Deadly Water: What Pollutant Kills The Most?

Water pollution is a serious issue, with nearly half of rivers and streams and over a third of lakes being contaminated and unfit for human use. Contaminants can include chemicals, waste, plastic, pesticides, fertilizers, and bacteria. Waterborne pathogens, in the form of bacteria and viruses from human and animal waste, are a major cause of illness from contaminated drinking water. In 2015, water pollution caused 1.8 million deaths, and unsafe water sickens about 1 billion people annually. Some of the most lethal water pollutants include lead, arsenic, fluoride, and cyanide, which can cause permanent brain damage, reproductive issues, seizures, and increased risk of certain cancers.

Lead leaching from corroded pipes

Water pollution is a critical issue that poses a severe threat to human health and the environment. Among the various water pollutants, lead leaching from corroded pipes stands out as a significant concern due to its insidious nature and detrimental health impacts.

Lead has historically been used in water pipes, including in ancient Roman times, due to its toughness, malleability, and ease of manipulation. However, it is now well-established that lead is a toxic substance that poses serious health risks, particularly to vulnerable populations such as fetuses, infants, and young children. Lead is a potent neurotoxin that can cause irreversible damage to the brain and body, and there is no safe level of lead exposure, according to health experts.

Lead leaching occurs when plumbing pipes and fixtures containing lead corrode, allowing lead to dissolve or flake into the water. This corrosion is influenced by various factors, including the water's acidity, mineral content, temperature, and the length of time the water remains stagnant in the pipes. Galvanic corrosion, caused by the electrical connection of dissimilar metals in corrosive water, is a significant contributor to lead leaching in drinking water systems.

The presence of lead in drinking water can have detrimental health consequences. In 2016, Flint, Michigan gained international attention when it was revealed that children's blood-lead levels had nearly doubled due to increased lead content in the city's drinking water source. This incident highlighted the urgent need to address lead leaching and ensure safe drinking water for all.

To mitigate the issue of lead leaching, anti-corrosion chemicals, such as zinc orthophosphate, can be used to coat the inside of lead pipes and reduce the release of lead into the water. Additionally, replacing old lead pipes with safer alternatives like copper pipes is crucial, especially in older cities and homes built before 1986, where lead pipes are more prevalent. Regularly running cold water from the tap, especially after periods of stagnation, can also help flush out accumulated lead in the pipes.

Nitrates and nitrites from chemical fertilizers

Nitrogen is an essential nutrient for plants and crops, but elevated concentrations are harmful to humans and the environment. Nitrates and nitrites from chemical fertilizers are a significant source of water pollution, particularly in Europe and Asia. The excessive use of nitrogen fertilizers in agriculture has led to increased nitrate concentrations in groundwater and surface water bodies, posing a risk to drinking water sources and ecosystems.

Nitrogen fertilizers, when applied to the soil, undergo biochemical transformations to become nitrates, which are highly soluble and prone to leaching. This process results in nitrates migrating below the root zone and reaching groundwater. Additionally, during rainy seasons, precipitation can carry nitrates from fertilizers into groundwater through a process known as runoff.

The impact of nitrate pollution extends beyond the contamination of drinking water sources. In water bodies such as rivers, lakes, and marine environments, elevated levels of nitrates stimulate excessive algae growth. This disrupts the natural balance of the ecosystem and can lead to oxygen depletion in the water, affecting aquatic life.

The problem of nitrate pollution from chemical fertilizers is not limited to a specific region but is a global concern. Developing countries, particularly in East and South Asia, have witnessed a significant increase in fertilizer nitrogen consumption, contributing to the growing prevalence of nitrate pollution in freshwaters.

To address this issue, various measures have been proposed and implemented. These include establishing codes of good agricultural practices, such as limiting the application periods and conditions for nitrogen fertilizers, implementing crop rotations, and soil winter cover to prevent nitrate leaching and runoff. Additionally, programs like the Township Testing Program (TTP) help identify areas with elevated nitrate levels and inform well owners of potential health risks.

Microorganisms from human and animal waste

Water pollution occurs when harmful substances contaminate a body of water, degrading water quality and rendering it toxic to humans or the environment. One of the main sources of water pollution is human and animal waste, which introduces microorganisms, including disease-causing bacteria and viruses, into water sources. These waterborne pathogens can lead to illnesses such as cholera, giardia, and typhoid, and are a significant health risk, particularly in low-income communities.

