Air Pollution's Impact On Ecosystems: A Global Concern

Air pollution affects all ecosystems, from forests to grasslands, and aquatic environments such as lakes, rivers, and oceans. Ecosystems are particularly impacted by sulphur, nitrogen, and ground-level ozone emissions. Sulphur and nitrogen oxides mix with water vapour in the atmosphere, creating acid rain that falls on vegetation, soil, and water bodies, increasing their acidity and causing adverse effects on flora and fauna. Ground-level ozone damages plant cell membranes, inhibiting their growth and development, and reducing their ability to absorb pollutants and clean the air. Eutrophication, caused by the accumulation of nutrients, including nitrogen, in water bodies, often results from air pollution, leading to algae blooms, oxygen depletion, and loss of aquatic life. These impacts on ecosystems affect their ability to provide essential services such as nutrient cycling, water provision, and carbon sequestration, ultimately harming human populations as well.

Eutrophication of aquatic ecosystems

Eutrophication is a process of nutrient overload in aquatic ecosystems, often resulting from air pollution. Eutrophication is characterised by excessive plant and algal growth due to the increased availability of one or more limiting growth factors needed for photosynthesis, such as sunlight, carbon dioxide, and nutrient fertilisers. Eutrophication is a persistent condition of surface waters and a widespread environmental problem.

Eutrophication occurs naturally over centuries as lakes age and are filled with sediments. However, human activities have accelerated the rate and extent of eutrophication through both point-source discharges and non-point loadings of limiting nutrients, such as nitrogen and phosphorus, into aquatic ecosystems. This acceleration is known as cultural eutrophication.

The Causes of Cultural Eutrophication

Cultural eutrophication is caused by human activities that increase the levels of nutrients, particularly nitrogen and phosphorus, in aquatic ecosystems. These activities include:

• Agriculture: Excessive application of fertiliser or manure can cause phosphorus to accumulate in soils, which are then washed into lakes and other water bodies.
• Sewage: Sewage discharges can contain high levels of nutrients, such as phosphorus, which can contribute to eutrophication.
• Industrial discharges: Industrial activities can release nutrients and other pollutants into water bodies, contributing to eutrophication.
• Runoff from urban areas, construction sites, and agricultural lands: Nutrients from these areas can run off into nearby water bodies, leading to eutrophication.

The Consequences of Cultural Eutrophication

Cultural eutrophication has dramatic consequences for drinking water sources, fisheries, and recreational water bodies. Some of the known consequences include:

• Dense blooms of noxious, foul-smelling phytoplankton: These blooms can reduce water clarity, harm water quality, and limit light penetration, affecting the growth of aquatic plants and the success of predators.
• Increased pH levels: High rates of photosynthesis associated with eutrophication can raise pH levels to extreme levels, impairing the chemosensory abilities of organisms that rely on chemical cues for survival.
• Hypoxia or anoxia: When the dense algal blooms die, microbial decomposition depletes dissolved oxygen, creating "dead zones" lacking sufficient oxygen to support most organisms.
• Toxic algal blooms: Some algal blooms produce noxious toxins that can pose risks to humans, livestock, wildlife, and aquatic organisms.
• Changes in aquatic community structure: Cyanobacterial blooms can dominate nutrient-rich freshwater systems, impacting zooplankton and fish communities.
• Water pollution: Eutrophication can lead to water pollution, as high nutrient levels can result in the growth of harmful algae and bacteria, making the water unsafe for drinking and other uses.

Managing Cultural Eutrophication

Water resource managers employ various strategies to minimise the effects of cultural eutrophication, including diverting excess nutrients, altering nutrient ratios, physical mixing, shading water bodies, and applying algaecides and herbicides. However, these strategies have often proven ineffective, costly, and impractical, especially for large, complex ecosystems.

Reducing nitrogen and phosphorus inputs into aquatic systems can improve water quality, and there are examples where this approach has been successful. However, nutrient reduction can be challenging and expensive, especially in agricultural areas where nutrients come from non-point sources.

