How Old Cars Impact The Environment

The transport sector is responsible for a significant portion of global energy-related greenhouse gas emissions, with vehicle emissions being a major source of air pollution. As cars age, they tend to become more polluting, and older cars are now a proven major source of air pollution. This is particularly true for cars manufactured before 1980 or 2004, which produce higher amounts of lung-damaging particulate pollution and harmful emissions that drive climate change. These older vehicles also contribute significantly more to smog-forming nitrogen oxide emissions than newer vehicles. The negative impacts of these polluting older vehicles disproportionately affect low-income communities and communities of colour, as they are more likely to be unable to afford a newer, less polluting car.

Old cars are a major source of air pollution

The transport sector is responsible for nearly a quarter of energy-related greenhouse gas emissions globally. Vehicle emissions are a significant source of fine particulate matter and nitrogen oxides, which are major causes of urban air pollution. Older vehicles contribute significantly more to smog-forming nitrogen oxide emissions than newer vehicles. A study in California found that cars and trucks manufactured before 2004 make up only 19% of registered vehicles, yet they are responsible for the majority of tailpipe pollution. This is because they produce higher amounts of lung-damaging particulate pollution and harmful emissions that drive climate change.

The same study found that the harmful environmental, health, and economic impacts of older vehicles disproportionately affect Latino and Black Californians and lower-income households. This is due to historical redlining practices that forced people of color into areas with high rates of toxic tailpipe emissions. As a result, Black and Latino residents are more likely to own older, less fuel-efficient vehicles that negatively impact their health. Additionally, older cars are more expensive to fuel and maintain, further exacerbating the financial burden on these communities.

The issue of ageing cars extends beyond California. In developing countries, the demand for affordable second-hand cars has led to an increase in the export of polluting and outdated vehicles from developed nations. These exported cars often do not meet the safety or emission standards of their countries of origin and may even be stripped of key parts or safety features, such as air filters. This practice undermines the efforts to meet zero-emission targets under the Paris Agreement on climate change.

To address this global issue, clear policies and regulations are necessary. Developed countries should stop exporting vehicles that fail environment and safety inspections, while importing countries should tighten their regulations. Accelerated vehicle retirement (AVR) programs offer a market-based solution by buying and scrapping highly polluting pre-1980 cars. However, the cost-effectiveness of AVR programs has been debated, and their success depends on various factors such as the size, duration, and location of the program.

In conclusion, old cars are a major source of air pollution, and their impact disproportionately affects vulnerable communities. To mitigate this problem, global efforts are needed to regulate the used car trade, promote the transition to cleaner transport systems, and provide affordable access to less polluting vehicles, especially for low-income families.

The trade of old cars from developed to developing countries

Older cars are a proven major source of air pollution, and as cars age, they tend to get dirtier, contributing to an enormous share of total pollution. Many people who own old cars cannot afford to replace them with new ones. This has led to a rise in the demand for affordable, second-hand cars in developing countries. This demand is being met by developed countries exporting old, polluting vehicles, which creates an easy disposal option for these countries.

A 2020 United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) report states that 14 million vehicles were exported to low- and middle-income countries between 2015 and 2018, with more than half ending up in Africa. The European Union, ranked as the largest exporter, sent approximately 7.5 million vehicles abroad. Many of these vehicles do not meet the safety or emission standards of their countries of origin, with some even stripped of key parts or safety features, such as air filters. This has led to a situation where many of the imported vehicles are not roadworthy, resulting in more accidents and fatalities.

The trade in second-hand vehicles has stark consequences for climate change and public health. The UNEP report's authors propose that exporting and importing countries coordinate on a standard for these vehicles. Rob de Jong, head of the Sustainable Mobility Unit at the UNEP, has stated that there is no way the world can meet its zero-emission targets under the Paris Agreement on climate change unless efforts are made to regulate the used car trade.

There are benefits for developed countries to stop this trade as well. Instead of exporting old, polluting vehicles, states could send them to recycling centres, creating jobs and building a circular system that provides recycled raw materials for car manufacturers. As the supply to developing nations shrinks, prices will rise, offering a financial incentive for these countries to increase their own production capacity and lay the groundwork for a transition to cleaner transport systems.

The cost-effectiveness of accelerated vehicle-retirement programs

Older cars are a proven major source of air pollution. However, many people who own old cars cannot afford to replace them with new ones. To address this issue, several public and private entities have implemented accelerated vehicle retirement (AVR) programs, which incentivize owners of older vehicles to scrap them earlier than they otherwise might. These programs are designed to reduce air pollution by taking polluting vehicles off the road.

The effectiveness of AVR programs in reducing air pollution depends on several factors, including how much earlier a vehicle is retired due to the program, how many miles the vehicle would have been driven if it had not been retired, the emissions levels of the retired vehicle, and the emissions levels, remaining life, and vehicle miles traveled by the replacement vehicle (if there is one).

