Plant-Based Diets: Environmental Friend Or Foe?

The environmental impact of food production is a pressing issue, with agriculture accounting for around 70% of freshwater use and driving climate change through its significant contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions. While plant-based diets are widely considered more sustainable than meat-heavy diets, not all plant-based foods are equal in their environmental impact. The transportation of delicate fruits like blueberries and strawberries by air, for instance, can create more greenhouse gas emissions than some types of meat. Additionally, the production of artificial fertilizers, used in agriculture, contributes to greenhouse gas emissions, with nitrous oxide being released into the atmosphere during their application on fields. Nevertheless, the shift towards plant-based diets is generally regarded as beneficial for the environment, with meat and dairy production being particularly resource-intensive and polluting.

Plant-based diets are better for the environment than meat-based diets

It is widely acknowledged that a plant-based diet is better for the environment than a meat-based diet. This is due to the environmental impact of meat production, which has consequences for climate change, water stress, pollution, land use, and biodiversity.

Climate Change

Agriculture is a significant driver of climate change, contributing around a quarter of the world's greenhouse gas emissions. Meat and dairy products tend to emit more greenhouse gases than plant-based foods. Beef and lamb, in particular, have an exceptionally high environmental impact. A study by the University of Oxford found that a plant-based diet can reduce food emissions by up to 73%.

Water Stress

Agriculture is the world's largest water-consuming sector, accounting for about 70% of freshwater use. Meat and dairy production is especially water-intensive. For example, producing just one pound of beef requires 1,800 gallons of water. By contrast, a plant-based diet can significantly reduce water consumption.

Pollution

The animal industry produces massive amounts of waste and contaminants that pollute the air and water. Factory farms generate large amounts of dust and other pollutants, including bacteria, mold, and fungi from feces and feed. Animal waste also emits toxic airborne chemicals that can cause health problems in humans.

Land Use

Agriculture is the world's largest land user, with half of the world's habitable land used for farming. Livestock farming degrades land and contributes to deforestation. An estimated 30% of land worldwide is used for livestock or growing feed for them, an area roughly the size of Asia. According to Greenpeace, cattle farming is responsible for 63% of Amazon rainforest destruction, as forests are cleared for grazing and growing feed.

Biodiversity

The loss of natural habitats due to agriculture has been a major driver of the decline in global biodiversity. By reducing the need for livestock grazing and feed production, a plant-based diet can help preserve natural habitats and protect wildlife.

Some plant-based foods have a disproportionate impact on the environment

While a vegan diet is widely regarded as better for the planet than diets that include animal products, not all plant-based foods have a small environmental footprint. For example, delicate fruits like blueberries and strawberries are often imported to Europe and the US by air to fill gaps when local fruits are out of season. This creates more greenhouse gas emissions per kilogram than poultry meat. Similarly, air-transported foods like avocados, mangoes, and soya milk, although vegan-friendly, may be doing far less good for the planet.

Artificial fertilisers, used in the production of plant-based foods, account for at least 3% of global greenhouse gas emissions. The production of synthetic fertiliser emits carbon dioxide and methane into the atmosphere, while their use on fields releases nitrous oxide, another potent greenhouse gas. In addition, agricultural practices such as the tilling of fields also release large volumes of greenhouse gases and speed up erosion.

The environmental impact of food production is calculated based on life-cycle analyses that consider impacts across the supply chain, including land use change, on-farm emissions, the production of agricultural inputs such as fertilisers and pesticides, food processing, transport, packaging, and retail. When comparing the carbon footprint of different types of foods, meat and dairy products tend to emit more greenhouse gases than plant-based foods. However, this does not consider the emissions created by air transport, which can be significant for certain plant-based foods.

To reduce the environmental impact of food consumption, it is recommended to adopt a plant-based diet, reduce meat consumption, and pay attention to how foods are grown and transported. Sticking to locally produced fruit and vegetables that are in season is the best approach.

