Water Pollution: Which State Suffers The Most?

Water pollution is a pressing issue in the United States, with several states facing significant challenges in providing clean and safe drinking water to their residents. While various factors contribute to water pollution across different states, the consequences for human health and the environment are dire and demand immediate attention. From industrial waste to agricultural runoff, the sources of water pollution vary, but the impact on communities is consistently detrimental. This introduction will discuss the critical issue of water pollution in the US, focusing on the states that have been identified as having the most contaminated water supplies and the efforts needed to address this pressing problem.

California's water contamination

California is facing a water contamination crisis, with unsafe drinking water being a chronic and sometimes hidden problem. In 2019, over 1 million California residents—more than one in 10 people in 12 counties—received unsafe drinking water. A 2022 report by the California state auditor revealed that more than 370 of the state's approximately 7,400 water systems were contaminated above the maximum levels of substances dangerous to humans. These systems serve over 920,000 residents, which is more than 2% of the state's population.

The main sources of water contamination in California are arsenic, nitrates, and "forever chemicals" like PFAS. Arsenic is found naturally in rocks and soils throughout California but is exacerbated by groundwater over-pumping for irrigation in farm fields in the San Joaquin Valley. Arsenic-contaminated water has been linked to cancers, fetal deaths, and malformations in test animals, as well as harm to the developing brains of babies and young children. Nitrates, which derive from agricultural fertiliser, and hexavalent chromium, an industrial chemical produced by manufacturing, are also common contaminants in California's water supply.

PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are a group of man-made chemicals that have been used in a variety of industries, including aerospace, automotive, and electronics. PFAS are highly persistent in the environment and have been detected in water sources across California. A 2021 report by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) identified landfills, wastewater treatment plants, oil and gas facilities, metal plating facilities, and airports as likely sources of drinking water contamination by PFAS. Military bases in California are also likely sources, due to the historical use of PFAS-containing firefighting foam.

The state of California has declared access to clean, drinkable water a "human right" since 2012, but economic inequality has been a significant factor in the water contamination crisis. More than two-thirds of the unsafe water systems serve disadvantaged communities with significant financial need. Rural Californians, who are more likely to rely on domestic wells for their water supply, are particularly affected by water contamination. These wells and other small community water systems are unregulated by the state, leaving them vulnerable to contamination by various chemicals.

California continues to monitor and address PFAS concerns, and in April 2024, several of the state's public water systems filed a lawsuit against PFAS manufacturers to support clean water initiatives. The state has also made progress in providing safe drinking water to its residents, with nearly a million more Californians gaining access to clean water in the last five years. However, the widespread nature of contamination has left many communities, especially vulnerable ones, with no choice but to continue consuming toxic water.

Industrial pollution in Indiana

Indiana has a reputation for being a polluted state. The state's industrial centres have seen a notable increase in ozone levels. For instance, in Columbus, reported ozone days rose from 111 in 2015 to 242 in 2018. The Elkhart-Goshen area rose from 96 days in 2015 to 194 days in 2018. Indianapolis also experienced an increase in the amount of yearly ozone days, jumping from 122 in 2015 to 145 in 2018. Indiana's emissions from vehicles, fuel combustion, industrial processes, and fires all contribute to the cities' levels of nitrogen dioxide and volatile organic compounds, the two precursor pollutants necessary for ozone formation. Vehicle emissions alone are responsible for 60 to 70 per cent of the nitrogen dioxide levels in the county.

Indiana's dependence on automobiles and lack of investment in public transit, as well as its coal-fired power plants in southwest Indiana, have also contributed to the state's poor air quality. The pollution from these power plants is carried by easterly winds across the rest of the state and beyond. This has taken a toll on the health of Indiana's residents, according to Paul Halverson, dean of the Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health at IUPUI.

In recent years, Indiana has introduced measures to improve its air quality. For example, in 2021, the state passed a bill to enable carbon trading, allowing producers of carbon dioxide to buy certificates worth one ton of carbon dioxide. The state has also cancelled the requirement for oil and gas producers to report methane emissions and stopped requiring authorities to monitor vehicle exhaust fumes on federal roads. However, these changes have been criticised for potentially reducing the state's commitment to cleaner air.

While Indiana has made some progress in improving its air quality, it still has a long way to go. The state's poor air quality has earned it a low ranking in various environmental categories, including quality of life, natural environment, and eco-friendliness.

Water pollution in Georgia

Water pollution is a pressing issue in Georgia, with the state facing significant challenges in maintaining clean and safe water resources. The state has a history of water quality issues, with industrial facilities releasing millions of pounds of toxic chemicals into its waterways. In 2020, Georgia ranked 13th in the nation for the amount of toxic chemicals dumped in its waterways, according to a report by Environment Georgia.

One of the major concerns in Georgia's water pollution crisis is the presence of long-lasting particles such as microplastics and PFAS (polyfluoroalkyl substances). These pollutants are particularly troublesome as they persist in the environment for extended periods and can have detrimental effects on ecosystems and human health. PFAS contaminants, often found in firefighting foam, pose a severe threat to drinking water sources, and their presence in Georgia's waterways is a growing concern.