Biomanipulation, which involves altering the food web to restore ecosystem health, has been proposed as another alternative for improving water quality in nutrient-rich lakes. This approach focuses on removing secondary consumers (planktivorous fish) through the addition of tertiary consumers (piscivorous fish) or harvesting, allowing for the dominance of large-bodied generalist grazers (e.g. Daphnia) to control phytoplankton. However, the effects of biomanipulation are typically short-lived and more effective in small, easily managed systems.

Acidification of surface waters

The acidification of surface waters is a significant concern, particularly in areas with high levels of acidic deposition and limited buffering capacity due to the nature of the catchment soil and bedrock. This process has been exacerbated by increased atmospheric emissions of sulphur and nitrogen oxides, mainly from burning fossil fuels.

The southern parts of Finland, Sweden, and Norway are the most affected by surface water acidification. While most surface waters in western and central Europe remain unaffected, acidification has been observed in certain areas, including high-altitude lakes in some mountain regions, lakes and streams in some central European forest areas, surface waters in acidic soil areas of Scotland, northern England, and Wales, and small seepage lakes in north-western Europe.

Acid rain, caused by emissions of sulphur and nitrogen oxides, is a significant contributor to surface water acidification. These emissions react with water molecules in the atmosphere, leading to the production of acids. While efforts to reduce these emissions have been made since the 1970s, they continue to pose a threat to aquatic ecosystems.

The acidification of surface waters has far-reaching consequences. It impairs the ability of ecosystems to provide essential services, such as nutrient and carbon cycling, and clean water provision. Aquatic ecosystems are particularly vulnerable, with increased acidity harming fish and other aquatic life. This, in turn, affects human populations, as harmful concentrations of pollutants can enter drinking water supplies.

To address this issue, international cooperation is crucial. The International Cooperative Programme on Assessment and Monitoring of Acidification of Rivers and Lakes, established under the Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution, coordinates monitoring efforts among 12 European countries, Canada, and the USA. These countries report chemical and biological variables to gain a better understanding of the extent and impacts of surface water acidification.

Impact on plants and trees

Plants and trees are often viewed as the "lungs" of an ecosystem as they absorb carbon dioxide and emit oxygen. They also act as the "liver" of an ecosystem, filtering atmospheric pollutants like sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide through their leaves.

Trees are particularly effective at removing particulate matter (PM). PM comes in the form of tiny particles of organic chemicals, acids, metals, and dust, emitted from fossil-fuel-burning vehicles and factories, as well as construction sites. The largest of these particles measure up to 10 micrometers across (known as PM10s), and there are also PM2.5s, measuring 2.5 micrometers across, and even smaller nanoparticle pollution.

Fine particulate matter can easily penetrate the human respiratory system, causing lung and cardiovascular diseases or exacerbating respiratory illness. It has also been linked to inflammation and heart disease. According to one estimate, 8.9 million deaths a year globally could be attributable to exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter.

Trees can improve air quality in two ways: directly and indirectly. By shading surfaces and reducing temperatures, trees can help reduce the need for conventional air conditioning and the emissions of greenhouse gases that come with it. Plus, lower temperatures decrease the risk of harmful pollutants like ground-level ozone, which commonly spike on hot days in urban areas.

Trees also play a vital role in directly removing pollutants from the air. The tiny pores on the leaves of trees, called stomata, inhale air that contains toxic pollutants. Once absorbed, gases, including pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, and ozone, diffuse within the inner surfaces of the leaves and are broken down.

Trees remove some particulate matter from the air by temporarily "catching" it on their vegetative surfaces. When it rains, these particulates are washed off the tree and carried into the soil or dissolved into stormwater.

Conifers, like pines and cypresses, are good natural purifiers. In 2015, an urban ecologist at the Center for Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, in Beijing, ranked the most common species in cities based on their PM 2.5 absorption capacity. The ranking also took into account the species' ability to survive in urban contexts and any negative impact on air quality, such as the production of allergens and volatile organic compounds (VOCs).

The extent to which each species performs filtering activity depends mostly on canopy size, leaf size, and leaf structure. Bigger canopies can trap more particles than smaller ones, and larger leaves can trap more pollutants than small ones. When it comes to leaf type, it is those with rough, rugged, and hairy surfaces that act as the "best filters" for PM.

While trees are generally effective at reducing air pollution, it isn’t as simple as the more trees there are in an urban space, the better the air quality will be. Some trees are markedly more effective at filtering pollutants from the air than others. To make the most difference in air quality in a street or city, the right tree must be chosen for the job.

