The Green Energy Paradox: Hydroelectricity's Pollution Problem

Hydroelectricity is a form of renewable energy that uses water stored in dams and flowing in rivers to generate electricity. It is a significant component of electricity production worldwide, with China, Canada, Brazil, and the United States being the largest producers. While hydropower does not directly emit air pollutants, the construction and operation of hydroelectric generators and dams can have environmental impacts and affect water quality. The creation of reservoirs can lead to the release of greenhouse gases and impact aquatic ecosystems, including fish populations. Additionally, changes in water temperature and flow characteristics can harm native plants and animals. The extent of these effects depends on various factors, and there are ongoing discussions about balancing hydroelectric power generation with maintaining healthy river ecosystems.

Hydropower is a low-carbon source of renewable energy

Hydropower is a renewable source of energy that uses the natural flow of water to generate electricity. It is one of the oldest and largest sources of renewable energy, with a long history of use that dates back thousands of years. In the modern era, hydropower accounts for 27% of total US utility-scale renewable electricity generation and 5.86% of total US utility-scale electricity generation.

Hydropower is a low-carbon source of energy. Independent research suggests that the use of hydropower instead of fossil fuels for electricity generation has helped avoid more than 100 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide in the past 50 years. This is roughly equivalent to the total annual carbon footprint of the United States for 20 years. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report noted that only wind and nuclear power have lower median lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions than hydropower. The IPCC states that hydropower has a median greenhouse gas emission intensity of 24 gCO₂-eq/kWh, which is the grams of carbon dioxide equivalent per kilowatt-hour of electricity generated allocated over its life cycle. The exact amount of greenhouse gas emissions from hydropower reservoirs depends on many site-specific and regional factors, such as the reservoir's depth and shape, the amount of sun reaching its floor, and wind speed.

However, it is important to note that hydropower facilities can still have a significant impact on the environment and aquatic ecosystems. For example, the construction of dams and reservoirs can affect fish migration and result in the obstruction of waterways. Additionally, the manufacturing of concrete and steel for hydropower dams requires equipment that may produce emissions if powered by fossil fuels.

Despite these considerations, hydropower is a reliable, versatile, and low-cost source of clean electricity generation. It is a key asset in building secure, clean electricity systems and reaching global net-zero targets. Hydropower plants can also provide essential power, storage, flexibility, and climate mitigation services. The global weighted average cost of electricity from hydropower projects in 2022 was US$0.061 per kWh, making it the lowest-cost source of electricity in many markets.

Hydropower facilities can affect aquatic ecosystems

Hydropower is a low-carbon source of renewable energy that provides substantial benefits for the climate, human health, and the economy. However, hydropower facilities can still have a significant impact on aquatic ecosystems.

One of the primary ways in which hydropower facilities affect aquatic life is by obstructing fish migration. Dams that create reservoirs or divert water to run-of-river hydropower plants can block the natural movement of fish, disrupting their spawning and migratory patterns. This can have a ripple effect on the entire aquatic food chain, as fish are a crucial source of food and income for surrounding communities. Additionally, fish and other organisms can be injured or killed by the turbine blades of hydropower generators.

The construction and operation of hydropower facilities can also lead to environmental impacts. The manufacturing of concrete and steel for hydropower dams may produce emissions, especially if fossil fuels are used as energy sources. These emissions contribute to the overall carbon footprint of the electricity generated by hydropower plants. Furthermore, the creation of reservoirs can result in higher levels of sediments and nutrients, promoting excessive growth of algae and aquatic weeds. These weeds can outcompete other native plant and animal species, reducing biodiversity in the ecosystem.

The impact of hydropower facilities on aquatic ecosystems is not limited to the immediate vicinity of the dam or reservoir. Downstream effects can also occur, influencing the health of aquatic life and the overall dynamics of the river system. Additionally, the flooding of land for reservoir creation can lead to the decomposition of vegetation and soil, releasing carbon dioxide and methane, which are greenhouse gases.

While hydropower facilities can have negative consequences for aquatic ecosystems, it is important to recognize that there are ways to mitigate these impacts. For example, fish ladders and intake screens can help minimize fish mortality, and proper management of reservoirs can control the growth of invasive weeds. Additionally, organizations like the Natural Heritage Institute (NHI) are working with national governments to improve the siting, design, and operation of hydropower projects to avoid or reduce their ecological footprint.

Hydropower dams can obstruct fish migration

Hydroelectricity is a low-carbon source of renewable energy that is considered more environmentally friendly than fossil fuels. However, the construction and operation of hydropower dams can still have a significant impact on the environment, including the obstruction of fish migration.

