Air Pollution: A Costly Affair For Our Planet

Air pollution is a significant issue that carries a heavy financial burden for the global economy. The economic cost of air pollution is staggering, amounting to billions or even trillions of dollars. The impact of air pollution on the economy is multifaceted, including healthcare costs, lost working days, reduced labour income, and higher rates of diseases such as asthma, diabetes, and chronic respiratory issues. According to various reports and studies, the cost of air pollution in terms of welfare losses and GDP percentage varies across different regions and countries. For example, in 2018, the cost of air pollution was equivalent to 6.6% of China's GDP, 5.4% of India's GDP, and 3% of the US GDP. Air pollution is a pressing issue that not only affects the environment but also has far-reaching financial implications.

Global economic impact

Air pollution has a significant impact on the global economy, with costs projected to increase over time. While the costs of air pollution are challenging to quantify, various organizations have attempted to estimate the economic consequences. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) published a report in 2016 using 2015 data to project macroeconomic costs associated with air pollution by 2060. According to the report, the total annual market costs of air pollution are expected to rise from 0.3% in 2015 to 1.0% in 2060. The global air pollution-related healthcare costs are projected to surge from $21 billion in 2015 to a staggering $176 billion in 2060. The annual cost of lost working days is also predicted to increase significantly, reaching $3.7 billion by 2060.

Non-market impacts, such as premature deaths and illness-related pain and suffering, also impose substantial costs on the global economy. The total annual welfare costs related to non-market impacts are estimated to soar from $3.4 billion in 2015 to a whopping $20.5-27.6 trillion by 2060. The annual global welfare costs associated with premature deaths alone are projected to reach $18-25 trillion in 2060. These estimates highlight the urgent need for action to address air pollution and mitigate its economic and human toll.

The World Bank Group also published a report in 2022, "The Global Health Cost of PM2.5 Air Pollution: A Case for Action Beyond 2021," which quantified the welfare costs related to PM2.5 air pollution. According to the report, these costs amounted to $8.1 trillion in 2019, equivalent to 6.1% of global GDP. The cost of ambient PM2.5 air pollution was estimated at $6.43 trillion (4.8% of global GDP), while the cost of particulate matter household air pollution was $1.67 trillion (1.3% of global GDP). These figures underscore the significant economic burden of air pollution on a global scale.

On a national level, the United States provides a telling example of the economic impact of air pollution. According to the Center for Air Quality, Climate, and Energy Solutions (CACES) at Carnegie Mellon University, air pollution cost the United States approximately 5% of its yearly gross domestic product (GDP) in damages, amounting to $790 billion in 2014. The highest costs were attributed to early deaths caused by exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5). While air pollution damages in the U.S. have been declining in recent years, the economic burden remains substantial.

The impact of air pollution is not limited to economic costs but also extends to human lives and well-being. In 2020, over 160,000 preventable deaths occurred in the world's five largest cities due to air pollution. The economic cost of reduced productivity in these cities was estimated to exceed $85.1 billion. These sobering statistics emphasize the critical importance of prioritizing air pollution prevention, control, and investment in clean air technologies to mitigate the global economic and human toll of air pollution.

Healthcare costs

Air pollution is a significant environmental health threat, killing approximately 7 million people worldwide annually. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), 9 out of 10 people breathe air that exceeds their air quality guidelines, with developing countries experiencing the highest levels. As such, the health impacts of air pollution are widely studied and known. Exposure to air pollution affects human health, the economy, and the climate.

The economic cost of air pollution is significant, with the global economy suffering as particulate matter and ground-level ozone levels increase. In 2013, global welfare losses from PM2.5 and O3 exposure totalled $5.11 trillion. By 2018, the total cost of air pollution had increased to $2.9 trillion, accounting for 3.3% of global GDP or $8 billion per day. This was linked to 4.5 million deaths, with each death associated with a loss of 19 years of life. The cost of air pollution is expected to continue rising, with projected annual healthcare costs increasing from $21 billion in 2015 to $176 billion in 2060.

The health effects of air pollution include an increased risk of stroke, heart disease, lung cancer, and chronic and acute respiratory diseases. These health issues result in substantial healthcare costs for individuals and societies. For example, in the United States, the average person pays an additional $2,500 in medical bills due to air pollution, totalling over $820 billion per year.

In addition to the direct healthcare costs, there are indirect costs associated with air pollution. For instance, ground-level ozone (O3) affects crop quality and production, reducing stable crop yields and impacting global food security and nutrition. Air pollution also affects productivity and cognitive function, leading to workforce losses. In 2018, PM2.5 pollution from fossil fuels was responsible for 1.8 billion days of work absence, 4 million cases of child asthma, and 2 million premature births.

The costs of air pollution are not evenly distributed across sectors or geographic areas. Certain economic sectors, such as agriculture, utilities, manufacturing, and transportation, contribute disproportionately to air pollution-related damages. Similarly, pollutants emitted in close proximity to urban areas cause more harm due to the higher population density. Addressing air pollution through policies and technologies can lead to significant net savings, improved health, and a better climate and economy.

