Farming's Close Land Water Pollution: What's The Deal?

Farming on closed land can cause water pollution through a variety of means. Firstly, the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides in crop production can lead to nutrient runoff, which contaminates local water sources. Animal waste from livestock operations, particularly concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) or factory farms, also contributes to water pollution by releasing high levels of nutrients such as phosphorus and nitrogen, as well as heavy metals like copper and zinc. In addition, improper management of livestock access to streams and rivers can result in excess nutrients and bacteria entering the water. Furthermore, farms discharge agrochemicals, drug residues, and sediments into water bodies, which can have detrimental effects on aquatic ecosystems and human health. The environmental and economic costs of water pollution caused by agricultural activities are significant, and effective pollution prevention and mitigation strategies are crucial to address these issues.

Farm runoff

Agricultural runoff is a significant contributor to water pollution, and it occurs when various contaminants are moved from farmland into local water sources. These contaminants include fertilizer, livestock manure, and pesticides, which can be transported by rainfall and snowmelt into nearby streams, rivers, and groundwater. The impact of agricultural runoff on water quality can vary depending on several factors, such as the type of farming operation, landscape conditions, soil type, climate, and farm management practices.

Farmers can employ nutrient management practices to minimize the negative impacts of agricultural runoff. This includes targeted application of fertilizer and manure through soil testing and crop-specific calibration, as well as timing applications to maximize uptake and reduce runoff. For example, using drip irrigation instead of furrow irrigation decreases water loss and allows for better control of the amount of pesticides and nutrients added to the water. Properly storing livestock manure in designated areas can also minimize the risk of runoff and reduce the impact on nearby water sources.

In addition to nutrient management, implementing conservation practices can help reduce water pollution from agricultural runoff. This includes techniques such as using fenced stream crossings to restrict livestock access and minimize damage to streams, as well as adopting subsurface cropland drainage systems that are managed to reduce pollutant export to streams. By combining multiple conservation practices into a systems approach, farmers can effectively control various pollutants and improve water quality.

To support farmers in their efforts to prevent water pollution, organizations like the Washington State Department of Ecology offer resources and guidance. Their Clean Water Guidance provides recommendations for agricultural landowners to help them meet clean water standards and protect water quality. Local conservation districts also collaborate with landowners to implement solutions that support both healthy farms and clean water, recognizing that everyone has a role in maintaining and improving water quality.

While most agricultural runoff is considered nonpoint source pollution, certain large-scale agricultural operations, such as Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs), are regulated as point pollution sources and are required to obtain permits under the Clean Water Act and state legislation. These regulations aim to address the significant impact of such operations on water quality and ensure that they take necessary measures to mitigate their pollutant discharge.

Infiltration and irrigation

Fertilisers, pesticides, and manure are essential for farming, but they can have a detrimental impact on water quality. When applied to farmland, these substances can be transported by runoff, infiltration, and irrigation return flows into local streams, rivers, and groundwater. This process contaminates water sources and harms aquatic ecosystems.

Infiltration refers to the movement of water and dissolved substances (such as fertilisers and pesticides) from the land surface into the soil and underlying rock layers. The rate and extent of infiltration depend on various factors, including soil type, compaction, and moisture content. In agricultural areas, infiltration can carry contaminants such as fertilisers, pesticides, and manure into the groundwater.

Irrigation, on the other hand, is the artificial application of water to land to assist in the growth of crops. While it can increase crop yields, inefficient or excessive irrigation can lead to waterlogging and the leaching of nutrients and contaminants into the groundwater. This process is known as irrigation return flow and can result in the pollution of local water bodies.

To mitigate the negative impacts of infiltration and irrigation on water quality, farmers can adopt several best management practices. These include:

• Nutrient management: Timing the application of fertilisers and manure to maximise uptake by crops and minimise runoff.
• Precision agriculture: Using technologies such as soil moisture sensors and weather forecasting to optimise irrigation scheduling and minimise excess water application.
• Conservation tillage: Leaving the soil undisturbed between harvest and planting ("no-till") can help prevent erosion and reduce the risk of contaminants being washed away.
• Drip irrigation: Using drip irrigation instead of furrow irrigation reduces water loss and provides better control over the amount of pesticides and nutrients added to the water.
• Buffer zones: Establishing vegetated buffer strips along fields and streams can help capture and filter contaminants before they reach water bodies.

