Trump's Policies: Air Pollution's Worst Friend?

Despite claims by the Trump administration that it is committed to protecting the nation's air, there is significant evidence to suggest that Trump's policies are contributing to air pollution in the US. The administration has been accused of rolling back environmental protections and ignoring climate change, which is expected to lead to an increase in air pollution and negative health outcomes for Americans, particularly those from minority communities. While some sources point to improvements in air quality during Trump's presidency, others argue that these gains are despite his policies, not because of them. With the US already experiencing the detrimental effects of air pollution, it remains to be seen whether Trump's approach will ultimately improve or worsen the situation.

Trump's EPA is ending 'environmental justice'

In 2025, the Trump administration was accused of ending environmental justice by cutting environmental justice programs at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Justice (DOJ). Over 1,000 "probationary" employees at the EPA, many of whom worked on climate change programs, were notified that they could face immediate termination. The administration also suspended all environmental litigation and sidelined senior career section chiefs at the DOJ who oversaw the natural resources, environmental enforcement, appellate, and environmental crimes sections.

These actions were criticized by environmental groups, who argued that they would expose Americans to more deadly pollution and roll back decades of progress in improving air quality. The Trump administration's approach to air pollution regulation was characterized by a focus on deregulation and cutting climate protections. The administration argued that environmental regulations were burdensome to businesses and stifled economic growth. However, this rhetoric was contradicted by economic research, which found no evidence that environmental regulations "kill jobs."

Despite claims of improving air quality, data from the American Lung Association's 2025 State of the Air report revealed that 46% of the US population was living in areas with unhealthy levels of ozone or particle pollution. This issue was particularly prominent in California, with Los Angeles, Visalia, and Bakersfield leading the rankings of metros most affected by ozone pollution. The report also highlighted the disproportionate impact of air pollution on Hispanic communities, who were almost three times more likely than white people to live in areas with failing air quality grades.

The Trump administration's stance on air pollution and environmental justice was influenced by reports from organizations like the Heritage Foundation, which disputed the link between air pollution and negative health outcomes. However, this contradicted decades of scientific research establishing the connection between air pollution and various health issues, including asthma, respiratory infections, and permanent lung damage.

Overall, the actions taken by the Trump administration through the EPA and DOJ reflected a prioritization of economic interests over environmental protection and justice, potentially compromising the health and well-being of Americans, especially those from marginalized communities.

Trump's policies are encouraging more pollution

Trump's EPA has announced plans to repeal a barrage of clean air and water regulations, including rules limiting harmful air pollution from cars and power plants, restrictions on the emission of mercury, and clean water protections for rivers and streams. These regulations were set to save the lives of nearly 200,000 people in the years ahead and deliver at least $254 billion in economic benefits annually via lowered healthcare costs and fewer sick days. Despite this, the Trump administration has claimed that repealing these regulations will roll back trillions in regulatory costs and hidden 'taxes' on US families.

The Trump administration is also attempting to severely shrink the EPA, firing hundreds of employees and drawing up plans to remove as many as 1,155 scientists while dissolving the agency's office of research and development. This will almost certainly result in weakened enforcement of pollution regulations. Furthermore, the EPA has informed businesses that they can request exemptions from certain pollution regulations, opening a back door for polluters.

The impact of these policies will be felt most strongly by minority communities, particularly Black and Hispanic communities, which have long endured the harmful effects of pollution due to historical injustices. For example, a $20 million EPA grant for San Diego's Barrio Logan, a predominantly Latino community with high rates of asthma, has been cut, resulting in the cancellation of programs to improve air quality.

While some argue that a second Trump administration does not mean giving up on climate goals, it is clear that Trump's policies are encouraging more pollution and putting the health and safety of Americans at risk.

Trump's administration is ignoring climate change

Despite the efforts of the Trump administration to reduce air pollution, data suggests that the United States is backsliding towards its most polluted era. On his first day in office, President Trump withdrew the United States from the Paris Climate Accord. Since then, his administration has attempted to freeze billions in funding for clean energy projects, boost coal production, and increase domestic fossil fuels.

Trump's administration has also been accused of ignoring and stoking climate change by defunding scientific investigation into the issue. The administration's proposed NOAA cuts would reduce funding for the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR) by $485 million, effectively eliminating it. This would be a huge blow to efforts to understand climate change and would set the United States back to the 1950s in terms of climate research.

In addition, the administration has informed businesses that they can request exemptions from pollution regulations, potentially worsening air quality in the interim. The recent cuts to EPA personnel will also likely lead to a decrease in enforcement. Despite claims of improving air quality, nearly half of Americans (approximately 156 million people) are living in areas with unhealthy levels of ozone or particle pollution, according to the American Lung Association's 2025 State of the Air report. This is the highest number in the past decade.

