time people spend online, the greater the energy demand and the higher the emissions. For example, if you're one of the 2.85 million Facebook users, you produce 12g of CO2 per year, and if you stream an hour of video on Netflix or YouTube, that's another 36g of CO2. A tweet is estimated to have a footprint of 0.2g of CO2, while a one-minute mobile phone call generates slightly more emissions. The average time spent on social media is 145 minutes per day, and if all that time is spent on TikTok, it would cause nearly 140kg of carbon emissions in a year, the same as driving a standard car for over 350 miles.

However, social media can also be a force for good in the environmental movement. Environmental advocates and organizers use these platforms to share essential information and help people take climate action. Social media has also been found to increase government action and decrease pollution. A study in China found that social media appeals to the government regarding an industrial plant violation were more likely to receive a response and result in an inspection of the polluting plants when they had more "likes" and "shares", creating the appearance of growing public support.

Carbon emissions from social media usage

Social media usage has a significant carbon footprint, contributing to the global climate crisis. The energy used to power the digital world largely comes from fossil fuels, which produce heat-trapping gases that warm the planet. This means that every time someone checks their social media, they are contributing to carbon emissions.

The carbon emissions from social media usage are significant. In 2021, there were 4.33 billion active social media users worldwide, with 35% growth since 2019. On average, people spend 2 hours and 24 minutes on social media each day, and 80% of this time is spent on mobile devices. This level of usage has a considerable environmental impact. For example, each Facebook user produces 12g of CO2 per year, and streaming an hour of video on Netflix or YouTube generates another 36g of CO2. TikTok, the fastest-growing social media platform, has a particularly high carbon footprint due to the large amount of data it consumes. Spending 145 minutes on TikTok daily for a year results in approximately 140kg of carbon emissions, equivalent to driving a standard car for over 350 miles.

The carbon emissions from social media usage are not limited to individual users. The IT infrastructure required to support social media platforms also consumes a large amount of energy and contributes to carbon emissions. Data centers, in particular, have been identified as major contributors to carbon dioxide emissions due to their high energy and water consumption.

While social media usage has a significant carbon footprint, it is important to note that social media platforms have also become hubs for climate information and activism. Environmental advocates utilize these platforms to share essential information and mobilize support for climate action. Additionally, some tech companies, such as Meta (owner of Facebook and Instagram), have taken steps to secure renewable energy for their operations.

Social media as a tool for environmental activism

Social media has become an integral part of our daily lives, with many of us spending a significant amount of time on various platforms. While this habit certainly has its drawbacks, including contributing to internet pollution, it is also a powerful tool for environmental activism.

Social media has revolutionized the way we communicate and share information. It has become a platform for activism and awareness, especially in the realm of environmentalism. As environmental challenges become increasingly urgent, social media provides a crucial avenue for raising awareness, mobilizing support, and driving global action. Anyone with a phone can become an environmental activist, sharing information and building community around environmental issues.

Environmental advocates and organizations use social media to disseminate essential information and encourage climate action. They can quickly and easily share articles, videos, and infographics about various environmental topics, such as climate change, pollution, deforestation, and wildlife conservation. Hashtags like #ClimateAction, #SaveTheBees, and #PlasticFreeJuly have helped spark conversations and draw attention to pressing environmental concerns.

Social media also serves as a tool for holding governments and corporations accountable. It provides a public space for citizens to voice their concerns and demand action from their leaders. For example, in China, citizen volunteers sent messages through social media appealing for action after an industrial plant violation. The more popular these social media posts became, the more effective they were in generating a response from the government. This demonstrates how social media can be an effective tool for citizens to participate in governance and improve government accountability.

Additionally, social media has helped environmental activists reach new and diverse audiences. It has enabled individuals like Greta Thurnberg and Isra Hirsi to inspire collective climate activism and amplify their messages through their platforms. It has also provided a space for activists like queer environmentalist Pattie Gonia to find freedom and build a community around environmental action.

While social media can be a powerful force for good in environmental activism, it is essential to acknowledge its limitations and potential drawbacks. These include the risk of spreading misinformation, the potential for it to be a substitute for real action, and the energy consumption and emissions associated with its use. However, by being mindful of these challenges, activists can leverage social media as a valuable tool to promote environmental causes and drive meaningful change.

