Retail Pollution: Harming People And The Planet

The rise of online shopping and fast fashion has had a significant impact on the environment, with the fashion industry being the second-biggest industrial polluter, responsible for 10% of global emissions. The pressure to keep up with trends and the convenience of fast shipping have led to a drastic increase in waste and pollution. Retail pollution affects the average person in various ways, from the environmental impact of producing and transporting goods to the health risks associated with toxic chemicals used in manufacturing. The overconsumption of cheap, trendy clothing has resulted in enormous quantities of clothing ending up in landfills, and the production and disposal of these items have contributed to greenhouse gas emissions and water pollution. Additionally, the pressure to meet consumer demands has led to labour rights violations and unsafe working conditions in economically developing countries.

Fast fashion: cheap clothing, low-quality clothing, waste, and pollution

Fast fashion is a rapidly growing industry, with the number of new garments produced per year nearly doubling over the past 20 years and global fashion consumption increasing by 400%. The industry is known for its cheap and trendy clothing, but it comes at a significant environmental cost.

The fast-fashion business model relies on the rapid production and distribution of garments to meet the latest trends, which demands a large volume of raw materials and results in significant waste and pollution. The industry is a major contributor to the climate crisis, responsible for about 10% of global carbon emissions, more than all international flights and maritime shipping combined. It is also a significant source of water pollution, with textile dyeing being the world's second-largest polluter of water. The production of synthetic fibres like polyester, nylon, and acrylic, which are commonly used in fast fashion, is an energy-intensive process that requires large amounts of petroleum and releases harmful substances such as volatile particulate matter and hydrogen chloride.

The poor quality of fast fashion clothing contributes to their limited lifespans, often ending up in landfills or being incinerated. These plastic-based materials are a notorious source of microplastics in marine environments, as they shed fibres that make their way into the oceans. Animal-based textiles, such as wool, are also commonly used in fast fashion and contribute to greenhouse gas emissions, water pollution, and habitat loss.

The impact of fast fashion is felt by the average person in various ways. The average US consumer throws away 81.5 lbs of clothing each year, contributing to the millions of tonnes of textile waste produced annually. The throwaway culture has worsened over the years, with items being worn fewer times before being discarded. The environmental impact of fast fashion also extends to the degradation of land and water sources, affecting access to clean water and natural habitats.

To address the issue of fast fashion, consumers can opt for more sustainable and ethical choices, such as buying second-hand clothing, renting clothes, or supporting brands that prioritise sustainability and fair labour practices.

Fossil fuel emissions: corporations are the main culprit, not consumers

Retail pollution, driven by unsustainable consumerism, has had a significant impact on the environment and public health. The rise of e-commerce has led to an increase in packaging waste, with billions of trees pulped each year to produce shipping cartons, and most of the plastic packaging ending up in landfills or the ocean. Shipping emissions are another concern, with the transport of goods contributing significantly to CO2 emissions.

However, when it comes to fossil fuel emissions, the primary culprits are the corporations, not the consumers. Fossil fuels, including coal, oil, and natural gas, are the dominant cause of global warming. When burned, they release large amounts of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, which trap heat in the Earth's atmosphere. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) found that in 2018, 89% of global CO2 emissions came from fossil fuels and industry.

The responsibility for these emissions lies largely with fossil fuel companies and corporations that prioritise profits over the environment. Since 1988, just 100 companies have been responsible for 71% of global greenhouse gas emissions, and 25 corporations for over 50% of global industrial emissions. These companies spend billions on advertising campaigns to promote themselves as environmentally conscious while continuing to invest predominantly in oil and gas. They also lobby for subsidies that make fossil fuels cheaper and hinder the development of renewable energy sources.

The impact of fossil fuel emissions is felt by the average person in the form of climate change, including rising global temperatures, extreme weather events, sea-level rise, and environmental degradation. These changes have led to biodiversity loss, species extinction, food scarcity, and worsening health and poverty for millions worldwide. Additionally, air pollution from fossil fuels causes respiratory issues and contributes to premature deaths, with communities of colour and low-income communities disproportionately affected.

While individual choices, such as buying sustainable products or using public transportation, can help reduce environmental impact, they are not enough to address the scale of the climate crisis. The focus on individual consumer behaviour also ignores the disproportionate responsibility of corporate interests. To effectively tackle climate change, fossil fuel companies must be held accountable, and a transition to renewable energy sources must be prioritised.

Online shopping: the environmental impact of e-commerce

The Covid-19 pandemic has accelerated the shift towards online shopping, with global e-commerce giants like Amazon, Alibaba, and Walmart dominating the market and shaping consumer expectations. This new consumer era has had a significant environmental impact, with the convenience of same-day delivery and free returns taking a toll on the planet.

