Water Pollution: Aquatic Life's Slow Poisoning

Water pollution is a pressing global issue, threatening aquatic life and ecosystems. It is caused by human activities such as urbanisation, industrialisation, and agricultural practices, which release contaminants like heavy metals, oil spills, pesticides, and plastic waste into water bodies. These pollutants harm marine organisms directly through ingestion or suffocation and indirectly by reducing oxygen levels and promoting algae growth, leading to eutrophication and dead zones. The impact of water pollution on aquatic biodiversity is significant, as it affects the interconnectedness of species and their habitats. With biodiversity loss already accelerating, addressing water pollution is crucial for the health of aquatic ecosystems and the planet.

Plastic waste and microplastics

One of the primary ways plastic waste and microplastics impact aquatic life is through ingestion. Due to their small size, microplastics can be easily consumed by a variety of marine organisms, including corals, plankton, marine invertebrates, fish, seabirds, whales, and even smaller organisms like molluscs and plankton. When these organisms ingest microplastics, it can lead to the accumulation of noxious wastes and disruption of their physiological functions, including blocking digestive tracts, reducing their urge to eat, and altering their feeding behaviour. This can result in reduced growth, reproductive output, and even death.

The presence of microplastics in the water also allows for the transfer of chemical additives and hydrophobic waterborne pollutants to aquatic life. A single plastic particle can adsorb up to one million times more toxic chemicals than the surrounding water, and these toxins can build up in the fatty tissues of animals that ingest them. This process, known as biomagnification, means that the higher an organism is on the food chain, the greater the concentration of toxins it will contain. This poses a significant threat to marine apex predators such as orcas and great white sharks, which have been found to have high levels of chemicals in their fatty tissues and breast milk.

In addition to the direct impacts on aquatic life, plastic waste and microplastics also have indirect effects on the ecosystem. For example, microplastics can act as transport vectors for harmful pollutants, carrying them over long distances and releasing them into new areas. They can also leach out chemicals, such as additives, which can have toxic effects on aquatic life. The accumulation of plastic waste in the water can also physically entangle marine mammals and fish, leading to starvation, injury, and increased vulnerability to predators.

The impact of plastic waste and microplastics on aquatic life is a growing global concern, and it is important to address this issue at its source. This includes implementing measures to minimise plastic leakage into the natural environment, making plastics less toxic, and promoting the reuse, repurposing, and recycling of plastics. By changing how we view and use plastic, we can help reduce the detrimental effects of plastic pollution on aquatic ecosystems.

Oil spills

One of the primary direct pathways through which oil spills impact aquatic life is ingestion. Animals may swallow oil particles directly or consume prey items that have been exposed to oil. This can lead to gastrointestinal irritation, ulcers, bleeding, diarrhea, and digestive complications, impairing the ability to digest and absorb food, ultimately resulting in reduced health and fitness. Ingestion can occur across multiple levels of the food chain, affecting various species. For example, herbivorous wildlife, such as sea turtles, may ingest vegetation coated with oil particles.

The impact of oil spills can vary depending on the age and overall health of the affected animals. Individuals with lower fitness levels or those in early life stages, such as eggs, larvae, and early juveniles, tend to be more vulnerable to the additional stresses imposed by oil spills. The reproductive state of a population at the time of a spill is also crucial, as the loss of many larvae or juveniles can reduce the capacity of the species to recover in subsequent years due to a decrease in reproducing individuals.

Habitat damage

Water pollution has a devastating impact on aquatic life, and human activity is the most common cause of poor water quality. Habitat damage is a direct consequence of water pollution, and it can have far-reaching effects on the biodiversity and health of aquatic ecosystems.

One of the primary causes of habitat damage is the discharge of untreated or inadequately treated wastewater and industrial waste into water bodies. It is estimated that around 58% of urban wastewater and 81% of industrial waste are released directly into water bodies, leading to the contamination of a significant portion of the world's water sources. This contamination includes high levels of mercury, chromium, lead, cadmium, copper, zinc, and nickel, which can have toxic effects on aquatic life.

