Airplane Emissions: How Much Do They Pollute Our Air?

Air travel has become increasingly accessible, with the number of passengers travelling by air soaring from 100 million in 1960 to 4.56 billion in 2019. This hypermobility has had a significant impact on the environment, with aviation contributing to global warming and climate change. Aviation is responsible for around 2.4% to 2.5% of global CO2 emissions, and when considering other gases and water vapour trails, its impact on global warming rises to approximately 3.5% to 5%. The industry is facing pressure to adopt more sustainable practices and reduce its carbon footprint, with a target of achieving net-zero emissions by 2050. This includes exploring sustainable aviation fuels, improving aircraft and engine design, and transitioning to electric aircraft. While aviation emissions account for a relatively small share of global emissions, it is one of the most challenging sectors to decarbonise due to the limited range and size of electric aircraft with current battery technology.

Aviation's contribution to global warming

The impact of aviation on global warming goes beyond carbon emissions. When an aircraft burns jet fuel, it releases nitrogen oxides (NOx), water vapour, soot, and aerosols, which react with the atmosphere at altitude and contribute substantially to global warming. These non-CO2 effects make up two-thirds of aviation's climate impact, with contrail cirrus alone accounting for up to 57% of the total impact. Contrail cirrus are long, cloudy strips that form when moisture in ice-saturated air freezes around soot particles released by burning jet fuel. They can trap heat radiating from the Earth's surface, particularly at night.

The aviation industry has set ambitious goals to address its contribution to global warming, adopting the target of reaching net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. Sustainable aviation fuels (SAFs) and carbon offsetting are expected to play a significant role in reducing emissions, with SAFs projected to contribute around 65% of the required emissions reduction. However, critics argue that carbon offsets have repeatedly been proven ineffective in reducing emissions and can cause harm by concentrating pollution in low-income communities and displacing Indigenous communities.

To achieve net-zero emissions, the aviation industry must also explore alternative low-emission technologies, such as electric and hydrogen-powered aircraft. Policymakers and organizations like the Center for Biological Diversity are pushing for rigorous standards and regulations to reduce and prevent carbon pollution from aircraft. Additionally, trajectory optimization, or the use of alternative flight paths to avoid areas prone to persistent contrail formation, is another strategy to mitigate aviation's non-CO2 effects.

While aviation's contribution to global warming is substantial, it is important to note that only a small percentage of the world's population flies frequently. Nevertheless, the increasing demand for air travel and the projected growth in the aviation industry emphasize the urgency of implementing sustainable practices and technologies to reduce its climate impact.

Alternatives to air travel

Aviation is responsible for around 2.4% of global CO2 emissions, contributing to about 5% of global warming. In the United States, aircraft are one of the fastest-growing sources of emissions, with emissions from domestic aviation alone increasing by 17% since 1990.

With the aviation industry's significant contribution to global warming, it is essential to explore alternatives to air travel. Here are some options:

Train Travel

Trains are a popular alternative to air travel, offering a more environmentally friendly way to move between destinations. Train travel emits much lower carbon emissions than flying and is often cheaper and faster for shorter distances when considering the time spent on airport procedures. Trains also offer the advantage of connecting city centres directly, providing scenic views and the opportunity to explore new places along the route.

Road Trips

Road trips by car, motorcycle, or RV are another alternative, especially if you're travelling with others. While driving alone in a medium-sized petrol car produces about 192g of CO2 per kilometre, sharing the ride with passengers can significantly reduce the carbon footprint per person.

Ferries and Boats

For those who love water, ferries and boats provide a unique travel experience. This option is particularly appealing when travelling between continents separated by oceans or seas.

Other Options

Other alternatives to air travel include bus, bicycle, or even a combination of these modes of transportation.

While these alternatives exist, it's important to acknowledge that some journeys are harder to undertake without flying. However, by choosing these options when feasible, we can collectively contribute to reducing the carbon emissions associated with air travel.

