Geothermal Vs. Nuclear Power: Which Is Less Polluting?

Nuclear and geothermal power plants are both sources of clean energy. Nuclear reactors do not produce air pollution or carbon dioxide while operating, but the processes of mining and refining uranium ore and making reactor fuel require large amounts of energy. Nuclear power plants also produce radioactive waste, which is dangerous to human health and the environment and remains so for thousands of years. Geothermal power plants, on the other hand, have almost no negative environmental effects, especially when used for direct applications and geothermal heat pumps. They do not burn fuel to generate electricity but may release small amounts of sulfur and carbon dioxide. They also have a high capacity factor, meaning they can operate at maximum capacity nearly all the time.

Geothermal vs Nuclear Power Plants

Nuclear reactors don't produce air pollution or carbon dioxide while operating

Nuclear reactors, unlike fossil fuel-fired power plants, do not produce air pollution or carbon dioxide while operating. However, it is important to consider the processes that enable nuclear reactors to function. For instance, mining and refining uranium ore, as well as making reactor fuel, require large amounts of energy. The construction of a nuclear power plant also demands substantial energy, especially in the manufacturing of the large amounts of metal and concrete that are used. If fossil fuels are used in these processes, then the emissions from burning those fuels could be associated with the electricity that nuclear power plants generate.

Nuclear energy is considered a clean energy source and is the only form of clean energy that can supply power around the clock, at any time of day. It also keeps the air clean by removing thousands of tons of harmful air pollutants each year that contribute to acid rain, smog, lung cancer, and cardiovascular disease. A typical 1,000-megawatt nuclear facility in the United States, for example, needs just over 1 square mile to operate, whereas wind farms require 360 times more land area to produce the same amount of electricity, and solar photovoltaic plants require 75 times more space.

Despite the benefits of nuclear energy, there are environmental concerns related to the creation of radioactive wastes. These include uranium mill tailings, spent (used) reactor fuel, and other radioactive wastes. These materials can remain radioactive and dangerous to human health for thousands of years. Radioactive wastes are subject to strict regulations that govern their handling, transportation, storage, and disposal to protect human health and the environment. The radioactivity of these wastes can range from slightly higher than natural background levels to the much higher radioactivity of used reactor fuel and parts of nuclear reactors. The radioactivity of nuclear waste decreases over time through radioactive decay, and wastes with shorter half-lives are often stored temporarily to reduce potential radiation doses to workers and the environment.

While the risk of an uncontrolled nuclear reaction resulting in widespread contamination of air and water exists, the implementation of diverse and redundant barriers, safety systems, skilled personnel, testing and maintenance activities, regulatory requirements, and oversight by entities such as the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission helps to mitigate this risk significantly.

Nuclear power plants produce radioactive waste that can be dangerous for thousands of years

Nuclear power plants emit neither air pollution nor carbon dioxide during operation. However, they do produce radioactive waste, which is a major environmental concern. This waste, which includes uranium mill tailings, spent reactor fuel, and other radioactive materials, can remain dangerously radioactive for thousands of years. The radioactivity of nuclear waste does decrease over time through a process called radioactive decay, but the time it takes for radioactivity to halve is called the radioactive half-life, and some waste has a very long half-life.

Radioactive waste is classified as low-level or high-level. Low-level waste includes contaminated tools, protective clothing, wiping cloths, and other disposable items that become contaminated with small amounts of radioactive dust or particles at nuclear power plants. High-level waste includes irradiated or spent nuclear reactor fuel, which is no longer useful for producing electricity. Spent reactor fuel is highly radioactive and must be stored in specially designed pools of water, which cools the fuel and acts as a radiation shield, or in dry storage containers.

The handling, transportation, storage, and disposal of radioactive waste are subject to strict regulations to protect human health and the environment. Storage facilities are commonly located at the power plant but may be separate. Disposal occurs when there is no further use for the waste, and when radioactivity has decayed to relatively low levels. Most low-level waste and short-lived intermediate-level waste are sent to land-based disposal immediately after packaging. However, there is currently no operational geological repository for the disposal of high-level waste, which can remain dangerously radioactive for thousands of years.

Compared to nuclear power, geothermal energy is a growing part of our clean energy future, but nuclear supplies more electricity. Nuclear energy is also reliable and requires low land use.