The state's water pollution problem is not limited to a single source. Traditional sources of pollution, such as runoff and wastewater from factories, continue to contribute to the degradation of water quality. Additionally, Georgia's waterways are affected by agricultural runoff, which can introduce high levels of nitrates and other contaminants that pose risks to both environmental and human health. The combination of these pollutants has led to Georgia being ranked among the top 10 states with the highest pollution loads for chemicals linked to cancer and developmental and reproductive health issues.

To address the water pollution crisis in Georgia, there have been calls for stricter regulations and enforcement of existing laws. Environmental advocates, such as Jennifer Duenas from Environment Georgia, have highlighted the lack of repercussions for polluters who use rivers as open sewers. Upgrading definitions and legal limits, as well as enhancing accountability and infrastructure, are also crucial steps towards improving Georgia's water quality. The Clean Water Act, a landmark federal law, has played a significant role in improving the country's water health, but ongoing efforts are necessary to ensure its effective implementation and protection from legal challenges.

Georgia's water pollution issues are not isolated but are part of a broader national challenge. States like Texas, California, and Pennsylvania also struggle with contaminated water systems, affecting the health and well-being of millions of residents. Addressing water pollution requires a combination of policy changes, stricter regulations, and the adoption of advanced filtration technologies to ensure safe and clean water for all.

Poor water quality in Washington

While Washington is known for its lush greenery, the state is facing significant challenges when it comes to water quality. The state's growing population is exerting unprecedented pressure on its water resources, including lakes, rivers, marine waters, and groundwater. As a result, Washington is grappling with a range of water pollution issues that threaten both the environment and public health.

One of the primary concerns is nonpoint source pollution, which is caused by a multitude of factors and is not limited to a single source. For instance, rainfall or melting snow can wash pollutants from the land into nearby rivers or streams, contributing to this type of pollution. Another example is when a lack of shade-providing plants next to streams leads to higher water temperatures, impacting the aquatic ecosystem. Animal waste and leaking septic tanks that directly discharge into streams also fall under this category. Addressing nonpoint source pollution necessitates a collective shift in behaviour, along with improved land and structural management practices.

Point source pollution, on the other hand, has a known origin, such as pipes or discharges from businesses. This type of pollution is regulated through wastewater discharge permits for various facilities, including sewage treatment plants and industrial operations. Washington's water pollution issues are further exacerbated by diverse factors, including rising water temperatures, low oxygen levels for fish, acidic water, toxic chemicals, and bacteria. These issues pose a significant threat to the health of the state's rivers, lakes, wetlands, and marine waters.

To combat these challenges, the Washington State Department of Ecology is taking several measures. They work with communities to develop water cleanup plans, also known as Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs), and administer a permit system that restricts the amount of pollution that industries and municipalities can discharge into water bodies. The department also provides technical and financial assistance to promote the adoption of best practices for pollution prevention and cleanup. Additionally, they manage grants and loans totalling approximately $200 million annually to support projects that benefit human health and the environment.

Despite these efforts, Washington continues to face water quality issues, as reflected in the Environmental Protection Agency's Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) database. This database tracks compliance and enforcement-related information for drinking water utilities across the state, highlighting areas where improvements are needed to ensure safe and healthy water for Washington's residents and ecosystems.

Contaminated water in Pennsylvania

Water contamination is a pressing issue in the United States, with several states facing significant challenges in providing safe and clean drinking water to their residents. One state that has been particularly affected by water pollution is Pennsylvania.

Pennsylvania has struggled with contaminated water systems, impacting the lives of millions of its residents. A notable source of water contamination in Pennsylvania is PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). PFAS are a group of synthetic chemicals known for their persistence in the environment and their ability to accumulate in the human body. They are widely used in various applications, including electronics manufacturing, water pollution control facilities, and firefighting foam. In 2023, a study found that 76% of the 161 Pennsylvania rivers and streams tested contained at least one type of PFAS. The highest levels of PFAS contamination in Pennsylvania were detected at Brookside Village Mobile Home Park in Berwick, Columbia County, ranging from 200 to 2,100 parts per trillion—alarming levels that far exceeded federal and state regulations.

The presence of PFAS in Pennsylvania's water systems has raised significant health concerns. PFAS exposure has been linked to adverse effects in both laboratory animals and humans. It can occur through various routes, such as consuming fish from contaminated waters, eating food packaged in PFAS-coated materials, or even handling products made with PFAS chemicals. Recognizing the severity of the situation, Pennsylvania's Department of Environmental Protection has taken steps to address the issue. In January 2023, they published the PFAS MCL Rule, setting maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for two specific types of PFAS—PFOA and PFOS—in drinking water.

However, the issue of contaminated water in Pennsylvania extends beyond PFAS. Fracking, a common practice in rural areas of the state, has also contributed to water pollution. Well water in these areas is often discolored and has an unpleasant odour. Additionally, near Philadelphia, approximately 85,000 residents live with unsafe drinking water due to PFAS contaminants from firefighting foam used at nearby decommissioned military bases. In 2019, Pennsylvania's water woes were further highlighted when 4,010 of its public water systems violated the EPA's water quality standards, with 352 cases considered serious violations.

While the state has implemented policies to address the issue, the conditions for many small communities remain largely unchanged. The persistence of water contamination in Pennsylvania underscores the urgent need for effective remediation measures and stricter enforcement of environmental regulations to protect the health and well-being of its residents.

Frequently asked questions