Productivity losses

In 2018, fossil fuel PM2.5 pollution was responsible for significant productivity losses, leading to 1.8 billion days of work absence globally. This resulted in substantial economic costs for businesses and countries. Additionally, ground-level ozone (O3) pollution is expected to reduce stable crop yields by 26% in 2030, impacting global food security and nutrition. The decrease in agricultural productivity due to air pollution will have far-reaching consequences, affecting multiple industries and livelihoods dependent on the agricultural sector.

The costs of air pollution are not evenly distributed across all sectors of the economy. Certain sectors, such as agriculture, utilities, manufacturing, and transportation, contribute disproportionately to air pollution-related damages. These sectors are responsible for just under 20% of GDP but account for more than 75% of all air pollution-related costs. The impact of air pollution on productivity in these sectors can lead to decreased output, increased operational costs, and negative externalities for society as a whole.

The impact of air pollution on productivity losses varies across different regions. For example, northern Indian cities bear a more significant financial burden from air pollution compared to other global cities. Two cities in northern India lost at least 13% of their gross domestic product (GDP) in 2020 due to air pollution. This highlights the uneven distribution of productivity losses, with certain regions experiencing more severe economic consequences due to air pollution.

Overall, the productivity losses caused by air pollution have far-reaching economic implications. The costs include not only the direct impact on businesses and industries but also the indirect costs associated with healthcare, premature mortality, and reduced quality of life. Addressing air pollution through policy interventions and technological advancements can lead to significant net savings, improved health outcomes, and a more sustainable economy.

Environmental impact

Air pollution has far-reaching environmental impacts, affecting the health of our planet and all that live on it. It is the single largest environmental health risk in Europe, and the World Health Organization estimates that seven million people die globally each year from air pollution.

Climate Change

Greenhouse gas pollution, caused by human activities, is the main driver of climate change. Burning fossil fuels releases carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, into the atmosphere. These gases trap heat energy, causing the planet's overall temperature to rise. This, in turn, affects weather patterns and ecosystems.

Ecosystems and Biodiversity

Air pollution has negative impacts on both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, degrading environments and reducing biodiversity. Ground-level ozone damages plants, crops, and forests by reducing growth rates and yields. It does this by damaging the stomata, tiny pores on the underside of leaves that allow the plant to "breathe". Certain pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides and ammonia, are deposited on land and in water bodies, introducing excessive amounts of nitrogen. This disrupts the balance of species within an ecosystem, negatively impacting grasslands and other fragile environments.

Water Bodies

Air pollution also affects water bodies such as rivers, lakes, and estuaries. Atmospheric deposition of nitrogen and sulfur leads to acidification and eutrophication of aquatic ecosystems. Additionally, runoff from farms and fields containing pollutants can leach into water sources, further degrading water quality.

Visibility and Sunlight

Particulate pollution reduces the amount of sunlight that reaches the surface, impacting photosynthesis and crop productivity. It also contributes to hazy skies, reducing visibility and affecting the weather and climate.

Soils

Air pollution can change the chemical nature of soils, robbing plants of the nutrients they need to grow. Gaseous ammonia from agriculture and nitrogen dioxide from vehicle emissions increase nitrogen levels in soils. While plants need nitrogen, too much can limit the growth of some species and favour others, disrupting ecosystems.

Policy and regulation

Air pollution is a significant threat to global public health, and while broad mitigation policies exist, there is a lack of understanding of the economic consequences of implementing such policies. The costs and benefits of air pollution control strategies are dependent on various factors, including the relative nature of the control strategy, the size and setting of the intervention, and the specific exposure and health endpoints considered.

In recognition of the impact of air pollution on health and the environment, regulatory bodies have implemented policies and regulations to address this issue. For example, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been mandated by law to conduct comprehensive cost-benefit analyses of the Clean Air Act. The EPA develops and publishes reports such as Regulatory Impact Analyses (RIAs) and Economic Impact Analyses (EIAs), providing insights into the economic implications of air pollution regulations. The EPA also offers guidance for estimating the costs of air pollution control devices, focusing on point source and stationary area source controls for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), particulate matter (PM), and oxides of nitrogen (NOx), among others.

Some high-income countries, like the United States, require regular assessments of the costs and benefits of proposed environmental regulations. This ensures that the potential economic impact of implementing these regulations is carefully considered. However, on a global scale, there is a gap in the systematic analysis of the costs and health benefits of air pollution control strategies. While reducing air pollution has undeniable health benefits, the strategies to achieve this can be costly.

To address this, studies have been conducted to systematically review the economic implications of air pollution control strategies worldwide. These studies focus on understanding the health benefits and associated costs of implementing pollution control measures. By conducting cost-benefit analyses and evaluating the net benefits and benefit-cost ratios, policymakers can make informed decisions about the most effective and economically viable strategies to combat air pollution.

The benefits of implementing emissions control programs are significant. For example, the Clean Air Act Amendments in the United States are projected to prevent over 230,000 early deaths in 2020 alone, with most economic benefits attributed to reductions in premature mortality associated with ambient particulate matter. Additionally, cleaner air leads to improved health and productivity for workers, resulting in potential savings in medical expenses related to air pollution-related health issues. These positive economic effects are expected to offset the expenditures incurred for pollution control measures.

Frequently asked questions