Cargo Ships: Polluting Our Oceans And Air

The global shipping industry is responsible for around 3% of all greenhouse gas emissions, with large cargo ships being some of the worst offenders. These ships produce a variety of pollutants, including nitrogen oxides, sulphur oxides, carbon dioxide, and particulate matter, which have severe impacts on both human health and the environment. In addition to air pollution, cargo ships also contribute to water pollution, acoustic pollution, and oil pollution. While regulations and initiatives are being implemented to reduce emissions, the shipping industry's transition to carbon-neutral or green fuel has been challenging due to the lack of affordable and commercially available alternatives.

Cargo ships produce more greenhouse gas emissions than some small countries

The environmental impact of cargo ships includes air pollution, water pollution, acoustic, and oil pollution. While ships are the most energy-efficient method to move a given mass of cargo a given distance, the sheer size of the industry means that it has a significant effect on the environment. Shipping containers produce more greenhouse gas emissions than some small countries. According to The Essential Daily Briefing, a single container ship, approximately six football pitches in length, can produce the same amount of pollution as 50 million cars. The emissions from just 15 of these mega-ships match those from all the cars in the world.

The transportation sector, including shipping, is responsible for about 20.2% of the world's total CO2 emissions, making it the second-largest contributor to global carbon pollution. In 2022, international shipping alone accounted for nearly 3% of the world's greenhouse gas emissions. At current growth rates, shipping could represent some 10% of global greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.

The environmental impact of shipping is not limited to greenhouse gas emissions. Ships are responsible for more than 18% of nitrogen oxides pollution. Large plastics, such as lost cargo, pose a serious threat to marine life, causing entanglement and ingestion risks that affect mobility, respiration, and feeding behaviors in marine species. The noise produced by ships can travel long distances and harm marine species that rely on sound for their orientation, communication, and feeding.

To reduce the climate impact of the shipping industry, various measures have been proposed and implemented. The IMO, for instance, has set targets for cutting emissions, including a goal of reaching net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by or around 2050. Reducing ship speed is another strategy that can lead to significant emission reductions. Slow steaming, or operating ships at slower speeds, can decrease fuel consumption and lower CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions. Additionally, switching to cleaner alternative fuels, such as liquefied natural gas (LNG), hydrogen, and biofuels, can help reduce pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions.

Shipping containers emit as much pollution as 50 million cars

Shipping is an essential part of the global economy, but it is also a major contributor to pollution. One of the most concerning facts about shipping pollution is that a single large container ship can emit pollutants equivalent to that of 50 million cars in a year. This means that the emissions from just 15 of these mega-ships match those from all the cars in the world.

The low-grade bunker fuel burned by cargo ships contains up to 2,000 times more sulfur than the diesel fuel used in automobiles, resulting in high levels of sulfur oxide pollution. In addition to sulfur oxides, ships emit nitrogen oxides, greenhouse gases, and particulate matter, which contribute to air pollution and have harmful effects on both the environment and human health. The noise produced by ships can also travel long distances and disrupt the communication and survival of marine species such as whales.

The shipping industry's environmental impact extends beyond air and noise pollution. Large plastics lost from cargo pose a serious threat to marine life, breaking down into microplastics that disperse throughout the ocean. These microplastics can absorb toxic substances, acting as carriers for persistent organic pollutants, and negatively impact marine ecosystems and human health when ingested by marine organisms.

While shipping is indeed the most energy-efficient method to move a given mass of cargo over a given distance, the sheer size of the industry and the annual increase in shipping overwhelm any gains in efficiency. The growth in tonne-kilometers of sea shipments has averaged 4% yearly since the 1990s and has grown by a factor of 5 since the 1970s. Additionally, shipping enjoys substantial tax privileges, which have contributed to the rising emissions.

To address the environmental impact of shipping, international organizations, national governments, businesses, and civil society must work together. While phasing in cleaner fuel is an option, it would significantly increase the price of low-grade fuel, impacting transportation costs and global food prices and goods. Nevertheless, some shipping companies like Maersk are taking initiatives to make their ships more environmentally friendly, partly to save on fuel costs and reduce pollution.

Shipping pollution costs the Danish health service almost £5 billion a year

The environmental impact of shipping is significant, encompassing air, water, acoustic, and oil pollution. While shipping is the most energy-efficient method for transporting cargo, the industry's sheer size results in notable ecological consequences. Shipping is responsible for over 18% of nitrogen oxides pollution and 3% of global greenhouse gas emissions.

