Pollution Profiteers: Gas Companies' Dirty Secrets

The oil and gas industry has long been associated with environmental concerns, particularly regarding air pollution and its impact on wildlife and public lands. While natural gas is considered the cleanest fossil fuel, with lower emissions of harmful pollutants compared to coal or petroleum, the process of extracting and drilling for natural gas can disturb vegetation, soil, and water resources, leading to air and water pollution. The burning of fossil fuels releases impurities, contributing to air pollution, which has been linked to various health issues, including respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. Additionally, oil and gas companies have been criticized for their role in methane emissions, with some suing to block regulatory efforts to limit pollution. The debate revolves around the balance between meeting energy demands and preserving the environment, with a push for renewable energy sources to reduce the impact of pollution on communities and wildlife.

Gas companies sue to avoid pollution limits

Oil and gas companies have long been associated with environmental damage and pollution. The negative impacts of their operations on the environment include air pollution, water pollution, soil pollution, noise pollution, destruction of wildlife habitats, and disruption of natural processes.

Despite the industry's best efforts to comply with environmental regulations, it is clear that oil and gas drilling has a detrimental impact on the environment. Drilling projects operating around the clock generate pollution, fuel climate change, disrupt wildlife, and damage public lands set aside for the benefit of the people.

In recognition of the harm caused by the oil and gas industry, governments and communities are increasingly turning to legal action to hold these companies accountable and seek redress for the damage inflicted on the environment. For instance, in a landmark case in 2024, Hugues Falys, a Belgian farmer, supported by several environmental NGOs, initiated legal proceedings against the French fossil fuel company TotalEnergies. Falys sought damages for the negative impacts of extreme weather events on his farm and requested that the company be compelled to reduce its fossil fuel production and investments in new projects.

In another notable case, the Attorney General of California, Rob Bonta, filed a lawsuit against major oil and gas companies for misleading the public about the contribution of fossil fuel combustion to climate change. The lawsuit seeks to protect California's natural resources from further pollution, impairment, and destruction caused by the companies' misconduct.

These lawsuits represent a growing trend of legal action against oil and gas companies to address their role in climate change and environmental degradation. As public awareness and concern for the environment increase, it is likely that we will see more communities and governments taking legal action to hold these companies accountable and seek redress for the harm caused by their operations.

Gas drilling damages public lands

Gas drilling has been shown to have a detrimental impact on public lands and the environment. Oil and gas drilling projects operate around the clock, generating pollution, fuelling climate change, and disturbing wildlife. They also damage public lands that were set aside for the benefit of the people.

In the US, over 12 million acres of public lands are being used to produce fossil fuels, which is the equivalent of six Yellowstone National Parks. These developments often remove large amounts of rangelands and vegetation used by wildlife and people. Even if oil and gas companies abandon these sites, they can take centuries to recover fully. For example, in the Arctic, oil drilling can irreversibly poison the tundra, leaving fields devoid of vegetation and wildlife. Infrastructure such as well pads, roads, and airstrips disrupt habitats and cause significant air and noise pollution for neighbouring communities.

Furthermore, the water requirements for fracking are high and can affect aquatic habitats and water availability for other uses. Natural gas production can also generate large volumes of contaminated water, which, if not properly handled, stored, and treated, can pollute land and water sources. This contaminated water can cause cancer, birth defects, and liver damage, with Black, Brown, Indigenous, and low-income communities disproportionately impacted.

The Biden administration has recently introduced a new rule that addresses the environmental impacts of drilling on public lands by increasing the rates and minimum prices that fossil fuel companies must pay for drilling. This rule aims to hold companies accountable for the toxic messes they leave behind and protect taxpayers' money and the environment.

Gas companies benefit from lax regulation

Firstly, lax regulation allows gas companies to avoid the costs associated with implementing stricter environmental measures. For example, without stringent regulations, companies may not be incentivized to invest in more sustainable drilling technologies or emission-reducing equipment, which can be expensive. This results in higher profit margins for the companies, even if it comes at the cost of environmental degradation.

Secondly, lax regulation provides gas companies with greater operational flexibility and reduced oversight. They are free to make decisions that may prioritize short-term gains over long-term sustainability. For instance, without regulations mandating the repair of methane leaks or limiting methane pollution, gas companies can continue operations without incurring the costs and efforts associated with leak detection and repair.