Geothermal power plants emit 97% less sulfur and 99% less carbon dioxide than fossil fuel plants

Nuclear energy is often touted as a clean energy source, and it is true that nuclear reactors do not produce air pollution or carbon dioxide while operating. However, the processes for mining and refining uranium ore and making reactor fuel require large amounts of energy, which may come from fossil fuels, thereby creating emissions. Additionally, nuclear power plants produce radioactive waste, which remains dangerous for thousands of years and is subject to strict regulations for its handling, transportation, storage, and disposal.

Geothermal energy, another source of clean energy, has some advantages in this regard. Geothermal power plants emit 97% less sulfur compounds and about 99% less carbon dioxide than fossil fuel plants. They do not burn fuel to generate electricity, but they may release small amounts of sulfur dioxide and carbon dioxide. The carbon dioxide released is not a pollutant but a greenhouse gas. The sulfur compounds emitted by geothermal power plants are primarily in the form of hydrogen sulfide, which is removed through treatment processes. These processes have been so effective that, in the case of The Geysers in California, the plant received the Clean Air Award for Technology Development from the American Lung Associations of the Bay Area in 2004.

Furthermore, geothermal power plants commonly inject geothermal fluids back into reservoirs, which has been shown to diminish their carbon dioxide emissions significantly. For example, the Dixie Valley geothermal "flash" power plant in Nevada experienced a 39% decrease in carbon dioxide emissions when it adopted this practice in 1992. Additionally, most geothermal power plants recycle the geothermal steam and water they use by injecting them back into the earth, further reducing emissions.

While both nuclear and geothermal energy sources have their advantages and trade-offs, geothermal power plants' significantly lower emissions of sulfur compounds and carbon dioxide give them a clear edge in terms of pollution reduction when compared to fossil fuel plants.

Geothermal plants have a high-capacity factor, producing electricity 90% of the time

Geothermal power plants have a high-capacity factor, typically producing electricity 90% of the time or more. This means they can operate at maximum capacity almost all the time, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, regardless of weather conditions. This gives geothermal energy a significant advantage over other renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar power, which are more intermittent.

The high-capacity factor of geothermal plants is due to the consistent availability of geothermal resources, which are reservoirs of hot water and steam found at varying temperatures and depths below the Earth's surface. These reservoirs can be natural or human-made. Wells are drilled into these reservoirs to extract the steam and hot water, which are then used to generate electricity through various methods, such as binary cycle power plants or enhanced geothermal systems (EGS).

The high-capacity factor of geothermal plants contributes to their cost-effectiveness. While the initial costs of building a geothermal power plant can be high, the high-capacity factor means that the costs can be recouped more quickly as there is very little downtime once the plant is operational. Additionally, geothermal plants have low operating costs, as they do not require fuel to keep running, and their compact design consumes less land and water compared to other conventional power plants.

The ability of geothermal plants to produce electricity consistently makes them a critical part of the renewable energy mix. They can balance out intermittent sources of energy and provide a reliable baseload supply, potentially offsetting coal, natural gas, or nuclear power in the electricity market.

Geothermal plants can impact water quality and consumption

Geothermal power plants can impact both water quality and consumption. The water pumped from underground reservoirs often contains high levels of sulfur, salt, and other minerals. Geothermal plants use this water for cooling and re-injection. The amount of water consumed depends on the cooling technology used, with requirements ranging from 1,700 to 4,000 gallons of water per megawatt-hour.

Most geothermal facilities have closed-loop water systems, where extracted water is pumped directly back into the geothermal reservoir after use. This prevents contamination and land subsidence. However, not all water removed from the reservoir is re-injected, as some is lost as steam. To maintain a constant volume of water in the reservoir, external water sources are sometimes needed. For example, the Geysers geothermal site in California uses non-potable treated wastewater for this purpose.

Geothermal power plants in the Salton Sea region use 16 acre-feet of water yearly per MW capacity, equivalent to one Olympic swimming pool per year to power around 100 homes. Despite this, these facilities do not affect the water levels of the Salton Sea. Additionally, there have been no reported cases of water contamination from geothermal sites in the United States.

In contrast, nuclear power plants, which produce a larger supply of electricity than geothermal plants, are associated with radioactive waste that can remain dangerous for thousands of years. While nuclear reactors do not produce air pollution or carbon dioxide, the processes of mining and refining uranium ore and creating reactor fuel require significant energy.

Frequently asked questions