Agriculture uses a lot of water

Agriculture uses a significant amount of water, accounting for about 70% of global freshwater usage, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization and the United Nations' World Water Development Report. This water is essential for irrigating crops and sustaining livestock, with irrigation being crucial, especially in arid regions or areas with scarce or unpredictable rainfall.

The agriculture industry relies on a steady water supply, and droughts can negatively impact crop yields. However, unsustainable water usage can lead to reduced water flows, changes in downstream water access, increased soil salinity, and the loss of wetlands, all of which have negative consequences for biodiversity and flood control.

To address these challenges, efficient irrigation techniques such as drip irrigation and advanced scheduling are being adopted. These innovations help improve crop yields while conserving water and reducing costs. Additionally, initiatives like partnering with organizations to promote regenerative agriculture practices, such as cover cropping and reduced tillage, aim to improve soil health and water conservation.

The environmental impact of agriculture extends beyond water usage. Agriculture is a significant driver of climate change, contributing about one-quarter of the world's greenhouse gas emissions. It also impacts land use, with half of the world's habitable land being used for agriculture, often leading to deforestation and loss of natural habitats, which reduces biodiversity.

Transitioning to more plant-based diets can help mitigate these environmental impacts. Meat and dairy products, especially beef and lamb, have a higher environmental footprint than plant-based foods in terms of greenhouse gas emissions, land, and water usage. However, it is important to note that not all plant-based foods have a low environmental impact, and considerations such as transportation and production methods also play a role in the overall sustainability of our food choices.

Vegan diets can preserve nature's territory

Vegan diets can help reduce this environmental impact by decreasing the amount of land needed for agriculture. If the world shifted to a vegan diet, global agricultural land use would be reduced from 4.1 billion hectares to 1 billion hectares, a reduction of 75%. This would allow natural vegetation and ecosystems to return, benefiting biodiversity and carbon sequestration.

Additionally, vegan diets can help reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the food system. Meat and dairy products tend to emit more greenhouse gases than plant-based foods, contributing to climate change. A plant-based diet can reduce food emissions by up to 73%, including greenhouse gas emissions and eutrophying emissions that degrade ecosystems.

However, it is important to note that not all plant-based foods have a low environmental impact. Air-transported fruits and vegetables, for example, can create more greenhouse gas emissions than some meat products. Therefore, it is recommended to stick to locally produced and seasonally available fruits and vegetables to minimize the environmental impact of a vegan diet.

Overall, a widespread shift towards vegan diets has the potential to preserve nature's territory by reducing agricultural land use and greenhouse gas emissions associated with food production.

Plant-based diets may not meet micronutrient requirements

While plant-based diets are considered healthier, they may not meet all micronutrient requirements. A balanced and diverse diet is necessary to ensure the right amount of daily nutrient intake for a healthy life.

Vegetarians and vegans may be at risk of vitamin B12 and vitamin D deficiency since these micronutrients are mostly found in animal foods or have lower bioavailability in plant foods. Vitamin B12 can be obtained from nori seaweed, but it does not provide a sufficient amount. Fortified foods or supplements are recommended to ensure adequate intake.

Additionally, plant-based diets have been associated with lower intakes of protein, vitamins B2, B3, vitamin D, iodine, zinc, calcium, potassium, and selenium. For example, calcium intake in the majority of vegans was below the recommended daily amount.

The intake of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), primarily found in fish and seafood, has also been inadequate in vegetarians and vegans. However, it is important to note that plant-based diets provide a better supply of certain micronutrients, such as folate, vitamin E, and magnesium.

To ensure a nutritionally adequate diet, those following plant-based diets may need to consider supplements or fortified foods for specific micronutrients like vitamins B12 and D. Additionally, consuming a variety of whole foods, including fruits, vegetables, pulses, whole grains, and nuts, can help meet micronutrient requirements.

Frequently asked questions