Biomass Energy: Clean Or Polluting Power Source?

Biomass energy is frequently depicted as a 'clean' and renewable energy source that is carbon-neutral. However, data and tests show that burning biomass, especially forest biomass, can increase carbon emissions compared to fossil fuels and contribute to air pollution, with serious health consequences for nearby communities. While biomass is a promising alternative to fossil fuels, it is important to consider the environmental and health impacts of its utilization as an energy resource. This includes the effects on carbon emissions, air quality, and public health, as well as the sustainability of biomass sources.

Biomass energy is not carbon-neutral

Biomass energy has been promoted as a carbon-neutral energy source by industry, some countries, and lawmakers. This is based on the idea that the carbon dioxide released by burning wood can be offset by the carbon dioxide absorbed by trees grown to replace those burned. However, there are several reasons why biomass energy is not carbon-neutral.

Firstly, burning biomass for energy releases large amounts of carbon into the atmosphere all at once. While forests can absorb carbon as they grow, it can take decades or even a century for them to draw the same amount of carbon back out of the air. This means that in the short term, burning biomass contributes to increased carbon emissions, which is not compatible with the immediate need to reduce global carbon emissions.

Secondly, the argument for carbon neutrality assumes that the carbon uptake of mature forests remains constant or decreases, and that harvesting and replacing old trees with young trees increases the rate of carbon uptake. However, evidence suggests that mature trees continue to absorb carbon, and harvesting them reduces the total carbon uptake. Additionally, harvesting can disturb the soil, leading to increased carbon losses in the short term.

Thirdly, the processing and transportation of biomass for energy use can add to the total emissions produced by the industry. For example, converting trees into wood pellets and shipping them overseas, as is commonly done in the biomass industry, contributes to higher emissions.

Finally, burning biomass creates air pollution, causing a range of health issues, including asthma attacks, cancer, and heart attacks. The air pollution created contains particulate matter, nitrogen oxide, carcinogens, and carbon monoxide, which are toxic and harmful to human health. Therefore, burning biomass is not a clean or environmentally friendly source of energy.

In conclusion, while biomass may be a renewable and low-sulfur fuel, it is not carbon-neutral and has negative environmental and health impacts. Claims of sustainability and carbon neutrality in the biomass industry are deceptive, and truly carbon-neutral sources of energy, such as wind and solar, should be prioritized instead.

Burning biomass increases air pollution

Despite biomass being considered an attractive alternative to fossil fuels, it is not without its environmental impacts. Burning biomass can emit as much or more pollution than burning fossil fuels, including coal, and is a heavily polluting technology. The combustion of biomass releases harmful pollutants, such as carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxide, and particulate matter, which contribute to air pollution and pose risks to human health.

Biomass burning refers to the combustion of living or dead vegetation, including grassland, forest biomass, agricultural waste, and biomass used for fuel. The emissions from biomass burning can include particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and aerosols. These emissions have been linked to adverse health effects, including asthma attacks, headaches, nausea, and dizziness, and an increased risk of cancer.

In some cases, biomass burning can even contribute to climate change. For example, burning forest biomass can increase carbon emissions compared to coal and other fossil fuels. Additionally, the biomass industry can imperil precious forests, contributing to environmental destruction. Furthermore, the incomplete burning of traditional biomass fuels can result in indoor air pollution, severely affecting human health.

The impact of biomass burning on air quality and human health is influenced by factors such as the type of fuel burned, combustion temperature, and the presence of pollution controls. Small-scale biomass burners, such as those used in schools, typically have minimal controls, while utility-scale biomass plants emit significant amounts of pollutants. The burning of biomass releases a wide range of gases and aerosols, affecting regional air quality, visibility, and global atmospheric chemistry.

While biomass has the potential to be a renewable and sustainable energy source, it is important to address the environmental and health impacts associated with its combustion. The development of clean and renewable biofuels is essential to mitigate the negative consequences of biomass burning and to promote a truly clean energy future.

Biomass energy facilities emit hazardous air pollutants

While biomass is an attractive alternative to fossil fuels, its utilisation as an energy resource is not without potential environmental impact. The environmental impacts of burning biomass for electricity are well documented. When power plants use biomass as fuel, they can increase carbon emissions compared to coal and other fossil fuels. Burning biomass emits large amounts of pollutants, such as particulate matter (PM), nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), lead, mercury, and other hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). HAPs is the group name for 187 compounds known to have highly harmful health or environmental effects. These include metals like chromium, lead, and mercury, as well as compounds like dioxins, benzene, and formaldehyde.

