Ethanol Cars: Pollution Solution Or Environmental Disaster?

Ethanol, a biofuel commonly blended with gasoline, has sparked a debate about its environmental impact. While it is made from plants that absorb carbon dioxide from the air, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, it may not be an effective solution for reducing air pollution. Growing corn for fuel has a significant environmental impact, and increasing the percentage of ethanol in gasoline blends can lead to higher emissions of regulated pollutants, toxic chemicals, and even increased air pollution. The use of ethanol in vehicles is a complex issue that requires careful consideration of its benefits and drawbacks to make informed choices about fuel options and their impact on the environment.

Ethanol cars can increase air pollution

Secondly, while ethanol is often touted as a greener alternative to gasoline, it may not be as environmentally friendly as claimed. A study found that ethanol is at least 24% more carbon-intensive than gasoline due to the amount of farmland required to grow corn and the associated tillage. This contradicts the goals of the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), which aims to reduce emissions and energy dependence on other countries.

Additionally, ethanol can cause increased evaporative emissions in vehicles. Low-level ethanol blends can make gasoline more volatile, leading to higher emissions when the car is parked or refueling. While E85, a high-level ethanol-gasoline blend, has lower evaporative emissions, it still increases acetaldehyde emissions, which are anticipated to be carcinogenic and contribute to ground-level ozone formation.

Ethanol combustion also releases nitrogen oxides and unburned hydrocarbons, which can impact air quality. While E85 has been shown to reduce the formation of ozone-depleting compounds compared to low-sulfur, low-benzene gasoline, it may not be suitable for all vehicles. Ordinary cars may not be compatible with E85, and even with specially engineered flexible fuel vehicles (FFVs), there are concerns about engine damage and reduced fuel efficiency.

In conclusion, while ethanol may offer some environmental benefits, it is not a panacea for air pollution. The production and use of ethanol in vehicles can lead to various forms of air pollution, and its widespread adoption may have unintended consequences for the environment and vehicle performance. Therefore, it is essential to carefully consider the potential drawbacks of ethanol cars and explore a range of alternative solutions to reduce air pollution and combat climate change effectively.

Growing crops for ethanol can increase food prices

The use of ethanol in cars is a highly debated topic, with conflicting evidence about its environmental impact. While some argue that ethanol can help reduce air pollution, others claim that it can increase pollution levels and contribute to food price increases.

Regarding the impact on food prices, the argument centres around the use of corn, the most common raw material for ethanol production in the US, which accounts for about 58% of global ethanol production. The concern is that growing corn for fuel will inevitably lead to higher prices for this staple food crop. This is already happening, with the cost of corn rising due to its use in ethanol production, which was 6% of total domestic consumption in 1990 and increased to 37% in 2008.

The impact of ethanol production on corn prices is complex and influenced by various factors, including the oil crisis, environmental pollution, and government policies. For example, the release of biofuel policies and the increased production of bulk chemicals using corn syrup have contributed to the rise in corn prices since 2019. The strong growth in corn demand has led to increased price pass-through from crude oil to corn.

The connection between ethanol production and corn prices is further supported by the observation that corn-growing capacity is dependent on weather conditions. Poor weather in breadbasket regions, such as droughts and unfavourable growing conditions, can impact corn yields and, consequently, corn prices. Additionally, the demand for corn by the ethanol industry puts pressure on global supplies of edible crops, leading to higher prices for processed and staple foods worldwide.

The increase in corn prices due to ethanol production has a ripple effect on food prices. As corn is used for animal feed, farmers have to pay more to feed their animals, and this cost is passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices for meat, eggs, and dairy products. Additionally, as farmers plant more corn and less wheat and soy, the prices of other food items like cereals and grains also rise.

Ethanol blends can increase evaporative emissions

Ethanol blends, especially low-level blends, can increase evaporative emissions from fuel tanks and dispensing equipment. Evaporative emissions are those that evaporate from fuel in open-air conditions, and they are highly dependent on temperature, vehicle activity, and vehicle system materials. Most of these emissions occur when the car is parked or refueling.

