Polluted Water Habitats: Which Animals Can Survive?

Water pollution is a pressing issue that affects many animals. From sewage to plastic waste, there are many ways in which pollution is destroying our lands and seas. While some animals are forced to leave their habitats, others have been found to adapt to the changing environment. In this article, we will explore the different ways in which animals are affected by polluted waters and the ways in which we can help to combat this issue.

Killifish can survive in polluted waters due to genetic mutations

Water pollution is a pressing issue that affects many animals, from sea birds to marine mammals, fish, and reptiles. One notable example of an animal that has adapted to survive in polluted waters is the killifish.

Killifish, also known as mud minnows or mummichog, are typically found in the brackish waterways and marshes along the Atlantic coast. They are highly sensitive to pollution and are considered an indicator species, used to gauge the health of aquatic ecosystems. However, scientists have discovered that some killifish populations have evolved to tolerate extremely high levels of pollution, up to 8,000 times the lethal dose for most killifish.

The secret to their survival lies in genetic mutations. Researchers have found a common set of mutations among pollution-tolerant killifish that help deactivate or turn off molecular pathways responsible for cellular damage caused by industrial chemicals. These mutations are rare among fish in unpolluted waters because they do not provide a survival advantage in clean environments. The genetic diversity within the species of killifish is believed to have played a crucial role in their ability to adapt to polluted conditions.

For example, Gulf killifish in the Houston Ship Channel were once declining due to toxins from industrial activity. However, through interspecies mating with Atlantic killifish, they acquired genetic mutations that helped them survive in polluted conditions, leading to a mysterious rebound in their population. Additionally, studies on killifish from polluted sites such as New Bedford Harbor and the Elizabeth River have revealed genetic variations in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) pathway, which is responsible for regulating an animal's biological response to chemicals.

The adaptability of killifish provides valuable insights into how chemical pollutants affect both animals and humans. However, it is important to note that their evolution in polluted waters may come at a cost. Pollution-tolerant killifish may experience a loss of genetic diversity, making it challenging for them to cope with future environmental changes.

Sewage pollution endangers mayflies, an important food source for fish and birds

Mayflies are a small species of insect that spends its juvenile life in the water and its adult life in the air and on land. They are an important food source for many fish and bird species, and their presence is often used as a signal of river health. However, sewage pollution is endangering their existence.

Sewage pollution transforms rivers into hostile environments, threatening the survival of many iconic and important species and ecosystems. Mayflies, which spend much of their lives on riverbeds, are particularly vulnerable to this form of pollution. The influx of nutrients from sewage causes an explosion of algae, preventing them from feeding and killing off their eggs.

Mayflies are very sensitive to pollution and are usually only found in high-quality, minimally polluted sites. They are one of the most commonly used indices of aquatic ecosystem health. Their presence or absence can indicate the level of pollution in a body of water.

In addition to sewage, other sources of pollution that threaten mayflies include pesticides, which pose an acute risk to freshwater ecosystems. Even at low concentrations, pesticides can have a widespread impact on mayfly populations, with laboratory tests showing that half of the mayflies died when exposed to certain concentrations.

The decline of mayflies can have ripple effects up the food chain. As a food source for many fish and birds, their reduction in numbers can impact the populations of these species. This, in turn, can affect other animals higher up the food chain, demonstrating the interconnectedness of healthy ecosystems.

Salmon populations are declining due to pollution in rivers

Salmon are facing various environmental challenges, including pollution, climate change, and human activities. One of the main issues is the increase in water temperature due to climate change and human activities such as logging and farming. Higher water temperatures can be lethal for salmon, and they need cold, clean water to survive and spawn. Pollution, such as sewage and plastic waste, also makes it harder for salmon to spawn, and the young salmon that return to the sea are often smaller and less likely to survive.

Sewage pollution, for example, causes an explosion of algae, preventing mayflies from feeding and killing their eggs. Mayflies are a food source for many fish and birds, so their decline can have ripple effects up the food chain. Plastic pollution is another major issue, as it can harm animals in multiple ways, including entanglement, digestion issues, and the ingestion of toxins.