The Trump administration has also attempted to cast doubt on the link between air pollution and negative health outcomes, despite scientific evidence to the contrary. The Heritage Foundation, a group with ties to the administration, published a report arguing that no definitive link exists between air pollution and poor public health outcomes. This report has been criticized for attempting to cast doubt on decades of scientific research. Overall, the Trump administration's actions and policies suggest a disregard for the importance of addressing climate change and air pollution.

Trump's policies are risking public health

Despite claims from the Trump administration that it is "fully committed to fulfilling all statutory obligations" to ensure clean air, land, and water, Trump's policies are risking public health. The administration's push to repeal 31 clean air and water regulations may deal a severe blow to US public health, with a Guardian analysis finding that the targeted rules were set to save the lives of nearly 200,000 people in the years ahead. The regulations slated for repeal, affecting coal plants, cars, trucks, and other sources of pollution, were projected to deliver at least $254 billion in economic benefits annually through lowered healthcare costs and fewer sick days.

Trump's EPA has argued that the repeal will "roll back trillions in regulatory costs and hidden 'taxes' on US families". However, assessments by the EPA itself show that the benefits of the regulations outweigh the costs by a factor of around six to one. The current limits on emissions from coal-fired power plants, cars, and trucks are on track to avoid 100 million symptomatic asthma incidents across the US by 2050. The repeal of these regulations will increase heart attacks, hospitalizations, cognitive impairment, respiratory disease, and healthcare costs, according to Gaurab Basu, a Harvard University assistant professor of medicine and climate expert.

The Trump administration's lack of interest in regulating the burning of fuel for energy, a major source of particulate matter in the air, further exacerbates the problem. Particulate matter is estimated to kill more than twice as many people as vehicular accidents in the United States, or 100,000 to 200,000 people annually. The administration's moves to cut EPA personnel and scientists, as well as its dismissal of environmental justice programs, will likely result in weaker enforcement of pollution regulations and disproportionately affect minority communities that have long endured the harmful effects of pollution.

While the Trump administration touts improvements in air quality, with a 7% drop in criteria air pollutant emissions since 2017, these gains are at risk of being reversed. The country's progress in air quality is already being threatened by worsening wildfire seasons fueled by climate warming, and the administration's refusal to address climate change will only make this worse. As a result, the slide back towards the more polluted past "will become a steeper trajectory," according to environmental epidemiologist Joan Casey. Trump's policies, therefore, pose a significant risk to public health by undermining efforts to improve air quality and protect vulnerable communities from the harmful effects of pollution.

Trump's policies are impacting the economy

Firstly, Trump's policies are influencing the costs and benefits associated with environmental compliance. The Trump administration has argued that removing environmental protections will "roll back trillions in regulatory costs and hidden 'taxes' on US families". However, assessments by the EPA itself contradict this claim, showing that the economic benefits of maintaining environmental regulations outweigh the costs. According to these analyses, the targeted regulations were expected to generate at least $254 billion in annual economic gains through reduced healthcare costs, improved productivity, and other positive outcomes. This indicates that weakening these protections may hinder economic growth and competitiveness, as businesses and families could face higher expenses related to healthcare and environmental remediation.

Secondly, Trump's policies are impacting the energy sector and related industries. By encouraging the use of traditional energy sources, such as fossil fuels, and rolling back regulations on coal plants, cars, and trucks, the administration is creating an uncertain environment for clean energy investments and innovations. This could deter businesses and investors from embracing sustainable practices and technologies, potentially stifling economic opportunities in the growing clean energy market.

Thirdly, Trump's policies are affecting the well-being and productivity of the workforce. Air pollution has been linked to various health issues, including respiratory problems, heart conditions, and cognitive impairments. By weakening air quality standards, the administration is contributing to an increase in these health issues, which can result in higher absenteeism, reduced productivity, and increased healthcare costs for businesses and the economy as a whole.

Additionally, Trump's policies have implications for the distribution of economic resources and the welfare of minority communities. The termination of environmental justice programs and the reduction of grants for underserved communities can exacerbate existing health inequities and further marginalize vulnerable populations. This can lead to a less equitable distribution of economic opportunities and resources, hindering the overall economic potential of these communities.

Finally, Trump's stance on climate change and environmental regulations sends a signal to foreign investors and trading partners. With a growing global focus on sustainability and environmental responsibility, Trump's approach may affect the country's attractiveness as an investment destination. Foreign businesses and investors who prioritize environmental sustainability may be deterred from establishing or expanding operations in the US, potentially impacting economic growth and job creation.

In conclusion, while the Trump administration's policies may provide short-term economic gains for specific industries, the overall impact on the economy is complex and far-reaching. Weakening environmental protections, discouraging clean energy investments, increasing healthcare costs, and creating health inequities can have significant economic consequences, affecting the country's competitiveness, innovation, and long-term growth prospects.

Frequently asked questions