Nuclear Power's Pollution Paradox: Harming Nature, Helping Humans

Nuclear power is a controversial energy source, with supporters touting its potential to reduce reliance on fossil fuels, and critics highlighting the environmental and health risks associated with its production and waste. Nuclear energy is generated through nuclear fission, a process that produces massive amounts of energy as heat, radiation, and radioactive waste. While nuclear power plants do not directly emit carbon dioxide or burn fossil fuels, the processes of mining, refining uranium ore, and manufacturing reactor fuel require large amounts of energy and can result in environmental damage. The production and use of nuclear power generate radioactive waste, which remains dangerous for thousands of years and poses significant risks to human health and the environment if not properly handled, transported, stored, and disposed of. Uranium mining, a critical step in nuclear power generation, can also have detrimental effects on the surrounding environment and ecosystems, especially through open-pit mining and groundwater contamination.

Uranium mining and milling

Uranium is a naturally occurring radioactive element that has been mined and used for its chemical properties for over a thousand years. Uranium mining and milling can cause pollution in several ways. Firstly, the extraction process creates radioactive waste. Uranium can be recovered through conventional mining of rock (ore) or by using strong chemicals to dissolve uranium from rock while it is still in the ground and then pumping it to the surface. This process is known as in situ leaching and is the most commonly used uranium extraction method in the United States.

Regardless of the method used, the uranium extraction process leaves behind radioactive waste. These processes separate uranium from its decay products, which are also radioactive and contain most of the radioactivity in the rock. The solid radioactive waste left over from the milling processes is called tailings, and the liquid waste is called raffinates. Mill tailings and raffinates are stored in specially designed ponds called impoundments. The tailings remain radioactive and contain hazardous chemicals from the recovery process.

Uranium mining can also contaminate water supplies. Uranium eventually decays into radium, a naturally occurring radioactive element that can contaminate water supplies. Radium poses a risk when it decays into radon, a radioactive gas. While open-pit uranium milling and in-situ mining sites do not pose a significant radon risk to the public or miners, as the radon disperses into the atmosphere, underground mines can present a radiation hazard to miners. Without proper ventilation, radon gas can collect in the mineshafts, where it is inhaled by miners. Operators of uranium mines must take special precautions to protect miners, such as pumping radon gas out of the mine and replacing it with fresh air.

Radioactive waste

The radioactivity of nuclear waste decreases over time through a process called radioactive decay. The amount of time it takes for the radioactivity of radioactive material to decrease to half its original level is called the radioactive half-life. Radioactive waste with a short half-life is often stored temporarily before disposal to reduce potential radiation doses to workers and decrease radiation levels at disposal sites.

By volume, most of the waste related to the nuclear power industry has a relatively low level of radioactivity. Uranium mill tailings, for example, contain the radioactive element radium, which decays into the radioactive gas radon. These tailings are usually placed near the processing facility and covered with a sealing barrier of clay and soil to prevent radon from escaping into the atmosphere.

The disposal of high-level radioactive waste is controversial, with many proposed long-term storage schemes under intense review and criticism. The preferred long-term storage solution is to dispose of radioactive waste in specially-engineered underground repositories. However, there is scepticism from the general public in many countries, and finding communities willing to host a nuclear waste repository is challenging.

Nuclear power plants produce significantly less radioactive waste than coal power plants. The waste produced by coal plants carries 100 times more radiation than a nuclear power plant producing the same amount of energy.

Accidents and attacks

Nuclear power plants, uranium enrichment plants, fuel fabrication plants, and even uranium mines are vulnerable to attacks that could lead to radioactive contamination. There are several types of attacks that could be carried out: commando-like ground-based attacks on equipment, external attacks such as an aircraft crash, or cyber attacks.

Nuclear reactors are often targeted during military conflict and have been attacked by military airstrikes on several occasions. For example, in September 1980, Iran bombed the Osirak reactor complex in Iraq, and in June 1981, an Israeli airstrike completely destroyed the same reactor.

The vulnerability of nuclear plants to deliberate attack is a significant concern in the area of nuclear safety and security. Nuclear power plants are potential targets for terrorist groups, as an attack on a reactor's core or spent fuel pools could lead to a core meltdown and widespread radioactive contamination. The Federation of American Scientists has emphasized the need to make nuclear facilities extremely safe from attacks that could release radioactivity.

