Hydraulic Fracking's Chemical Pollution Of Water Sources

Hydraulic fracking is a technique used to extract natural gas and oil from shale rock formations. This process involves forcing water, sand, and a mix of chemicals into horizontally drilled wells at high pressure, causing the rock to crack and release natural gas or oil. While this method has been effective in extracting fossil fuels, it has also raised concerns about its environmental and health impacts, particularly regarding water pollution. The chemicals used in hydraulic fracking have the potential to contaminate drinking water sources and harm human health and the environment. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has identified cases where hydraulic fracking activities have impacted drinking water resources, and there are concerns about the toxicity of the chemicals used. The extent of water contamination and the potential dangers to local communities are not yet fully understood due to data gaps and the difficulty in analyzing fracking compounds.

Characteristics and Values of Water Pollution from Hydraulic Fracking

Toxic chemicals in drinking water

Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, is a technique used to extract natural gas and oil from deep rock formations. This process involves forcing water, sand, and a mix of chemicals into horizontally drilled wells, causing the rock to crack and release natural gas or oil. While fracking has been a popular method for extracting fossil fuels, it has also raised concerns about its potential impact on the environment and human health, particularly regarding drinking water contamination.

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has identified over 1,000 chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing, many of which can potentially contaminate drinking water resources. These chemicals are added to the water and sand mixture, known as fracking fluid, to make it less viscous and easier to pump into the wells at high pressure. However, spills and leaks during the fracking process can lead to these chemicals reaching and contaminating groundwater resources.

One well-known case of drinking water contamination occurred in Pavillion, Wyoming, where residents reported a bad taste and smell in their water. An investigation by the EPA found that the groundwater contained toxic chemicals linked to hydraulic fracturing. Another example is the Wind River Basin, where a study by former EPA scientist Dominic DiGiulio confirmed that fracking had polluted the entire groundwater resource with chemicals commonly found in fracking fluid.

The specific chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing are not always disclosed, as operators are not always required to do so. This lack of transparency makes it challenging to fully understand the potential risks to human health and the environment. Additionally, the high-pressure nature of fracking can cause fractures in the rock formations, allowing chemicals to migrate directly into aquifers and contaminating drinking water sources.

The impact of fracking on drinking water resources is a serious concern, and further research and regulation are needed to protect human health and the environment from potential harm. While fracking may provide a valuable source of energy, it is crucial to balance this with the potential risks associated with water contamination and work towards mitigating these risks effectively.

Inadequate chemical disclosure

Hydraulic fracking is a technique used to extract natural gas and oil from shale rock formations. This process involves injecting water, sand, and a mix of chemicals into horizontally drilled wells at high pressure, causing the rock to crack and release natural gas or oil. While most states with oil and gas production have rules requiring the disclosure of chemicals used in fracking, these regulations often contain exclusions for "confidential business information" (CBI) and "trade secrets". This lack of transparency has raised concerns among residents, environmental advocates, and researchers about the potential health and environmental impacts of hydraulic fracking.

In the United States, the federal government is prohibited from mandating the disclosure of fracking chemicals due to a provision in the Energy Policy Act of 2005. This means that individual states are responsible for regulating chemical disclosure in hydraulic fracking. As of 2016, 28 states required the disclosure of some chemicals used in fracking, but these laws vary in their effectiveness. For example, the Texas hydraulic fracturing disclosure bill, HB 3328, has been criticized for prioritizing industry interests over the public's right to know about potentially harmful chemicals in their drinking water. The bill includes a trade secrets exemption, allowing companies to withhold information about the chemicals used in fracking fluids.

The lack of comprehensive chemical disclosure in hydraulic fracking has several negative consequences. Firstly, it hinders risk assessment and management. Without knowing the specific chemicals used and their frequencies of use, it is challenging to anticipate and prepare for potential environmental and human health hazards. This is particularly concerning given that fracking chemicals have been detected in drinking water resources at levels that could impact human health. Secondly, inadequate chemical disclosure contributes to a lack of transparency and accountability in the oil and gas industry. Landowners and the public are left in the dark about the chemicals being used in close proximity to their homes and water sources.

Furthermore, the exemption of certain chemicals as trade secrets makes it difficult to fully understand the impact of hydraulic fracking on air, soil, and water quality. This, in turn, affects the ability to regulate and mitigate any negative consequences. For instance, a 2019 review study found that hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) associated with oil and gas development have been detected near development sites at levels exceeding health-based standards. However, without complete information on the chemicals used in hydraulic fracking, it is challenging to accurately assess and address these air pollution concerns.

While some states have taken steps towards greater transparency by mandating chemical disclosure, there are still gaps and shortcomings in these regulations. These include nondisclosure of proprietary mixtures, insufficient penalties for inaccurate or incomplete reporting, and timelines that allow for after-the-fact reporting. Addressing these issues is crucial for ensuring the protection of human health and the environment from the potential risks associated with hydraulic fracking.

