Stream Pollution: Can Nature Recover From Human Impact?

Streams are vulnerable to pollution from a variety of sources, including agricultural runoff, sewage, and industrial waste. This pollution has a detrimental impact on the plants, animals, and people that depend on these water sources. However, there is hope for streams to recover from pollution through a combination of regulatory action, technological advancements, and individual efforts. While streams may naturally recover from pollution over millions of years, human intervention is necessary to accelerate this process and mitigate the harmful effects of pollution on the environment and human health.

Point-source pollution from farms, factories, and sewage plants

Streams can recover from pollution, but it is a slow process. According to theories of evolution, even a stream filled with toxic industrial chemicals may eventually be able to support life, but it will take millions of years.

Factories, including oil refineries, pulp and paper mills, and chemical, electronics, and automobile manufacturers, often discharge pollutants into water bodies, either directly or through sewage treatment plants. These discharges, called effluents, can contain harmful chemicals and toxins. Some factories treat their effluents before releasing them, while others do not, leading to water pollution and unsafe drinking water.

Sewage treatment plants themselves are also a common type of point source. While they treat human waste, the treated effluent they release into streams and rivers can still contain pollutants. Additionally, during heavy rains, combined sewer systems can overflow, discharging untreated sewage and stormwater directly into nearby water bodies, causing severe damage to human health and the environment.

To control point-source pollution, regulations such as the Clean Water Act and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) have been established. These regulations require factories, sewage treatment plants, and other point sources to obtain permits and use the latest technologies to treat their effluents before discharge.

Nonpoint-source pollution from urban runoff and stormwater

Urbanization increases the variety and volume of pollutants that are carried into bodies of water. In urban and suburban areas, most of the land surface is covered by buildings, pavement, and compacted landscapes. These surfaces do not allow rain and snowmelt to soak into the ground, which increases stormwater runoff. Urban stormwater and snowmelt pollution significantly contribute to the deterioration of surface water quality. Vehicular transportation-related activities and metallic building envelopes are among the major sources of pollution.

The sources of such pollution have been studied for the past 50 years, with the vehicular transportation sector and atmospheric deposition identified early as the major polluters. The pollutants from urban runoff include oil, grease, and toxic chemicals from motor vehicles; pesticides and nutrients from lawns and gardens; viruses, bacteria, and nutrients from pet waste and failing septic systems; heavy metals from roof shingles, motor vehicles, and other sources; and thermal pollution from impervious surfaces such as streets and rooftops.

These pollutants can have far-reaching and detrimental effects on the environment and human health. They can harm fish and wildlife populations, kill native vegetation, foul drinking water sources, and make recreational areas unsafe and unpleasant. For example, bacteria and urban pollutants can endanger human health, leading to beach closures. Trash that makes its way into the ocean can be ingested by marine animals or entangled around their bodies.

Urban runoff also contains a mixture of cancer-causing chemicals (carcinogenic hydrocarbons) deposited by cars, buses, and trucks on roadways. These toxins include chemicals like hexane, cyclohexane, benzene, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), formaldehyde, methanol, acrolein, 1,3-butadiene, and acetaldehyde, as well as lead. These chemicals are known to cause cancer, birth defects, and immune suppression in humans, and they are likely to have similar effects on aquatic life, such as fish and birds.

Nutrient pollution from excess nitrogen and phosphorus

The impacts of HABs on human health are significant. Exposure to these blooms can cause skin rashes, liver and kidney damage, neurological issues, and respiratory problems. Additionally, nitrates, a form of nitrogen found in fertilizers, can contaminate drinking water sources, particularly in agricultural areas, posing serious health risks, especially to infants.

Nonpoint source pollution, which is challenging to address, contributes significantly to nutrient pollution. Contaminants from nonpoint sources enter waterbodies from locations that are difficult to identify, as they come from multiple places simultaneously. Rainwater can carry nutrients for thousands of miles through river and stream systems, dispersing the negative impacts of nutrient pollution far from their source.

Despite the challenges, states are taking action to combat nutrient pollution. For example, the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program is a voluntary initiative that encourages farmers to implement conservation measures to protect water quality. Additionally, states like Vermont and Wisconsin are introducing legislation to address agricultural waste and fertilizer use, aiming to prevent excess nutrients from entering waterways. These efforts are crucial in maintaining the health of aquatic ecosystems and ensuring safe drinking water for their residents.

Addressing nutrient pollution from excess nitrogen and phosphorus requires a combination of regulatory measures, agricultural best practices, and public awareness. By implementing conservation measures, improving wastewater treatment processes, and reducing nutrient runoff, we can work towards mitigating the harmful effects of nutrient pollution on our streams, rivers, and public health.

Radioactive waste from uranium mining and nuclear power plants

The Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978 was enacted to address the disposal and regulation of radioactive waste, overseen by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This legislation was established in response to issues caused by improper waste disposal, such as the use of waste rock and mill tailings in construction, resulting in radiation hazards for occupants and passersby. The act sets limits on radium levels in soil from mill tailings and includes health and environmental protection standards.

The extraction of uranium from rock, regardless of the method, results in radioactive waste. Uranium milling, for instance, involves crushing and processing uranium-containing ore, followed by the addition of chemicals to dissolve the uranium. The resulting solid and liquid wastes are radioactive and contain hazardous chemicals. Uranium mining and milling operations have left a legacy of contaminated sites, particularly on Navajo lands, where populations have been exposed to radioactive dust and contaminated water sources.

Nuclear power plants also contribute to radioactive waste. The spent fuel rods used in the nuclear power generation process are highly radioactive and require cooling in large pools of water for 7 to 10 years before being transferred to dry storage casks. The final step for the disposal of this high-level waste is burial in a geologic repository deep underground. However, the lack of such repositories in the United States has led to on-site storage at reactor facilities.

The environmental impact of radioactive waste from uranium mining and nuclear power plants is significant. Radioactive particles from mill waste can be carried by wind to populated areas, and uranium's decay products, such as radium, can contaminate water supplies. Additionally, the disposal of uranium mining waste in the past has resulted in groundwater contamination and the release of radioactive gases like radon.

Oil pollution from land-based and sea-based sources

Streams can recover from pollution, but it is a slow process. Even with human intervention, it can take years for a stream to recover from an oil spill or other forms of pollution. Oil pollution is a significant threat to the health of the world's oceans and the life within them. Oil pollution from land-based sources, such as agricultural runoff, plastic waste, and industrial discharges, accounts for approximately 80% of marine pollution. This includes urban runoff, with water rushing over impermeable surfaces like roads and into gutters, carrying pollutants from cars and other vehicles into nearby streams.

Land-based runoff is the top source of oil in the sea, and it has increased significantly in the past two decades. Oil flows from cities, highways, and vehicles into rivers and oceans. This is supported by a report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, which states that land-based runoff is the main source of oil in North American waters, with natural seeps and oil spills being the second and third largest sources.

Oil pollution from sea-based sources, such as oil spills and discharge from oil and gas operations, further exacerbates the problem. Oil spills, in particular, have received significant media attention, with images of seabirds covered in crude oil making headlines. While these incidents are indeed devastating, it is important to recognize that land-based runoff is a more significant contributor to the overall oil pollution in our oceans.

To address this issue, individuals can play a role by reducing their fossil fuel consumption, using more electric vehicles, and improving fuel efficiency and car maintenance. Additionally, governments and industries must take responsibility and implement measures to prevent and reduce the impacts of oil pollution on the marine environment.

Frequently asked questions