Socioeconomic Disparity: Air Pollution's Unfair Impact

Ambient air pollution is a global concern, with low- and middle-income countries experiencing significantly higher levels of air pollution compared to wealthy nations. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), air pollution kills around 7 million people worldwide every year, with 89-90% of those deaths occurring in low- and middle-income countries. This disparity is due to several factors, including weaker or unenforced environmental laws, lax vehicle emission standards, and a greater reliance on polluting industries and technologies. In addition, the poorest residents of low-income countries often live in cramped, informal settlements near rubbish dumps, which are major sources of air pollution.

Lax regulations and lack of basic air pollution controls

Air pollution is a pressing issue in lower- and middle-income countries, with lax regulations and a lack of basic air pollution controls contributing significantly to the problem. This issue is further exacerbated by the prevalence of older, more polluting machinery and vehicles, congested urban transport systems, and rapidly developing industrial sectors.

Lax regulations and weak enforcement of air quality standards in lower-income countries contribute to higher levels of ambient air pollution. Lower-income countries often have less stringent vehicle emission standards, allowing for higher levels of pollutants to be released into the atmosphere. For example, in Nairobi, Kenya, a massive dump site lies adjacent to schools, churches, clinics, and shops, subjecting the nearby communities to harmful air pollutants.

Furthermore, lower- and middle-income countries often lack the economic capacity to implement large-scale air quality monitoring networks. This lack of comprehensive monitoring makes it challenging to accurately assess and address the extent of the air pollution problem. As a result, these countries may not have the data and resources necessary to develop effective policies and regulations to mitigate air pollution.

The absence of robust air quality laws and enforcement mechanisms in many countries further exacerbates the issue. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), about 92% of the global population resides in areas where air pollution levels surpass safe limits. However, only around a third of countries impose obligations to adhere to legally mandated standards for outdoor air quality. This discrepancy highlights the urgent need for stronger regulations and enforcement efforts to protect public health and the environment.

Additionally, lower- and middle-income countries often face challenges in accessing cleaner fuels and technologies. They may rely more heavily on polluting industries and outdated machinery, further contributing to air pollution levels. The combination of lax regulations, limited monitoring, and inadequate access to cleaner alternatives creates a cycle that perpetuates the problem of air pollution in these countries.

To address these issues, international organizations like the World Health Organization and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) are taking initiatives to improve air quality in lower- and middle-income countries. These efforts include research, innovation, and the implementation of programs aimed at tackling poor air quality, such as the Breathe Life campaign. By strengthening regulations, improving monitoring capabilities, and promoting the adoption of cleaner technologies, these countries can make significant strides in reducing ambient air pollution and improving the health and well-being of their citizens.

Inefficient cooking, heating, and lighting practices

The reliance on these inefficient and polluting fuels has severe health consequences, especially for women and children in LMICs. The inefficient combustion of fuelwood and charcoal releases high levels of methane and other greenhouse gases (GHGs), contributing to climate change and respiratory issues. Additionally, the practice of cooking with open fires or unsafe stoves is a leading cause of burns among women and children in developing countries. The work of gathering fuel falls disproportionately on women and children, exposing them to safety risks and reducing their time for education, rest, and paid work.

Traditional cooking facilities are highly inefficient, allowing heat to escape into the open air instead of being utilized for cooking. This not only wastes valuable energy but also contributes to ambient air pollution. The lack of access to clean and efficient cooking technologies in LMICs perpetuates this problem. While improved cookstoves or clean cookstoves that burn wood and solid fuels more efficiently than traditional stoves are available, they may not be affordable or accessible to everyone in these countries.

In contrast, richer countries often utilize natural gas stoves for cooking, which, while not perfect, emit lower levels of pollutants than traditional cooking methods in LMICs. Additionally, the adoption of clean cooking technologies, such as LPG, improved biomass cookstoves, electricity, and biogas or ethanol, has the potential to significantly reduce ambient air pollution in LMICs. However, the rate of access to these clean cooking technologies has increased slowly, at about 1.4% per year from 2010 to 2022, with significant variations among different LMICs.

Lack of access to healthcare

Air pollution is a global concern, with low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) experiencing significantly higher levels of ambient air pollution compared to wealthy nations. Within LMICs, low-income populations are the most exposed to ambient air pollution. This is due to a variety of factors, including the lack of access to healthcare, which is a basic human right.

People in poorer countries tend to have less access to health services than those in wealthier nations, and within countries, the poor have less access to health services. This inequality in access to healthcare is a significant issue in LMICs, where the density of health workers and hospital beds per population is much lower than in high-income countries. The poorer the country, the larger the amount of total health spending that comes out of pocket, with more than 60% of spending in low-income countries being from out-of-pocket payments, compared to about 20% in high-income countries. Out-of-pocket payments for healthcare are often a barrier to healthcare access, particularly for the poor, who are hit the hardest by these expenses. This lack of financial protection can lead to financial distress for families as they pay for essential health services.

