Bitcoin's Dirty Secret: Pollution And Crypto's Dark Side

Bitcoin is a decentralized digital currency that supports international transactions, micropayments, and peer-to-peer transactions. However, the process of mining Bitcoin, which involves using complex encryption techniques to secure and verify transactions and control the creation of new units, has raised concerns about its environmental impact. The energy-intensive nature of Bitcoin mining, with its reliance on fossil fuels and associated carbon emissions, water consumption, and electronic waste generation have drawn criticism from sustainability advocates and regulators alike. With the currency's growing popularity, understanding and addressing the pollution caused by Bitcoin mining have become increasingly important for ensuring a livable planet.

Bitcoin mining's high energy consumption

The energy consumption of Bitcoin mining is difficult to estimate due to varied facility sizes, a lack of data on operations, and shifts in facility locations. However, according to a study by the United Nations University and Earth's Future journal, the global Bitcoin mining network consumed 173.42 Terawatt hours of electricity during the 2020-2021 period. This energy consumption would rank 27th in the world if Bitcoin were a country, surpassing Pakistan's energy consumption, which has a population of over 230 million people.

The high energy consumption of Bitcoin mining has led to increased electricity demand, with the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) expressing concern over its potential impact on resource projections and system operations. The Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) has received 41 gigawatts (GW) of requests for new cryptocurrency mining capacity, highlighting the significant electricity requirements of this industry.

Bitcoin's energy consumption is largely due to its proof-of-work algorithm, which requires vast amounts of computing power to validate transactions and secure the network. While this algorithm was the first of its kind and enabled Bitcoin's trust-minimizing consensus, more energy-efficient alternatives, such as the proof-of-stake consensus mechanism, are now available. This alternative mechanism grants the authority to validate transactions based on the amount of cryptocurrency staked, rather than relying on energy-intensive computing power.

The environmental impact of Bitcoin mining extends beyond its high energy consumption. The process also has significant water and land footprints, with its water usage comparable to the domestic water needs of more than 300 million people in rural sub-Saharan Africa. Additionally, the heat generated by mining machines has led to the use of water cooling methods, raising concerns about the potential contamination and temperature increase of nearby water bodies.

Bitcoin's carbon footprint

Bitcoin mining is a highly electricity-intensive process. Miners run dedicated software to compete against each other and be the first to solve the current 10-minute block, yielding them a reward in bitcoins. This process is called proof-of-work. Bitcoin is the most popular cryptocurrency, and its mining is highly dependent on fossil fuels, with worrying impacts on water and land in addition to a significant carbon footprint.

According to a study by the United Nations University and Earth's Future journal, during the 2020-2021 period, the global Bitcoin mining network consumed 173.42 Terawatt hours of electricity. This means that if Bitcoin were a country, its energy consumption would have ranked 27th in the world, ahead of a country like Pakistan, with a population of over 230 million people. The resulting carbon footprint was equivalent to that of burning 84 billion pounds of coal or operating 190 natural gas-fired power plants. To offset this footprint, 3.9 billion trees should be planted, covering an area almost equal to the area of the Netherlands, Switzerland, or Denmark, or 7% of the Amazon rainforest.

The land footprint of worldwide Bitcoin mining activities during this period was 1.4 times the area of Los Angeles. China has been the biggest Bitcoin mining nation. To offset the carbon emissions from China's coal-intensive Bitcoin mining operations in 2021-2022, about 2 billion trees should be planted, covering an area equivalent to the sum of Portugal and Ireland.

Bitcoin mining representatives argue that their industry creates opportunities for wind and solar companies, leading to a debate on whether bitcoin could be an ESG investment. According to a 2023 paper, directing the surplus electricity from intermittent renewable energy sources such as wind and solar towards bitcoin mining could reduce electricity curtailment, balance the electrical grid, and increase the profitability of renewable energy plants—accelerating the transition to sustainable energy and decreasing bitcoin's carbon footprint.

A broad carbon price coordinated across countries would be the best way to curb emissions, as it would encourage reduced fossil fuel consumption, cleaner power sources, and improved energy efficiency.