Additionally, overfishing and the presence of dams contribute to the decline of salmon populations. Dams can cause fish to die from the shock of going through the turbines or from predators that eat disoriented fish as they emerge from the dam. Removing dams can help restore salmon populations and the surrounding ecosystem, as seen in the Elwha River in the Olympic Peninsula.

The situation is dire, and without immediate action to reduce pollutants, mitigate climate change, and protect salmon habitats, there is a risk of losing this iconic species from our rivers forever.

Plastic pollution entangles marine animals and affects their digestion and reproduction

Marine animals are facing a grave threat from plastic pollution, which is causing harm in multiple ways. One of the significant dangers is entanglement, where large pieces of plastic, such as abandoned fishing gear, trap and restrict the movement of marine creatures, leading to starvation, injuries, and increased vulnerability to predators. This issue affects a wide range of species, including the rare humpback dolphin found in the waters of Australia and New Guinea.

Plastic pollution also poses a severe risk to the digestive systems of marine animals. As plastics are ingested, they can cause internal damage and blockages, impacting their ability to feed and leading to starvation. Microplastics, a specific concern, are tiny plastic particles that can be accidentally consumed by filter-feeding molluscs like mussels and oysters, resulting in the accumulation of plastic fragments in their bodies. These microplastics can then be passed up the food chain, with apex predators like great white sharks and orcas at risk of consuming contaminated prey.

The toxic chemicals present in plastics further exacerbate the problem. A single plastic particle can absorb up to one million times more toxic chemicals than the surrounding water, and these toxins build up in the fatty tissues of animals that consume contaminated prey, leading to bioaccumulation. This process results in a higher concentration of toxins in apex predators, posing a significant yet understudied threat to their health and reproduction.

Additionally, plastic pollution can hinder the reproduction of marine animals. The chemicals and toxins found in plastics can interfere with the hormonal balance, disrupting reproductive cycles and impairing the ability to reproduce. This, coupled with the physical injuries and entanglement issues caused by plastic debris, poses a severe threat to the survival and population growth of various marine species.

To address this pressing issue, organizations like Fauna & Flora are advocating for policy changes to reduce the irresponsible use and disposal of plastics. They promote measures to minimize plastic leakage into the environment, reduce plastic toxicity, and increase the reuse, repurposing, and recycling of plastics. By supporting such initiatives and making conscious choices to reduce plastic consumption, we can collectively work towards mitigating the detrimental effects of plastic pollution on marine life.

Water pollution from agricultural operations threatens amphibians like frogs and salamanders

Water pollution from agricultural operations threatens many animals, including amphibians like frogs and salamanders. Frogs and salamanders are particularly vulnerable to the effects of water pollution due to their sensitive skin and reliance on aquatic habitats for survival.

Agricultural operations often use pesticides, fertilizers, and other chemicals that can run off into nearby waterways, causing pollution and contaminating the water that amphibians depend on for their survival. These chemicals can impair the development of amphibians, reduce their hatching success, and increase the risk of deformities and other abnormalities.

For example, a study on the effects of agricultural runoff on native amphibians in the Lower Fraser River Valley in British Columbia, Canada, found that water samples from agricultural sites had high levels of ammonia, total phosphate, and biological oxygen demand. These pollutants negatively impacted the hatching success of northern red-legged frogs (Rana aurora) and northwestern salamanders (Ambystoma gracile). The study also suggested that agricultural runoff may contribute to lower reproductive success and reduced population viability of amphibian populations in the region.

Additionally, agricultural operations can also lead to habitat loss and degradation for amphibians, further threatening their survival. The intensification of agriculture and the expansion of farming activities can destroy and fragment amphibian habitats, making it difficult for them to find suitable places to live and reproduce. Climate change, driven in part by agricultural practices, also poses a significant threat to amphibians, with 39% of status deteriorations attributed to ongoing and projected climate change effects since 2004.

The decline of amphibian populations has severe consequences for the environment as they are considered a key indicator of the health of wetlands and biodiversity in general. Their specific biological needs and sensitivity to pollutants make them particularly vulnerable to the effects of water pollution. Therefore, it is crucial to address the impact of agricultural operations on amphibian populations and implement measures to reduce pollution and protect their habitats.

Frequently asked questions