Biomass energy facilities that burn "urban wood" as fuel, which contains lead-painted wood, wood treated with copper chromium arsenate, and non-wood materials that exacerbate dioxin/furan formation, can emit significant amounts of HAPs. The burning of biomass also contributes to climate change, with known human health threats such as heat-related illnesses and deaths, vector-borne diseases, food insecurity, and more frequent and severe extreme weather events.

Most biomass plants do not use the most effective pollution controls, and small-scale biomass burners typically only have minimal controls. Utility-scale biomass plants emit tens to hundreds of tons of pollutants each year, including hazardous air pollutants. The problem with this approach is that it hides differences in efficiency between facilities. Converting these rates so they are expressed in terms of emissions per unit of energy delivered to the grid is a more accurate way of evaluating the impact of different technologies and fuels.

To reduce the amount of hazardous air pollutants emitted by commercial and industrial boilers, the EPA sets limits for certain pollutants under the "boiler rule", which is part of the Clean Air Act. The EPA also applies strict environmental rules to waste-to-energy plants, requiring them to use air pollution control devices such as scrubbers, fabric filters, and electrostatic precipitators to capture air pollutants.

Biomass energy can worsen air quality in communities

Despite being considered a renewable and environmentally friendly alternative to fossil fuels, biomass energy can worsen air quality in communities, leading to a range of health issues. The burning of biomass, including wood, agricultural crops, and waste by-products, emits pollutants such as fine particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, volatile organic compounds, and metals. These emissions contribute to air pollution, which has been linked to respiratory infections, lung conditions, cardiovascular disease, and even cancer.

Biomass burning produces large amounts of fine particulate matter, which can penetrate deeply into the lungs and cause airway inflammation. This is of particular concern for individuals with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The pollution from biomass burning can also worsen asthma symptoms and trigger attacks. Additionally, fine particulate matter, such as PM2.5, can enter the bloodstream and negatively impact lung function, leading to serious health issues, including heart attacks and premature death.

The health risks associated with biomass burning are not limited to those living near biomass facilities. In developing countries, indoor air pollution from burning biomass fuel for cooking, heating, and lighting affects a significant portion of the population. Studies have found links between exposure to biomass fuel smoke and the development of lung cancer, as well as increased cardiovascular disease risk. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified biomass smoke as a 'probable carcinogen'.

While some claim that biomass is a "clean" energy source, data from air permit applications and smokestack tests contradict this notion. Burning biomass can emit as much or even more pollution than fossil fuels, including coal. The environmental impact of biomass energy is particularly concerning when it comes to forest biomass, as it contributes to climate change and endangers precious forests.

The biomass industry endangers precious forests

The biomass industry poses a significant threat to precious forests, with its practices leading to deforestation and negative environmental consequences. The primary concern is the industry's reliance on harvesting wood from forests to produce wood pellets for energy generation. This involves clearing large areas of mature hardwood forests, which disrupts ecosystems, exacerbates climate change, and endangers the very ecosystems that help stabilize global temperature rise.

The biomass industry often sources wood from “working” or “managed” forests, claiming that their practices are sustainable and environmentally friendly. However, investigations have revealed that these claims are misleading, and the true impact of biomass operations on forests is concerning. The process of converting whole trees into pellets contributes to deforestation and destroys the very ecosystems that are vital for mitigating climate change.

One of the key arguments made by the biomass industry is that their practices are carbon-neutral. They assert that the carbon emitted during biomass burning is sequestered as the cut forests regrow over time. However, this claim has been refuted by studies, including one from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which found that it would take 44-104 years for carbon neutrality to be achieved, assuming the forest is allowed to regrow undisturbed. This prolonged timeframe underscores the significant environmental impact of biomass operations on forests.

The biomass industry's sustainability claims are further undermined by their failure to account for carbon emissions accurately. The current carbon accounting methods used in sustainable forestry certifications do not adequately consider net changes in carbon emissions from forest biomass utilization. As a result, the true extent of carbon emissions from biomass burning is often underestimated or ignored, leading to what is known as “missing emissions." This discrepancy is particularly notable in importing countries, such as the UK, EU member states, South Korea, and Japan, which do not properly account for carbon losses when trees are cut down for biomass energy.

The biomass industry's practices not only endanger precious forests but also negatively impact the climate and local communities. The burning of wood pellets has been associated with increased air pollution, leading to various health issues for nearby residents. Additionally, the destruction of forests disrupts the ecosystems that play a crucial role in stabilizing global temperature rise and building community resilience to climate change. As a result, the biomass industry's operations ultimately exacerbate the very environmental and climate challenges they claim to address.

Frequently asked questions