Fracking's Dark Side: A Pollutant And Its Consequences

Fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, is an inexpensive way to extract oil or natural gas by injecting water, chemicals, and sand into horizontal wells under high pressure to crack rock and release oil and gas. However, fracking has been associated with multiple environmental and social problems, including air, water, and soil pollution. The process releases large amounts of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, and other toxic compounds such as nitrogen oxides, benzene, and hydrogen sulfide. Fracking also uses large amounts of water, reducing the water supply and threatening to contaminate local water sources with toxic chemicals and wastewater.

Air pollution

One of the primary air pollutants associated with fracking is methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Fracking can result in methane leakage rates as high as 7.9 percent from shale gas wells, contributing to the greenhouse effect and climate change. Methane has a higher heat-trapping potential than carbon dioxide, making these leaks a significant concern. Additionally, fracking has been linked to the release of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), including particulate matter and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) such as benzene, toluene, and ethylbenzene. These pollutants have been associated with respiratory and cardiovascular health issues, and exposure to them has been linked to an increased risk of cancer, especially for those living within 0.5 miles of a fracking site.

The lack of sufficient air pollution monitoring stations near fracking wells has been a cause for concern. Residents in areas with fracking activities, such as Belmont County in Ohio, have taken it upon themselves to set up low-cost sensor networks to gather more accurate data on air quality. These efforts have helped them advocate for cleaner air and take necessary precautions to protect their health. The data has also enabled community leaders to request public records and assess compliance with air quality standards by fracking facilities.

The health impacts of air pollution from fracking are significant. A Harvard study found a link between air pollution from fracking and early deaths among nearby residents, particularly senior citizens. This is consistent with other studies that have reported various health consequences, including increased risks of cancer and respiratory issues. Additionally, research has suggested that children born near fracking sites have a higher risk of leukemia, and proximity to oil and gas wells has been linked to low birth weight. These findings underscore the urgent need to understand the causal links between fracking and adverse health outcomes and to address the potential hazards of air pollution from fracking operations.

Water pollution

Fracking is a process that involves injecting large volumes of water, mixed with toxic chemicals and sand, into horizontal wells under high pressure to crack rock and release oil and gas. This process has been associated with significant water pollution, which can have detrimental effects on both the environment and human health.

One of the main concerns with fracking is the potential for water contamination. The toxic chemicals used in the fracking process can leak into nearby water sources, such as rivers and groundwater. In one incident in Ohio in 2014, a fire at a fracking site caused trucks carrying toxic chemicals to explode, releasing thousands of gallons of these chemicals into a tributary of the Ohio River. This resulted in the death of more than 70,000 fish.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has identified over a thousand chemicals used in fracking fluid, many of which are considered harmful to human health. Researchers at the Yale School of Public Health analysed more than 1,000 chemicals found in fracking fluid and wastewater and found that 65% of those tested were toxic. These chemicals have been linked to various negative health effects, including cancer, endocrine disruption, and neurological and immune system problems.

In addition to the immediate contamination of water sources, fracking also has indirect effects on water pollution. The process requires large volumes of water, with each well consuming a median of 1.5 million gallons, according to the EPA. This reduces the amount of water available for drinking and irrigation and can impact local water sources. The wastewater generated in the fracking process is often contaminated with toxic chemicals and high salinity, which can further pollute water sources if not properly treated or disposed of.

The environmental and health impacts of water pollution caused by fracking are significant. The contamination of water sources can lead to the destruction of wildlife habitats and the death of aquatic organisms. It can also affect the soil's ability to support plant life, impacting the broader ecosystem. For humans, exposure to contaminated water sources can result in various health issues, including respiratory diseases and cancer.

Soil pollution

Fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, is a process that involves injecting large volumes of water, mixed with toxic chemicals and sand, into horizontal wells under high pressure to crack rock and release oil and gas. While fracking has the potential to provide increased oil and gas resources, it also has long-lasting negative impacts on the environment.

One of the primary concerns regarding fracking is its contribution to soil pollution. According to a study by Cornell University researchers, published in the journal Environmental Science and Technology, fracking can lead to greater levels of soil contamination than previously thought. The study found that certain chemicals within the wastewater used in fracking can trigger the release of particles within the soil. These particles have the ability to bind pollutants to metals, which could result in more severe consequences for wildlife and human health in the event of a spill.

