Who Pollutes More: Corporations Or Individuals?

The debate over whether corporations or individuals are responsible for the majority of pollution is a complex one. On the one hand, it is true that individuals make personal choices that contribute to pollution, such as choosing to drive a car or fly less often, and these choices can have a significant impact on the environment. However, it is also true that a small number of corporations produce a disproportionately large amount of pollution. For example, a study found that just 100 companies have been responsible for 71% of global greenhouse gas emissions since 1988, and only 25 corporations were responsible for over 50% of global industrial emissions during the same period. Additionally, some corporations have been accused of blocking measures to reduce emissions and prioritizing profits over environmental concerns. Ultimately, both individuals and corporations have a responsibility to reduce pollution and mitigate climate change, but the debate continues over who should bear the brunt of the responsibility and accountability.

Fossil fuel companies' contribution to climate change

Fossil fuels, including coal, oil, and natural gas, are significant contributors to climate change. When burned, these fuels release carbon dioxide (CO2), a greenhouse gas that traps heat in the atmosphere, leading to global warming. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has identified fossil fuel emissions as the dominant cause of global warming. In 2018, 89% of global CO2 emissions originated from fossil fuels and industry, with coal being the largest single contributor to the increase in global temperatures.

A Carbon Tracker study in 2015 highlighted the financial risks faced by fossil fuel companies investing in coal, oil, and gas projects. With the growing momentum for international action on climate change and the development of renewable energy sources, these companies risk wasting trillions of dollars on assets that could become worthless. Despite this, many fossil fuel companies have continued to pursue these projects, prioritizing short-sighted profits over the planet's health.

The responsibility for tackling climate change has often been placed on individual consumers, with an emphasis on changing personal habits and purchasing sustainable products. However, this approach overlooks the disproportionate impact of corporations, particularly fossil fuel producers, on the environment. Since 1988, just 100 companies have been responsible for 71% of global greenhouse gas emissions, with 25 corporate and state-owned entities contributing to over 50% of global industrial emissions during the same period. ExxonMobil, Shell, BP, and Chevron are among the highest emitting investor-owned companies in this group.

The fossil fuel industry has also been accused of deceiving the public and policymakers about the climate impacts of their products. Reports and lawsuits have revealed that these companies have long been aware of the dangers associated with their operations but have chosen to mislead and block efforts to address climate change. For instance, Exxon, a multinational gas and oil company, is known to have been aware of climate change for decades yet actively worked to obstruct emissions-reducing measures.

While some corporations are now advocating for cleaner energy and supporting the transition to renewable sources, the historical and ongoing contributions of fossil fuel companies to climate change cannot be overlooked. These companies must be held accountable for their actions and be urged to take swift and meaningful action to reduce their global warming emissions.

Corporations' greenwashing and false advertising

While individuals can certainly contribute to pollution, it is important to recognise that corporations play a significant role in environmental degradation and climate change. Since 1988, just 100 companies have been responsible for 71% of global greenhouse gas emissions, with 25 corporations and state-owned entities contributing to over 50% of global industrial emissions during the same period. Despite these staggering figures, the burden of change is often placed on consumers, who are encouraged to make ethical choices, such as purchasing green products or adopting vegan diets. However, such options are not always accessible to everyone, particularly those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds.

Corporations have the resources and capabilities to make meaningful changes toward sustainability. However, many prioritise profits over environmental concerns. For instance, Exxon, a multinational gas and oil company, was aware of climate change for decades but chose to block emission-cutting measures instead of taking proactive steps to address the issue. This discrepancy between corporations' public image and their actual practices is where greenwashing comes into play.

Greenwashing refers to the deceptive tactics used by organisations to present themselves as more environmentally friendly and sustainable than they truly are. This phenomenon undermines efforts to address climate change by misleading consumers, investors, and the public. One notable example is Volkswagen, which cheated emissions tests by fitting vehicles with a "defect" device that reduced emissions levels only during the tests. Meanwhile, their marketing campaigns touted the vehicles' low emissions and eco-friendly features. Similarly, Starbucks released a "straw-less lid" as part of its sustainability drive, but this new lid contained more plastic than the previous lid and straw combination.

Another manifestation of greenwashing is the vague and non-specific language used by companies. Terms like "green" and "eco-friendly" lack standard definitions and can be easily misinterpreted. Additionally, companies may imply that minor improvements have a significant environmental impact or promote products that merely meet regulatory requirements as if they are exceptional. These misleading marketing strategies have eroded customer trust in corporate sustainability initiatives.