By implementing these practices, farmers can help reduce the impact of infiltration and irrigation on water pollution, protecting both water quality and the health of aquatic ecosystems.

Buffer strips

There are different types of buffer strips, including grass, forested, and riparian. Grass buffer strips are effective at reducing pesticide transfer by surface runoff from farmed fields to streams. Forested buffer strips can provide benefits associated with mitigating the impacts of climate change, such as carbon capture and moderating aquatic temperatures. Riparian buffer strips can generate a host of ecosystem services, such as reducing runoff from fields and pastures into streams, decreasing erosion, and reducing pollution of watercourses with pesticides.

Overall, buffer strips are a useful tool for reducing agricultural diffuse pollution and improving water quality in farming areas.

Soil and water conservation

One of the primary goals of soil and water conservation is to prevent water pollution caused by agricultural practices. Agriculture is a major contributor to water pollution, with farms discharging large quantities of agrochemicals, organic matter, drug residues, sediments, and saline drainage into water bodies. This has significant economic and social costs, impacting the health of billions of people and damaging economic growth.

To address this issue, farmers can adopt soil and water conservation practices such as contour strip cropping, which reduces erosion and runoff. Integrated farming systems, where crops, vegetables, livestock, trees, and fish are managed collectively, can also help optimize resource use and reduce pollution. Establishing protection zones along surface watercourses and buffer zones around farms can effectively reduce the migration of pollutants into water bodies.

Additionally, efficient irrigation schemes can reduce water return flows, minimizing the migration of fertilizers and pesticides into waterways. Simple off-farm techniques, such as riparian buffer strips or constructed wetlands, can also cost-effectively reduce pollutant loads entering surface waters. By implementing these practices, farmers can play a crucial role in conserving soil and water resources and mitigating the environmental impacts of agriculture.

Veterinary medicines

A study conducted in Japan found oxytetracycline, a commonly used veterinary pharmaceutical, in a small drainage basin influenced by many livestock farms, including beef cattle, dairy cattle, swine, and chicken farms. The authors also found higher loads of oxytetracycline in the winter, due to the common veterinary practice of using higher dosages to prevent respiratory infections and diarrhea when animals are more vulnerable. Similarly, a study in the United States detected sulfamethazine and sulfadimethoxine in waste from factory farms, indicating contamination from animal sources as these drugs are not approved for human use.

The use of veterinary medicines in aquaculture, or fish farming, has also gained attention in recent years due to its potential environmental risks. Veterinary medicinal products (VMPs) are necessary to prevent and reduce disease outbreaks in aquaculture systems, but their use may contribute to the disruption and pollution of the environment, including the alteration of natural habitats and the decline of wild fish stocks. The introduction of aquaculture effluent and wastewater containing pharmaceutical residues and pathogens can negatively affect non-target wild fauna, including species destined for human consumption such as fish and crustaceans.

The environmental impact of veterinary medicinal products in aquaculture has led to calls for a harmonized approach to environmental risk assessment (ERA) in Europe. The current regulatory guidance documents for ERA are considered inadequate, and there is a need for a simple and applicable approach that considers the environmental conditions of different aquaculture facilities. The expansion of aquaculture production appears to be manageable only through the use of veterinary medicinal products, but the potential risks to the environment and aquatic ecosystems must be carefully evaluated.

Overall, the use of veterinary medicines in farming, especially in factory farms and aquaculture, has contributed to water pollution through the contamination of drinking water sources and the disruption of aquatic ecosystems. The heavy use of these medicines in animal agriculture, their persistence in the environment, and their potential impact on non-target species highlight the need for careful evaluation and management of their use to mitigate their environmental and public health impacts.

Frequently asked questions