A dam that creates a reservoir may obstruct fish migration by blocking their natural pathways between feeding and spawning grounds. This can cause interruptions in their life cycles and limit their ability to reproduce. For example, migratory fish such as shad and river herring are food sources for other commercial and recreational species, including striped bass and cod. When hydropower dams block their migration, these populations decline, which can have knock-on effects on the entire ecosystem.

The Federal Power Act in the United States authorises the NOAA Fisheries organisation to issue mandatory conditions for fish passage and recommend other protection and mitigation measures. They work with partners, including federal agencies, states, and non-governmental organisations, to implement solutions that reopen rivers to migratory fish while preserving hydropower generation. These solutions include fish ladders and intake screens, which can help minimise the impact on fish populations.

Despite these efforts, the development of hydropower dams continues to threaten fish habitats worldwide. Researchers have used detailed spatial data to evaluate the impact of existing and planned dams on fish species, finding that the highest numbers of fragmented habitats are in the United States, Europe, South Africa, India, and China. In developing countries, the impacts of planned hydropower development are disproportionately high. For example, the construction of a single dam near the outlet of the Purari River in Papua New Guinea is expected to decrease habitat connectivity for freshwater fish in the region by about 80%.

Overall, while hydropower is generally considered a more environmentally friendly alternative to fossil fuels, the obstruction of fish migration due to dams remains a significant concern that requires careful planning and mitigation measures to protect fish populations and the ecosystems that depend on them.

Hydropower's carbon footprint is uncertain

Hydropower is a widely available, reliable, and renewable energy source. It is considered a low-carbon alternative to electricity generation from fossil fuels. However, the exact carbon footprint of hydropower remains uncertain due to various factors that influence greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

The creation of a reservoir, which is necessary for hydropower generation, can lead to the release of GHGs. When an area is flooded to form a reservoir, the vegetation and soil undergo decomposition, releasing carbon dioxide and methane. The amount of carbon dioxide and methane released depends on factors such as the reservoir's depth, shape, sunlight exposure, and wind speed. The time water is stored in the reservoir and the carbon content of the flooded soil also contribute to GHG emissions.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimates the median greenhouse gas emission intensity of hydropower to be 24 gCO₂-eq/kWh. However, this estimate may not account for all relevant factors. For instance, few studies have assessed the net emissions of freshwater reservoirs, considering pre-existing natural sources and unrelated human emissions. Additionally, current methods for quantifying the carbon footprint of hydropower facilities may be insufficient, and certain emissions, such as degassing emissions associated with turbines, are often not included in calculations.

The long operating lifetime of hydropower plants, typically between 50 and 100 years, helps to offset the emissions associated with construction and operation. Over their long lifespan, hydropower plants can avoid significant carbon dioxide emissions compared to fossil fuel alternatives. Additionally, in some cases, reservoirs may act as carbon sinks, absorbing more emissions than they release.

The G-res Tool, developed by the International Hydropower Association (IHA) and UNESCO, aims to provide a more accurate estimate of the net change in GHG emissions attributable to the creation of a specific reservoir. It considers the land's pre-impoundment state and accounts for local emissions before and after reservoir construction.

While hydropower's carbon footprint is uncertain, it is generally accepted that it has a lower carbon footprint than fossil fuel alternatives and is an important part of the transition to a cleaner electric grid.

Hydropower is still better than fossil fuels

Hydropower is a renewable source of energy that relies on the water cycle, which is driven by the sun. It is fuelled by water and does not directly emit air pollutants. It is also a domestic source of energy, allowing each state to produce its own energy without relying on international fuel sources.

Hydropower is a low-carbon source of energy and a reliable and cost-effective alternative to electricity generation by fossil fuels. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report noted that only wind and nuclear power have lower median lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions than hydropower. The report states that hydropower has a median greenhouse gas (GHG) emission intensity of 24 gCO₂-eq/kWh, while the median figure for gas is 490 gCO₂-eq/kWh.

Independent research suggests that the use of hydropower instead of fossil fuels for electricity generation has helped avoid more than 100 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide in the past 50 years alone. If hydropower were replaced with burning coal to generate electricity, the International Hydropower Association (IHA) estimates that more than 4 billion metric tonnes of additional greenhouse gases would be emitted annually, and global emissions from fossil fuels and industry would be at least 10% higher.

However, it is important to note that hydropower facilities can still have a major impact on aquatic ecosystems, including fish migration and the obstruction of waterways. Additionally, the creation of reservoirs, which are used to store water for hydropower, can release greenhouse gases due to the decomposition of flooded organic material. These emissions tend to be highest in the first 10 to 20 years after reservoir impoundment, then decrease over time. Despite these considerations, hydropower remains a cleaner and more renewable energy source than fossil fuels.

Frequently asked questions