A World Without Air Pollution: Clean Air, Blue Skies

Air pollution is a global issue with severe consequences for human health and the environment. It is caused by various human activities, such as burning fossil fuels, agriculture, manufacturing, and urbanization, filling the air with harmful substances like carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter. The impact of air pollution is evident in the reduced air quality, contributing to diseases such as asthma, heart attacks, strokes, pneumonia, and cancer. During the coronavirus pandemic, a brief glimpse of a world with less air pollution was observed as fewer people drove cars and fewer factories operated, resulting in a drop in pollution levels worldwide. This temporary reprieve from pollution allowed nature to flourish, with wildlife exploring emptier streets and canals. While it is challenging to find places untouched by human-induced pollution, it is crucial to recognize the importance of reducing air pollution to protect our health and the planet.

Health: No more asthma, heart attacks, strokes, pneumonia, or cancer from air pollution

Air pollution is a major public health issue, contributing to millions of deaths and even more cases of illness every year. It is linked to a wide range of adverse health effects, including respiratory and cardiovascular problems, as well as cancer.

In a world without air pollution, the incidence of asthma would be significantly reduced. Ozone, a common air pollutant, is formed from the reaction between emissions from burning fuels and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), along with heat and sunlight. Ground-level ozone, often found in smog, is highly irritating to the lungs and airways, triggering asthma attacks and worsening respiratory diseases. Other air pollutants, such as nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and sulfur dioxide (SO2), can also irritate the airways and lungs, exacerbating asthma symptoms. Without these pollutants, people with asthma would no longer need to limit their time outdoors or worry about triggering an attack.

Cardiovascular diseases, including heart attacks and strokes, would also be far less prevalent. Air pollution has been linked to an increased risk of heart disease, with tiny pollution particles causing significant problems for heart health. Studies have shown a strong association between air pollution and strokes, particularly in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). The effects of air pollution on cardiovascular health are so significant that it is now considered one of the top five risk factors for mortality in emerging economies. In a world without air pollution, the risk of heart attacks and strokes would be greatly reduced, leading to improved cardiovascular health for millions of people.

Additionally, the incidence of pneumonia, particularly in children, would decrease significantly. Studies have found a link between indoor air pollution and childhood pneumonia, with solid fuel use being a significant contributor. Particulate matter in polluted air can increase the risk of pneumonia, especially in children with higher exposure. By eliminating air pollution, we could protect children from this serious respiratory infection and reduce the burden of pneumonia-related illnesses.

Lastly, a world without air pollution would result in a significant decrease in cancer cases. Outdoor air pollution has been identified as a public health challenge worldwide due to its ubiquitous nature and serious health effects, including cancer. Major primary air pollutants, emitted from the combustion of fossil fuels and biomass, include gaseous pollutants such as nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and particulate matter (PM). These pollutants have been associated with cancer, and their presence in the air we breathe poses a significant risk to human health. By removing air pollution, we could drastically reduce the number of cancer cases and improve the overall health and well-being of people worldwide.

Nature: Wildlife would thrive, and we'd see stars at night

Light pollution, caused by human-generated illumination, is brightening the night sky at an alarming rate. Research by physicist Christopher Kyba has revealed that light pollution is causing the night sky to brighten by about 10% each year, threatening to obscure all but the brightest stars within a generation. This has already had a detrimental effect on stargazing, with the Milky Way no longer visible to a third of the world's population. The increased use of LEDs, external lighting, street illumination, advertising, and illuminated sporting venues is causing this light pollution.

Without air pollution, the night sky would be a dazzling display of stars, with the Milky Way glittering across the heavens. We would be able to see the constellations and experience the splendour of the cosmos.

Air pollution also has a significant impact on wildlife. It affects the quality of the environment or habitat in which they live and the availability and quality of their food supply. For example, acid rain can change the chemistry and quality of soils and water, making it difficult for some animals to survive or function normally. Heavy metals, toxic substances, and persistent organic pollutants (POPs) can enter the food chain, damaging the supply and quality of food. These pollutants collect and increase in concentration as they move up the food chain through bioaccumulation.

Without air pollution, wildlife would thrive. Their habitats would be healthier, and the quality of their food supply would improve. The negative impacts of air pollution on endocrine function, organ injury, stress and disease vulnerability, and reproductive success would be reduced. With healthier habitats and food sources, wildlife populations would increase, benefiting dependent species.

Climate: Fewer climate changes, less extreme weather

The world would undoubtedly look very different if human-caused air pollution were eliminated. The COVID-19 pandemic provided a glimpse into what this might look like, as reduced human activity resulted in lower air pollution levels globally.

Considering the climate specifically, reducing air pollution would likely lead to fewer climate changes and less extreme weather events. Air pollution and climate change are intricately linked, with certain air pollutants contributing to climate change and vice versa. For example, greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide and methane, trap heat in the atmosphere, leading to rising temperatures, sea levels, and more extreme weather. By reducing the emission of these greenhouse gases, we can slow down climate change and mitigate its impacts.

