Air Pollution Masks: Effective Chemical Protection?

Air pollution is a serious issue that affects people worldwide, causing an estimated 3 million excess deaths each year. It is composed of particles and gases, including carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). With the increasing levels of air pollution, especially in urban areas, many people are turning to masks as a solution to reduce their exposure to harmful pollutants. But do these masks actually work against chemicals? This question is particularly important as the effectiveness of masks depends on various factors, such as the type of pollutant, the mask itself, and how it is used.

Do air pollution masks work against chemicals?

N95 masks are effective against air pollution

Air pollution is a global crisis that affects the health and well-being of millions of people worldwide. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that around 4.2 million premature deaths occur annually due to outdoor air pollution. As urbanization and industrialization continue to increase, air pollution remains a pressing concern.

N95 masks, also known as N95 respirators, are a type of personal protective equipment (PPE) designed to filter out airborne particles, including bacteria and viruses. The "N95" designation means the mask can filter out at least 95% of airborne particles, including particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), ozone (O3), and carbon monoxide (CO). N95 masks are designed to form a tight seal against the wearer's face, ensuring that air passes through the filter material and not around the edges of the mask.

While N95 masks are highly effective at filtering out airborne particles, they have limited protection against gases commonly found in air pollution, such as NO2, SO2, and O3. This is because gas molecules are smaller than particulate matter and can more easily penetrate the mask's filter. To enhance protection against gases, N95 masks can be combined with additional features such as activated charcoal, which helps reduce exposure to gases. However, these combination masks tend to be more expensive.

The effectiveness of N95 masks in reducing the harmful effects of air pollution also depends on user compliance. N95 masks can be uncomfortable for extended periods due to their design, which can restrict airflow and cause heat and moisture buildup. As a result, people may be less inclined to wear them consistently or correctly, reducing their overall protection against air pollution. Despite this drawback, N95 masks are still considered an effective tool for protecting oneself from the ill effects of air pollution when worn correctly and consistently.

Carbon masks are also effective

Activated carbon masks have been found to be particularly effective in reducing carbon monoxide (CO) levels. A study conducted on non-smokers around Universitas Sumatera Utara showed that the use of carbon masks, along with surgical and N95 masks, significantly reduced expiratory carbon monoxide levels after 8 hours of usage. Another study comparing the effectiveness of masks in reducing COx exposure found that masks with an activated carbon combination material had significantly lower COx levels compared to not wearing a mask or using masks made from other materials.

The ability of activated carbon to adsorb various chemicals is also beneficial in healthcare settings, specifically in preventing the inhalation of anticancer drugs by healthcare workers. Japanese guidelines recommend the use of N95 masks or other permeability-resistant masks, which often include activated carbon, when handling anticancer drug preparations.

Additionally, carbon masks can be combined with other materials to enhance their effectiveness. For example, a study found that masks made from a combination of activated carbon, spunbond, and meltblown materials outperformed masks made from spunbond and meltblown materials alone in absorbing toxic gases like COx, NOx, and SOx.

Surgical masks are not as effective

While surgical masks are effective in blocking splashes and large-particle droplets, they are not as effective as N95 respirators. Surgical masks are loose-fitting, disposable devices that create a physical barrier between the mouth and nose of the wearer and potential contaminants in the immediate environment. However, the gaps between the skin and the edges of the mask make it less effective at safeguarding against small particles in the air.

Surgical masks are not designed to form a seal around the nose and mouth, which means that unfiltered air can bypass the mask and reduce its effectiveness against pollutants. In contrast, N95 respirators are designed to achieve a very close facial fit and efficient filtration of airborne particles. The edges of the respirator form a seal around the nose and mouth, maximising protection.

The level of protection provided by a mask depends on the quality of its design, materials, and fit. N95 respirators, reusable valved filtering masks, and carbon-layer masks can reduce the load of particles by 60–80%, while surgical and cloth masks are less effective, achieving efficiencies of 25–60%. Surgical masks are ideal for settings with airborne pathogens, such as hospitals, but they are not as effective at protecting against outdoor air pollution.

The ordinary surgical masks are not effective in filtering PM2.5, and their loose fit allows gaps between the skin and the edges of the mask. Cloth masks may also be ineffective in filtering fine particulate matter (PM2.5) or toxic gases. Additionally, masks can become less effective in humid conditions due to moisture buildup, and discomfort or difficulty breathing may lead individuals to remove them, exposing themselves to pollutants.

Simple dust masks are useless

The effectiveness of simple dust masks, such as inexpensive disposable paper-filter masks, is limited to protection against ordinary dust and pollen. These masks are designed to filter out airborne particles and are rated according to the amount of particles they can filter. For example, a mask rated 95 will stop 95% of airborne particles that are 0.3 microns in size and larger.

However, the pore sizes in cloth and surgical masks typically range from 80 to 500 microns, which is significantly larger than particular matter (PM) in the nano-micro range, such as nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), and bacteria. As a result, cloth and surgical masks are ineffective against PM less than 80 microns and provide no protection against nano-micron particles.

While simple dust masks can offer some protection against larger particles like pollen, dust, or hair, they are useless against smaller particles in the nano-micro range, including chemical pollutants. These masks are not designed to protect against chemical exposure, and their large pore sizes render them ineffective in filtering out harmful substances.

Therefore, it is important to understand the limitations of simple dust masks. They are not suitable for protection against chemical or biological hazards and should not be relied upon in such situations. In the event of a chemical emergency or exposure to hazardous substances, specialized equipment, such as gas masks with activated charcoal filters, may be required to ensure effective protection.

HEPA filter masks are a good option

The CDC recommends the use of HEPA filters in healthcare settings, especially during renovations or repairs when negative-pressure rooms may not be available. HEPA filters have gained popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic due to their ability to reduce the airborne spread of viruses, including SARS-CoV-2.

One example of a HEPA filter mask is the NXTGEN EasyFlow Mask, which offers Level 3 replacement filters without valve hole filters. These filters can be reused for up to 40 hours of intermittent use or 8 hours of continuous use. The mask features a tight seal with a silicone elastomeric face gasket, ensuring a snug fit around the nose and mouth.

Another option is the CHEMBAYO Chemical/Biological Escape Mask, which is specifically designed for emergency evacuation involving chemical and biological agents. It provides short-term protection against low concentrations of various chemical and biological toxins, including nerve and blood agents. The multi-layer filter includes an external polyester screen, a high-efficiency particle filter (HEPA), activated charcoal to absorb acidic gases, plain charcoal cloth for organic gases, and a soft inner pad for comfort.

Frequently asked questions