The cost-effectiveness of AVR programs can be analyzed using methodologies that estimate, for a given number of vehicle retirements, the required bounty, the number of retired vehicles that will be replaced, the net effect on vehicle miles traveled and fuel use, the reduction in emissions, and the welfare effects by income level. For example, a program targeting 20-year-old vehicles is likely to be more cost-effective and have less of an impact on used car prices than a program targeting 10-year-old vehicles. Additionally, the design and timing of AVR programs can play a crucial role in meeting multiple policy goals. For instance, policies that increase the annual registration fees of used cars as they get older can help reduce pollution and improve health outcomes, particularly in lower-income neighborhoods.

While AVR programs can be effective in reducing emissions, they may not always have the desired climate impact. For example, buyback programs can make it harder for new fossil fuel cars to enter the market and more profitable to get rid of old ones, but they may still ultimately promote private vehicle ownership. Furthermore, there is a lack of robust assessments of the life cycle energy and environmental effects of various car pricing and taxation instruments, such as graded purchase taxes, vehicle excise duties, and vehicle scrappage incentives.

Overall, AVR programs can be a cost-effective way to reduce air pollution and promote the transition to cleaner transport systems. However, they must be carefully designed and implemented to ensure they meet their intended goals without causing unintended consequences.

The environmental impact on communities of colour

While air pollution has improved in the US over the last 50 years, with emissions from carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, and ozone dropping by 80% since 1970, older cars are a proven major source of air pollution. As cars age, they get dirtier, and a small group of old vehicles is responsible for a large share of total pollution. Many exported used cars would not meet safety or emission standards in their countries of origin, and some are even stripped of key parts or safety features, such as air filters. These vehicles are often sent from developed countries to developing ones, where they contribute to air pollution and expose people to high levels of dangerous fumes.

Communities of color are disproportionately impacted by environmental injustices, including air and water pollution, and are often subject to inequitable living conditions. They are more likely to live near toxic facilities, such as petrochemical companies, and experience higher exposure rates to air pollution than their white, non-Hispanic counterparts. Hispanics, for instance, had the highest exposure rates for 10 out of 14 pollutants in a Yale University study, and African Americans had higher exposure rates than whites for 13 out of the 14 pollutants. People of color are also more vulnerable to heatwaves, extreme weather events, environmental degradation, and the health impacts of climate change.

The environmental justice movement aims to address these issues by ensuring fair treatment for all people, regardless of race, ethnicity, or income, in the laws, regulations, and policies that affect their environment. Organizations like the NAACP's Environmental and Climate Justice Program and the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) are working to rectify past injustices and uphold all people's rights. Local initiatives, such as the Ironbound Community Corporation in Newark, New Jersey, have successfully advocated for an Environmental Justice Ordinance and an Affordable Housing Ordinance to support healthy and equitable community development.

To efficiently reduce pollution from older cars, increasing the annual registration fees for used cars as they get older could be an effective strategy. While this may hurt lower-income families who typically own the oldest cars in the short run, the environmental and health benefits of lower pollution could be higher in lower-income neighborhoods. Additionally, developed countries can contribute by sending old cars to recycling centers instead of exporting them, creating jobs, and building a circular system that provides recycled raw materials for car manufacturers.

The economic impact on low-income households

The economic impact of older cars on low-income households is a complex issue that involves various factors. Firstly, it is important to recognize that older cars are a significant source of air pollution, with higher emissions of carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, and ozone. This has a direct impact on the health and well-being of individuals in low-income households, who are more likely to own older, more polluting vehicles. To address this issue, some have suggested increasing the annual registration fees for older cars, but this may hurt low-income families in the short term as they typically own the oldest cars. However, the environmental and health benefits of reduced pollution could be more significant in these communities.

The relationship between car ownership and economic mobility among low-income households is well-established. Access to a car enables individuals to seek employment opportunities more easily, increasing their chances of gaining and retaining employment, working more hours, and earning higher incomes. This is especially true in suburban areas where jobs may be less accessible without a car and in cities with limited public transportation. As a result, car ownership can help low-income individuals and families improve their economic situation and even leave welfare programs.

However, this creates a dilemma for transportation planners and policymakers. While promoting car ownership among low-income households can enhance their economic prospects, it also contributes to the negative externalities associated with increased car dependence, including environmental pollution and climate change. This conflict between economic mobility and environmental sustainability presents a challenge that requires innovative solutions.

One possible solution is to promote the adoption of used low- and zero-emission vehicles among low-income households. This approach can improve their economic situation while minimizing the environmental impact. However, this requires tightening regulations on the import and export of used vehicles to ensure they meet safety and emission standards. Additionally, financial incentives and recycling initiatives can encourage the transition to cleaner transport systems, such as electric mobility.

In conclusion, the economic impact of older cars on low-income households is multifaceted. While older cars may contribute to financial constraints and negative health outcomes due to higher pollution levels, car ownership is also a pathway to improved economic opportunities and social mobility for low-income individuals. Balancing these factors requires comprehensive policies that address both environmental sustainability and social equity, ensuring that low-income households can access affordable, cleaner transportation options that support their economic aspirations without compromising the planet's health.

Frequently asked questions