Understanding The Limitations Of Sewage Treatment For Water Purification

Sewage treatment is a type of wastewater treatment that removes contaminants from sewage to produce an effluent that can be discharged into the environment or reused. While sewage treatment plants are effective at removing many pollutants, some water pollutants may not be eliminated by standard treatment processes. These can include micropollutants such as pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and chemicals, as well as dispersed-source pollutants like urban stormwater drainage carrying petroleum residues and road deicing chemicals. The degree of treatment required for wastewater depends on local environmental conditions and government standards, with the overall goal of minimizing water pollution and protecting vulnerable ecosystems.

Pharmaceuticals and pesticides

Pharmaceuticals, including prescription drugs and over-the-counter medications, are increasingly being detected in waterways. While some drugs, such as caffeine, acetaminophen, and estriol, have high removal rates in wastewater treatment plants, others are more persistent. For example, a study found that treatment methods had a low removal rate for 11 out of 42 chemicals, with compounds like triclosan, an antibacterial and antifungal agent, having a "medium removal efficiency". Furthermore, while some aspects of sewage treatment may remove certain pharmaceuticals, this can result in increased concentrations of these drugs in the resulting sludge, which is often used as fertilizer, thus reintroducing the contaminants into the environment.

The presence of pharmaceuticals in water is a growing concern for environmental advocates and water quality experts. While there is currently no federal regulation of pharmaceuticals in waste or drinking water in the United States, 12 pharmaceuticals are on the Environmental Protection Agency's list of chemicals under consideration. The challenge lies in the fact that wastewater treatment plants were not designed to handle these specific types of chemicals, and more advanced and expensive technology may be required to effectively remove them.

Pesticides are another type of contaminant that can be challenging to remove during standard sewage treatment. Pesticides enter water bodies through surface runoff from farms and urban stormwater drainage, and their levels in water have increased due to excessive use in modern agriculture. Various chemical, physical, and biological treatment approaches have been investigated for pesticide removal, including advanced oxidation processes, adsorption, activated sludge, and membrane technologies. However, choosing the most suitable treatment method depends on the specific type of pesticide and the efficacy of the treatment process.

In conclusion, while standard sewage treatment methods can remove some pharmaceuticals and pesticides, they are not equipped to handle all types of these contaminants. The persistence of these pollutants in water highlights the need for ongoing research and the development of innovative treatment techniques to protect aquatic ecosystems and ensure safe drinking water for human consumption.

Industrial wastes and toxic chemicals

Industrial wastewater contains pollutants that can affect the quality of water and interfere with publicly owned treatment works (POTWs). These pollutants include high concentrations of dissolved solids (such as salts), naturally occurring radionuclides, metals, and other drilling pollutants. Industrial sewage, which is wastewater from manufacturing or chemical processes, may contain higher concentrations of suspended solids than domestic sewage. These suspended solids can include heavy metals such as copper, nickel, and chrome, which are removed by mixing with iron and chemicals to cause precipitation, followed by filtration. Other toxic substances treated include cyanide, which is converted to the non-toxic cyanate through the use of bleach at a high pH.

However, the removal of chemical pollutants from water is challenging. Many persistent organic pollutants, such as pharmaceuticals and pesticides, are present as dissolved species and are stable, so they are not consumed by microbes or settled out. This means that a lot of these compounds can pass through the standard sewage treatment process. Additionally, there are various types of industrial wastes and toxic chemicals that are not effectively removed by standard sewage treatment processes. These can include synthetic organic chemicals, inorganic chemicals, microplastics, radioactive substances, oil, and heat.

Standard sewage treatment processes typically focus on removing particulate and suspended matter from water. Particulate matter, such as sludge, is removed through settling, a process where the particles settle out of the water. Suspended matter, on the other hand, is smaller and requires oxidation using microbes for efficient removal. After the microbes treat the suspended matter, they are settled out, and the final effluent is treated with a disinfectant to reduce biological contamination.

While standard sewage treatment can address some types of pollutants, it is important to recognize that industrial wastes and toxic chemicals present significant challenges. Many of these substances are stable and dissolved, evading removal by microbes or settling. Consequently, they persist in the water, highlighting the need for specialized treatment methods to effectively eliminate them.

