How Industries Emit Sox Pollution

Sulphur oxides (SOx) are one of the main elements of air pollution, alongside nitrogen oxides (NOx). SOx emissions are mainly caused by the burning of sulphur compounds in fuel, particularly in the marine industry. The combustion of marine fuel containing sulphur causes the emission of sulphur oxides in the form of smoke, which can further oxidise to form sulphuric acid, a major contributor to acid rain. Acid rain can have detrimental effects on ecosystems, wildlife, and cultural heritage sites. SOx emissions also contribute to the formation of secondary inorganic aerosol gases, which are harmful to humans. While shipping is a significant contributor to SOx pollution, other sources include power plants, industrial facilities, and vehicles that burn fuel with a high sulphur content.

Shipping and maritime transportation

The burning of fossil fuels, such as heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine gas oil, is a major contributor to the shipping and maritime transportation industry's carbon footprint. This industry is a significant emitter of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and sulfur oxide (SOx). In fact, according to a report by the World Economic Forum in 2018, if shipping were a country, it would be the sixth largest carbon polluter.

The combustion of HFO and the use of fuels with high sulfur content in marine engines result in the release of SOx, which contributes to air pollution. This air pollution has adverse effects on both human health and the environment. The two main pollutants from ship emissions are nitrogen oxides (NOx) and SOx. These gases can have detrimental effects on the ozone layer in the troposphere, contributing to the "greenhouse effect" and potentially causing global warming.

To reduce SOx emissions, the maritime industry is transitioning to cleaner fuels and adopting new technologies. LNG fuel, for example, has gained popularity due to its low sulfur content and ability to eliminate almost all NOx and SOx emissions. Additionally, ports are playing a crucial role in driving change by assessing the emission profiles of vessels and implementing incentive programs to attract more efficient ships. Digital technologies are also being leveraged to visualize emissions, identify emission sources, and develop targeted approaches to reduce pollution.

Power plants and industrial facilities

SOx emissions from power plants and industrial facilities have several adverse effects. Firstly, they contribute to the formation of acid rain, which can harm sensitive ecosystems and damage stone, metal, and other materials, including culturally significant objects. Secondly, SOx can react with other compounds in the atmosphere to form fine particles that reduce visibility and contribute to haze, commonly seen in national parks and wilderness areas. These fine particles are also harmful to human health, particularly for individuals with asthma and children, who are more susceptible to respiratory issues.

In addition to power plants, other industrial processes can also emit SOx pollutants. These include metal extraction from ore, fuel combustion in locomotives, ships, and other vehicles, as well as heavy equipment that burns fuel with a high sulfur content. International shipping has been identified as a significant contributor to SOx emissions. The use of marine fuel with high sulfur content can emit sulfur oxides that further oxidize and form sulfuric acid, a major component of acid rain.

To address SOx pollution, regulatory frameworks and air quality standards have been implemented. Organizations like the US EPA have established rules to reduce SO2 and other sulfur oxide emissions. These regulations aim to help state and local governments meet national air quality standards and protect public health and the environment. Additionally, new technologies and methods are being developed to reduce pollutants from the exhaust gases of combustion power plants and industrial facilities. These advancements aim to simultaneously remove various pollutants, including SOx, with higher efficiency.

Environmental economic instruments

Sulfur oxides (SOx) are emitted as a result of the combustion of fossil fuels by power plants and industrial facilities. Smaller sources of SO2 emissions include industrial processes such as metal extraction, natural sources like volcanoes, and vehicles that burn fuel with a high sulfur content. SOx emissions contribute to air pollution, particularly affecting the ozone layer and causing the "greenhouse effect," which may lead to global warming.

To address SOx pollution, economic incentives have been increasingly employed over the last two decades, especially in the past ten years. These incentives aim to supplement or replace traditional regulatory approaches to pollution control. Here are some examples of environmental economic instruments:

• Voluntary programs: The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promotes voluntary programs such as Energy Star, Waste Wise, and XL, which encourage and reward actions that reduce energy consumption and pollution. These programs provide incentives for individuals and organizations to voluntarily take steps towards reducing their environmental impact.
• Regulatory approaches: While traditional regulatory approaches have been commonly used to control pollution, the EPA has started to incorporate a wider array of economic incentive mechanisms. These mechanisms provide flexibility and can often achieve pollution reduction beyond what is possible with regulations alone.
• Incentives for specific environmental problems: Economic incentives can be tailored to address specific environmental issues. For example, charging a disposal fee based on the volume of curbside solid waste encourages citizens to reduce waste through recycling, composting, or other means. Such targeted incentives can effectively manage a narrow range of problems.
• Emission controls and fuel standards: Regulations and economic incentives are employed to control SOx emissions from ships, particularly in Emission Control Areas (ECAs). Within ECAs, ships must use fuel with a maximum sulfur content of 0.1% m/m, which can be achieved by using LNG fuel or highly refined diesel oil. These regulations and incentives help reduce SOx emissions and their associated environmental impacts.
• Cost savings: Economic incentives can provide cost savings compared to traditional regulatory approaches. Studies have estimated that the widespread use of economic incentives could result in potential savings of up to $45 billion annually, demonstrating their cost-effectiveness in addressing environmental issues.

Acid rain and its effects

Acid rain is a phenomenon that occurs when sulphuric acid and nitric acid mix with rainwater, lowering its pH and causing it to become highly acidic. This acidified rainwater then falls onto the ground or bodies of water, altering their chemical composition and endangering the balance of ecosystems.

The primary cause of acid rain is the emission of sulphur and nitrogen oxides into the atmosphere, which is largely a by-product of human activities, such as the burning of fossil fuels by power plants and industrial facilities. Other sources include natural phenomena, such as lightning strikes releasing nitrogen oxides and volcanic eruptions emitting sulphur oxide.

The effects of acid rain are far-reaching and detrimental. It harms sensitive ecosystems, including forests, freshwater bodies, and soils. Acid rain damages foliage, decreases plant growth by stripping the soil of essential nutrients, and harms insects and aquatic life. It also corrodes metal structures, such as bridges and pipes, resulting in the leaching of heavy metals like iron, lead, and copper into drinking water.

In addition, acid rain deteriorates the appearance of monuments and buildings, particularly those made of marble or other calcareous materials, by causing paint to peel and stone to weather. This degradation poses a significant threat to our artistic, historical, and cultural heritage.

The impact of acid rain extends to human health as well. It contributes to respiratory issues in humans and animals, and when it contaminates water sources, it can lead to the presence of harmful substances in drinking water.

Recognising the severity of these consequences, governments and corporations are taking measures to mitigate acid rain. These include implementing regulations to reduce pollutant emissions, encouraging the use of renewable energy sources, and promoting energy conservation in factories and companies.

LNG as a solution

The burning of fossil fuels by power plants and other industrial facilities is the largest source of SO2 in the atmosphere. Smaller sources of SO2 emissions include industrial processes such as extracting metal from ore, natural sources such as volcanoes, and locomotives, ships, and other vehicles and heavy equipment that burn fuel with a high sulfur content. These combustible gases, emitted into the environment in the form of smoke, can have adverse effects on the ozone layer in the troposphere, resulting in the "greenhouse effect" and contributing to global warming.

SO2 and other sulfur oxides contribute to acid rain, which can harm sensitive ecosystems, and the formation of secondary inorganic aerosol gases—fine particulates that are harmful to people. At high concentrations, gaseous SOx can harm trees and plants by damaging foliage and decreasing growth. They can also react with other compounds in the atmosphere to form fine particles that reduce visibility (haze) and stain and damage materials such as stone, statues, and monuments.

To reduce SO2 emissions and improve air quality, LNG fuel is a viable solution. LNG, or Liquefied Natural Gas, is a clean-burning fuel that is composed of only carbon and hydrogen (CH4). It significantly lowers SOx emissions by eliminating nearly all NOx and SOx emissions and reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 20-40%, depending on consumption. LNG is a cost-effective solution to reducing air pollution from ships, as it is compliant with SOx and NOx emissions limits in coastal Emission Control Areas (ECAs) and the IMO's global sulphur cap. It also offers greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions of up to 21% on a Well-to-Wake basis and 28% on a Tank-to-Wake basis when compared to conventional marine fuels.

LNG is a favourable option when compared to the alternatives, which include expensive, highly refined diesel oil or costly exhaust gas cleaning systems. It poses no pollution risk to ocean environments through fuel spills, and there are no waste disposal or discharge issues associated with its use. By choosing LNG, shipping companies can effectively insulate themselves from the impact of future, more stringent local emissions regulations.

Frequently asked questions