Green Words: Less Pollution, More Expression

Food production has a significant impact on the environment, contributing to water scarcity, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions. Plant-based foods generally have a lower environmental impact than animal-based foods, with fruits, vegetables, whole grains, beans, peas, nuts, and lentils requiring less energy, land, and water. Meat production, particularly beef and lamb, has a higher carbon footprint and contributes to methane emissions, a potent greenhouse gas. Agriculture and fishing often displace native wildlife, and certain fishing methods, such as bottom trawling, can destroy ocean floor ecosystems. Sugarcane and palm oil production contribute to deforestation, while fast food and processed foods generate significant waste and plastic pollution. Shifting towards plant-rich diets and choosing sustainable seafood can help reduce the environmental impact of food systems.

Fossil fuels are the most polluting sector

The energy sector, particularly fossil fuel-based power plants, is a major contributor to air pollution. The transportation sector, including vehicles that burn fossil fuels, is another large emitter. In addition to carbon dioxide, fossil fuel power plants release other hazardous pollutants such as nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide.

The fashion industry is another highly polluting sector, responsible for about 10% of global carbon emissions. Fast fashion, in particular, has a significant environmental impact due to the use of cheap materials, frequent discarding of clothing, excessive water usage, and chemical pollution from synthetic dyes. The manufacturing of polyester, a popular fabric in the fast-fashion industry, relies on fossil fuels, and the washing of polyester clothing releases microplastics into the water system.

To tackle the climate crisis, it is crucial to decarbonize the most polluting industries and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Shifting energy sources from fossil fuels to renewable power is necessary to stabilize the climate. Electric vehicles, alternative fuels, and initiatives like the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) are helping to reduce emissions in the transportation sector. In Europe, regulation, developments in manufacturing, and environmental initiatives have contributed to a decrease in industrial pollution.

Fashion industry: 10% of carbon footprint

While it is challenging to pinpoint industries that create less pollution, as it depends on various factors and specific practices within each sector, some sectors are undoubtedly more polluting than others. The fashion industry, for instance, is a significant contributor to global pollution, accounting for about 10% of the world's carbon emissions. This percentage translates into 1.2 billion tonnes of carbon emissions annually, more than all international flights and maritime shipping combined.

The fast fashion business model, which involves rapidly designing, producing, distributing, and marketing inexpensive garments that mimic the latest trends, is a key driver of the industry's environmental impact. This high-turnover approach results in the frequent discarding of clothes, with 92 million tonnes of textile waste generated each year. The perception of clothing as disposable has led to a culture of overconsumption and overproduction, with clothing production doubling in the first decade and a half of the 21st century.

The environmental consequences of the fashion industry extend beyond carbon emissions. It is the second-largest consumer of water, requiring 700 gallons of water for a cotton shirt and 2,000 gallons for a pair of jeans. The industry pollutes freshwater resources, with textile dyeing and finishing processes contributing to 20% of global clean water pollution and synthetic fabrics releasing millions of microplastics into aquatic ecosystems with every wash. Additionally, the industry contributes to air pollution through CO2 emissions during manufacturing and transportation, as well as microfibre pollution.

To address the fashion industry's substantial carbon footprint, a multifaceted approach is necessary. Individual consumers can play a role by buying less, extending the lifespan of garments, and shopping second-hand. Brands, on the other hand, need to reduce the number of collections they release, switch to renewable energy in factories, and reduce the use of polyester and synthetic fabrics. By combining these individual and collective actions, we can work towards decreasing the fashion industry's considerable contribution to global carbon emissions.

Transport: one-fifth of GHG emissions

Greenhouse gas emissions from transport currently account for around one-fifth of global emissions. While this varies by country, it is a significant contributor to climate change.

Some countries have implemented measures to reduce transport emissions. For example, Norway's capital, Oslo, has a sustainable public transport system that runs entirely on renewable energy, aiming to be emission-free by 2028. Similarly, Helsinki in Finland is investing heavily in public transport to make it so efficient and comfortable that citizens will not feel the need to own private vehicles, with a goal of becoming a car-free city by 2025.

Other countries have also taken steps to reduce emissions. Colombia and Indonesia have implemented public transport programmes, while companies can turn to projects like U-Earth's Pure Air Zone, a biotech solution that uses natural bacteria and enzymes to capture and neutralise air contaminants.

