Cruise Ships' Bunker Oil Burning: Air Pollution Impact

Cruise ships are a major source of air pollution, which causes and contributes to a wide range of serious health problems, including respiratory ailments, lung disease, cancer, asthma, and emphysema. Bunker fuel, also known as bunker oil or heavy fuel oil (HFO), is the cheapest and most toxic type of fuel used by cruise ships. It is the dredge remaining in the pits of oil refineries after the refining process and has the consistency of tar. The use of bunker fuel has been banned in some regions, and the industry is working towards adopting alternative fuels, such as liquefied natural gas (LNG), which produces less air pollution. However, the overall benefits of switching to LNG are unclear, as it may do little to curb the shipping industry's greenhouse gas emissions.

Bunker fuel is the nastiest and most toxic fuel

Bunker fuel, also known as bunker oil, is the dirtiest of all fossil fuels. It is the dredge remaining in the pits of oil refineries after the refining process has ended and all the high-value products have been extracted from the crude oil. This process leaves behind a toxic, tar-like substance with the consistency of sludge.

Bunker fuel is extremely toxic and hazardous to human health. When burned, it releases incombustible particles that blacken the sky and, if inhaled, burrow deep into the mucous membranes of the lungs, causing lung disease, cancer, asthma, and emphysema. The fumes from cruise ships burning bunker fuel are known to contribute to air pollution in nearby coastal cities and ports, with residents reporting that they can "smell, see and taste" the pollution.

The use of bunker fuel by the cruise industry has been widely criticized by environmental groups and local communities. Despite efforts to reduce air emissions, cruise companies have been accused of prioritizing profits over the environment and public health. Bunker fuel is cheap, and its use allows cruise lines to keep their operating costs low. However, the burning of bunker fuel emits high levels of sulphur, NO2 gas, particulate matter, and other pollutants, leading to increased air pollution and negative health impacts, particularly among children and the elderly.

In response to the growing concerns over bunker fuel pollution, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) created a buffer zone around the US and Canada that prohibits the use of bunker fuel in those regions. This move was met with resistance from the cruise industry, highlighting the challenge of regulating the use of hazardous fuels in the absence of strong governmental oversight.

Cruise ships burn bunker fuel because it's cheap

Cruise ships are some of the largest emitters of air pollutants, with a single large cruise ship emitting over five tonnes of NOX emissions and 450kg of ultra-fine particles a day. This is due to the burning of bunker fuel, also known as bunker oil, which is the cheapest fuel available to the cruise industry.

Bunker fuel is the leftover residue from the oil refining process, with the consistency of tar. It is extremely toxic, with a high sulphur content—3,500 to 5,000 times more sulphur than gasoline used in automobiles. This cheap fuel has a disastrous effect on the environment and is deadly to those who breathe in the smoke, causing lung disease, cancer, asthma, and emphysema.

Despite the harmful effects of bunker fuel, it has been the cornerstone of the cruise industry due to its low cost. Cruise lines have been criticized for prioritizing profits over the environment and the health of their passengers and crew. In response to growing environmental concerns, some cruise companies are transitioning to liquefied natural gas (LNG), which produces less air pollution and carbon dioxide than bunker fuel. However, LNG has its own drawbacks, such as methane leaks, which contribute to greenhouse gas emissions.

The use of bunker fuel has faced increasing regulation, with the International Maritime Organization (IMO) creating a buffer zone around the US and Canada that prohibits the use of this type of fuel. As a result, cruise lines are being pressured to adopt cleaner technologies and fuels to reduce their environmental impact and air pollution emissions.

While the transition to alternative fuels like LNG is a step in the right direction, it is not enough to curb the shipping industry's greenhouse gas emissions significantly. As such, there is a continued push for the cruise industry to go beyond the use of dirty fuels and address other environmental concerns, such as the dumping of sewage and waste into the sea.

Bunker fuel is the dredge at the bottom of oil refineries

Cruise ships are major contributors to air pollution. They burn large amounts of fuel, emitting more sulphur than several million cars, more NO2 gas than all the traffic in a medium-sized town, and more particulate emissions than thousands of London buses. The fuel used by cruise ships is bunker fuel, also known as bunker oil, which is the dirtiest of all fossil fuels. It is a cheap, gelatinous sludge that is the dredge remaining in the pits of oil refineries after the refining process has ended and the high-octane fuels and diesel products have been extracted from the crude oil.

Bunker fuel is the cornerstone of the cruise industry. It is a nasty, tar-like substance that is impossible to burn completely, leaving non-combustible particles that blacken the sky and, if inhaled, cause serious health issues such as lung disease, cancer, asthma, and emphysema. It is the cheapest and most hazardous fuel available, and without governmental oversight, cruise lines will continue to use it to operate their ships. The use of this toxic fuel is in stark contrast to the cruise companies' image of being a clean and environmentally friendly sector.

