Renewable Energy's Dark Side: Pollution And Its Causes

Renewable energy sources emit little to no greenhouse gases or pollutants into the air and are key to a safer, cleaner, and sustainable world. However, some renewable energy sources, such as biomass, which uses organic plant and animal matter to create energy, can cause air pollution. The burning of solid waste and leftover plant life used in food production can create significant air pollution. In addition, the construction of wind and solar facilities and the disposal of retired equipment can have harmful effects on the environment. For example, solar panels are constructed using semi-toxic materials that can be complicated and expensive to recycle, and wind turbines can cause the deaths of unsuspecting birds. Despite these drawbacks, renewable energy sources are still much less polluting than fossil fuels, and the benefits of transitioning to them far outweigh their environmental impact.

Biomass energy creates air pollution from burning organic matter

Renewable energy sources emit little to no greenhouse gases or pollutants into the air and are key to a safer, cleaner, and more sustainable world. However, biomass energy, which involves burning organic plant and animal matter to generate energy, is an exception. It is a major source of air pollution, emitting large amounts of pollutants, including hazardous air pollutants (HAPs).

Biomass energy is frequently depicted as a "clean" and renewable energy source. However, data and tests indicate that it is a heavily polluting technology. The burning of wood, solid waste, and leftover plant matter releases pollutants into the air, similar to burning fossil fuels like coal. These emissions include harmful pollutants such as carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, and hazardous air pollutants, which have been linked to adverse health effects.

The combustion of biomass can emit as much or even more pollution than burning fossil fuels. While biomass may be better for certain pollutants like sulfur and mercury, it can be comparable to or worse than fossil fuels for particulates and nitrogen oxides. The problem is exacerbated by the fact that many biomass plants do not employ the most effective pollution control measures, and small-scale biomass burners often have minimal controls in place. As a result, biomass electricity generation facilities significantly worsen air quality in the surrounding areas.

The burning of "urban wood" as fuel in biomass energy facilities is particularly concerning. This wood can contain lead-painted wood, wood treated with copper chromium arsenate, and non-wood materials, which, when burned, can release toxic chemicals and hazardous air pollutants into the atmosphere. These pollutants have been linked to serious health issues, including neurological damage, heart attacks, cancer, and premature death. Therefore, despite being considered a renewable energy source, biomass burners should be subject to strict evaluation and regulation to ensure they do not cause unnecessary harm to the environment and public health.

Solar panels are constructed with semi-toxic materials that are challenging to recycle

Solar panels are an important source of renewable power that will play a crucial role in fighting climate change. However, they are constructed with semi-toxic materials, such as lead and cadmium, that are challenging and expensive to recycle. At the end of their lifespan, solar panels become large sheets of electronic waste, and most of the world does not have a plan for dealing with this waste.

The complexity of solar panels means that standard electronics recycling methods are insufficient. The most valuable components of solar panels, such as silver and silicon, require bespoke recycling solutions. A small number of dedicated solar PV recyclers are working to separate and purify these valuable components efficiently. For example, Veolia, which runs the world's only commercial-scale silicon PV recycling plant in France, uses an optical technique to recover low-purity silicon. While this process can recapture more than 90% of the materials present in a panel, it is still more costly than using new raw materials.

The high cost of recycling means that most solar panels end up in landfills, where they can release toxic chemicals into the environment. The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) has warned against disposing of solar panels in regular landfills, as the toxic materials they contain can leach into the soil. Despite this, solar panels in California currently end up in landfills, and there is a growing public awareness that solar panels are not as environmentally friendly as previously believed.

To address this issue, some have proposed a fee on solar panel purchases to internalize the cost of safely removing, recycling, or storing solar panel waste. Others suggest that the solar industry should focus on repurposing panels whenever possible, as reuse generally requires less energy than recycling. Through its Circular Business Models for the Solar Power Industry program, the European Commission is funding projects that demonstrate how solar panels can be repurposed, such as for powering e-bike charging stations in Berlin.

