Pathogen Pollution: Waterborne Threats And Their Impact

Pathogen pollution in water is a pressing issue that poses significant risks to human health and environmental sustainability. Pathogens, including bacteria, viruses, and parasites, can contaminate water sources through various means, such as agricultural runoff, sewage systems, and natural processes. The presence of these harmful microorganisms can lead to waterborne diseases, ranging from mild gastrointestinal issues to severe illnesses like hepatitis A. Understanding pathogen transport and interactions in the environment is crucial for developing effective strategies to protect water resources and ensure safe drinking water for communities. This complex issue demands interdisciplinary research and innovative modeling approaches to accurately predict and mitigate pathogen contamination in our water systems.

Fecal matter

The presence of fecal matter in water is typically indicated by the detection of coliform bacteria, which are usually harmless but signify the potential presence of harmful pathogens. These bacteria are part of the natural gut microbiota in humans and other warm-blooded animals and are found in high concentrations in sewage. Testing for coliform bacteria is a simple and widely used method to assess water quality and safeguard public health. However, more advanced molecular methods and microbial source tracking markers are also being employed to detect fecal contamination and identify its sources.

The sources of fecal matter pollution in water can be diverse, ranging from agricultural practices to urban settings. In agricultural areas, manure application on fields can influence pathogen transport into water resources. The macropores of agricultural land have been identified as significant contributors to groundwater pollution, especially when contaminated by manure. Additionally, the use of fertilizers of fecal origin can contaminate vegetables and fruits, which then become vehicles for pathogen transmission if washed with polluted water.

Urban areas also face challenges with fecal pollution, particularly in cities with aging sewer systems that are prone to leakage. Inadequate sanitation infrastructure and the close proximity of humans and livestock in densely populated areas can further exacerbate the issue. The expected increase in human and animal feces production due to population growth and meat consumption will likely worsen the impact on water quality in both coastal and inland areas of developed countries.

To address the issue of fecal matter pollution, better management practices, remediation strategies, and increased awareness are necessary. This includes improving sanitary conditions, particularly in developing countries, and implementing land management practices that reduce pathogen transport from agricultural lands to water sources. By integrating knowledge from hydrology, microbiology, and ecology, we can enhance our understanding of pollution levels and develop long-term strategies to improve water quality and protect public health.

Sewage and wastewater

Pathogens in sewage and wastewater can come from different sources. Human fecal pollution, for instance, can result from sewage leaks or inadequate sanitation systems. Animal waste, such as manure applied to agricultural land, can also introduce pathogens into water sources. Industrial waste, particularly from animal processing, can release pathogenic microorganisms into wastewater. Additionally, aging city sewer systems may leak, allowing fecal matter to reach water bodies.

The impact of sewage and wastewater on water quality is significant. Pathogens in these sources can contaminate both surface water and groundwater. For example, sewage leaks or improper waste management can lead to the contamination of lakes, streams, rivers, and groundwater. This contamination can have far-reaching consequences, affecting ecosystems and human health.

The treatment of sewage and wastewater is crucial to mitigate the risks associated with pathogen pollution. Conventional wastewater treatment processes aim to remove suspended solids, biodegradable organics, and pathogenic microorganisms through physical, chemical, and biological methods. However, it is important to note that most wastewater treatment plants are designed primarily to reduce organic pollution and may not eliminate all pathogenic organisms. As a result, even treated wastewater can still contain some pathogenic organisms, posing potential risks when used for irrigation or other purposes.

The presence of pathogens in sewage and wastewater has driven the development of various treatment and disinfection processes. Chlorination, for instance, has been widely used for disinfection, leveraging the high oxidizing capacity of chlorine. However, some pathogens, such as Cryptosporidium and Giardia, exhibit resistance to chlorine, making them particularly challenging to manage.

In summary, sewage and wastewater are significant sources of pathogen pollution in water. Effective treatment and disinfection processes are crucial to minimize the presence of pathogenic organisms and protect human health. The complex nature of pathogen transport and persistence in the environment underscores the importance of ongoing research and the development of improved models to predict and manage water-borne pathogen levels.

Agricultural pollution

Agricultural runoff is the leading cause of water quality issues in rivers and streams, and it is the third leading source of lake impairments. The primary stressors to water quality from agricultural operations are soil erosion, nutrient loss, bacteria from livestock manure, and pesticides. These contaminants are transported into local streams, rivers, and groundwater through runoff, infiltration, and irrigation return flows.

