Reducing Pollution: Power Stations' Role And Responsibility

Power plants that burn fossil fuels, such as coal, oil, and natural gas, are a major source of pollution and have significant impacts on the environment and human health. The combustion of these fuels releases harmful pollutants into the atmosphere, including carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, and heavy metals such as mercury. These emissions contribute to air pollution, global warming, and climate change, with far-reaching consequences for ecosystems, weather patterns, and public health. As a result, reducing pollution from power stations is critical to mitigating environmental degradation and safeguarding human well-being.

Switch to clean, renewable energy sources like solar, wind, geothermal and tidal

Power stations can reduce pollution by switching to clean, renewable energy sources like solar, wind, geothermal, and tidal power. Renewable energy sources are naturally replenished, unlimited resources, unlike non-renewable energy sources such as coal, natural gas, and oil, which are finite and harmful to the environment.

Solar energy, for example, is harnessed through photovoltaic (PV) cells or solar panels, which convert sunlight directly into electricity. Solar energy systems do not produce air pollutants or greenhouse gases and have few environmental impacts beyond the manufacturing process.

Wind energy is another clean and eco-friendly energy source that has been used for centuries. Wind turbines generate electricity by harnessing the power of wind motion, and as they have few or no moving parts, they require less maintenance than traditional fuel sources.

Geothermal energy utilizes the heat in the earth's crust to generate electricity. Geothermal power plants have low emissions if they pump the steam and water they use back into the reservoir.

Tidal energy harnesses the power of the ocean's surges during rising and falling tides to generate electricity. While tidal energy has great potential, it is limited by the number of locations that can be used to capture it effectively.

By switching to these renewable energy sources, power stations can reduce pollution, decrease their carbon footprint, and contribute to a healthier environment and cleaner water and air.

Implement pollution controls such as flue gas combustion modification and electrostatic precipitators

Flue gas is the gas exiting to the atmosphere via a flue, which is a pipe or channel that conveys exhaust gases from combustion at power plants. The composition of flue gas depends on what is being burned but usually consists of mostly nitrogen, carbon dioxide, and water vapour, as well as excess oxygen. It also contains a small percentage of pollutants, such as particulate matter (like soot), carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and sulfur oxides.

Electrostatic precipitators are an effective way to remove these harmful particles from flue gas. They use an electric charge to remove solid particles or liquid droplets from the air or other gases in smokestacks and other flues. The electrostatic charge is applied to the particulate matter, which is then attracted to and pulled out of the combustion gas. This method does not impede the flow of gases.

The electrostatic precipitator was invented by American chemist Frederick Gardner Cottrell in 1907, who first applied it to removing sulphuric acid mist and lead oxide fumes from various acid-making and smelting activities. The devices helped protect vineyards in northern California from lead emissions.

Today, electrostatic precipitators are used to remove dirt from flue gases in steam plants, remove oil mists in machine shops, remove bacteria and fungi in medical settings, and clean blast furnace gases, among other applications.

In power plants, flue gas is often treated with a series of chemical processes and scrubbers to remove pollutants. Electrostatic precipitators or fabric filters remove particulate matter, and flue-gas desulfurization captures the sulfur dioxide produced by burning fossil fuels, particularly coal. Nitrogen oxides are treated either by modifications to the combustion process to prevent their formation or by high-temperature or catalytic reaction with ammonia or urea.

Reduce mercury emissions to protect nervous, digestive and immune systems

Mercury is a highly toxic substance that poses a significant threat to human health and the environment. When coal is burned at power plants to generate electricity, mercury is released into the atmosphere as air pollution. Here are some ways to reduce mercury emissions from power stations to protect the nervous, digestive, and immune systems:

Reduce Coal Usage

Coal-burning power plants are a major source of mercury emissions. Mercury is found naturally in coal, and when coal is burned, the mercury is released into the air. By reducing the amount of coal used for electricity generation and transitioning to alternative energy sources, such as natural gas, nuclear power, wind, or solar, mercury emissions can be significantly reduced.

Implement Mercury Capture Technology

Technology like the Gold Shop Mercury Capture System (MCS) can be employed to capture mercury emissions from small-scale gold refining facilities. Additionally, the use of activated carbon sorbents has proven effective in controlling mercury emissions at coal-fired power plants.

Improve Waste Management

Proper waste management and disposal techniques are crucial. Coal combustion residuals, or coal ash, are produced when coal is burned and contain harmful contaminants like mercury. The safe disposal of coal ash in lined landfills or surface impoundments can help prevent mercury from leaching into the environment and affecting nearby water sources.