Domestic animals, including poultry, cattle, sheep, and pigs, are responsible for more than 85% of the world's faecal waste. This waste can contaminate recreational waters and drinking-water sources, posing a threat to public health. The issue of animal waste contamination is inadequately understood and addressed in regulations, and current water standards primarily focus on controlling human faecal contamination rather than non-human sources. However, with the development of advanced source-tracking techniques, such as molecular biology methods combined with geostatistical analysis, we are gaining a better understanding of the role of livestock in water pollution.

Livestock production practices have intensified since the 1940s, leading to a concentration of animals and their associated microorganisms in limited geographical areas. This intensification increases the risk of surface and groundwater contamination. Effective water-protection strategies in mixed-activity watersheds, where fecal contamination can originate from livestock, humans, or wildlife, require the identification of multiple potential sources of fecal pollution. Constructed wetlands and riparian zones can act as natural filters, retaining pathogens and reducing their survival through competition with other microbes, predation, and exposure to unfavourable conditions.

Best management practices for manure handling, storage, and application can significantly reduce the risk of microbial contamination. Additionally, the dispersion of manure over a surface area can decrease pathogen survival by increasing desiccation, exposure to UV radiation, and temperature extremes. While these strategies can help mitigate the impact of animal waste on water quality, it is essential to address the broader issue of water pollution to protect human health and the environment.

Unsafe water is a significant global health concern, causing approximately 1.8 million deaths and affecting the health of about 1 billion people annually. With increasing global demand for freshwater expected by 2050, it is crucial to address water pollution and ensure access to safe and clean water sources. This includes regulating agricultural practices, industrial activities, and sewage treatment facilities to prevent the release of harmful substances into our waterways.

Radionuclides from uranium mining and milling

Uranium is a naturally occurring radioactive element found in virtually all soil, rock, and water. Its extraction, particularly through mining and milling, can lead to water pollution.

Mining and milling processes leave behind radioactive waste. Uranium decays over time, first into radium, and then into radon, a radioactive gas. Radon in underground uranium mines poses a significant radiation hazard to miners, as it can accumulate in mine shafts and be inhaled. Uranium mining waste and mill tailings can also contaminate the environment, including water sources, if not properly managed.

The US mining industry primarily employs two methods to extract uranium. The first is conventional mining, where rock containing uranium is mined directly. The second is in situ leaching, where chemicals are pumped into groundwater to dissolve uranium from porous rocks, after which the uranium-containing liquid is pumped to the surface. The waste from these processes is more radioactive than natural rock, as the concentrated radioactive material is exposed.

The environmental impact of uranium mining and milling has raised concerns. Uranium extraction can create environmental anomalies that require long-term management. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has implemented regulations to address these issues, such as the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) and the Clean Air Act, which set limits on radium and radon levels, respectively. Additionally, the Clean Water Act regulates runoff water from mines and mills, and the Safe Drinking Water Act establishes limits for radionuclides in drinking water.

To mitigate the risks associated with radionuclides in water, diversion techniques are employed to intercept clean water before it comes into contact with potential contaminants. Rehabilitation actions aim to reduce radiation exposure for individuals and minimize environmental impacts from contaminated areas. These actions are guided by clear objectives and strategies outlined in rehabilitation plans.

Oil spills

The use of supertankers to transport oil has been a significant contributor to oil spills, with intensified petroleum exploration and production on continental shelves leading to more frequent and severe spills since the 1960s. While stringent shipping and environmental regulations have reduced the number of major oil spills from supertankers, thousands of minor and several major oil spills related to well discharges and tanker operations are still reported annually.

The impact of oil spills on the environment is significant. Oil on the surface of the ocean can harm aquatic life by reducing the amount of sunlight penetrating the surface and decreasing the level of dissolved oxygen in the water. Oil can also damage the insulating and waterproofing properties of feathers and fur, leading to hypothermia in birds and marine mammals. Ingesting oil can be toxic to animals, and the damage to their habitats and reproductive rates can slow the recovery of populations. Oil spills can also affect plant life, with saltwater marshes and mangroves being particularly vulnerable.

The economic impact of oil spills can be substantial, with potential effects on tourism, commerce, and industries that rely on seawater. The cleanup of oil spills is challenging, and even with sound scientific approaches, it is difficult to remove 100% of the spilled oil without causing additional harm. The Oil Pollution Act of 1990 established that those responsible for oil spills can be held accountable for the costs of cleanup and restoration.

In summary, oil spills are a significant environmental and economic issue, with the potential to cause lasting damage to aquatic ecosystems and human industries. While efforts have been made to reduce the frequency and severity of spills, the ongoing release of oil into the world's oceans continues to pose a threat to the health of our planet.

Frequently asked questions