Air Pollution Laws: Effective Or Not?

Air pollution is a serious issue that claims the lives of 7 million people annually, exceeding the official death toll of COVID-19. While legislation like the Clean Air Act in the US has helped combat air pollution, the issue persists and requires stronger global cooperation. The effectiveness of air quality laws varies across countries, and even in nations with such laws, many fail to meet WHO standards. This highlights the need for stricter enforcement and a global treaty to address air pollution collectively. The complexity of designing enforcement mechanisms and the absence of an international regime on air quality standards pose challenges. Nonetheless, there is optimism that strengthening air quality laws and regulations can significantly improve air quality and protect human health.

Effectiveness of the Clean Air Act

The Clean Air Act, enacted 50 years ago in 1970, has been instrumental in reducing air pollution and safeguarding public health. The Act shifted the focus of air quality regulation from states to the federal government, specifically the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which was established by President Richard Nixon alongside the Clean Air Act.

The Clean Air Act has been highly effective in improving air quality and protecting public health. Since its implementation, air pollution has dropped significantly, even as the gross domestic product has quadrupled. The Act has set specific targets and timetables for reducing major air pollutants, and it empowers citizens to take legal action against the government if it fails to fulfil its duties. Additionally, the Act has driven innovation in cleaner technologies, with the United States becoming a global leader in this market.

A major retrospective analysis of the Clean Air Act highlights its positive impact on public health, with reductions in premature deaths and illnesses, leading to longer life expectancies and improved quality of life for Americans. The Act has also resulted in economic benefits, as cleaner air leads to reduced medical expenses and improved worker productivity, contributing to economic growth and the economic welfare of American households. The EPA's Second Prospective Report, which assessed the Clean Air Act from 1990 to 2020, found that the benefits of the Act exceeded the costs by a significant margin.

While the Clean Air Act has faced challenges and setbacks, such as the West Virginia v. EPA case in 2022, public advocacy and the courts have played a crucial role in ensuring the Act's implementation and strengthening it over time. The Clean Air Act continues to be a vital tool in the fight against air pollution and its associated health and environmental impacts.

However, it is important to note that air pollution remains a significant issue, and even with the Clean Air Act in place, more efforts are needed to address this complex problem effectively.

International accords and cooperation

International cooperation is essential to effectively combat air pollution, as it is a cross-border issue that affects people in multiple countries. While there is currently no international treaty that requires or encourages countries to adopt air quality standards, several global treaties address air pollution, including:

• The Vienna Convention
• The Montreal Protocol
• The Climate Change Convention
• The Kyoto Protocol
• The Paris Agreement
• The Stockholm Convention
• The Minamata Convention on Mercury

The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has also played a crucial role in tackling air pollution through legislation and developing global air quality standards. Despite the increase in laws and regulations to address air pollution, the UNEP report concludes that air quality continues to deteriorate, emphasizing the need for a complementary global treaty.

One of the most successful examples of international cooperation is the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP), signed by 32 European countries, the United States, and Canada in 1979. This agreement initially focused on tackling acid rain and has since become a model for effective international environmental collaboration. The LRTAP has led to significant improvements, including cleaner air, healthier ecosystems, and the prevention of premature deaths in Europe.

Regional agreements, such as the Nairobi Agreement in Eastern Africa and the Abidjan Agreement in West and Central Africa, also foster cooperation and address specific regional challenges related to air pollution. These agreements often target key sources of pollution and prioritize public participation, capacity building, and research development.

The UN ESCAP Regional Action Programme on Air Pollution, spearheaded by the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, is another significant initiative. It aims to facilitate cooperation among nations in the Asia-Pacific region, where rapid urbanization and industrialization have led to critical air pollution issues.

Overall, international accords and cooperation are vital in the fight against air pollution, as they provide a framework for countries to work together, share expertise, and address the global challenges posed by air pollution.

Enforcement of air quality standards

Despite the existence of laws and regulations to address air pollution, air quality continues to deteriorate in many countries. The enforcement of air quality standards is complex, and there is a lack of international accords and cooperation between countries to effectively control cross-border air pollution.

