Manufacturing's Dark Side: Pollution And Its Worst Offenders

Manufacturing is a critical component of economic growth and social progress. However, it is also a significant contributor to environmental pollution, with industrial activities being the leading cause of pollution worldwide. The manufacturing process involves the extraction and processing of natural resources, which can result in harmful by-products such as waste materials and substances that are released into the environment. This includes air and water pollution, caused by the release of toxins and liquid effluents, as well as soil toxicity, which can have severe impacts on human health and the planet's health. The manufacturing-pollution-export nexus is particularly evident in developing countries, where the production of exports can strain local soils, water consumption, and land use.

Fossil fuels

The manufacturing sector, which includes the chemical and refining industries, is a significant contributor to greenhouse gas emissions. In 2021, the manufacturing sector was responsible for 12% of US greenhouse gas emissions, with 75% of those emissions coming from burning fuel for heat generation. The combustion of fossil fuels in manufacturing releases carbon dioxide and other pollutants, exacerbating climate change and environmental degradation.

Drilling, fracking, and mining operations for fossil fuels generate enormous amounts of wastewater, which can be contaminated with heavy metals and radioactive materials. This wastewater is often stored in open-air pits or underground wells, posing risks of leakage and contamination of waterways and aquifers. Even before combustion, fossil fuels emit toxic air pollutants such as benzene and formaldehyde, endangering the health of millions of people.

To address the pollution caused by fossil fuels, a transition to renewable energy sources is essential. Embracing clean energy alternatives, such as solar and wind power, can help stabilize our climate and reduce harmful emissions. Additionally, improving energy efficiency and implementing regulations to limit mercury, air toxics, and carbon pollution from power plants are crucial steps toward mitigating the environmental and health impacts of fossil fuel usage.

Energy production

The production and use of electricity have a substantial environmental impact. While electricity is considered a clean and relatively safe form of energy, its generation and transmission affect the environment. The type of power plant and its location influence the magnitude of its environmental footprint. For instance, coal-fired power plants produce ash, a solid residue that contains hazardous materials captured by pollution control devices. These plants also contribute to water pollution, as coal mining can alter groundwater flow, leading to acid mine drainage.

To mitigate the environmental impact of energy production, regulations such as the Clean Air Act in the United States have been implemented. This act regulates air pollutant emissions from power plants, and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets emissions standards. Various programs, including the Acid Rain Program, have helped reduce emissions of major air pollutants. Additionally, the adoption of renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and geothermal power is crucial for stabilizing our climate and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

The transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources is essential to address the environmental and health impacts of energy production. By shifting to renewable power, we can reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and decrease the carbon footprint of the energy sector. This transition aligns with the goals set by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to reduce carbon emissions and mitigate the worst impacts of the climate crisis.

Exports

The export-oriented manufacturing industry has a notable impact on water consumption and quality, land-use change, and soil toxicity. In 2019, large textile clusters in countries like Bangladesh, Kenya, Pakistan, and Tanzania exported $79 billion worth of goods. The environmental footprint of these exports included high water consumption (44%), land use (19%), and degradation of freshwater quality. The manufacturing stage contributed to 44% of the pollution, primarily in the form of soil toxicity, which is challenging and costly to remediate.

The production of goods for export can also lead to deforestation and a strain on local soils. For instance, an analysis of palm oil exports from Kenya revealed that for every tonne of palm oil processed, 1.8 tonnes of pollutants, equivalent to dichlorobenzene, were left in the environment, negatively affecting the soil. Similarly, the fashion industry, driven by exports, is the third most polluting industry, contributing about 10% of the annual carbon footprint.

To address the environmental and health impacts of exports, several strategies can be employed:

• Adopting clean production technologies and improving energy efficiency.
• Implementing regulations and policies, such as the European Union's Taxonomy on Sustainable Finance, which encourages a life cycle perspective for investments and promotes the use of the best available technologies.
• Improving productive capacities and adopting sustainable practices to balance economic growth with environmental protection.
• Reducing consumption of unethically manufactured goods to limit the demand that drives industrial pollution.

Water pollution

The fashion industry, for instance, produces around 92 million tonnes of waste annually, polluting water throughout its production chain. This includes the runoff of fertilisers from cotton plantations, the use of toxic chemicals in dyeing processes, and the release of fibres and dyes into wastewater during product use. Additionally, the construction industry contributes to freshwater pollution, with building materials like cement, steel, and lumber requiring significant amounts of water for production.

Agricultural practices also play a significant role in water pollution. Agriculture accounts for up to 70% of global freshwater use and is one of its biggest polluters. The use of fertilisers, insecticides, and pesticides in farming can contaminate groundwater, harming animals, plants, and humans. These chemicals can dissolve easily in water, increasing their concentrations and posing health risks, including skin and eye irritation, nervous system issues, and even cancer.

Chemical factories, textile mills, sugar mills, and oil refineries are also responsible for water pollution. These industries discharge harmful chemicals, heavy metals, and pollutants into rivers and streams, endangering aquatic life and disrupting ecosystems. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the United States has been criticised for not adequately regulating and addressing water pollution caused by dirty industries, allowing billions of pounds of toxic pollution to enter waterways annually.

The impact of water pollution extends beyond the environment. According to the United Nations, more deaths are caused annually by polluted water than by all forms of violence, including war. Water pollution also affects sectors such as commercial fishing, recreational businesses, tourism, and property values, all of which rely on clean water. Furthermore, polluted drinking water increases treatment costs, leading to higher drinking water prices.

Air pollution

Manufacturing, along with transportation and power generation, is a significant contributor to air pollution. The manufacturing sector emits carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, such as nitrous oxide and methane, by burning fossil fuels and through specific industrial processes. In 2021, 91% of industrial process emissions were carbon dioxide, primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels to generate heat. The refining industry, for example, relies heavily on fossil fuel combustion, while the cement and lime industry's emissions mostly come from breaking down raw materials like limestone.

Over the years, the manufacturing sector has made efforts to reduce its emissions intensity by adopting new production technologies. For instance, the steel industry has transitioned from using basic oxygen furnaces (BOFs) that burn fossil fuels to electric arc furnaces (EAFs) that use electrical currents to melt and reform scrap metal. This change has resulted in lower emissions. Additionally, policies like the Clean Air Act in the United States have been instrumental in regulating and reducing harmful emissions from the manufacturing sector.

However, certain manufacturing facilities, such as factories and power plants, continue to contribute significantly to air pollution. These facilities are required to comply with air pollution permits, and while they have achieved reductions, they still account for a notable proportion of total emissions. For example, in Minnesota, permitted facilities, including large power plants, contribute to 21% of the state's total emissions.

To further reduce air pollution from manufacturing, a combination of regulatory measures, technological advancements, and energy source transitions is necessary. Regulatory bodies, such as the EPA, play a crucial role in enforcing emissions standards and providing incentives for cleaner production methods. Additionally, transitioning to cleaner energy sources, such as natural gas and electricity, can help reduce emissions from the manufacturing sector, improving air quality and mitigating the harmful effects of air pollution on human health and the environment.

Frequently asked questions