Cargo Ships: Ocean Polluters Or Sustainable Transport?

The cargo shipping industry is facing increasing pressure to reduce its environmental impact, as it is responsible for a significant amount of ocean pollution. With sea freight representing 80% of global trades, the large carbon footprint of cargo ships is a pressing issue. Cargo ships emit high levels of carbon dioxide, nitrous oxides, sulphur oxides, and particulate matter, contributing to oceanic acidification and the deaths of marine life. In addition to air pollution, cargo ships also contribute to water pollution through ballast water discharge, waste disposal, and oil spills. While some companies are taking initiatives to adopt more sustainable practices, the industry as a whole is facing challenges in transitioning to greener alternatives.

Cargo ships emit toxic chemicals, causing acid rain and water pollution

The shipping industry is responsible for a significant amount of global emissions, with cargo ships being the main contributor. Cargo ships emit various pollutants, including carbon dioxide, nitrous oxides, and sulphur oxides. These emissions have detrimental effects on the environment, causing acid rain and contributing to water pollution.

Nitrous oxides and sulphur oxides are highly toxic chemicals released by cargo ships that are proven causes of acid rain. Acid rain has harmful effects on aquatic ecosystems, increasing the acidity of water bodies and causing damage to marine life and vegetation. This, in turn, affects coastal nations that depend on healthy aquatic ecosystems for resources.

Cargo ships also contribute to water pollution through the discharge of ballast water, which often contains biological materials such as plants, animals, viruses, and bacteria. These materials can include invasive species that cause ecological and economic damage to aquatic ecosystems. Additionally, cargo ships are responsible for plastic pollution, with shipping identified as a key contributor to global plastic pollution. Containers lost due to extreme weather, operational errors, and improper waste management result in the introduction of large quantities of plastic debris into the marine environment.

The use of bunker fuel, a type of low-grade ship fuel oil with high sulphur content, further exacerbates the problem. While it is economical, it is also highly polluting. The emissions from bunker fuel contribute to air pollution and have severe health impacts, causing lung and heart diseases, as well as childhood asthma.

There have been efforts to reduce ship emissions and improve environmental standards, but the progress has been slow. Some shipping companies are investing in sustainable alternatives, such as green methanol, to reduce their environmental impact. However, the shipping industry continues to face challenges in decarbonization due to the lack of widely available commercial-scale green fuel options.

Bunker fuel is highly polluting, yet widely used

Bunker fuel, also known as fuel oil, is a highly polluting fuel that is commonly used in the shipping industry. It is the cheap residue left over after crude oil has been refined into gasoline, diesel, and kerosene. This fuel is very economical, but it has a high environmental cost.

Bunker fuel is pitch black and thick, with a consistency similar to molasses. It is loaded with sulphur, and when burned, it releases sulphur oxides (SOx), nitrous oxides (NOx), and fine particles that are harmful to human health and the environment. These gases and particles contribute to air pollution and are proven causes of acid rain. A single large container ship using bunker fuel can produce as much pollution as 50 million cars, and just 15 of these ships can emit as much pollution as all 760 million cars in the world.

The shipping industry relies on bunker fuel because it is cheap, enabling the massive shipping of goods worldwide. However, this fuel has severe environmental and health impacts. Studies have shown that pollution from cargo ships leads to 60,000 deaths per year and causes up to 6.4 million cases of childhood asthma annually. The health costs associated with shipping emissions are substantial, with the Danish government's environmental agency estimating a cost of £5 billion per year for treating cancers and heart problems.

Despite the known negative impacts of bunker fuel, it continues to be widely used due to its low cost. While some regulations have been implemented to reduce bunker fuel usage near coastlines, such as the North American Emissions Control Area, ships often switch back to burning bunker fuel once they leave these designated areas. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) has also adopted voluntary practices and encouraged the exploration of renewable energy sources, but environmentalists argue that these steps are not aggressive enough.

The high pollution levels caused by bunker fuel have led to increasing pressure on governments and organizations to tighten laws governing ship emissions and take more decisive action to curb the problems associated with this highly polluting fuel.

Greenhouse gas emissions from ships contribute to climate change

Greenhouse gas emissions from cargo ships contribute significantly to climate change. The shipping industry is the backbone of international trade, making it possible to transport goods worldwide. However, it is also highly carbon-intensive, with ships running on fossil fuels and emitting large amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxides (NOx), and sulphur oxides (SOx). These emissions have detrimental effects on both human health and the environment.

According to estimates, the shipping industry is responsible for about 3% of global greenhouse gas emissions, which is comparable to the emissions from the aviation industry. At current growth rates, this percentage could increase to 10% by 2050. The issue is exacerbated by the fact that most shipping emissions occur on the open seas, beyond national borders, making it a challenge to implement effective regulations and reductions.