Bunker fuel is classified as a residual fuel oil, which is produced after the refining process removes the lighter and more valuable components from crude oil. These residual fuel oils are cheaper, but they tend to be more viscous and are more likely to contain contaminants compared to distillate fuel oils. Bunker fuel specifically refers to the various grades of marine fuels used for powering ships, with classifications based on viscosity, pour point, sulfur content, carbon residue, and metals residue content. The International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) sets the specifications for bunker fuels, with the latest version being ISO 8217:2017, which outlines the requirements and tests for both marine distillate and residual fuels.

The use of bunker fuel has faced increasing scrutiny and regulation. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) has implemented a global sulphur cap of 0.5% on marine fuel emissions, requiring ships to use fuels with lower sulphur content or retrofit their vessels with filters to comply. Additionally, a buffer zone around the US and Canada has been established to prohibit the use of bunker fuel. These measures aim to reduce the environmental and health impacts of bunker fuel, but the cruise industry has been criticized for not doing enough to limit its environmental footprint.

Bunker fuel causes serious health problems

Bunker fuel is the colloquial term for the fuel oil used by marine vessels. It is the cheapest and dirtiest of all fossil fuels, and its use has severe consequences for human health.

Bunker fuel is the dregs left over at the end of the refinery process. It is a nasty, tar-like substance with the consistency of sludge. It cannot be completely burned without leaving behind non-combustible particles that blacken the sky. These particles, if inhaled, burrow deep into the mucous membranes of the lungs and can cause serious health issues, including lung disease, cancer, asthma, and emphysema.

The use of bunker fuel by cruise ships has been identified as a significant contributor to air pollution. Cruise companies have been criticized for presenting themselves as environmentally friendly while relying on this highly polluting fuel. The burning of bunker fuel emits large quantities of sulphur, NO2 gas, particulate matter, and other pollutants. These emissions have been linked to asthma emergencies, heart attacks, and lung ailments, particularly in children and the elderly.

The impact of bunker fuel emissions is not limited to those on board the ships but also affects individuals living in port cities and coastal areas. For example, residents of Southampton, a major cruise ship port, have complained about the air pollution caused by these vessels, stating that they can "smell, see, and taste" the fumes.

In recognition of the health and environmental risks posed by bunker fuel, efforts have been made to regulate its use. In 2010, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) established the North American Emissions Control Area (ECA), prohibiting ships that burn bunker fuel from approaching within 200 miles of the North American coast. Additionally, the IMO has mandated that large ships gather data on their fuel use to inform policy recommendations. However, outside the ECA, ships are still permitted to burn bunker fuel, and critics argue that voluntary measures encouraged by the IMO are insufficient to address the pollution and greenhouse gas emissions associated with its use.

Cruise companies create a misleading environmentally-friendly image

Cruise companies have been accused of creating a misleading image of being environmentally friendly, while in reality, their practices are damaging to the environment and public health. The cruise industry has a large carbon footprint, with ships burning large amounts of fuel and emitting air pollutants, such as sulphur oxide, that contribute to climate change and air pollution.

Cruise ships often burn bunker fuel, also known as bunker oil, which is considered the dirtiest of all fossil fuels. This fuel is the leftover sludge from the refining process, containing toxic and hazardous particles that are released into the air when burned. It has been compared to burning tires, with residue that can cause serious health issues, including lung disease, cancer, asthma, and emphysema. Despite this, cruise companies continue to use bunker fuel due to its low cost.

In addition to air pollution, cruise ships also contribute to water pollution and harm to marine ecosystems. They have been known to dump sewage and waste into the sea, affecting water quality and fragile marine habitats and wildlife. The size and number of cruise ships have increased significantly over the years, leading to growing concerns about their environmental impact.

While some cruise lines have made efforts to reduce their environmental footprint, such as installing advanced sewage treatment systems, these initiatives are often seen as insufficient or half-hearted. For example, MSC Cruises has been criticized for only having advanced sewage treatment systems on 12 out of their 19 ships. Additionally, some companies use misleading marketing tactics to portray themselves as environmentally conscious, when in reality, they are contributing to pollution and harm to the planet.

Friends of the Earth, an environmental organization, has been actively grading and assessing the environmental practices of major cruise lines through their Cruise Ship Report Card. They have given failing grades to several top cruise lines, including Carnival, Celebrity Crystal, Cunard, Disney, and Royal Caribbean, for their lack of commitment to reducing air pollution and addressing their environmental impacts.

The cruise industry's resistance to change and the lack of strong government regulations have prolonged the journey towards sustainability. However, with growing public awareness and pressure, there is hope that the industry will be held accountable and make the necessary changes to protect the environment and public health.

Frequently asked questions