The use of pesticides and fertilizers in agriculture is a major concern. In the continental United States, around half a million tons of pesticides and 12 million tons of nitrogen fertilizer are applied to crops annually. This has a detrimental effect on water quality, as the nutrients in these substances can cause algal blooms in lakes and rivers, leading to hypoxic conditions that are harmful to aquatic life. Excessive algal growth can also block sunlight, disrupting the ecosystem below the water surface. In addition, the high levels of nitrogen and phosphorus in fertilizer and manure can increase the levels of these nutrients in water, leading to eutrophication and further contributing to the decline of aquatic ecosystems.

Livestock manure is another significant source of agricultural pollution. Manure contains bacteria and nutrients that can contaminate water bodies, affecting both aquatic ecosystems and drinking water supplies. The storage of manure in exposed mounds, as is common in poultry farming, can lead to phosphorus runoff, which harms waterways. Manure management is also a significant contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, as the manure emits ammonia, which combines with other air pollutants to form harmful solid particles.

The impact of agricultural pollution on water quality is not limited to chemical and bacterial contaminants. Physical alterations to the land, such as soil erosion and excessive sedimentation, can also have detrimental effects. Increased sedimentation can overwhelm aquatic ecosystems, smother breeding areas, and degrade coastal and marine ecosystems, including coral reefs.

It is important to note that the understanding of pathogen transport from agricultural lands to water sources is still limited, and more field-scale studies are needed to enhance the understanding of pathogen interactions in the environment. By improving the existing models and developing new ones, we can better predict waterborne pathogen levels and implement effective strategies to improve water quality.

Stormwater runoff

Sources of pathogens in stormwater include urban stormwater runoff, leaking sewer lines, sewer overflows, septic systems, landfills, and animal waste. Animal waste, particularly from domestic pets and wildlife, is identified as the ultimate source of bacteria in urban stormwater. Fecal coliform and E. coli, two closely related bacteria groups, are commonly used as indicators of the presence of pathogens in water.

Studies have detected high concentrations of FIB (fecal indicator bacteria) in stormwater runoff, often exceeding the designated threshold values for recreational use of waters. For example, research in San Diego River and Tourmaline Creek found high positive agreements for the human pathogen NoV using the HF183 marker. Additionally, Ahmed et al. (2018) examined sewage contamination in an urban recreational lake in Sydney, Australia, and found higher concentrations of human feces-associated marker genes after storm events, indicating that stormwater runoff transported the contamination to the lake.

The maintenance of storm sewer systems and the implementation of structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) are crucial for mitigating pathogen pollution in stormwater runoff. BMPs, such as infiltration practices, are designed to capture stormwater runoff and allow it to infiltrate the underlying soils. Regular maintenance, including frequent cleaning and the use of efficient technologies like vacuum cleaning, helps remove trash, debris, and sediments that can harbor bacteria and pathogens.

While it is challenging to test for specific disease-causing organisms in water quality monitoring due to the difficulty, expense, and time consumption, focusing on indicator organisms like fecal coliforms and E. coli helps in assessing the potential presence of harmful pathogens.

Indicator bacteria

The discovery and testing of indicator bacteria have helped to meet the conciliation of two needs. A good indicator of faecal pollution should fulfil the following criteria: exist in high numbers in the human intestine and faeces; not be pathogenic to humans; and be easily, reliably, and cheaply detectable in environmental waters. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) lists further criteria for an organism to be an ideal indicator of faecal contamination: the organism should be present whenever enteric pathogens are present; the organism should be useful for all types of water; the organism should have a longer survival time than the hardiest enteric pathogen; and the organism should be found in warm-blooded animals' intestines.

The most common indicator bacteria include total coliforms, or a subset of this group, faecal coliforms, which are found in the intestinal tracts of warm-blooded animals. Testing drinking water for coliform bacteria is a simple way to find out if there may be harmful pathogens in the water. If water also tests positive for E. coli bacteria, it has faecal matter in it. The presence of E. coli bacteria in water has been linked to gastrointestinal symptoms, eye infections, skin complaints, ear, nose, and throat infections, and respiratory illness in swimmers.

Fecal indicator bacteria have been used for over 150 years to indicate faecal contamination of water and associated health risks. The recognition that sewage contamination of water sources spreads diseases such as cholera and typhoid has made it necessary to ascertain the presence of sewage in drinking water. The development of new models and the improvement of existing modelling approaches commonly used for predicting water-borne pathogen levels will likely help in assessing pathogen contamination at the watershed scale.

Frequently asked questions