Power Plants' Water Pollution: Understanding The Common Contaminants

Power plants are a major source of water pollution, with coal-fired power plants being a significant contributor. These plants use water for various processes, including cooling, steam generation, and industrial tasks like scrubbing air pollutants and transporting coal ash. The improper disposal of wastewater from these plants can lead to the discharge of pollutants into water bodies, threatening their ecological balance. Additionally, nuclear power plants can generate radioactive waste, which persists in the environment for extended periods and poses a significant threat to groundwater, surface water, and marine ecosystems if not managed safely. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is committed to addressing this issue by implementing the Clean Water Act and proposing stricter standards to limit pollutant discharge from coal-fired power plants, aiming for a cleaner and safer water future.

Coal-fired power plants

Coal ash, the toxic byproduct of burning coal, is often stored in ponds, which can leak or flood, poisoning nearby freshwater sources. These coal ash ponds are frequently located in low-income communities and communities of color, exacerbating environmental justice issues. The disposal of coal ash has long-term consequences, as it can persist in the environment for thousands of years, similar to radioactive waste.

In addition to water pollution, coal-fired power plants also contribute significantly to air pollution, particularly fine particulate matter (PM2.5) pollution. Research has linked increased exposure to coal-related PM2.5 with a higher risk of mortality, highlighting the urgent need to reduce coal emissions and implement effective pollution control measures.

Regulations and the retirement of coal power plants have played a role in reducing water and air pollution. The Clean Water Act, implemented by the EPA, aims to establish stricter wastewater discharge standards for coal-fired power plants, utilizing advanced treatment technologies to remove pollutants. These efforts are crucial in mitigating the environmental and health impacts of water pollution caused by coal-fired power plants, fostering cleaner water, healthier ecosystems, and more resilient communities.

Radioactive waste

Nuclear power plants are a significant source of radioactive waste. The waste from spent fuel rods consists primarily of cesium-137 and strontium-90, with potential inclusions of plutonium, which is considered transuranic waste. The half-lives of these radioactive elements vary greatly; while cesium-137 and strontium-90 have half-lives of approximately 30 years, plutonium has a half-life of 24,000 years. The amount of high-level radioactive waste (HLW) worldwide is increasing by about 12,000 tonnes per year, and a 1000-megawatt nuclear power plant produces about 27 tonnes of spent nuclear fuel annually.

The challenge of radioactive waste disposal is significant due to its persistence in the environment for thousands of years. The cleanup of radioactive waste is costly and time-consuming. For example, the decommissioned Hanford nuclear weapons production site in Washington is expected to cost over $100 billion and continue until 2060 to clean up 56 million gallons of radioactive waste.

The long-term storage of radioactive waste requires stabilizing it in a form that will neither react nor degrade over extended periods. One proposed method for stabilization is vitrification, which involves mixing the waste with sugar and then calcining it. Calcination is a process where the waste is passed through a heated, rotating tube to evaporate water and de-nitrate fission products, aiding the stability of the resulting glass.

The environmental impact of radioactive waste is a serious concern. Accidentally released or improperly disposed of contaminants threaten groundwater, surface water, and marine resources. The exposure from the complete nuclear fuel cycle, from mining to waste disposal, is significant, and the impact on surrounding communities and the environment can be detrimental.

To address radioactive waste pollution and protect water sources, it is crucial to identify the pollution's source and the type of water body affected. By understanding these factors, effective measures can be implemented to reduce the impact of radioactive waste on the environment and human health.

Sewage treatment plants

While power plants are a major source of water pollution, sewage treatment plants can also contribute to this issue.

One common issue is the backup or overflow from sewage treatment facilities, which can impact nearby properties. There is also a risk of accidental releases of water treatment chemicals, such as methanol or chlorine, which can have toxic effects on people and the environment. Severe weather events, such as floods or early freezes, can cause pipes to break or leach fields to fail, resulting in the release of untreated sewage into nearby water bodies.

In one example, a wastewater treatment plant's sewer lines developed cracks due to age, leaking raw sewage over many years and polluting a nearby stream. The residents in the area sued the treatment plant for the cost of remediating the stream, with claims exceeding $350,000. In another instance, a chlorine gas release at a wastewater treatment plant led to toxic air emissions, requiring the evacuation of residents and businesses, and resulting in hospitalizations and business interruptions.

Additionally, septic systems used by approximately 20% of homes in the United States can become a source of nutrient pollution if not properly maintained. Elevated levels of nitrogen and phosphorus can be released into local water bodies or groundwater when septic systems fail due to aging infrastructure, improper design, overloading, or poor maintenance.

To address these issues, it is crucial for sewage treatment plants to have proper insurance and follow best practices to minimize the risk of pollution. Strategies to reduce nitrogen and phosphorus loads from wastewater treatment plants are also being pursued, and advancements in pollution control technology offer hope for a cleaner water future.

Fossil fuel power plants

The use of fossil fuels, including coal, oil, and natural gas, has significant environmental and health impacts that are often not reflected in market prices. These externalities include water pollution, caused by each stage of the fossil fuel supply chain, from extraction and transportation to refining and burning. For example, the extraction process can result in oil spills that contaminate water bodies, destroy habitats, and harm wildlife and communities.

One of the most well-known examples of water pollution caused by fossil fuel power plants is the 2010 BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. This spill released 134 million gallons of oil, resulting in the deaths of 11 people and countless animals, and costing BP $65 billion in penalties and cleanup costs. Even after cleanup efforts, oil spills can have long-lasting effects on the environment and local ecosystems.

Furthermore, coal-fired power plants use water for cooling, generating steam, and industrial processes, withdrawing billions of gallons of water per year from rivers, lakes, and estuaries. This water is then discharged at a higher temperature, creating "thermal pollution" that negatively impacts aquatic life. While "wet-recirculating" plants reuse water for cooling, they still lose a significant amount of water during the process, leading to higher water consumption.

To address these issues, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed strengthened wastewater discharge standards for coal-fired power plants under the Clean Water Act. These regulations aim to reduce the amount of pollutants discharged into water bodies and foster cleaner water, air, and land for communities, especially those that have been disproportionately affected by pollution from power plants.

Water withdrawals

The environmental implications of these water withdrawals are profound. Firstly, they can lead to entrainment and impingement of fish and shellfish species, causing damage to aquatic ecosystems and fish populations. Secondly, the withdrawal of such large volumes of water from natural sources can disrupt aquatic habitats and ecosystems, impacting the survival of various species and the overall ecological balance.

Moreover, power plants discharge hundreds of billions of gallons of heated and treated water back into water bodies each day. This discharged water may contain chemical and thermal contaminants that can harm the receiving water bodies and the organisms within them. To address this issue, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program has been established to ensure that all discharges meet the criteria of biological acceptability and are properly permitted, monitored, and reported.

The Clean Water Act, implemented by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), plays a crucial role in mitigating water pollution from power plants. The EPA proposes strengthened wastewater discharge standards, leveraging advanced treatment technologies to effectively remove pollutants. These regulations specifically target coal-fired power plants, aiming to reduce the discharge of pollutants through wastewater by approximately 584 million pounds per year. This initiative is expected to have a significant positive impact on environmental justice communities that are often located downstream from these power plants and have been disproportionately affected by water pollution.

Frequently asked questions