Reducing social media's carbon footprint

Social media platforms have become integral to our daily lives, with billions of users engaging in endless scrolling, sharing, and video streaming. However, this convenience and entertainment come at an often-overlooked environmental cost: the energy required to keep these platforms running.

The digital infrastructure behind every social media post, video, or comment consumes significant amounts of electricity, much of which still comes from carbon-intensive sources like coal, oil, and gas. This energy demand leads to global carbon emissions, contributing to climate change.

To reduce social media's carbon footprint, here are some strategies:

• Reduce personal usage: Minimise the time spent on social media platforms. If you can't avoid using them, consider limiting your usage to a few apps instead of spreading your time across multiple platforms. Every minute spent online contributes to carbon emissions.
• Choose energy-efficient platforms: Some platforms are more energy-intensive than others. For example, TikTok and video streaming platforms like Netflix and YouTube tend to have higher carbon footprints due to the energy required for video content. Opt for text-based platforms or those with primarily static content.
• Disable unnecessary features: App updates, automatic cloud backups, and automatic downloads for app updates can increase carbon emissions. Disabling these features can help reduce your carbon footprint without significantly impacting your user experience.
• Support environmental advocacy: Social media has become a hub for climate information and advocacy. Follow and share the work of environmental activists to raise awareness and encourage climate action. Use your social media presence to advocate for renewable energy and phase out fossil fuels.
• Engage in social media activism: Social media can be a powerful tool to galvanize momentum for change. Share and engage with posts that highlight environmental issues and call for government action. The more popular these posts become, the more likely they are to spur government responses and improve environmental enforcement.
• Choose SMS or messaging apps over emails: Sending an SMS text message is the most environmentally friendly option, generating only 0.014g of CO2e. Messaging apps like WhatsApp or Facebook Messenger are also more energy-efficient than sending an email, although this can vary depending on the type of content you share.
• Use carbon footprint calculators: Tools like Ecotree and the social media carbon footprint calculator can help you estimate your carbon emissions from social media usage. This awareness can motivate you to make more informed choices to reduce your footprint.
• Demand industry-level change: While individual actions are important, systemic change is necessary. Support organisations like Greenpeace that advocate for reducing carbon emissions in the IT industry. Encourage social media companies to go beyond net-zero targets and carbon neutrality claims by implementing meaningful emissions reduction strategies.

Social media's contribution to internet pollution

Social media usage has an environmental footprint, which is often a lot higher than people realize. The energy required to power the vast digital infrastructure that supports social media platforms is a significant contributor to internet pollution. This infrastructure includes data centers and servers that consume large amounts of electricity, much of which is derived from carbon-intensive sources such as coal, oil, and gas. As a result, each digital action on social media, from a simple "like" to streaming video content, contributes to global carbon emissions.

The impact of social media on the environment is twofold, influenced by both user behavior and the operations of the companies that own these platforms. While the average time spent on social media is 145 minutes per day, many people spend significantly more time on these platforms, increasing the energy demand and emissions associated with their usage. For example, spending 145 minutes on TikTok every day for a year results in nearly 140kg of carbon emissions, equivalent to driving a standard car for over 350 miles.

Additionally, the companies that own social media platforms are also responsible for expanding energy-intensive data center operations. While many organizations set ambitious net-zero targets or claim carbon neutrality, achieving true net-zero emissions is complex and challenging. The IT industry's greenhouse gas emissions are projected to reach 14% of global emissions by 2040, highlighting the urgency of reducing the carbon footprint associated with social media usage.

However, it is important to note that social media can also be a powerful tool for positive environmental impact. Environmental advocates and organizers use these platforms to share essential information and mobilize climate action. Social media appeals and campaigns can generate public support, increasing government accountability and leading to concrete actions to address pollution and environmental issues.

To reduce the environmental impact of social media usage, individuals can make small changes such as disabling automatic app updates and cloud backups, which contribute significantly to mobile data traffic. Additionally, seeking out and sharing content from environmental activists, as well as advocating for climate action, can help leverage the power of social media for positive change.

Frequently asked questions