Plastic Pollution's Impact On The Carbon Cycle Explained

Plastic pollution is a significant and growing threat to the Earth's climate. As plastic is derived from fossil fuels, it emits greenhouse gases at every stage of its lifecycle, from production to disposal. The incineration of plastic waste, in particular, releases significant greenhouse gases and toxic pollutants into the atmosphere. Even after plastic has been used and disposed of, it continues to have a climate impact as it slowly breaks down and releases methane and ethylene. Furthermore, microplastics in the oceans may interfere with the ocean's ability to absorb and sequester carbon dioxide, as they affect the growth, reproduction, and carbon capture abilities of marine microorganisms. Therefore, the impact of plastic pollution on the carbon cycle is a critical issue that requires urgent attention and action to reduce plastic production and waste.

Plastic incineration releases greenhouse gases and toxic pollutants into the atmosphere

The incineration of plastics is a major source of air pollution, especially when burned in open fields. The release of hazardous halogens from burning Poly Vinyl Chloride further exacerbates air pollution, impacting the climate. Additionally, the toxic substances produced during plastic incineration pose risks to both human and animal health. These substances can cause heart disease, aggravate respiratory ailments, and lead to neurological damage.

Furthermore, the open burning of plastics contributes to environmental degradation. Dioxins, a type of lethal persistent organic pollutant released during incineration, can settle on crops and waterways, eventually entering the food system and causing harm to human and animal health. The toxic effects of dioxins include cancer, neurological damage, and disruptions to reproductive, thyroid, and respiratory systems.

The impact of plastic incineration extends beyond the immediate release of toxic gases and pollutants. The process also contributes to the emission of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide (CO2). Research indicates that burning plastic in incinerators creates the most CO2 emissions among any plastic waste management method. The climate impact of plastic incineration is significant, with the U.S. alone generating about 5.9 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent emissions in 2015.

Additionally, the plastic industry's efforts to portray incineration as a ""renewable energy"" source have led to incinerator companies receiving renewable energy subsidies. This misrepresents the true nature of incineration and diverts funds from genuine renewable energy sources.

In conclusion, plastic incineration is a significant contributor to greenhouse gas emissions and toxic pollution in the atmosphere. The release of toxic substances and greenhouse gases during incineration has detrimental effects on the environment, human health, and climate change. Addressing plastic incineration and transitioning towards more sustainable waste management practices are crucial steps in mitigating these negative impacts.

Extraction and transportation of fossil fuels for plastic production are carbon-intensive activities

Extraction processes for fossil fuels, such as mining and drilling, can generate air and water pollution and harm local communities. Mining, for instance, can result in the collapse of mines, alter subsurface water flows, and cause mine fires. Drilling methods, on the other hand, can lead to oil spills and leaks during extraction or transportation, contaminating drinking water sources and ecosystems.

The transportation of fossil fuels also carries risks. For instance, the diesel fuel used to transport coal by rail, barge, or truck is a major source of nitrogen dioxide and soot, which pose substantial health risks. Natural gas, though cleaner, is highly flammable, and its transportation has led to accidents and fatalities. Oil transportation, on the other hand, always carries the risk of oil spills, which harm communities, wildlife, and the environment.

The extraction and transportation of fossil fuels for plastic production contribute significantly to carbon emissions and climate change. For instance, the extraction and transportation of natural gas for plastic production in the United States emit an estimated 12.5 to 13.5 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year. Land disturbance for fossil fuel extraction also contributes to greenhouse gas emissions, with each mile of pipeline requiring a cleared "right of way" zone. This land clearing releases carbon stored in trees and soils into the atmosphere, with an estimated 1.686 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide released due to oil and gas development in the United States.

Refining and manufacturing plastic are greenhouse-gas-intensive processes

Refining and manufacturing plastic are among the most greenhouse-gas-intensive processes in the manufacturing sector. The production of plastic is both energy-intensive and emissions-intensive, with significant emissions released during the refining process. This includes the cracking of alkanes into olefins, the polymerization and plasticization of olefins into plastic resins, and other chemical refining processes.