To combat greenwashing, stricter regulations, such as the EU's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, have emerged to demand conclusive evidence from advertisers to support their sustainability claims. Investigations and lawsuits against companies engaging in greenwashing have also increased. Despite these efforts, greenwashing remains prevalent, and consumers must remain vigilant and informed to recognise and avoid supporting such deceptive practices.

Individual consumer choices and their impact

Individual consumer choices can have a significant impact on the environment. While it is true that a small percentage of corporations produce a large proportion of global emissions, individual choices can still make a difference.

One way that individuals can make an impact is by being mindful of their consumption habits. This includes reducing overconsumption, particularly in fast fashion, and choosing second-hand or sustainable clothing options when possible. Individuals can also choose to buy more energy-efficient appliances, such as dishwashers, or make changes to their homes, such as installing better insulation or more efficient lighting, to reduce their carbon footprint.

Transportation is another area where individual choices can make a difference. People can opt to drive less, work from home, or combine trips to reduce their vehicle emissions. They can also choose to fly less often, as air travel is a significant contributor to carbon emissions.

Dietary choices also play a role in an individual's environmental impact. Choosing to reduce meat consumption or adopt a vegetarian or vegan diet can have a positive effect, as the meat industry is a major emitter of greenhouse gases.

While these individual actions are important, it is also crucial to recognize that systemic change is needed. This includes electing leaders who prioritize the climate crisis and holding corporations accountable for their emissions and their role in driving consumer demand for fossil fuels. Ultimately, individual consumer choices can have a meaningful impact when combined with broader structural changes.

Corporations' lack of concern for the environment

Corporations are responsible for a significant portion of global greenhouse gas emissions. Since 1988, just 100 companies have been accountable for 71% of global greenhouse gas emissions, and 25 corporations and state-owned entities were responsible for over 50% of global industrial emissions during the same period. Fossil fuel companies, in particular, have contributed immensely to climate change, with ExxonMobil, Shell, BP, and Chevron among the highest emitters. Despite this, corporations often fail to address their emissions comprehensively, neglecting upstream and downstream emissions from the entire life cycle of their products.

The fashion industry is another major contributor to climate change, being the second-biggest industrial polluter, responsible for 10% of global emissions. Fast fashion brands, while affordable, contribute to overconsumption and environmental damage. Yet, consumers, especially those from working-class backgrounds, are often blamed for their purchasing choices, rather than holding the companies accountable for their unsustainable practices.

Additionally, corporations impact the environment through resource consumption, waste production, and supply chain operations, causing irreversible damage to natural habitats and biodiversity. Water scarcity, declining biodiversity, rising sea levels, and depleting freshwater resources are all consequences of corporate activities.

While some corporations have set targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, these targets often exclude Scope 3 emissions, which encompass the emissions from the production of raw materials and the use and disposal of products. For example, P&G's climate commitment to reduce annual emissions by 50% by 2030 only accounts for Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, which are easier to measure and control but do not reflect the full extent of their operations.

In conclusion, corporations' lack of concern for the environment is evident in their indifference to climate change, prioritization of profits, failure to address their emissions comprehensively, and their contribution to environmental degradation. Real change can only be achieved when corporations acknowledge their role in the climate crisis and take accountability for their actions.

The fashion industry's role as a major polluter

The fashion industry is the second-biggest industrial polluter, responsible for about 10% of global carbon emissions. This is more than all international flights and maritime shipping combined. The industry also dries up water sources and pollutes rivers and streams, while 85% of all textiles end up in dumps each year. Even washing clothes releases 500,000 tons of microfibres into the ocean annually, the equivalent of 50 billion plastic bottles.

The fast fashion model involves the rapid design, production, distribution, and marketing of clothing, allowing retailers to maximise on current trends and consumers to get more fashion and product differentiation at a low price. However, this has resulted in the fashion industry producing vast amounts of waste.

The three main drivers of the industry’s global pollution are dyeing and finishing (36%), yarn preparation (28%), and fibre production (15%). Fibre production has the largest impact on freshwater withdrawal and ecosystem quality due to cotton cultivation. Cotton production can have consequent impacts on the planet due to the use of pesticides, high water consumption, and the conversion of habitat to agricultural use. Dyeing and finishing, yarn preparation, and fibre production have the highest impacts on resource depletion, due to the energy-intensive processes based on fossil fuel energy.

In addition, the fashion industry is a significant source of plastic leakage into the environment. The textile value chain is responsible for 9% of annual microfibre pollution in the oceans. Synthetic fibres like polyester are responsible for 35% of global microplastic pollution in oceans.

The environmental and social costs of fast fashion are becoming increasingly evident, and there is a growing need for a shift to sustainable fashion. Organisations in Geneva and beyond are joining efforts to foster international cooperation on the issue.

Frequently asked questions