The lack of access to healthcare in poorer countries is further exacerbated by the fact that these countries often have weaker laws and regulations regarding air pollution, such as less stringent vehicle emission standards and more prevalent coal power stations. As a result, the health complications and mortality rates associated with air pollution are higher in these countries. For example, in Nairobi, Kenya, a large dump site lies right next to schools, churches, clinics, and shops, directly exposing the surrounding communities to air pollution.

The relationship between air pollution and healthcare access is complex. On the one hand, air pollution can lead to health complications that require medical attention, such as heart disease, stroke, cancer, and acute lower respiratory infections. On the other hand, limited access to healthcare can make it difficult for individuals to seek treatment for these health issues, potentially worsening their condition and contributing to the cycle of poverty.

To address this issue, organizations like the World Bank and WHO are advocating for universal health coverage (UHC), which would allow everyone to obtain the health services they need without facing financial hardship. UHC aims to provide financial protection and ensure that individuals can access healthcare when and where they need it, regardless of their economic status.

Poor government actions and financial resources

Firstly, LMICs tend to have lax regulations regarding air quality and vehicle emissions. They often lack basic air pollution controls such as filters and scrubbers, which are essential for reducing the amount of particulate matter released into the atmosphere. This is particularly true of coal power plants, which are prevalent in LMICs due to industrialization. The lack of stringent vehicle emission standards also contributes to higher levels of ambient air pollution, as older, more polluting vehicles remain in use.

Secondly, financial constraints limit the ability of LMIC governments to invest in cleaner technologies and infrastructure. For example, many LMICs rely heavily on polluting industries and technologies, such as fossil fuel combustion, that contribute to higher levels of ambient air pollution. The transition to cleaner energy sources and more efficient technologies requires significant financial investment, which may not be feasible for countries with limited financial resources.

In addition, the lack of financial resources in LMICs can also lead to inadequate monitoring and enforcement of existing regulations. For instance, while many LMICs have air pollution monitoring networks, these often do not provide the same level of temporal and spatial coverage as those in wealthier nations. This makes it difficult to accurately assess the extent of the problem and develop effective mitigation strategies.

Moreover, financial constraints can also hinder the ability of governments to provide access to cleaner alternatives for their citizens. For example, in many LMICs, households are more dependent on burning wood, coal, and kerosene for cooking and heating, which contributes to indoor air pollution. Providing access to cleaner fuels and technologies, such as liquefied petroleum gas connections, can help reduce household air pollution levels, as seen in specific projects like India's Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana scheme.

Lastly, the lack of financial resources can also impact the ability of LMICs to adapt to the impacts of air pollution and climate change. For instance, the health impacts of air pollution can be mitigated through access to healthcare services. However, many individuals living in areas with unsafe air pollution levels, such as in Sub-Saharan Africa, also lack access to adequate healthcare, increasing their vulnerability to the negative health effects of air pollution.

Urbanization and economic opportunity

Secondly, the geography of economic opportunity within LMICs influences settlement patterns and exposure to pollution. People may migrate to areas with greater economic prospects, which are often urban centres with higher-paying jobs. These cities, with concentrated economic activity, become hubs of pollution as industries and an increasing number of commuters converge. The study by the World Bank suggests that individuals are willing to tolerate higher pollution levels for better economic opportunities.

Furthermore, the sources of pollution differ between LMICs and wealthy countries. LMICs tend to rely more heavily on polluting industries and technologies, such as coal power plants, that lack basic air pollution controls. The prevalence of these industries contributes significantly to ambient air pollution levels. Additionally, households in LMICs often use inefficient and polluting practices for cooking, heating, and lighting, such as burning wood, coal, and kerosene. These practices release toxic air pollutants and have severe health implications, particularly for women, children, and the elderly who are typically responsible for domestic tasks.

Moreover, LMICs often face challenges in monitoring and addressing air pollution due to limited financial resources and lax regulations. They may have weaker laws regarding air quality and vehicle emissions, and their economies may be more dependent on polluting industries, creating a cycle of high pollution and negative health and economic impacts.

Lastly, within LMICs, it is often the poorest populations who are most exposed to ambient air pollution. They may live in informal settlements near rubbish dumps or industrial areas, bearing the brunt of the health consequences of poor air quality. This disparity in exposure to pollution within LMICs further exacerbates the impact of ambient air pollution on vulnerable communities.

Frequently asked questions