In 2015, 24 ethylene facilities in the US produced 17.5 million metric tons of CO2e, emitting as much CO2 as 3.8 million passenger vehicles. Globally, emissions from the cracking process used to produce ethylene were 184.3-213 million metric tons of CO2e, equivalent to the emissions of 45 million passenger vehicles driven for a year. These emissions are increasing rapidly. For example, a new Shell ethane cracker being constructed in Pennsylvania is expected to emit up to 2.25 million tons of CO2e annually, while a new ethylene plant at ExxonMobil's Baytown refinery in Texas could release up to 1.4 million tons. The annual emissions from these two facilities alone would be equivalent to adding nearly 800,000 new cars to the road.

The plastic refining and manufacturing processes are not limited to these two facilities but are part of a larger trend. There are over 300 new and expanded petrochemical projects being built in the US alone, primarily for the production of plastic and plastic feedstocks. This rapid expansion of the plastic industry, largely fueled by natural gas, undermines efforts to reduce carbon pollution and mitigate climate change.

The high emissions intensity of plastic refining and manufacturing processes is a critical issue that needs to be addressed to mitigate the impact of plastic on the carbon cycle and the planet's climate.

Landfills, where single-use plastics often end up, account for over 15% of methane emissions

The problem with single-use plastics is that they are rarely actually used just once. The plastic industry has prioritised convenience and cheapness over durability and reuse, resulting in a linear "take-make-dispose" model of consumption. This has led to a situation where plastic waste is accumulating in landfills at an alarming rate. Landfills are a significant source of methane emissions, a powerful greenhouse gas with a global warming potential up to 5,000 times greater than carbon dioxide. As plastic breaks down in landfills, it releases methane and other harmful gases, contributing to climate change.

The impact of plastic waste in landfills extends beyond climate change. Landfills are often located in low-income or marginalised communities, resulting in environmental injustices. These communities bear the brunt of the negative consequences of plastic pollution, including air and water pollution, soil contamination, and health risks associated with exposure to toxic chemicals. Furthermore, the expansion of landfills to accommodate the growing volume of plastic waste can lead to land disturbance and deforestation, further contributing to greenhouse gas emissions and biodiversity loss.

To address the issue of plastic pollution in landfills, a transition towards a circular economy is necessary. This involves reducing the overall use of plastic, reusing and recycling plastic materials, and investing in sustainable waste management infrastructure. By extending producer responsibility and adopting ambitious targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, we can minimise the climate impact of plastic pollution and work towards a more sustainable future.

Microplastics in the ocean may interfere with its ability to absorb and sequester carbon dioxide

The ocean is the largest active carbon pool on the planet, absorbing and sequestering vast amounts of carbon dioxide. Marine microplastics, however, pose a significant threat to this carbon cycle.

Microplastics in the ocean can interfere with the ocean's ability to absorb and sequester carbon dioxide in several ways. Firstly, they affect phytoplankton and zooplankton, the most important producers and consumers of carbon in the ocean. Microplastics can alter photosynthesis in phytoplankton and reduce feeding rates in zooplankton. This, in turn, impacts their growth, lifespan, reproduction, and fertility, with potential knock-on effects up the food chain.

Secondly, microplastics can make phytoplankton excretion more buoyant, causing it to float for longer and slowing its descent to the ocean floor. This gives carbon more time to escape back into the atmosphere, disrupting the capture cycle.

Additionally, microplastics can affect the role of whales in carbon capture. Whales store large amounts of carbon dioxide, and when they die, they sink to the ocean floor, trapping that carbon for hundreds of years. However, plastic poses a lethal threat to whales through ingestion, entanglement, and the build-up of pollutants, reducing their lifespan and, consequently, their ability to capture and store carbon.

Moreover, studies have shown that microplastics, when exposed to sunlight, can release carbon themselves, further contributing to carbon emissions.

Finally, microplastics can also impact seafloor organisms that play a role in nutrient cycling, particularly nitrogen cycling. This can have knock-on effects, exacerbating problems like toxic algal blooms and contributing to ocean deoxygenation, which further threatens marine life.

While the exact mechanisms and scale of these impacts are still being studied, it is clear that microplastics in the ocean have the potential to interfere with its ability to absorb and sequester carbon dioxide, disrupting this crucial aspect of the carbon cycle.

Frequently asked questions