Additionally, lax regulation enables gas companies to exploit natural resources in environmentally sensitive areas. Without strict environmental standards, companies can access and develop fossil fuel resources in wildlands and public lands, disturbing vegetation, soil, and wildlife habitats. This can lead to irreversible damage to these areas, even if the gas companies eventually abandon the sites.

Furthermore, lax regulation can result in inadequate protection for communities living near gas production facilities. Without stringent emission limits, these communities are exposed to higher levels of pollutants, putting their health and well-being at risk. This is particularly detrimental to marginalized communities, who are already disproportionately affected by pollution due to their proximity to industrial operations.

Finally, lax regulation allows gas companies to shape the regulatory landscape to their advantage. They can lobby for self-regulation or influence the development of voluntary standards, giving them greater control over their operations and potentially delaying or weakening the implementation of stricter environmental measures.

In conclusion, lax regulation provides gas companies with financial and operational benefits, even as it contributes to environmental degradation, community health risks, and delayed progress towards climate goals.

Gas drilling harms wildlife

Gas drilling has been shown to have a detrimental impact on wildlife. There are several ways in which gas drilling harms wildlife and ecosystems. Firstly, the infrastructure and development associated with gas drilling can fragment habitats and disrupt wildlife behaviour. The construction of roads, pipelines, facilities, and drilling sites can destroy large areas of wilderness and vegetation that are crucial for wildlife. This can impede the movement of animals and alter their hunting patterns, leading to an increase in predation. For example, the development of oil and gas fields in Wyoming has disrupted the migration of pronghorn antelope and mule deer, forcing them to navigate past well pads and compressor stations.

Secondly, gas drilling operations generate noise, human movement, and vehicle traffic, which can disturb animal communication, breeding, and nesting. Studies have found that noise from compressor stations has negatively impacted the hunting ability of northern saw-whet owls, with similar effects observed in other acoustically specialized predators. Lights at drilling sites can also affect nocturnal wildlife. The presence of roads and increased traffic can also result in injuries and fatalities for wildlife, as they struggle to avoid large vehicles.

Thirdly, gas drilling can contaminate water sources and pollute land and air. Gas drilling requires large amounts of water, and the improper handling of contaminated water can lead to pollution of water resources. Additionally, drilling can release toxic chemicals and pollutants into the air, affecting both wildlife and nearby human populations. Spills and leaks of drilling fluids and wastewater can have devastating effects on wildlife through direct contact, inhalation, or ingestion of toxic substances. For instance, a pipeline burst in North Dakota in 2015 spilled nearly 3 million gallons of saltwater waste, killing wildlife and damaging ecosystems.

Lastly, gas drilling contributes to climate change through the release of emissions, which further exacerbates the decline of wildlife populations. While there are multiple factors contributing to population decline, the role of the gas industry cannot be denied. Studies have shown that wildlife populations have suffered even in areas where efforts have been made to mitigate the impact of development. The cumulative effects of gas drilling can have ecosystem-wide implications, and the disturbance caused by gas drilling operations can lead to long-lasting harm to wildlife and their habitats.

Natural gas is the cleanest fossil fuel

Natural gas is often touted as the cleanest fossil fuel. Compared to other fossil fuels, it produces fewer harmful emissions. For instance, burning natural gas emits 45% less carbon dioxide than coal, 30% less than oil, and 15% less than wood. It also produces less sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide than oil, and very little sulfur, mercury, or particulate matter. This has led to natural gas being considered a bridge fuel to a cleaner energy system.

Natural gas is also more energy-efficient than other fossil fuels. It has a 92% efficiency rate from wellhead to home, compared to electricity generated by coal, which operates at only a 32% efficiency rate. As a result, natural gas is cost-effective and has become one of the greatest domestic energy sources in the US and Canada.

However, the climate benefits of natural gas are questionable. While it emits less CO2 than other fossil fuels, it still releases CO2 and methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Methane leaks during the extraction, production, and transportation of natural gas can significantly reduce or eliminate its climate benefits. Additionally, the production and drilling of natural gas can have negative environmental impacts, including air and water pollution, soil contamination, and disruption to wildlife and communities.

To address these concerns, organizations like IGS Energy invest in innovation and carbon-offset projects to remove CO2 from the atmosphere. The US Environmental Protection Agency has also established guidelines to reduce methane and other harmful air pollutants in the natural gas industry. As the world transitions to cleaner energy sources, natural gas is seen as a key ingredient, but it is not as clean as wind or solar power.

Frequently asked questions