Trump's Actions On Plastic Pollution: Any Impact?

Former US President Donald Trump has been criticized for his stance on plastic pollution. Trump has been accused of prioritizing the interests of the fossil fuel and plastic industries over environmental protection. During his presidency, Trump rolled back environmental protections, expanded fossil fuel production, and disrupted global supply chains with his tariff policies. Trump also withdrew the US from the Paris Climate Accords and opposed efforts to negotiate a global treaty to end plastic pollution. In February 2025, Trump signed an executive order reversing a federal push away from plastic straws, citing his preference for plastic over paper straws. Trump's policies have been characterized as detrimental to the fight against plastic pollution, with concerns raised about their impact on recycling and waste management.

Trump's executive order on plastic straws

On February 10, 2025, former US President Donald Trump signed an executive order to end the procurement and forced use of paper straws, reversing a federal push away from plastic straws. The order, which took effect immediately, reversed former President Joe Biden's 2024 measure to phase out federal purchases of single-use plastics, including straws, from food service operations, events, and packaging by 2027, and from all federal operations by 2035.

Trump, a long-time critic of paper straws, has referred to them as "nonfunctional" and "disgusting," claiming that they "don't work," "break," and "explode." He has also stated that plastic straws are preferable because they do not affect marine life, claiming that "plastic is not going to affect the shark very much as they're munching their way through the ocean."

Trump's executive order directs federal agencies to review procurement processes to allow the use of plastic straws. It also requires the development of a National Strategy to End the Use of Paper Straws within 45 days. The order was met with criticism from environmental advocates, who pointed out the contribution of plastic straws to ocean waste and microplastics, which can affect human health and harm marine life.

While Trump's executive order specifically targeted paper straws, his broader policies and agenda have significant implications for the plastic industry. His push for fossil fuel expansion and rollback of environmental protections directly affect the regulatory landscape for plastic production. Additionally, his "America First" agenda, which includes tariffs on imported goods, including plastic products, further impacts global supply chains and costs for manufacturers reliant on foreign suppliers.

Trump's impact on plastic procurement

However, Trump's policies and actions have also been criticised for potentially hindering progress in addressing plastic pollution. He has been known to oppose international agreements and efforts to reduce plastic pollution, such as pulling the US out of the Paris Climate Accords. Trump's administration has also targeted the Biden administration's policies aimed at phasing out single-use plastics in federal agencies. Trump's executive order reversing the federal push away from plastic straws and his criticism of paper straws showcase his stance on single-use plastics.

Trump's policies may have a significant impact on recycling practices. His funding cuts, labour shifts, and tariffs could affect supply and costs within the recycling industry. While tariffs on imported goods may make domestic consumption of plastic goods more attractive, they might also disrupt global supply chains and raise costs for manufacturers reliant on foreign suppliers. Trump's stance on immigration and funding freezes could further impact the supply of plastic waste for recycling processes.

Additionally, Trump's focus on fossil fuel expansion and support for the fossil fuel industry could influence the dynamics of the plastic industry. His administration's prioritisation of domestic oil and gas production, positioning the US with other petrostates, may impact the global negotiations and treaties aimed at reducing plastic pollution. Trump's policies may offer cost advantages and regulatory relief to manufacturers, but companies that ignore sustainability and environmental concerns may face reputational damage and alienate environmentally conscious consumers.

Overall, Trump's impact on plastic procurement is a mix of potential cost advantages for manufacturers and challenges in balancing sustainability, compliance, and reputational risks. While his administration's policies may benefit the plastic industry economically, they could also hinder progress in addressing plastic pollution and environmental sustainability.

Trump's deregulation and trade policies

Trump's ""America First" agenda has disrupted global supply chains with tariffs on imported goods, including plastic products. These tariffs have made domestic consumption of plastic goods more attractive, further impacting the plastic industry.

Trump's policies have also affected plastic procurement, creating a balance between cost, sustainability, and compliance. The breakdown of global treaty negotiations has left manufacturers without a unified framework to address plastic waste, prompting them to explore sustainable alternatives.

Trump's administration has also taken steps to reduce investment in waste infrastructure through funding freezes and immigration actions. His broad support for industry-friendly regulations could impact the regulatory environment for recycling, although it is unclear if recycling will be a priority due to his anti-sustainability stance.

Overall, Trump's deregulation and trade policies have had mixed effects on the plastic industry. While they offer cost advantages and promote domestic production, they also create challenges for sustainability and compliance, with potential risks to companies that do not adapt to environmental concerns.

Trump's stance on the Paris Climate Accords

On June 1, 2017, President Donald Trump announced his intention to withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement, a global accord that implements the objectives of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. In his announcement, Trump stated that the Paris accord was “unfair” to the United States and would result in a loss of GDP and jobs, claiming that it would “undermine our economy” and “hamstring our workers." He also criticized the Green Climate Fund as a scheme to redistribute wealth.

Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris Climate Accords was met with disappointment and concern from world leaders and environmentalists. Several states, including Colorado, Connecticut, and Oregon, declared their intention to uphold the agreement and work towards its goals. Internationally, the decision was seen as a setback, with Colombia's Minister of Environment and Sustainable Development expressing that Trump's decision increased their country's vulnerability to climate change and hindered progress toward global climate goals.

Trump's policies have had significant implications for the plastic industry. His focus on deregulation and bolstering domestic production, coupled with reduced environmental protections, impacted the regulatory landscape for plastic production. While there have been innovations and efforts to develop sustainable alternatives, Trump's policies present challenges for balancing cost, sustainability, and compliance in the plastics sector.

Overall, Trump's stance on the Paris Climate Accords and his broader environmental policies have been criticized for prioritizing economic growth and industry over climate action and environmental protection.

Trump's views on plastic recycling

Trump's administration has prioritised domestic production and lowering costs for manufacturers, which could impact recycling and waste management. His support for the fossil fuel industry and withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accords also indicate an antipathy towards environmental agreements and regulations. These actions have led to concerns that a Trump administration would hinder efforts to end plastic pollution and reduce plastic production.

However, it is important to note that Trump has not specifically targeted plastics in his policies. Some of his actions, such as funding cuts and labour shifts, could impact plastic recycling efforts, but direct action on plastic recycling does not seem likely. Trump's administration may be more open to industry-friendly regulations, but it is challenging to predict if recycling will be a priority.

Trump has expressed concerns about plastic pollution caused by other countries, particularly China. He has criticised China's contribution to plastic pollution and waste, which has been supported by evidence. However, these statements do not necessarily reflect a commitment to reducing plastic pollution or promoting plastic recycling domestically.

Overall, while Trump's policies and statements may impact plastic recycling efforts, his administration's focus on deregulation, domestic production, and support for the fossil fuel industry suggest that plastic recycling may not be a key priority.

Frequently asked questions