Nitrates In Water: A Growing Pollution Problem

Nitrate pollution is a pressing issue for water sources worldwide, with far-reaching consequences for human health and the environment. Nitrates are a naturally occurring compound, but human activity has disrupted the natural nitrogen cycle, leading to excessive levels of nitrates in water. This is primarily due to agricultural runoff, sewage, and fertiliser use, which contaminate groundwater, rivers, lakes, and estuaries. The problem is particularly acute in intensively farmed and fertilised regions, and the cost of addressing nitrate pollution is significant, with water treatment requiring high energy use and incurring substantial expenses. The health risks associated with nitrate consumption are also a critical concern, especially for infants, who are vulnerable to methemoglobinemia or blue baby syndrome, which affects the blood's ability to carry oxygen and can lead to serious illness and death.

Nitrate contamination in surface water and groundwater

In surface water, nitrates enter through runoff from agricultural fields, sewage, and septic systems. This runoff contains nitrogen-based nutrients from fertilisers, manure, and sewage effluent, leading to excessive nutrient concentrations in rivers, lakes, and estuaries. As a result, algae grow excessively, depleting the oxygen levels in the water and disrupting the natural ecosystem. This process, known as eutrophication, causes ecological and amenity damage to our rivers, lakes, and coasts.

Groundwater, a crucial source of drinking water, is also vulnerable to nitrate contamination. Nitrates leach into the soil from various sources, including irrigation water containing fertilisers, wastewater treatment plants, septic systems, and dairies. Initially, shallow aquifers are at the highest risk. However, in areas with deeper water tables, long-term issues are emerging. Decades of intensive fertiliser application have resulted in large nitrate stores in the subsurface, creating a "nitrate time bomb" that will impact water quality for years to come.

The health risks associated with nitrate-contaminated water are significant, particularly for infants. Consuming water with high nitrate levels can lead to methemoglobinemia, or "blue baby syndrome," which affects the blood's ability to carry oxygen and can cause serious illness or death. Infants under six months old who are bottle-fed are at the highest risk. Additionally, there are potential long-term health impacts, including associations with thyroid problems, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and cancers, although further research is needed to confirm these links.

Addressing nitrate contamination in surface water and groundwater is challenging and costly. Regulatory measures, such as the Nitrates Directive in Europe, aim to protect water quality by establishing good agricultural practices and identifying areas at risk of pollution. Local efforts, such as those by the Central Valley Water Board in California, also play a crucial role in tackling this issue. However, the removal of nitrates from drinking water supplies is expensive, especially for systems relying on untreated groundwater without the necessary water treatment infrastructure.

Nitrate's harmful effects on human health

Nitrates are a naturally occurring compound, with many human-made sources. It is often found in lakes, rivers, and groundwater. You cannot taste, smell, or see nitrates in water. Consuming too many nitrates can be harmful to human health, especially for babies.

High levels of nitrates in water, often above 10 mg/L, can be the result of runoff or leakage from fertilized soil, wastewater, landfills, animal feedlots, septic systems, or urban drainage. Natural levels of nitrates in groundwater are usually quite low (less than 3 mg/L). However, human activities can cause contamination and lead to short-term or long-term health effects.

One of the primary health concerns associated with nitrates in drinking water is methemoglobinemia, also known as "blue baby syndrome." This condition affects how blood carries oxygen, causing the lips and skin to turn bluish. Bottle-fed babies under six months old are at the highest risk of developing this illness, which can be serious or even fatal.

Recent studies have also linked low levels of nitrate in drinking water to colorectal cancer, thyroid problems, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. These potential health impacts highlight the importance of regular testing of well water and the need for effective methods to remove nitrates from drinking water.

Furthermore, nitrates in water can have indirect effects on human health. Excessive nitrates in water systems can lead to excessive algae growth, which can deplete the oxygen in the water and affect the natural ecosystem. This disruption can impact the availability of clean water, which is vital for human health and well-being.

Nitrate's impact on aquatic ecosystems

Nitrates are a significant concern for aquatic ecosystems, causing ecological and amenity damage to rivers, lakes, and coasts. The problem is twofold: nitrates directly harm human and ecosystem health, and they are an indicator of other contaminants.

Nitrates are a naturally occurring compound, but human activity has disrupted the natural nitrogen cycle. Excessive nitrogen-based nutrients from agricultural runoff, sewage, and manure seep into groundwater and surface water. This "overfeeding" of aquatic systems with nitrogen has local and downstream effects.

In water, nitrates stimulate the growth of algae. While moderate levels of algae serve as food for aquatic organisms, excessive nutrient concentrations lead to algal blooms. These blooms deplete the oxygen in the water, creating "dead zones" where nothing can survive. This process, known as eutrophication, results in amenity and species loss in aquifer-fed wetlands and rivers.