The environmental impact of these emissions is significant. Carbon dioxide emissions contribute to oceanic acidification, which puts marine ecosystems at risk and reduces fish populations. Additionally, air pollution from ships is estimated to cause hundreds of thousands of deaths annually, with increased cases of lung and heart diseases, cancer, and asthma.

To address these concerns, there have been efforts to implement international shipping regulations. For example, new regulations introduced in 2020 drastically cut sulfur emissions from ships, improving air quality. However, this also led to an unintended warming effect, as the reduction in sulfur emissions eliminated the cooling impact of reflective clouds formed by sulfur emissions.

To mitigate the contribution of the shipping industry to climate change, various measures have been proposed. These include reducing ship speeds, improving energy efficiency, and transitioning to cleaner fuels. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) has set targets to reduce emissions by 20%-30% by 2030 and achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by or around 2050.

Shipping noise pollution harms marine life

Cargo ships are a major source of pollution, with the shipping industry representing up to 3% of global emissions and 10% of transport emissions. The environmental impact of cargo ships extends beyond carbon dioxide emissions, as they also release nitrous oxides and sulphur oxides, which are highly toxic chemicals that contribute to acid rain and ocean acidification.

However, the impact of noise pollution from cargo ships on marine life is often overlooked. Ocean noise, or anthropogenic noise, is an invisible but powerful disruptor of marine life. Cargo vessels produce very low-frequency sounds that can travel hundreds of kilometres underwater. As shipping operates day and night, the constant drone masks the natural soundscape of the sea, interfering with essential biological and ecological processes. Marine mammals rely on underwater sounds for vital life functions such as searching for prey, avoiding predators, locating their offspring, and finding a mate. The increase in ambient noise from shipping can make it difficult for them to perform these tasks, leading to changes in behaviour, physiology, and reproduction cycles, and ultimately, increased mortality rates.

The impact of noise pollution on marine life has been observed in various studies. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic when there was a decrease in shipping traffic, marine mammals returned to their original habitats, and some fish populations thrived due to decreased fishing pressure. Additionally, the population of cetaceans (whales and dolphins) has declined in areas prone to noise pollution from ships.

To address the issue of shipping noise pollution, several solutions have been proposed:

• Stricter noise regulations in shipping lanes and incentives for noise-reducing technologies can promote industry-wide change.
• Ship designs that reduce propeller noise can help mitigate noise pollution, but these designs are often costly and lack regulatory support.
• Slower shipping speeds and rerouting vessels away from sensitive marine ecosystems can reduce the impact of noise on marine life.
• Acoustic "curtains" can be installed to lower the volume of anthropogenic noise.
• Scientific research and education are crucial for protecting marine ecosystems from noise pollution. Students can study the effects of sound pollution and work on conservation projects to address this issue.

Plastic pollution from cargo ships is a major issue, with illegal dumping occurring

Cargo ships are a major contributor to the pollution of the ocean. They are responsible for the emission of carbon dioxide, nitrous oxides, and sulphur oxides, which have detrimental effects on marine life and human health. The shipping industry represents up to 3% of global emissions and 10% of transport emissions. The demand for shipping is rising, and without intervention, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) predicts a 50% to 250% increase in emissions by 2050.

In addition to air pollution, cargo ships also contribute significantly to water pollution. They release ballast water, biocides, sewage, and garbage into the ocean. Oil spills, in particular, have devastating consequences for marine ecosystems. Despite regulations such as the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, or MARPOL, illegal dumping of plastic waste by cargo ships remains a significant issue.

Plastic pollution from cargo ships is a pressing concern, with studies indicating that ships are responsible for a substantial amount of the plastic pollution in the ocean. Approximately 20% of global plastic pollution originates from oceanic sources, and shipping is a key contributor. This includes cargo losses due to extreme weather, operational errors, and inconsistent securing standards, as well as illegal dumping of plastic waste.

The Great Pacific Garbage Patch and Inaccessible Island serve as stark reminders of the impact of plastic pollution from shipping activities. In 2018, researchers collected 2,580 plastic bottles from a kilometre of beach on Inaccessible Island, with 73% of the accumulated bottles originating from China. This study contradicted the common assumption that most ocean garbage flows from rivers on land.

The plastic pollution from cargo ships has severe consequences for marine life and ecosystems. Plastics can cause entanglement and ingestion risks, affecting the mobility, respiration, and feeding behaviours of marine species. As larger plastic debris breaks down into microplastics, they disperse throughout the marine environment, absorbing toxic substances and acting as carriers for persistent organic pollutants. These microplastics can then be ingested by marine organisms, potentially impacting their health and the health of human consumers.

Frequently asked questions