Oil spills are another major contributor to habitat damage. Accidental spills from tankers, pipelines, and offshore rigs can release large quantities of crude oil into the water, causing widespread harm to marine life. Oil slicks move towards shorelines, damaging aquatic habitats and recreational areas. The Exxon Valdez oil spill in 1989 and the Deepwater Horizon spill in 2010 are notable examples of the devastating impact of oil pollution on aquatic habitats.

Plastic pollution is also a significant concern, with oceans bearing the brunt of this issue. Plastic waste can smother and entangle marine life, leading to injury or death. Additionally, plastic often attracts algae and other biological life, making it more appealing to unsuspecting creatures. The breakdown of plastics into micro and nano-particles has led to their proliferation throughout the food web, impacting not only marine life but also birds, bears, big cats, and wolves that rely on fish as a food source.

The introduction of invasive species and the unsustainable use of resources further contribute to habitat damage. For example, the dumping of sewage and sludge can promote excessive algae growth, leading to eutrophication. Eutrophication is a process where a body of water becomes nutrient-rich and algae-filled, resulting in a decline in oxygen levels. This, in turn, creates ""dead zones" where aquatic life cannot survive due to the lack of oxygen.

The impact of habitat damage on biodiversity is profound. When a habitat is destroyed, species reliant on that environment are forced to relocate or face extinction. This disruption has far-reaching consequences on species richness, abundance, distribution, genetic variation, and inter-population dynamics, ultimately affecting the delicate balance of the biological food web.

Eutrophication

The consequences of eutrophication include a decrease in biodiversity, an increase in toxicity, and a change in species dominance. The excessive growth of algae and plankton can hinder the flow of sunlight to the bottom of the aquatic body, inhibiting the growth of submerged aquatic plants and affecting species that depend on them, such as fish and shellfish. This can cause shifts in species composition, with only the more tolerant species surviving and new competitive species invading and outcompeting original inhabitants.

Oxygen depletion, or hypoxia, is also a common consequence of eutrophication, leading to fish kills, especially for species that require high levels of dissolved oxygen. Additionally, eutrophication can result in the accumulation of algal toxins in marine ecosystems, which can reach dangerous levels for both human and animal health. These toxins can accumulate in shellfish and other seafood, causing various types of poisoning in consumers.

To address the issue of eutrophication, collective efforts are required from scientists, policymakers, and citizens to reduce nutrient inputs, develop effective long-term biomanipulation techniques, and restore aquatic communities.

Heavy metals

Heavy metal contamination of water sources has emerged as a significant environmental concern, threatening aquatic ecosystems and human health. Heavy metals are released into water bodies through various natural and anthropogenic sources, such as industrial activities, chemical manufacturing, mining waste, agricultural practices, and household usage. These metals include arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), chromium (Cr), lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), and nickel (Ni).

Moreover, heavy metal contamination has been linked to physiological and biochemical changes in aquatic organisms. Studies have reported malformations in fish, including fin loss, gill underdevelopment, and liver dysfunction, due to exposure to heavy metals such as cadmium, nickel, mercury, chromium, lead, and arsenic. These contaminants can also affect the physical functioning and chemical parameters in the tissues and blood of fish, making them more susceptible to infectious diseases and increasing their mortality rate.

The toxicity of heavy metals in water poses a significant threat to the health of aquatic life and can disrupt the aquatic food chain. The accumulation of these metals in organisms higher in the food chain can also indirectly affect human health, as consuming contaminated fish or other aquatic organisms can lead to health issues in humans.

To address the issue of heavy metal contamination in water, various treatment technologies have been developed to remove these metals from wastewater. These include physical adsorption using biochar, ion-exchange methods with zeolite, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), membrane filtration, reverse osmosis, and chemical reduction. However, the high costs and secondary toxic waste generated by some of these methods have driven the search for more cost-effective and eco-friendly approaches.

Frequently asked questions