Control and Limit Mercury Emissions

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has played a pivotal role in regulating and limiting mercury emissions from various sources. The Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) regulation, issued in 2011, has been instrumental in reducing toxic air pollutants from coal- and oil-fired power plants. The compliance date for MATS was in 2015, and power plants have installed controls and updated operations to meet these standards, resulting in substantial health benefits.

Promote Mercury-Free Products

Mercury can be found in various consumer products, such as thermometers, paints, and dental amalgam fillings. By encouraging the use of mercury-free alternatives and providing guidance on proper disposal, mercury emissions can be reduced. The EPA has worked with various industries to phase out the use of mercury in products and establish best management practices for mercury waste disposal.

By implementing these measures, power stations can significantly reduce mercury emissions, thereby protecting the nervous, digestive, and immune systems of surrounding communities and ecosystems.

Improve water usage and discharge methods to reduce harm to aquatic life

Power plants' usage of water as a coolant is a common cause of thermal pollution. When water used as a coolant is returned to the natural environment at a higher temperature, the sudden change in temperature decreases oxygen supply and affects the ecosystem. This phenomenon is known as thermal pollution and can be detrimental to aquatic life.

To improve water usage and discharge methods in power stations, several measures can be implemented to reduce harm to aquatic life:

• Artificial lakes: Constructing artificial lakes near power plants can be used to dissipate heat. Warmed effluents are discharged at one end of the lake, and cooler water is withdrawn from the other end. This method naturally cools the water through evaporation.
• Cooling ponds: This is a low-cost method for regulating thermal discharges. By minimising the water area and volume, the maximum amount of heat can be dissipated into the atmosphere. However, this technique may not be as efficient in terms of air-water contact.
• Cooling towers: Cooling towers employ condensers to cool heated effluents before returning them to water bodies. This is a highly efficient technique, and the towers are designed to effectively control water temperature. However, the frequent change in local meteorological conditions can result in the release of large amounts of water vapour into the atmosphere.
• Hybrid cooling systems: Combining multiple cooling methods, such as evaporative and air-cooled systems, can help reduce water usage by up to 95%.
• Protective intake structures: Fine mesh intake screens, aquatic filter barriers, and hybrid systems can prevent fish and other aquatic life from being drawn into the cooling system, reducing impingement and entrainment.
• Repowering existing facilities: Instead of building new power plants, repowering existing facilities into state-of-the-art power plants can help minimise aquatic impacts. By incorporating more efficient technologies, such as combined cycle cooling, and protective intake structures, fuel use can be reduced, and thermal efficiency can be improved.
• Water-saving technologies: Implementing water-saving technologies, such as the WaterSense program in the US, can help reduce water usage and, consequently, thermal pollution.
• Effluent treatment: Treating effluents before discharge can help mitigate water pollution and thermal pollution.
• Wastewater storage: Carefully storing wastewater in ponds and reinjecting it into deep wells is an effective method for combating water pollution.

Transition to nuclear power to reduce deaths and carbon emissions

Nuclear power is a low-carbon source of energy that can play a key role in the transition to a clean energy future. Nuclear power plants produce no greenhouse gas emissions during operation, and over the course of its life cycle, nuclear power produces about the same amount of carbon dioxide-equivalent emissions per unit of electricity as wind power, and one-third of the emissions per unit of electricity compared to solar power.

Nuclear energy is essential to combatting climate change. The world must rapidly reduce its dependency on fossil fuels to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In 2018, carbon dioxide emissions related to energy reached a record high of 33.1 billion tons, and they have increased by more than 40% since 2000. While international efforts have increased the amount of electricity generated by wind, solar, and other renewable sources, they have failed to displace fossil fuels. Fossil fuels produced more electricity in 2017 than ever before, and we are likely to breach the 1.5 °C threshold by as early as 2030.

Nuclear power can directly replace fossil fuel plants, avoiding the combustion of fossil fuels for electricity generation. Nuclear energy today avoids emissions roughly equivalent to removing one-third of all cars from the world's roads. France, for example, generates over 70% of its electricity from nuclear power, and its electricity sector emissions are one-sixth of the European average. Nuclear energy went from playing a minor role in the French electricity system to producing most of its electricity in around 15 years, showing that nuclear energy can be expanded at the speed required to effectively combat climate change.

Transitioning to nuclear power is critical for lung health. Burning fossil fuels to generate electricity results in the emission and formation of harmful pollutants. Power plants are the nation's largest industrial source of carbon dioxide, a significant contributor to climate change. Switching to clean, renewable, non-combustion sources of electricity, such as nuclear power, can dramatically reduce health harms and premature deaths, both in the immediate term and over the long term due to climate change.

Frequently asked questions