The number and sophistication of cyber attacks on nuclear facilities is also increasing. For example, in 2010, a computer worm known as Stuxnet was discovered, believed to have been created by the United States and Israel to target Iran's nuclear facilities.

The consequences of a nuclear accident or attack can be devastating, as seen in the Chernobyl disaster in 1986 and the Fukushima nuclear disaster in 2011. These incidents resulted in the evacuation of hundreds of thousands of people, widespread radioactive contamination, and severe impacts on human health and the environment.

To mitigate the risks of accidents and attacks, the nuclear power industry has worked to improve reactor safety and performance. New, safer reactor designs have been proposed, although there is no guarantee that these reactors will be designed, built, and operated correctly. Additionally, human error remains a significant factor, and technical innovations cannot eliminate this risk entirely.

To summarize, accidents and attacks on nuclear power plants pose a serious threat that could result in widespread radioactive contamination and devastating consequences for human health, the environment, and the economy. Preventing and mitigating these incidents is of utmost importance to ensure the safe utilization of nuclear power.

Water pollution

Nuclear power plants require vast amounts of water for their operations, with 41% of all freshwater withdrawals in the United States in 2005 being for thermoelectric power operations, mainly cooling needs. This heavy usage of water bodies can lead to thermal water pollution, which is the degradation of water quality due to a change in ambient water temperature. Both nuclear and fossil fuel plants produce significant thermal pollution, but nuclear power plants have a more direct and intense impact on local water sources.

Thermal pollution from nuclear power plants can have far-reaching effects on deep water biogeochemical cycles, not just surface water or nearby water. This was evident in the Danube River in Romania, where thermal pollution from two nuclear power plants caused a thermal plume current that extended up to 6 kilometres downstream. Similar impacts on other water bodies have been observed, such as the Mississippi River Watershed, where thermal pollution from power plants impaired the energy efficiency of downstream plants.

The warm water discharged from nuclear power plants cannot hold as much dissolved oxygen as cold water, and the increased temperature also accelerates the decomposition of organic matter. This leads to eutrophication, often resulting in algae blooms that block sunlight for aquatic plants. The algae also serve as a food source for aerobic microbes, further depleting the oxygen levels and creating hypoxic dead zones that cannot support most aquatic life.

The rapidly heated water also affects the metabolism of cold-blooded aquatic animals, leading to malnutrition and changes in biodiversity as some species leave or die off. Therefore, while nuclear power may have a reduced impact in terms of direct greenhouse gas emissions compared to fossil fuels, it still has significant environmental consequences, especially regarding water pollution.

Air pollution

Nuclear power plants do not burn fossil fuels and so do not directly emit carbon dioxide or air pollutants during their operation. However, the processes for mining and refining uranium ore and making reactor fuel require large amounts of energy, which may come from fossil fuels.

Nuclear power plants also require large amounts of metal and concrete, which in turn require large amounts of energy to manufacture. If fossil fuels are used in the construction of the plant, then the emissions from burning those fuels could be associated with the electricity that nuclear power plants generate.

Nuclear power plants emit gaseous and liquid radiological effluents into the environment as a byproduct of the Chemical Volume Control System. These effluents are monitored in the US by the EPA and the NRC. Civilians living within 50 miles (80 km) of a nuclear power plant typically receive about 0.1 μSv per year. For comparison, the average person living at or above sea level receives at least 260 μSv per year from cosmic radiation.

The waste produced by coal plants is actually more radioactive than that generated by nuclear power plants. In fact, the fly ash emitted by a power plant—a byproduct from burning coal for electricity—carries into the surrounding environment 100 times more radiation than a nuclear power plant producing the same amount of energy.

Nuclear power has the potential to play a significant role in limiting future air pollutants and GHG emissions while meeting global energy needs. Using historical production data, a 2019 study from the International Energy Agency found that over 60 gigatons of CO2-equivalent net GHG emissions were avoided globally in the last 50 years, thanks to nuclear power. This prevented the death of approximately 2 million people, who could have otherwise died due to air pollution, according to an article by NASA scientists.

However, there are still risks associated with nuclear power. Uranium mining causes lung cancer in large numbers of miners because uranium mines contain natural radon gas, some of whose decay products are carcinogenic. A study of 4,000 uranium miners between 1950 and 2000 found that 405 (10%) died of lung cancer, a rate six times that expected based on smoking rates alone. 61 others died of mining-related lung diseases.

Frequently asked questions