The high salinity of wastewater spills from fracking operations can significantly reduce the soil's ability to support plant life. This not only affects agricultural productivity but also disrupts ecosystems and the habitats of various wildlife species. Additionally, the flowback fluid used in fracking can loosen the bond between sand and colloids, causing them to repel soil particles, further contributing to soil contamination.

The environmental impact of fracking extends beyond soil pollution. It is also associated with air pollution and water pollution, as well as increased seismic activity. The toxic chemicals and wastewater generated during fracking have been linked to negative health effects, including cancer, endocrine disruption, and neurological and immune system problems. Furthermore, the loud machines and bright lights of industrial fracking areas can drive away wildlife, damaging their critical habitats and interfering with their behaviour.

Climate change

Fracking is an inexpensive way to extract oil or natural gas that cannot be reached through conventional drilling. However, it has long-lasting negative impacts on the environment and is a significant contributor to climate change.

Fracking involves injecting large volumes of water mixed with toxic chemicals and sand into the earth to fracture rock formations and release oil and natural gas. This process contaminates water and emits massive amounts of greenhouse gas pollution, including methane, a potent climate-warming agent. Methane is the main component of natural gas, and it traps 25 to 86 times more heat in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide. Leaks from oil and gas operations are the leading source of human-caused methane pollution, and fracking has been associated with high methane leakage rates. This means that fracked gas could be worse for the climate than coal, despite being heralded as a "green" alternative.

The development of new technologies, such as horizontal drilling, has made it possible to exploit enormous unconventional reserves of shale gas worldwide. However, if even a small portion of these reserves is exploited, it is highly likely that global warming will exceed 2°C, a critical threshold. This could lead to accelerated ice melting and unstoppable global sea-level rise.

In addition to methane, fracking releases other toxic compounds such as nitrogen oxides, benzene, hydrogen sulfide, and hydrocarbons, which contribute to air pollution and endanger public health. The extraction of natural gas or oil via fracking can also affect local groundwater and soil quality.

To mitigate climate change and protect public health, it is crucial to transition towards renewable power and improve energy efficiency. This includes developing renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, which do not contribute to climate change.

Wildlife destruction

Fracking has been linked to wildlife destruction in several ways. Firstly, it contributes to water contamination, which can have devastating effects on aquatic life. In 2014, a fracking equipment failure in Ohio resulted in a fire, explosions, and the leakage of thousands of gallons of toxic chemicals into a river tributary. This single incident killed over 70,000 fish. Duke University researchers have also found that natural fissures between rock layers can allow toxic fracking fluids to reach the surface, contaminating water sources used by both wildlife and humans. This contamination has been linked to serious reproductive issues and even death in cattle.

Fracking also impacts wildlife through air pollution. A long-term study in Colorado revealed that air pollution from natural gas fracking can cause neurological problems, respiratory diseases, and cancer in wild animals. Additionally, the loud noises and bright lights associated with fracking operations can alter animal behaviour and drive them away from critical habitats. For example, the noise from air compressors and industrial traffic has been found to decrease species diversity within bird communities and disrupt plant pollination. Similarly, the bright lights at drilling sites can affect nocturnal wildlife, with light pollution posing risks to migratory birds and other nocturnal creatures.

The construction of infrastructure for fracking, such as pipelines and roads, can also lead to habitat destruction and fragmentation. This can displace wildlife and reduce their ability to survive. For instance, the mule deer population in an area of extensive gas extraction in Wyoming decreased by 56% between 2001 and 2010 due to habitat fragmentation. Additionally, the clearance of forest land for fracking can result in increased nutrient pollution in nearby water bodies, creating dead zones that further harm aquatic ecosystems and the wildlife that depends on them.

Fracking's intensive water usage can also affect wildlife. The process requires millions of gallons of water per well, which is often sourced from rivers, streams, or groundwater. This extraction of water can disrupt aquatic ecosystems and impact the wildlife that relies on these water sources. Furthermore, the contaminated water resulting from fracking, containing heavy metals, radioactivity, toxic chemicals, and high salinity, can return to the surface, further polluting waterways and harming aquatic life.

While research on the specific impacts of fracking on wildlife is still ongoing, the potential consequences for a diverse range of species, including birds, fish, mussels, and mammals, are significant. Preventative measures and careful planning are essential to minimize the negative impacts of fracking on wildlife and their habitats.

Frequently asked questions