The aviation industry's emission mitigation efforts

Aviation is a notable contributor to the global economy, but it also has a significant adverse impact on climate change. The aviation industry has been working to mitigate its environmental footprint through various measures, including improvements in technology, sustainable aviation fuel adoption, and aircraft design changes. However, the rate of improvement is often outpaced by the increasing demand for air transportation, resulting in steadily rising greenhouse gas emissions.

One key strategy for emission reduction in the aviation sector is the utilization of sustainable biofuels. Biofuels can be produced from various sources such as starches, oils, fats, sugar, forest residues, and waste materials. Blending biofuels with conventional jet fuel can significantly lower greenhouse gas emissions and reduce exhaust particulates like soot, water vapour, and sulfates. This, in turn, helps to mitigate the formation of contrails, which are a significant contributor to aviation's climate impact.

The development and deployment of advanced biofuels, such as second- and third-generation biofuels, are also being explored by the industry. However, there are challenges associated with the sustainability of biofuels, including environmental, financial, and regulatory issues. Additionally, the production of biofuels from food sources can impact the human food chain due to the large amount of land required. As a result, non-food biomass sources like algae, jatropha, halophytes, and switch grass are being considered for biofuel production.

Another focus area for emission mitigation is aircraft design and fuel-burn reduction. New aircraft from manufacturers like Boeing and Airbus already meet or exceed CO2 emission requirements. By 2028, many U.S. carriers will meet the emission standards for their fleet averages. Additionally, modern jet engines emit far fewer soot particles, reducing their contribution to contrail formation and eliminating the black exhaust typical of older jet aircraft.

While technological advancements are crucial, they alone are insufficient to achieve future emission reduction targets. Modernization of airports and air traffic management (ATM) systems is also necessary for steadily reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, coordination between national and international efforts is essential, as climate treaties often leave it to individual parties to decide on addressing GHG emissions from international transportation.

The impact of aviation emissions on public health

Aviation emissions have a significant impact on public health. While aviation only accounts for around 2.4% to 2.5% of global CO2 emissions, its overall contribution to climate change is higher when considering non-CO2 emissions. Aircraft emissions, including water vapour trails, contribute to approximately 5% of global warming.

The health effects of aviation emissions are not limited to respiratory issues. The EPA, the US environmental regulatory body, determined in 2016 that aircraft emissions "cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health and welfare." This decision was based on the understanding that aviation emissions contribute to overall air pollution levels, which have been linked to various adverse health outcomes.

Additionally, aviation emissions have a disproportionate impact on low-income communities and communities of colour, who are already burdened by toxic air emissions. The concentration of pollution in these areas can lead to a range of health issues, including cardiopulmonary and lung cancer deaths.

To address these public health concerns, there is a growing push for the aviation industry to transition to a more environmentally just and sustainable model. This includes reducing greenhouse gas emissions, improving fuel efficiency, and adopting electric aircraft and alternative fuels. By achieving a zero-emissions aviation sector, the industry can mitigate its impact on public health and contribute to global efforts to combat climate change.

The role of regulators in reducing aviation emissions

Aviation is a significant contributor to global carbon dioxide emissions, accounting for around 2% of all human-induced carbon dioxide emissions and 12% of CO2 emissions from transport sources. If the industry were a country, it would rank sixth in emissions, between Russia and Japan, or between Japan and Germany.

Regulators can drive emission reductions through technology improvements, new technology, operational efficiencies, and the use of Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAFs) and CORSIA (an international carbon offsetting scheme for aviation). For instance, the EPA in the US has set CO2 emission standards for aircraft under the Clean Air Act, and aircraft manufacturers are pioneering new technologies to achieve net-zero carbon air travel.

At the international level, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has set carbon dioxide emission standards, which the EPA has aligned with to keep US-manufactured aircraft competitive globally. The European Commission is also taking steps to reduce aviation emissions through the EU Emissions Trading System Directive, which now includes non-CO2 aviation emissions in its monitoring and reporting framework.

Additionally, regulators can encourage the use of alternative modes of transport where possible, such as trains and coaches, which are often more climate-friendly than flying.

Frequently asked questions