Wind turbines cause habitat disruption and bird deaths

While wind power is considered an extremely clean energy source, it is not without its environmental impacts. One of the most well-known disadvantages of wind energy is the threat it poses to bird populations.

Wind farms can cause habitat disruption and bird deaths, but the extent of these impacts is a subject of debate. Some studies indicate that wind turbines kill birds that collide with their spinning blades or tall towers. Research from 2013 and 2014 reported a wide range of bird deaths from wind turbine collisions, from 140,000 to 679,000 per year in the United States. However, it is important to note that these numbers represent a small fraction of total bird deaths, as other human activities, such as collisions with buildings and domestic cats, contribute significantly more.

The likelihood of bird collisions with wind turbines depends on various factors. Rotating blades, for instance, can create a "motion smear" effect, appearing as transparent blurs that birds may not perceive, leading to fatal collisions. Additionally, accidents involving power lines and supporting infrastructure can also cause thousands of bird deaths, especially if they intersect with busy migration routes.

To mitigate these impacts, preventative measures can be implemented during the planning, construction, and operational phases of wind farms. These include conducting detailed environmental impact assessments, consulting with ecological experts, and employing monitoring technologies such as cameras and bird detection radars. Some innovative solutions include painting one blade of a turbine black to increase visibility and using artificial intelligence to sense a bird's approach and power down turbines to avoid collisions.

While wind turbines can cause bird deaths, it is important to consider the broader context. Climate change, largely driven by fossil fuel use, poses a much greater threat to bird populations, with many species facing extinction. By transitioning to renewable energy sources like wind power, we can help address climate change and reduce the overall risk to bird habitats and populations.

Renewable energy infrastructure can impact wildlife and communities

Furthermore, renewable energy development can also have broader environmental implications. For instance, the construction and decommissioning of solar panels and wind turbines can generate waste and release toxic chemicals, respectively, which can have harmful effects on the surrounding ecosystems and communities if not properly managed.

However, it is important to note that the environmental impacts of renewable energy projects vary depending on the technology used, the extent of land conversion, and other factors. Overall, while renewable energy can have some negative consequences, it is still considered to have a much lower environmental impact than traditional fossil fuel alternatives, which contribute significantly to air and water pollution and have severe health and economic costs.

To minimise the negative effects of renewable energy infrastructure on wildlife and communities, various strategies are being explored. For example, the US Department of Energy's Solar Energy Technologies Office (SETO) supports research to better understand the interactions between renewable energy installations, wildlife, and ecosystems, with a focus on equity and environmental justice. This includes collaborative efforts between federal and state agencies, environmental organisations, academics, and industry representatives to promote better understanding and develop strategies to reduce adverse impacts.

Manufacturing renewable energy technology can cause pollution

Renewable energy sources emit little to no greenhouse gases or pollutants into the air. However, the manufacturing of renewable energy technology can cause pollution. For example, the production of photovoltaic (PV) cells generates toxic substances that may contaminate water resources. The energy-intensive manufacturing of silicon PV panels is associated with significant emissions of CO2, NOx, and other air pollutants.

The construction of wind and solar facilities can also have harmful effects on the environment due to the use of machinery and the disruption of land use and wildlife habitats. Additionally, solar panels are often constructed using semi-toxic materials that can be challenging and costly to recycle, leading to potential environmental risks from decommissioned panels in landfills.

Biomass, which involves burning organic plant and animal matter, is considered the most polluting renewable energy source due to the air pollution it creates. However, when compared to the burning of fossil fuels, the environmental impact of biomass is significantly less.

Overall, while renewable energy sources produce relatively low levels of GHG emissions, the manufacturing and transportation processes can result in some emissions and pollutants. The environmental impact of renewable energy technologies depends on factors such as technology, location, and scale.

Frequently asked questions