Fracking's Impact: Is Our Groundwater At Risk?

Fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, is a process used to extract oil and gas by cracking shale rock deep underground. This process involves injecting a mixture of water, sand, and chemicals into the ground to release fossil fuels. Given the nature of the process, there have been concerns about its impact on groundwater. While some studies and government organizations have found no evidence of groundwater contamination due to fracking, other reports, including those from the EPA, suggest that fracking has polluted groundwater in certain regions. The conflicting findings highlight the need for further research and monitoring to understand the potential risks fracking poses to groundwater and drinking water sources.

Does fracking pollute groundwater?

Water withdrawals during hydraulic fracturing

The average fracking job uses approximately 4 million gallons of water per well, with variation by state. For instance, the average fracking job in California requires more than 116,000 gallons of water. The amount of water used in hydraulic fracturing depends on the geology and other factors of the location.

The extraction of freshwater for hydraulic fracturing can alter the hydrologic regime of rivers and streams and impact biological species through habitat loss. This is especially true if the water withdrawal rate is high in a single location within a water body during a low-flow season or drought.

The EPA has identified certain conditions under which the impacts from hydraulic fracturing activities can be more frequent or severe. One of these conditions is water withdrawals for hydraulic fracturing in times or areas of low water availability, particularly in regions with limited or declining groundwater resources.

The EPA's report on the impacts of hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas on drinking water resources aims to advance the scientific understanding of the relationship between these activities and drinking water resources. However, data gaps and uncertainties limited the EPA's ability to fully assess the potential impacts.

Spills of hydraulic fracturing fluids

While there is debate over whether fracking contaminates groundwater, spills of hydraulic fracturing fluids are a concern. These spills pose environmental and health risks, and with the rapid expansion of hydraulic fracturing treatments worldwide, the probability of spills increases.

Hydraulic fracturing fluid can spill during transport, and the risk of contamination is heightened when shallow wells are drilled within reach of the aquifer zone. The likelihood of a spill occurring is the same regardless of the fluid's toxicity, but if the content is unsafe, it will pose a serious environmental hazard. The EPA has analysed spill data to better understand the nature of spills associated with hydraulic fracturing, and to gain insights into the materials spilled, spill sources, causes, and environmental receptors.

The toxicity of hydraulic fracturing fluid is a significant concern. Incomplete toxicity data and a lack of transparency from industries about the chemicals used hinder the ability to assess potential interactions and changes in toxicity. Human exposure to these chemicals primarily occurs through accidental spills and operational accidents.

The environmental risks of hydraulic fracturing fluid spills can be classified as surface or subsurface risks. Surface risks include spills and felt seismic events, while subsurface risks include groundwater contamination. The longer it takes for the fluid to migrate towards underground water sources, the longer it remains toxic, posing a risk to human health.

Injection of fracking fluids into wells

Injection wells are shafts in the ground used to store fluids or substances like carbon dioxide (CO2). They come in a variety of forms, including shallow wells for storing water and non-hazardous liquids, and deep wells for storing hazardous liquids, saltwater (brine), or a mixture of water and chemicals. Injection wells have been used for centuries, with the Chinese using them as early as 300 AD for salt extraction. In the 1930s, injection wells began to be widely used in Texas for the disposal of waste from oil and natural gas extraction.

In the context of fracking, injection wells are used to dispose of fracking wastewater, which is a mixture of water, sand, and chemicals used to crack shale rock formations and release oil and gas. This wastewater, also known as brine, is highly salty and can be toxic or even radioactive. Disposing of it in injection wells deep underground is meant to prevent it from contaminating surface water bodies and soils.

However, there have been concerns and incidents that highlight the potential environmental problems associated with this method. In one instance in Noble County, Ohio, an unused gas well began spewing salty brine water, resulting in the escape of over 1.5 million gallons of wastewater into a nearby creek and causing harm to aquatic life. This incident was attributed to the migration of wastewater from a nearby injection well or one located nearly four miles away.

The migration of fracking wastewater occurs when the liquid, under high pressure, finds spaces in porous rock formations and travels underground. If it encounters a well, the wastewater can rush up to the surface. This has led to concerns about the potential contamination of groundwater resources, as evidenced by a study conducted in Wyoming that detected high levels of salt and ions associated with fracking fluid in deep groundwater.

While there is ongoing debate about the impact of fracking on groundwater contamination, with some studies suggesting otherwise, the incident in Ohio and similar cases underscore the importance of further investigation and cautious management of injection wells to prevent potential environmental and ecological harm.

Wastewater disposal and reuse

Deep well injection is a common method for disposing of fracking wastewater, with approximately 20% of injection wells dedicated to this purpose. However, this practice has faced scrutiny due to concerns about its potential to induce seismic activity and the suitability of certain regions' geology for this method. As a result, the industry is exploring alternative disposal methods and increasing its focus on wastewater reuse.

Reuse of produced water is gaining traction, particularly in regions like the Permian Basin in West Texas and New Mexico, where disposal options are limited and costs are high. By reusing wastewater for drilling new wells, companies can manage their wastewater effectively. However, if the rate of establishing new wells decreases, the market for produced water may be impacted.

Treating and recycling produced water is another important aspect of wastewater management in the fracking industry. In some cases, the wastewater can be treated to meet regulatory standards and then discharged into local watersheds. Additionally, research institutions like the West Virginia Water Research Institute are analyzing the chemicals present in fracking wastewater to develop better reuse and treatment methods.

Overall, the management of wastewater disposal and reuse in the fracking industry is a complex issue. While deep well injection has been a standard practice, the industry is exploring alternatives due to environmental concerns and regional limitations. Reuse of produced water is becoming more prevalent, but it is dependent on the rate of new well development. As a result, there is a growing emphasis on improving treatment and recycling methods to address the challenges of wastewater management in the fracking process.

Fracking's impact on climate change

Fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, is a process used to extract fossil fuels like oil and methane gas from shale rock formations deep underground. This process involves injecting a mixture of water, sand, and toxic chemicals (called "fracking fluids") into the ground to break apart the shale rock and release the fossil fuels. While fracking has been touted as a solution to our energy challenges, it has also been criticised for its potential impacts on the environment, including climate change.

One of the main concerns with fracking is its contribution to greenhouse gas emissions. Methane, the main component of natural gas, is a potent greenhouse gas that is 85 to 105 times more effective at disrupting the climate over a 20-year period than carbon dioxide. However, due to the poor understanding and regulation of shale drilling and fracking, the exact amount of methane leakage from fracking wells is still unknown. Additionally, states like Colorado that have seen a significant increase in fracking wells have also experienced spikes in air pollution.

The production and transportation of fracking fluids also contribute to climate change. The process requires a large amount of fresh water, which is mixed with toxic chemicals. These chemicals are often kept secret by the industry, and their environmental impact is not well understood. Additionally, the oil and gas industry struggles to manage the massive amount of contaminated water produced during fracking, which can lead to water contamination and further environmental degradation.

Furthermore, fracking diverts attention and resources from the development of long-term sustainable energy solutions. Instead of investing in renewable and clean energy sources, countries like the United States, Canada, India, the United Kingdom, and China have pursued fracking, adding to the environmental and climate challenges we already face.

While there is ongoing debate about the extent of fracking's impact on climate change, it is clear that it contributes to greenhouse gas emissions, air pollution, and environmental degradation. More research and regulation are needed to fully understand and mitigate the potential consequences of fracking on our climate and planet.

Frequently asked questions