Are Geothermal Plants Polluting Our Environment?

Geothermal energy is one of the cleanest forms of energy used for electricity generation today. Unlike fossil fuel power plants, geothermal power plants do not burn fuel and emit 97% less sulfur compound and 99% less carbon dioxide. However, geothermal plants are not entirely pollution-free. They can impact water quality and consumption, and they emit small amounts of pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, carbon dioxide, methane, and hydrogen sulfide. The environmental impact of geothermal plants also depends on the technology used for conversion and cooling.

Geothermal plants emit greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxides

Geothermal energy is one of the cleanest forms of energy used for electricity generation today. However, it does produce some greenhouse gas emissions, including carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxides. The amount of these gases emitted is minimal compared to other energy sources, such as natural gas, coal, and some renewables. For example, methane emissions from geothermal plants are several orders of magnitude smaller than those from coal and natural gas plants.

Carbon dioxide is the most common greenhouse gas emitted by geothermal power plants. It is released when the geothermal fluid or steam is converted into electricity. However, geothermal power plants emit about 99% less carbon dioxide than fossil fuel power plants of similar size.

Methane is another greenhouse gas emitted by geothermal systems, but these emissions are natural and minimal. Geothermal plants that use enhanced geothermal systems, or hot dry rock geothermal, may access methane mixed with pressurised brine. However, the methane emissions from these plants are still significantly smaller than those of coal and natural gas plants.

Nitrous oxides are also emitted by geothermal power plants, but the amounts are negligible compared to other energy sources. According to one source, flash and dry-steam geothermal plants emit less than 1% of the nitrous oxide emitted by a coal-fired plant of equal energy capacity.

Overall, while geothermal plants do emit small amounts of greenhouse gases, they are a much cleaner source of energy than many other types of power plants.

Hydrogen sulfide is the most concerning pollutant, contributing to acid rain and health issues

Geothermal power plants emit 97% less acid rain-causing sulfur compounds than fossil fuel power plants of a similar size. However, the small amounts of hydrogen sulfide released by geothermal plants are the most concerning pollutant. This is because, once in the atmosphere, hydrogen sulfide changes into sulfur dioxide (SO2)—a key contributor to acid rain.

Acid rain is any form of precipitation with elevated levels of hydrogen ions, resulting in a low pH. Normal rain has a pH of about 5.6, while acid rain usually has a pH between 4.2 and 4.4, and can go as low as 4. The lower the pH, the more acidic the rain is. Acid rain is caused by emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide, which react with water molecules in the atmosphere to produce acids. These acids are then transported by wind and air currents and fall to the earth as wet and dry deposition, such as dust, rain, snow, or hail.

The acidic particles formed by these processes can be harmful to human health. Acid rain with a pH under 7 is considered acidic and harmful for human consumption. At these low pH levels, people can experience hair loss, low urinary pH, severe mineral imbalances, constipation, and chronic disorders like fibromyalgia and basal carcinoma. Additionally, acidic particles can be absorbed into the bloodstream and cause heart and lung disease.

Hydrogen sulfide also poses a threat to human health. Exposure to the gas, even at low levels, can cause headaches, poor attention span, memory, and motor function. At very high concentrations, it can quickly lead to death. Liquid hydrogen sulfide can cause "blue skin" or frostbite.

Water consumption and quality are impacted, with high water usage and potential contamination

Geothermal power plants can impact water quality and consumption. Water consumption is high, as geothermal plants require large amounts of water for cooling and other purposes. The amount of water needed depends on the size of the plant and the technology used. For example, geothermal plants can require between 1,700 and 4,000 gallons of water per megawatt-hour for cooling. The largest geothermal plant in the world, The Geysers, covers an area of approximately 78 square kilometers.

Most geothermal plants use either geothermal fluid or freshwater for cooling, with the use of geothermal fluids reducing the overall water impact. Geothermal plants located near geologic "hot spots" can use hot water produced by hot molten rock close to the Earth's crust. In other cases, water under high pressure is pumped through a specially drilled well into a deep body of hot compact rock, heating the water.