One example of legislation that has helped improve air quality is the Clean Air Act (CAA) in the United States. The CAA is a comprehensive federal law that gives the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the authority to regulate air pollutants and polluting industries. It establishes National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) to protect public health and welfare and sets emission standards for hazardous air pollutants, such as mercury, benzene, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The CAA also includes technology-based emissions standards, which are based on the most efficient and cost-effective technologies for controlling pollution.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has also developed Air Quality Guidelines (AQG) to serve as global targets for governments to improve their citizens' health by reducing air pollution. These guidelines are based on scientific evidence and provide recommended limit values for specific air pollutants. However, the WHO guidelines are not legally binding, and many countries' air quality laws do not meet the standards outlined by the organization.

To strengthen the enforcement of air quality standards, countries can adopt a combination of regulatory approaches, such as implementing technology-based standards, setting National Ambient Air Quality Standards, and utilizing operating permits for air pollution sources. Additionally, international cooperation and global treaties on air pollution, such as the Vienna Convention, the Montreal Protocol, and the Paris Agreement, can help address cross-border air pollution.

Technology-based emissions standards

The Clean Air Act requires the EPA to set national air quality standards that prioritize protecting public health and welfare. For instance, new gas power plants are mandated to not emit more than 1,000 pounds of CO2 per megawatt-hour of electricity produced. However, the law provides flexibility by not specifying the exact equipment to achieve these targets, accommodating evolving technologies.

The EPA collects and scrutinizes data on the performance of available technologies when setting emissions standards. This includes information on emissions, control technologies, and costs from industries. The Act also authorizes states or the EPA to establish emissions standards or limits for sources like power plants, industrial facilities, and motor vehicles. These standards address common pollutants, toxic pollutants, and greenhouse gas pollution, with technical feasibility and cost considerations in mind.

An example of a technology-based standard is the "best available control technology" requirement in permits for significant new pollution sources. State permitting authorities consider alternative control levels based on the emissions performance of technologies at other facilities and the associated costs before setting numerical pollution limits. This approach ensures that higher-emitting sources in an industry improve and align with the levels achieved by lower-emitting sources.

Air pollution and infant mortality

Air pollution is a serious issue that claims the lives of approximately 7 million people annually, exceeding the number of deaths caused by COVID-19. While legislation like the Clean Air Act in the United States has made significant strides in addressing this issue, air quality remains a pressing concern. The Clean Air Act, enacted in 1970, empowers the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate air pollutants and polluting industries. This comprehensive federal law has played a pivotal role in safeguarding public health and mitigating climate change.

The impact of air pollution on infant mortality has been a growing area of concern. Studies have indicated a potential link between short-term spikes in ambient air pollution and increased mortality, particularly in the elderly and those with pre-existing health conditions. However, there are also worries that air pollution might contribute to infant mortality and adverse pregnancy outcomes, resulting in a substantial loss of life-years.

In an analysis of daily time-series data from 1990 to 2000 in 10 major English cities, including Birmingham, Bristol, and London, researchers found limited associations between infant deaths and most pollutants. However, an exception was observed with sulphur dioxide (SO2), where an increase of 10 μg/m3 was associated with a higher risk of all infant deaths, including both neonatal and postneonatal fatalities. This finding underscores the potential impact of air pollution on infant mortality, even in developed countries with relatively lower pollution levels.

Further supporting this, a study in Germany from 1985 to 2003 estimated the effect of SO2 pollution on infant mortality. It found that mandated desulfurization at power plants, combined with prevailing wind directions, resulted in an annual gain of 826 to 1460 infant lives. Additionally, a ban on high-sulfur fuel in Hong Kong in 1990 provided evidence of reduced SO2 pollution and subsequent mortality. These interventions and regulations have improved air quality and yielded health benefits, particularly for infants.

While the current laws and regulations against air pollution have made progress, more stringent measures and global cooperation are necessary to effectively tackle this issue. The complexity of designing enforcement mechanisms and the absence of international treaties or standards for air quality pose significant challenges. Nevertheless, with continued efforts and a focus on global collaboration, there is optimism that humanity can successfully address the detrimental impacts of air pollution on human health, including infant mortality.

Frequently asked questions