Microplastics

The sources of microplastics in sewage can be traced to two main types: primary and secondary. Primary microplastics are manufactured at a minuscule size, such as the microbeads found in facial scrub cleansers, while secondary microplastics result from the breakdown of larger plastic items through degradation and weathering. The resilience and durability of plastics contribute to the challenge of removing microplastics from wastewater.

Standard sewage treatment plants, or wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), play a crucial role in mitigating the environmental impact of microplastics. While these facilities have been successful in removing a significant portion of microplastics, the remaining percentage can still find its way into aquatic environments. Secondary and tertiary WWTPs have achieved removal rates of 88% and 94% of microplastics, respectively, with the majority being eliminated during preliminary and primary treatment stages.

However, the challenge lies in the small particles (<150 μm) that remain in the discharged wastewater effluent. These minuscule fragments can accumulate in sewage sludge, which is sometimes treated and applied to land through agricultural reuse. This practice becomes a source of microplastic spread into the environment, impacting terrestrial ecosystems.

To address this issue, researchers have explored various treatment methods, including activated sludge, rapid sand filtering, and membrane bioreactors, coupled with sludge management technologies like anaerobic digestion and incineration. Among these, the combination of membrane bioreactors with sludge incineration has been identified as the most cost-effective approach to preventing the accumulation of microplastics in soils.

While removing microplastics from wastewater is technically feasible, it also underscores the necessity for policy interventions. Extending government regulations to encompass microplastics in wastewater treatment plants and targeting companies that utilize microplastics in their products are crucial steps in combating this environmental challenge.

Radioactive substances

Standard sewage treatment methods are not specifically designed to remove radioactive substances. While they can effectively eliminate many conventional pollutants, radioactive contaminants require specialized treatment techniques. This is because radioactive isotopes have unique chemical and physical properties that allow them to persist in the environment and bioaccumulate in the food chain, posing significant health risks to both human and ecological receptors.

To address the presence of radioactive substances in sewage, regulatory bodies like the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have established pretreatment standards and regulations. These standards, outlined in documents like 40 CFR 435 Subpart C, aim to prohibit the discharge of wastewater pollutants containing radionuclides into publicly owned treatment works (POTWs). By enforcing these standards, the EPA seeks to minimize the environmental and health risks associated with radioactive contamination in water bodies.

Additionally, advanced treatment technologies and optimization strategies are being explored to enhance the removal of radioactive substances from sewage. These technologies may include specialized filtration, ion exchange, or other physical, chemical, or biological processes capable of effectively capturing and treating radionuclides before the treated water is released into the environment.

In conclusion, radioactive substances in sewage pose a significant challenge that requires a multifaceted approach. While standard sewage treatment methods may not be equipped to handle these contaminants, the implementation of regulations, the development of advanced treatment technologies, and the optimization of existing processes are all crucial steps toward mitigating the environmental and health impacts of radioactive water pollution.

Nitrogen and phosphorus

Standard sewage treatment plants use an activated sludge process to treat wastewater. However, this method often fails to remove all the nitrogen and phosphorus, which remain in the form of ammonium and/or nitrate. These compounds can cause eutrophication in natural water bodies, leading to adverse effects on aquatic ecosystems. Additionally, nitrate is a health risk for humans, particularly infants, who are susceptible to methaemoglobinaemia.

To address this issue, post-treatment processes are necessary to eliminate the remaining nitrogen and phosphorus. One such method is bacterial sulfate reduction in an anoxic bioreactor packed with wood and iron. This approach has been successful in removing nitrogen and phosphate from the effluent of sewage treatment plants. The use of foam ceramics as a trickling filter for nitrification has also shown promising results.

Furthermore, the recovery and reuse of nitrogen and phosphorus from wastewater are highly desirable. This is because the use of nitrogen- and phosphorus-based synthetic fertilizers has led to a large-scale influx of reactive nitrogen in the environment, impacting human health and ecological balance. Various technologies, such as ion exchange/adsorption processes, bioelectrochemical systems, and membrane separation, can be employed to recover these nutrients efficiently.

Overall, while standard sewage treatment methods may not effectively remove nitrogen and phosphorus, there are alternative approaches and emerging technologies that show promise in addressing this issue. Optimizing treatment processes and adopting advanced techniques are crucial steps towards minimizing the presence of these pollutants in our water systems.

Frequently asked questions