It is worth noting that the world's most polluted countries are not always the ones that emit the most pollution. For instance, China ranks fifth for deaths per capita due to air pollution, partly due to its high population density, while the US, which ranks poorly on carbon dioxide emissions due to high per-person electricity consumption, has one of the lowest death rates attributed to air pollution.

Overall, while transport emissions contribute significantly to global GHG emissions, some countries are taking steps to reduce their environmental impact and create less pollution. These initiatives can serve as models for other nations working towards lowering their carbon footprint.

Construction: air, water, soil, light, noise pollution

While it is important to identify the most polluting industries to decarbonize and reduce emissions, it is also crucial to examine specific practices within these sectors that contribute to environmental degradation. Construction sites, for instance, are often associated with various forms of pollution, including air, water, soil, light, and noise pollution, which can have significant impacts on both the environment and human health.

Air pollution is a prominent issue in construction, with airborne contaminants such as particulate matter (PM10), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), asbestos, and gases like carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides spreading around the surrounding areas, carried by wind. These contaminants can have detrimental effects on the respiratory health of nearby residents.

Water pollution is another concern, as surface water runoff and groundwater near construction sites can become contaminated with construction materials, VOCs, paints, glues, diesel, oils, toxic chemicals, and cement. This pollution can affect local water sources, impacting both wildlife and residents who rely on these water bodies for their daily needs.

Soil pollution is also a significant issue in construction. The physico-chemical properties of soil can be altered due to air transport and deposition of construction contaminants, as well as water runoff carrying pollutants. Soil can act as a sink for these pollutants, with some persisting over long periods, affecting the quality of the land and potentially impacting nearby vegetation and ecosystems.

Light pollution is a unique aspect of construction sites, where temporary lighting and floodlights can cause excessive or obtrusive illumination. This can disrupt the breeding patterns of nocturnal animals and insects, impact the migration of birds, and even affect human health by disrupting natural body cycles, such as sleep.

Noise pollution, a well-known byproduct of construction, can have immediate effects on sleep patterns, causing stress, fatigue, and impaired cognitive functions. It can also impact children's academic performance and overall development, as well as disturb local wildlife that relies on sound for communication and navigation.

To mitigate these issues, various strategies can be employed. For air and water pollution, proper management and containment of construction contaminants are essential. Soil pollution can be addressed through effective surface water management and erosion control measures. Light pollution can be reduced by following guidelines such as screening, directional lighting, and using lights only when necessary. Finally, noise pollution can be minimized by using quieter machinery, limiting working hours, and implementing sound dampening panels.

While construction is necessary for infrastructure development, addressing these pollution concerns is crucial to minimize the industry's environmental footprint and protect the health and well-being of surrounding communities.

Mining and ore processing

While there are no industries that are entirely pollution-free, some sectors are making strides towards sustainability and reducing their environmental impact. For instance, the use of electric vehicles is on the rise, and tech companies are increasingly adopting renewable energy sources. Sustainable practices like plant-based diets and plastic-free shopping are also gaining popularity.

The mining and ore processing industry is responsible for significant environmental and health impacts due to the various pollutants released during its operations. These pollutants contaminate freshwater sources, leading to water pollution, and also contribute to air pollution.

Waste products are the primary source of pollution from both active and abandoned mining sites. This waste includes wastewater, waste rock, tailings, process solutions, and processed ore. The waste contains chemicals such as chlorides, sulfur compounds, acids, lime, soda ash, and cyanide compounds. When improperly managed, these toxins can seep into groundwater, surface water, and soil, ultimately affecting agricultural activities and the health of surrounding populations.

For example, lead toxins in mining waste and tailings can cause reduced IQ, neurological damage, anaemia, physical growth deficiencies, nerve diseases, memory loss, kidney disorders, and headaches. Mercury emissions from gold mining and arsenic emissions from smelting metals are also significant contributors to air pollution.

To address these issues, the mining industry has engaged with the Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM) policy framework, which aims to minimise the adverse impacts of chemicals on the environment and human health. The International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM) has implemented the Sustainable Development Framework, which its members are required to follow. Additionally, the EU's Industrial Emissions Directive aims to reduce pollutant emissions and minimise their harmful effects.

Frequently asked questions