The Issue of Over-Packaging

The rise in online shopping has led to a corresponding increase in packaging waste. The production of shipping cartons contributes significantly to CO2 emissions, with 3 billion trees pulped annually to meet the demand for 241 million tons of cartons. The plastic packaging used in e-commerce is also a major concern, with only 14% of the 86 million tons produced globally being recycled. China, as the world's leading country in e-commerce sales, is particularly affected by this issue, with courier services generating 1.8 million tonnes of plastic waste and nearly 10 million tonnes of paper waste in a single year.

The Impact of Shipping Goods

The transport of goods across the globe is a significant contributor to CO2 emissions from e-commerce. In 2020, the shipping and return of products accounted for 37% of total GHG emissions. The demand for fast shipping further exacerbates the problem, as delivery companies are often forced to send out partially filled trucks, increasing traffic and emissions. By 2030, the number of delivery vehicles is expected to increase by 36%, leading to a rise in CO2 emissions and longer commutes due to increased traffic congestion.

The Role of Consumers and Corporations

While corporations play a significant role in the environmental impact of e-commerce, consumer behaviour is also a key factor. Consumers' preference for convenience, speed, and price drives the industry. However, consumers also have the power to make more sustainable choices, such as opting for slower delivery options, grouping purchases, and reducing returns. Corporations are also taking steps towards sustainability, with some investing in electric delivery vehicles and developing more sustainable packaging.

The Way Forward

To address the environmental impact of e-commerce, a shift in mindset is necessary from both producers and consumers. Consumers can make more mindful choices, such as reducing unnecessary purchases and opting for more sustainable delivery options. Corporations can improve the sustainability of their products and supply chains, while also supporting new climate policies. By working together, we can reverse the dangerous trend that e-commerce has taken and create a more sustainable future.

Food: household food emissions, including production, trade, and transportation

Food is a significant contributor to a household's carbon footprint, accounting for 10-30% of the total, and often a higher percentage in lower-income households. The production stage of food accounts for the majority of these emissions, with 68% of household food emissions coming from agricultural practices. This includes the use of fuel and fertiliser, emissions from livestock (such as methane from manure management and enteric fermentation in ruminants), and energy used in manufacturing and storage. Restaurant, retail, and wholesale trade account for 27% of household food emissions, while transportation makes up the remaining 5%.

The environmental impact of food choices varies greatly depending on what is eaten. Meat products, particularly beef, have a much larger carbon footprint per calorie than grain or vegetable products due to the inefficient conversion of plant to animal energy and the methane emitted by livestock. A shift towards a more plant-based diet can significantly reduce an individual's carbon footprint. Additionally, food waste is a significant issue, and reducing waste by only buying what is needed, composting, and donating unused food can help lower emissions.

The "eat local" movement has gained traction as a way to reduce the carbon footprint of diets. However, the impact of local eating is minimal compared to the type of food consumed. Transport emissions make up a small percentage of total food emissions, and even when food is transported over long distances, the carbon footprint is usually much lower than that of locally produced animal products.

The retail industry plays a crucial role in sustainability by offering more sustainable packaging and reducing waste. However, the true impact lies in the hands of consumers, who can make a significant difference by being mindful of their food choices and waste.

Packaging: the use of plastics and mixed materials

The use of plastics and mixed materials in packaging has a significant impact on the average person, as it contributes to pollution and waste. Packaging is the largest end-use market segment for plastic, accounting for just over 40% of total plastic usage. While plastic packaging has benefits such as durability, safety, hygiene, and lightweight properties, its overuse and improper disposal have led to environmental concerns.

Plastic packaging waste is a growing segment of municipal solid waste (MSW). In 2018, the containers and packaging category had the most plastic tonnage at over 14.5 million tons in the United States. This includes bags, sacks, wraps, bottles, jars, and other containers. The durability of plastic materials means that they can persist in the environment for hundreds of years if not properly recycled or disposed of.

The production and use of plastic packaging contribute to pollution in various ways. Firstly, the manufacturing of plastic products requires the use of fossil fuels, leading to emissions of greenhouse gases and hazardous air pollutants. Secondly, plastic packaging waste can end up in landfills, where it takes up space and releases methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Thirdly, plastic waste can pollute ecosystems, including oceans, rivers, and soil, harming wildlife and contaminating food sources.

Mixed materials in packaging, such as those used in online shopping, can also be challenging to recycle. According to a study, on average, 2.18 pieces of packaging were used for each product, consisting of mixed materials that are hard to recycle. This adds to the waste stream and further contributes to environmental pollution.

To address the issue of plastic and mixed-material packaging pollution, some companies are developing more sustainable packaging alternatives. For example, reusable and recyclable packaging options are being explored to reduce waste and encourage recycling. Additionally, regulations and standards are being implemented to reduce the use of certain materials, such as single-use plastics, and promote more eco-friendly alternatives.

Frequently asked questions