Bitcoin's water footprint

To address Bitcoin's increasing water footprint, miners could adopt immersion cooling methods and transition to power sources that do not depend on freshwater. Additionally, modifications to the Bitcoin software could significantly reduce the network's water footprint.

Regional variations exist in the water footprint of Bitcoin mining. For instance, in the United States, large-scale Bitcoin miners in certain states contribute more significantly to the overall water consumption associated with Bitcoin mining.

Bitcoin's land footprint

Bitcoin mining has a significant environmental impact on land, water, and carbon emissions. The land footprint of global Bitcoin mining activities during the 2020-2021 period was 1,870 square kilometres, 1.4 times the area of Los Angeles. China's land footprint alone took up 913 square kilometres, or 353 square miles.

The energy-intensive nature of Bitcoin mining has led to a heavy reliance on fossil fuels, with coal contributing 45% of the energy supply mix, followed by natural gas at 21%. Hydropower, a renewable energy source with significant water and environmental impacts, is the most important renewable energy source for Bitcoin mining, providing 16% of its electricity demand. Nuclear energy also plays a considerable role, contributing 9% of the energy mix, while other renewable sources such as solar and wind power only provide 2% and 5% respectively.

The high energy consumption of Bitcoin mining, often from fossil fuels, has resulted in a significant carbon footprint. During the 2020-2021 period, Bitcoin mining emitted over 85.89 million metric tons of CO2, equivalent to the emissions from burning 84 billion pounds of coal or operating 190 natural gas-fired power plants. To offset these carbon emissions, it is estimated that 3.9 billion trees would need to be planted, covering an area almost equal to the Netherlands, Switzerland, or Denmark, or 7% of the Amazon rainforest.

The environmental impact of Bitcoin mining is not limited to carbon emissions and land use but also extends to water consumption. In 2020-2021, the global water footprint of Bitcoin mining was approximately 1.65 cubic kilometres, enough to fill over 660,000 Olympic-sized swimming pools and meet the domestic water needs of more than 300 million people in rural Sub-Saharan Africa.

While Bitcoin mining has significant environmental impacts, it is important to note that the Bitcoin network has the potential to be more flexible and price-sensitive in its energy consumption compared to other industries. Bitcoin miners can adapt their power usage to mitigate flare gas in remote oil fields or co-locate with renewable energy sources such as solar and wind installations. However, the rapidly growing demand for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies underscores the urgent need for regulatory interventions and technological advancements to reduce the environmental footprint of the digital currency sector.

Bitcoin's electronic waste

Bitcoin mining is an energy-intensive process that has been criticised for its large carbon footprint. However, the environmental impact of Bitcoin extends beyond its energy consumption. Bitcoin mining also generates significant amounts of electronic waste (e-waste).

Bitcoin mining is carried out using specialised hardware, which becomes obsolete approximately every 1.5 years. This rapid obsolescence leads to a large amount of e-waste being generated as miners constantly upgrade their hardware to stay competitive. The average lifespan of Bitcoin mining devices is estimated to be around 1.29 years. This short lifespan, combined with the high energy consumption of mining, results in a substantial amount of e-waste being produced annually.

The e-waste generated by Bitcoin mining includes not only the mining devices themselves but also the associated cooling equipment and other electronic components. This waste often contains toxic chemicals and heavy metals, which can leach into soils and cause pollution if not properly recycled.

It is estimated that Bitcoin mining produces around 30,700 tonnes of e-waste annually, with each transaction resulting in an average of 272 grams of e-waste. This amount is comparable to the small IT equipment waste produced by a country like the Netherlands. The problem is exacerbated by the fact that only a small fraction of e-waste is recycled globally, with estimates ranging from 17% to 20%.

The high demand for mining hardware also disrupts global semiconductor supply chains and contributes to the growing problem of e-waste. As older and less efficient devices become unprofitable, they are discarded, further adding to the e-waste issue.

To address Bitcoin's e-waste problem, some have suggested adopting alternative transaction verification methods that are less computing-intensive, such as the Proof-of-Stake (PoS) mechanism. By reducing the computational power required, the lifespan of mining devices could be extended, and the amount of e-waste generated could be significantly reduced.

Frequently asked questions