To prevent contamination and land subsidence, most geothermal plants re-inject water into the reservoir after it has been used. However, not all water removed from the reservoir is re-injected, as some is lost as steam. Therefore, outside water must be used to maintain a constant volume of water in the reservoir. In most cases, it is not necessary to use clean water for this purpose. For example, the Geysers geothermal site in California uses non-potable treated wastewater.

Hot water pumped from underground reservoirs often contains high levels of sulfur, salt, and other minerals. Most geothermal facilities have closed-loop water systems, in which extracted water is pumped directly back into the geothermal reservoir after it has been used for heat or electricity production. In such systems, the water is contained within steel well casings cemented to the surrounding rock. There have been no reported cases of water contamination from geothermal sites in the United States.

Hazardous waste disposal is a concern, especially for scrubber sludge containing heavy metals

Geothermal power plants do not burn fuel to generate electricity, but they may release small amounts of sulfur dioxide and carbon dioxide. They emit 97% less acid rain-causing sulfur compounds and about 99% less carbon dioxide than fossil fuel power plants of similar size. Geothermal power plants use scrubbers to remove the hydrogen sulfide naturally found in geothermal reservoirs. Scrubbers can reduce air emissions, but they produce a watery sludge composed of captured materials, including sulfur, silica compounds, chlorides, arsenic, mercury, nickel, and other heavy metals. This toxic sludge must often be disposed of at hazardous waste sites.

There have been studies conducted on the treatment and disposal of scrubber sludge. One study suggests that using dewatered sludge as a landfill cover material is the best alternative. Another study found that sewage sludge (SS) can be used to stabilize and immobilize externally impregnated heavy metals through carbonization. This process converts the heavy metals into stable forms that are evenly distributed throughout the SS, making it non-hazardous.

The land application of municipal wastewater treatment sludges is a widely practiced method for disposal and providing soil nutrients for agricultural use. However, there are concerns over the general disposal of sludge onto land, as heavy metals can pollute soils and nearby water sources. Studies have shown that certain plant species, such as tall wheatgrass and eastern red cedar trees, can grow well on scrubber sludge, especially when amended with manure, fertilizer, woodchips, or other materials.

Overall, while geothermal power plants have lower emissions and environmental impacts than fossil fuel plants, the disposal of scrubber sludge containing heavy metals is a concern that requires careful management to prevent soil and water contamination.

Land subsidence can occur due to water extraction and injection processes

Geothermal power plants are energy systems that harness geothermal energy—heat contained below the Earth's surface. The most widely developed type of geothermal power plant is the hydrothermal plant, which is located near "hot spots" where molten rock close to the Earth's crust produces hot water.

Geothermal plants can impact both water quality and consumption. The hot water pumped from underground reservoirs often contains high levels of sulfur, salt, and other minerals. Most geothermal facilities have closed-loop water systems, where extracted water is pumped directly back into the geothermal reservoir after it has been used for heat or electricity production. In such systems, the water is contained within steel well casings cemented to the surrounding rock, preventing water contamination. However, the removal of geothermal fluid from underground reservoirs can cause the rock formations above to compact, leading to land subsidence.

Land subsidence is a significant environmental consequence of groundwater pumping and extraction processes. The first observation linking land subsidence to subsurface fluid removal was made in 1926 by American geologists Pratt and Johnson. They attributed the settlement in the Gaillard peninsula, the centre of Goose Creek Oil Field in Galveston Bay, Texas, to the "extraction of oil, water, gas, and sand from beneath the surface." They postulated that the pore spaces were occupied by water that slowly drained, causing the clays to become more compact and permitting the subsidence of the overlying surface.

The impact of water extraction and injection processes on land subsidence can vary depending on the specific geothermal plant technology. Most geothermal plants re-inject water into the reservoir to prevent contamination and land subsidence. However, in some cases, not all extracted water is re-injected due to losses as steam. Additionally, the use of geothermal fluid for cooling instead of freshwater can reduce the plant's overall water impact.

While geothermal plants can contribute to land subsidence through water extraction and injection processes, they produce significantly fewer emissions than fossil fuel power plants. Geothermal plants emit 97% less acid rain-causing sulfur compounds and about 99% less carbon dioxide than similarly-sized fossil fuel plants.

Frequently asked questions