Additionally, air pollution from vehicle exhaust and industrial factories contributes to climate change and severe weather events. For instance, wildfires, which are becoming more frequent and severe due to climate change, release smoke that lowers air quality and harms human health. By reducing air pollution, we can decrease the frequency and intensity of wildfires and other extreme weather events, such as flooding and storm surges.

Furthermore, climate change lengthens the pollen season and increases pollen production, affecting air quality and human health. With less air pollution, there would likely be a decrease in pollen-related allergies and respiratory issues.

However, it is important to recognize that completely eliminating human-caused air pollution instantly would also have negative consequences. Aerosols, which are a type of air pollutant, have a cooling effect on the planet. If these aerosols were suddenly removed, the planet would experience a temporary spike in warming, with virtually no lingering cooling effect from previously emitted particles.

In conclusion, while the world may never be completely free of air pollution, taking steps to reduce it is crucial for mitigating climate change and its impacts. This includes reducing greenhouse gas emissions, transitioning away from fossil fuels, and implementing regulatory initiatives and individual actions to lower air pollutant levels. By doing so, we can create a more sustainable and resilient future, with fewer climate changes and less extreme weather events.

Water: Cleaner water, with less pollution from air and land

Water is a cornerstone of life on Earth, and without air pollution, our water bodies would be much cleaner. Air pollution significantly impacts water quality, and without it, water would be free of pollutants that originate in the air.

Cleaner Water, with Less Pollution from the Air

Air pollution affects water quality in several ways. Atmospheric deposition of nitrogen and sulfur from air pollution leads to the acidification of aquatic ecosystems. Acid precipitation, or acid rain, alters the chemistry of the soil, reducing its ability to retain essential nutrients, minerals, and elements such as calcium, magnesium, and potassium. These nutrients are then transported by water flowing through the soil, affecting both the soil and water quality. This process can lead to dramatic short-term or long-term acidification of water bodies, which can be lethal to aquatic organisms and reduce vegetation and wildlife.

Without air pollution, water bodies would not experience acid shock, and the pH levels of lakes, rivers, and streams would be more stable, providing a healthier environment for aquatic life. The water would be free from excessive nitrogen and sulfur deposition, reducing the stress on natural ecosystems.

Cleaner Water, with Less Pollution from Land

While air pollution directly impacts water quality, it is also important to consider land-based pollution sources. Eighty percent of ocean pollution originates on land, with contaminants such as chemicals, nutrients, and heavy metals carried from farms, factories, and cities into our bays, estuaries, and eventually the sea.

In a world without air pollution, efforts to reduce land-based pollution would be more effective. This includes managing farm waste and fertilizer runoff, controlling industrial waste discharges, and preventing the dumping of random junk into waterways. By addressing these land-based pollution sources, water quality would significantly improve.

The Impact of Reduced Human Activity on Water Quality

During the COVID-19 pandemic, a unique opportunity arose to observe the impact of reduced human activity on the environment. With fewer people driving cars and fewer factories running, air pollution levels dropped globally, and satellite imagery captured the improvement. This temporary reprieve from pollution allowed nature to rebound, with wildlife venturing into emptier streets and canals.

While human absence cannot be a long-term solution, it demonstrates the potential for rapid environmental recovery. In areas like Chernobyl, nature has taken advantage of human absence, with wildlife thriving in the absence of human settlements.

In summary, without air pollution, water would be much cleaner, with reduced pollution from both the air and land. This would lead to healthier aquatic ecosystems and improved water quality for all.

Energy: Less burning of fossil fuels, more clean energy

The burning of fossil fuels is a major contributor to air pollution. Oil, coal, and gas currently serve about 80% of our energy needs, and we are witnessing the consequences in the form of air and water pollution, and global warming. To reduce air pollution, we must transition to cleaner energy sources and reduce our reliance on fossil fuels.

One approach is to switch from coal to natural gas, a cleaner alternative that emits about half as much CO2 when burnt. However, natural gas is primarily methane, and leaks of uncombusted methane are a significant concern as it is a potent greenhouse gas. To address this, researchers are identifying and fixing leaks at top-emitting wells and pipes, which could significantly reduce methane emissions.

Another method to reduce emissions from fossil fuels is carbon capture and sequestration. This technique involves capturing carbon dioxide and storing it underground in deep geological formations. Researchers have established the scientific basis for safe and effective sequestration, demonstrating that captured CO2 can be permanently trapped underground. Additionally, captured CO2 can be used for sustainable purposes, such as making renewable plastic.

While we continue to burn fossil fuels, it is essential to focus on energy conservation to minimize air pollution. This includes simple actions such as turning off electrical equipment when not in use, buying energy-efficient appliances, and limiting the use of air conditioning. During the coronavirus pandemic, a decrease in driving cars and operating factories led to a noticeable drop in air pollution levels worldwide, demonstrating the impact of our energy consumption choices.

In the long term, we must continue to scale up renewable energy sources to replace fossil fuels entirely. This transition is already underway, with major progress made in the United States over the past decade due to supportive federal, state, and local policies. By embracing a clean energy future, we can significantly reduce air pollution and mitigate the harmful impacts of burning fossil fuels on our planet and our health.

Frequently asked questions