High levels of nitrates in drinking water are also harmful to human health, particularly for infants. Consuming too much nitrate affects the blood's ability to carry oxygen, causing methemoglobinemia or "blue baby syndrome." This condition can result in serious illness or death. As such, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has set a standard of 10 milligrams of nitrate per liter of drinking water (mg/L) to protect infants from methemoglobinemia.

The presence of nitrates in water also indicates potential contamination by other harmful substances. For example, if nitrate is detected in well water, other contaminants such as pesticides may also be present. Arsenic, for instance, is a common groundwater contaminant in Minnesota, with about 40% of wells containing it.

Addressing nitrate pollution in aquatic ecosystems is challenging and costly. Regulatory controls and local efforts are in place, but a more comprehensive approach is often needed. The European Commission's Nitrates Directive, for instance, aims to protect water quality across Europe by preventing nitrates from agricultural sources and promoting good farming practices. Similarly, California's Central Valley Water Board has several programs to tackle nitrate contamination in groundwater. However, the issue is persistent and widespread, requiring ongoing management and remediation efforts.

The cost of nitrate removal from drinking water

Nitrate pollution in drinking water is a severe issue, especially in small communities that cannot afford to fix it. Nitrate, mainly from polluted farm runoff, contaminates the public water supplies of numerous communities worldwide. The cost of nitrate removal from drinking water varies depending on several factors, such as the size of the system, the initial nitrate concentration, and the desired concentration after treatment.

The cost of nitrate removal can be spread over a larger customer base in larger cities, but in small communities, the increased cost of treatment per person could be in the hundreds or thousands of dollars per year. For example, the use of a nitrate-removal system by the Des Moines Water Works in Iowa, the state's largest drinking water utility, costs up to $10,000 per day to operate. This cost is ultimately passed on to the ratepayers.

The type of technology used for nitrate removal also influences the cost. Reverse osmosis systems, for instance, involve pushing pressurized water through a membrane that filters out nitrate and other contaminants. The higher the initial nitrate concentration, the higher the cost of removing it. Communities typically opt for reverse osmosis when they need to remove contaminants in addition to nitrate.

In October 2017, the town of Hiawatha, Kansas, started constructing a new water treatment plant with an ion exchange system to address nitrate levels of 11 parts per million (ppm). The plant was expected to cost the town of about 3,300 people an estimated $3.5 million.

It is worth noting that preventing nitrate contamination in drinking water is much cheaper than removing it. However, "volunteer approaches," such as providing tax-funded payments to farmers who change their farming practices, have not been successful. To effectively address the nitrate problem, targeted and enforceable protection efforts are necessary.

Regulatory and legislative controls on nitrate pollution

In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has set a standard for nitrate in drinking water at 10 milligrams of nitrate (measured as nitrogen) per liter of drinking water (mg/L). This standard is intended to protect infants, who are the most sensitive group, from methemoglobinemia, also known as "blue baby syndrome," which can result in serious illness or death. Wells that are older, near septic systems, or in areas with agricultural activities are particularly vulnerable to nitrate contamination.

In California, the State Legislature enacted Chapter 1 of the Second Extraordinary Session of 2008 (SBX2 1, Perata). This legislation required the State Water Board to develop pilot projects focusing on nitrate in groundwater in the Tulare Lake Basin and Salinas Valley. The Board was also mandated to submit a report on the findings of these projects, including recommendations, within two years of receiving funding. As a result, the Board contracted with the University of California, Davis (UC Davis) to conduct an independent study, which was delivered in March 2012. The report found that nitrate problems are likely to worsen in the coming decades.

In the United Kingdom, The Nitrate Pollution Prevention (Designation and Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2013 were introduced to address nitrate pollution. These regulations implemented the Council Directive 91/676/EEC, which aims to protect waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources. Regulation 3 identifies areas of land in England as nitrate vulnerable zones, and Regulation 4 empowers the Environment Agency to refuse applications for grassland derogations if applicants have breached conditions or have no further possibility of a successful appeal. Regulations 5 and 6 address the calculation of total nitrogen spread for horticultural crops and the equipment used to spread nitrogen fertiliser.

The Nitrate Pollution Prevention Regulations were further amended in 2015, with the previous regulations being revoked. These changes aimed to address the measures required in nitrate vulnerable zones in England. While there are currently no known outstanding effects of the 2015 regulations, it is important to note that legislation related to nitrate pollution prevention is subject to continuous review and updates.

At the European Union level, the Water Framework Directive and the Environmental Quality Standards Directive play a crucial role in regulating nitrate pollution. These directives identify 'priority substances', including pesticides, industrial chemicals, and metals, and mandate the reduction or phasing out of their emissions. The Groundwater Directive sets specific standards for pesticides and nitrates in groundwater and encourages Member States to consider setting thresholds for other substances. The directives also oblige the Commission to regularly review the lists of pollutants and update them accordingly.

Frequently asked questions