Air pollution

Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, is a technique used to extract natural gas and oil from deep rock formations. This is done by forcing water, sand, and a mix of chemicals into horizontally drilled wells, causing the rock to crack and release natural gas or oil.

Fracking has been linked to air pollution in several ways. Firstly, any related combustion process can release toxic chemicals into the air. For example, the burning of excess natural gas, the operation of heavy equipment, and the use of diesel trucks to transport materials to and from a site may all contribute to air pollution. The chemicals used in the fracking process, as well as those that surface with the natural gas, can also affect air quality. However, as operators are not always required to disclose the specific chemicals used, the full extent of air pollution and potential dangers to local communities are not yet fully understood.

A 2019 review study found that hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) associated with multiple cancer and non-cancer health outcomes have been detected near development sites at levels exceeding health-based standards. The production phase was identified as having the potential to emit the highest concentrations and most varied mixture of air pollutants over the longest period. Additionally, potential exposures are higher if production equipment is located near storage tanks for natural gas liquids and wastewater ponds.

Fracking has also been found to increase ground-level ozone levels, raising the risk of asthma and other respiratory illnesses. It also releases large amounts of methane, a potent greenhouse gas that contributes to climate change.

While there is growing awareness of the potential impacts of fracking on air quality, it is important to note that the specific chemicals used in the process are not always disclosed, making it challenging to fully understand the extent of air pollution and its potential dangers.

Wastewater disposal

Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, is a technique used to extract natural gas and oil from deep rock formations. This process involves sending a mixture of water, sand, and chemicals into horizontally drilled wells at high pressure, causing the rock to crack and release natural gas or oil. The wastewater that comes up, known as "flowback" or "produced water", has a different chemical composition than the water that was pumped in and can contain harmful substances.

The management and disposal of this wastewater is a significant challenge for the fracking industry. Up to 60% of the water injected into a well during fracking will return to the surface as wastewater, which needs to be captured and disposed of or recycled. The large volume of wastewater generated puts stress on surface water and groundwater supplies and requires proper management to prevent environmental and health hazards.

There are several methods for disposing of and treating fracking wastewater. One common method is deep-well underground injection, where wastewater is injected into deep underground wells. This method is used in several US states, including Texas, North Dakota, and Montana. However, the geology in some parts of the US may not be suitable for this practice, and there are concerns about the potential for inducing seismic activity.

Another method is to impound wastewater in surface ponds for evaporation. While this is a short-term option, it does not address long-term issues such as diminishing water sources and increasing environmental concerns. Centralised wastewater treatment facilities are also gaining popularity in North America, with over a dozen facilities already in operation or under development. These facilities provide a comprehensive approach to treating and reusing wastewater from a large number of wellheads.

The reuse of produced water is another option for wastewater management. This approach is particularly useful when new wells are being established at a high rate, as it provides a market for the produced water. However, if the drilling of new wells slows down, the accumulated wastewater can become a challenge to manage.

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) plays a crucial role in regulating and managing wastewater disposal. The EPA has classified injection wells into six categories, with Class II covering wells associated with oil and natural gas production, including disposal wells. The EPA is also evaluating industry practices and state requirements to minimise the potential environmental impacts of wastewater disposal, especially regarding the use of surface ponds.

Health effects

The process of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, involves forcing water, sand, and chemicals into horizontally drilled wells, causing the shale to crack and release natural gas or oil. This process has raised concerns about its potential health effects and environmental impact, particularly regarding water and air quality.

Water quality is a primary concern as the chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing can contaminate drinking water sources. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the United States has identified 1,084 different chemicals used in fracking formulas between 2005 and 2013, including methanol, ethylene glycol, and propargyl alcohol, which are considered hazardous to human health. However, the health impacts of the majority of these chemicals remain unknown. Contamination of drinking water can occur through various means, such as spills during the management of hydraulic fracturing fluids, injection of these fluids into wells with inadequate integrity, discharge of inadequately treated wastewater, and disposal or storage of wastewater in unlined pits.

The potential health risks associated with exposure to contaminated drinking water include neurological, reproductive, and developmental issues. For example, a study by Elaine Hill, Ph.D., linked drilling near public water sources to poorer birth outcomes, including an increase in preterm births and low birth weight in infants. Additionally, Hill's previous research examined the association between shale gas development and reproductive health, finding a subsequent impact on educational attainment, a higher risk of childhood asthma, heart attacks, and opioid deaths.

In addition to water contamination, fracking can also impact air quality. Any related combustion processes, such as flaring of excess natural gas and the operation of heavy equipment, can release toxic chemicals into the air. A 2019 review study found that hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) associated with upstream oil and gas development, which may include fracking, have been detected near development sites at levels exceeding health-based standards. These pollutants have been linked to both cancerous and non-cancerous health outcomes.

While the specific health effects of fracking are still being researched, the available evidence suggests that the practice can have negative consequences for human health, particularly for vulnerable populations such as infants and children. The lack of comprehensive data on the toxicity of chemicals used in fracking and the potential for contamination of water and air resources underscores the need for further research and stricter environmental regulations.

Frequently asked questions