The increase in evaporative emissions from ethanol blends is due to the fact that low levels of ethanol can cause gasoline to evaporate more easily. This leads to a rise in vapor pressure, which can result in more evaporative emissions. However, it is important to note that the vapor pressure of low-level ethanol blends can be adjusted to meet the same volatility standards as gasoline, mitigating this issue.

E85, a high-level blend of 85% ethanol and 15% gasoline, is less volatile than both gasoline and low-level ethanol blends. It results in lower evaporative emissions and also decreases carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Additionally, E85 reduces the emissions of many harmful toxins, such as benzene, a known carcinogen.

While E85 offers these environmental benefits, it is not without its drawbacks. For instance, it increases acetaldehyde emissions, which are "reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen" according to the National Institutes of Health. Furthermore, the production of ethanol, be it from corn, sugarcane, or cellulosic biomass, requires a heat source, and most producers currently use fossil fuels for this process.

Ethanol-gas blends can damage engines

Ethanol-gas blends have been the subject of much debate, with some arguing that they are a viable solution to combat global warming and others claiming that they can cause more harm than good. While it is true that ethanol, being made from plants, does not add additional greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, there are concerns about its impact on engines.

One of the main issues with ethanol-gas blends is their potential to damage engines, especially older ones. Ethanol has hydroscopic qualities, meaning it attracts and mixes with water. At higher concentrations of water, phase separation can occur, leading to the formation of rust and possible engine damage. This is a significant concern for boat engines, as water often gets into the fuel tank, and the ethanol-gas mixture can sink to the bottom, affecting performance or even causing a complete shutdown.

In addition, higher ethanol blends such as E85 have been known to cause accelerated engine wear and failure, as well as fuel-system damage. The American Automobile Association (AAA) has objected to ethanol blend increases beyond 15%, citing these potential issues. Older engines may also be susceptible to degradation of rubber, cork gaskets, and exposed magnesium and aluminum surfaces when using ethanol blends.

While E10 blends are generally considered non-corrosive and safe for newer engines, there are still concerns about their impact on older, pre-1995 engines. Some consumers have reported various problems with using ethanol-blended fuel in these older engines, including compatibility issues and potential damage to engine materials. It is worth noting that both gasoline and ethanol can be corrosive to certain plastics and natural rubber, with straight unleaded gasoline being more corrosive to plastics.

Overall, while ethanol-gas blends may offer some environmental benefits, there are valid concerns about their impact on engines, especially older ones. Comprehensive testing and scientific analysis are needed to fully understand the extent of the damage that higher ethanol blends can cause to engines and emission control systems.

Ethanol is more carbon-intensive than gasoline

Ethanol is a biofuel that has been used as a fuel additive to help gasoline burn more completely and reduce air pollution. However, there is much debate about whether ethanol is a viable solution to reducing carbon emissions.

A study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found that corn-based ethanol, which is mixed in huge quantities into gasoline, is likely a much bigger contributor to global warming than straight gasoline. The study contradicts previous research, showing that ethanol is likely at least 24% more carbon-intensive than gasoline due to the process of harvesting and producing corn-based ethanol, which releases carbon stored in the soil and produces emissions from fertilizers.

The Environmental Working Group's Emily Cassidy wrote that moving from E10 to E30 would lead to "more carbon emissions, more toxic pollutants in drinking water, more toxic algae blooms, and higher water bills for Midwestern residents." The production of corn-based ethanol also has an impact on food prices and can cause damage to engines.

However, some argue that corn ethanol has a lower carbon footprint than gasoline. A comparison of the emissions tied to making and using gasoline and corn ethanol found that the lifecycle carbon intensity of gasoline is about 98.5 g/MJ, while corn ethanol has a lifecycle carbon intensity of about 53.3 g/MJ, making it 46% lower than gasoline. Additionally, the carbon dioxide released when ethanol is used in vehicles is offset by the CO2 removed from the atmosphere by corn plants during their growth.

Furthermore, E85, a high-level gasoline-ethanol blend, is less volatile than gasoline and low-level ethanol blends, resulting in lower evaporative emissions. E85 also decreases the emissions of CO2 and harmful toxics such as benzene, a known carcinogen. While it increases acetaldehyde emissions, which are also anticipated to be a human carcinogen, its benefits in combating global warming are considered to outweigh any impact on ozone pollution.

Frequently asked questions