Impact on human populations

Air pollution has a detrimental impact on human populations, affecting people's health and well-being in a variety of ways. Firstly, air pollution can cause or exacerbate respiratory and lung issues, including coughing, itchy eyes, and breathing problems. Prolonged exposure to polluted air can lead to more severe consequences such as lung and heart disease, respiratory infections, stroke, and even lung cancer. Vulnerable groups, including children, the elderly, pregnant women, and individuals with pre-existing health conditions, are at an increased risk of developing these health problems.

Socioeconomic factors also play a significant role in the impact of air pollution on human populations. Low-income communities and minority groups often bear a disproportionate burden of air pollution due to their proximity to industrial sources of pollution and underlying health disparities. Factors such as poor nutrition, stress, and limited access to healthcare can further exacerbate the negative effects of air pollution on these communities. Additionally, certain occupations, such as those involving outdoor work or exposure to contaminated air, can increase the risk of health issues among specific populations.

Air pollution can also affect people's daily lives and activities. For example, on days with poor air quality, individuals may need to reduce their outdoor physical activities or take precautions when driving to minimize exposure to pollutants. The impact of air pollution on human populations extends beyond physical health, as it can also influence mental health and overall quality of life.

The effects of air pollution on human populations are not limited to direct exposure but also include indirect consequences. Air pollution can contaminate drinking water sources, leading to the ingestion of harmful pollutants. Additionally, air pollution can damage vegetation, reducing its ability to naturally filter water systems and capture carbon, which is crucial for mitigating the impacts of climate change. As a result, the interconnectedness of ecosystems and human populations becomes evident, highlighting the far-reaching implications of air pollution.

While the impact of air pollution on human populations is concerning, it is important to recognize that individuals can take steps to protect their health. Monitoring air quality and adjusting outdoor activities accordingly can help minimize exposure. Additionally, reducing personal contributions to air pollution, such as vehicle emissions or the use of chemicals in the home, can collectively contribute to improving air quality and mitigating the overall impact on human populations.

Effects on biodiversity

Air pollution has a detrimental impact on biodiversity, affecting various ecosystems and their ability to function and grow. Ecosystems are intricate systems that provide essential services such as nutrient cycling, carbon cycling, and water provision, which are vital for both the planet and human life. Here are some key ways in which air pollution affects biodiversity:

Acidification and Eutrophication

Atmospheric deposition of nitrogen and sulfur from air pollution leads to acidification and eutrophication of both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Acid rain, caused by emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, increases the acidity of water bodies, soils, and vegetation, adversely affecting flora and fauna. This, in turn, impacts the ability of ecosystems to provide essential services. Eutrophication, or the accumulation of nutrients like nitrogen in water bodies, can result in algae blooms and subsequent oxygen depletion, leading to a loss of aquatic life and affecting biodiversity.

Ozone Damage

Ground-level ozone causes damage to plant cell membranes, inhibiting their growth and development. The loss of plant cover reduces the capacity to absorb and filter pollutants like nitrogen dioxide, ozone, and particulate matter, leading to poorer air quality. Ozone is also known to reduce photosynthesis in many terrestrial plant species.

Toxicity and Bioaccumulation

Air pollution involves the release of toxic substances such as mercury and other heavy metal compounds, which can accumulate in plants and animals. These toxins can then enter the food chain, including humans, posing risks to various species and ecosystems.

Impact on Water Quality

Air pollution negatively affects vegetation, which plays a crucial role in naturally filtering water systems. Additionally, harmful concentrations of pollutants can seep into groundwater and drinking water sources, further impacting water quality and human health.

Changes in Species Composition

Both terrestrial and aquatic acidification and eutrophication can lead to changes in species composition, propagating throughout food webs and affecting a wide range of organisms beyond those directly sensitive to pollution. These changes in species composition can have cascading effects on ecosystem dynamics and biodiversity.

Overall, air pollution has far-reaching consequences for biodiversity, and it is important to consider its impacts when developing long-term conservation strategies. Addressing air pollution and reducing emissions are crucial for mitigating these effects and preserving the delicate balance of ecosystems.

Frequently asked questions