The health risks associated with shipping pollution have been a cause for concern, with studies suggesting that the emissions from shipping incur substantial costs on healthcare systems. Specifically, in Denmark, shipping pollution costs the health service almost £5 billion annually, primarily for treating cancers and heart problems. This issue is not isolated to Denmark, as air pollutant emissions from ships in the North Sea and the Baltic Sea are responsible for health damage in Europe valued at approximately €24 billion per year, with Denmark bearing a significant portion of this burden.

The impact of shipping pollution on health is multifaceted. Firstly, the emissions from ships, particularly the burning of high-sulphur residual fuels, result in increased levels of fine particulate matter. These particles have been linked to serious health issues, including respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. Additionally, the noise produced by ships can travel long distances and negatively impact marine life, such as whales, that rely on sound for communication and survival.

Furthermore, plastic pollution from shipping poses a significant threat to marine ecosystems and, consequently, human health. Large plastics, such as lost cargo, can break down into microplastics, which disperse throughout the marine environment, absorbing toxic substances. These microplastics can then be ingested by marine organisms, potentially affecting human health through bioaccumulation.

The health consequences of shipping pollution are not limited to physical ailments. Research has indicated that diesel soot, a pollutant emitted by ships, is linked to human cancer. Additionally, the impact of shipping pollution on mental health cannot be overlooked, as the disruption of marine ecosystems can have indirect effects on human psychological well-being.

Large plastics lost from cargo ships pose serious threats to marine life

Shipping is a vital part of the global economy, but it also contributes significantly to pollution. Ships are responsible for more than 18% of nitrogen oxides pollution and 3% of global greenhouse gas emissions. The shipping industry, if considered a country, would be the sixth-largest producer of CO2 emissions.

Cargo ships, in particular, have been identified as key contributors to plastic pollution in the oceans. Large plastics lost from cargo ships pose serious threats to marine life. Marine debris, of which 80% comes from land-based sources, includes overboard discharges from ships and discarded fishing gear. This plastic waste causes entanglement and ingestion risks for marine species, affecting their mobility, respiration, and feeding behaviours.

Large plastic debris breaks down into microplastics, dispersing throughout the marine environment. These microplastics absorb toxic substances and act as carriers for persistent organic pollutants. Marine organisms that ingest these particles can experience bioaccumulation, impacting marine ecosystems and potentially affecting human health.

Research shows that marine life that ingests plastics coated with pollutants can absorb these toxins into their bodies. A 2008 study found that 35% of the fish caught during a Pacific Gyre voyage had ingested plastic pieces. This plastic pollution also impacts seabirds, with approximately 98% of sampled chicks containing plastic.

Efforts to address plastic pollution from shipping require a multi-level governance framework involving international organizations, national governments, businesses, and civil society.

Shipping noise is a potential threat to marine life that relies on sound

Shipping noise is a significant and often overlooked contributor to marine pollution. Marine species rely on sound for orientation, communication, and feeding, and the noise produced by ships can travel long distances, disrupting these vital functions. This form of pollution, known as anthropogenic noise pollution, has severe consequences for marine life, affecting their behaviour, physiology, and reproduction cycles, ultimately driving up mortality rates.

The impact of shipping noise on marine mammals has been well documented, with species such as whales, dolphins, and porpoises particularly vulnerable due to their reliance on sound for essential life functions. Research has shown that ship noise can cause behavioural and acoustic responses, auditory masking, and stress in these animals. The population of cetaceans (whales and dolphins) has declined in areas with high levels of noise pollution from ships.

The problem is exacerbated by the increasing number of marine watercraft, from private boats in coastal areas to large commercial ships crossing oceans. This has resulted in a concomitant increase in underwater noise in several regions around the globe. The noise produced by these vessels can include anything from the sound of ship engines to the low-frequency sonar used in submarine detection and the seismic air gun noise from oil and gas exploration.

The Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species has identified ocean noise as a potential threat to marine life, and efforts are being made to address this issue. For example, the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority in British Columbia has implemented a program that encourages ships to take alternative routes away from the feeding grounds of endangered southern native killer whales. Additionally, shipping engineers are exploring the use of propellers that decrease cavitation, reducing the loud popping noise caused by bursting bubbles.

While shipping is a vital part of the global economy, it is essential to recognize that shipping noise is a significant form of pollution that threatens marine life. By developing and implementing noise-reducing technologies and protocols, we can work towards achieving a healthier ocean ecosystem that supports and protects all its inhabitants.

Frequently asked questions