Air Pollution In Space: Is It A Concern?

Since the beginning of the space age in the 1950s, humans have been exploring space and creating a mess. There are about 2,000 active satellites orbiting the Earth, with 3,000 dead ones and millions of smaller pieces of space junk or space debris floating alongside them. This debris travels at more than 28,000 kilometres per hour, posing a risk of collision with functioning satellites and spacecraft, as well as endangering future missions and terrestrial communications. The accumulation of space junk and the potential for collisions have led to concerns about air pollution in space.

Space junk is a growing problem

Since the beginning of the space age in the 1950s, thousands of rockets and satellites have been launched into space. Many of these are still in orbit, and with more launches, the risk of collision increases. This accumulation of space junk or space debris is a growing problem.

Space junk is any piece of machinery or debris left by humans in space. It can refer to large objects such as dead satellites that have failed or been left in orbit at the end of their mission. It can also refer to smaller things, like bits of debris or paint flecks that have fallen off a rocket.

The European Space Agency (ESA) estimates that there are about 900,000 objects over one centimetre in size orbiting the Earth with no use. The count of artificial objects in orbit around the Earth that are greater than 10 cm in length is likely to be approximately 34,000, with approximately 900,000 objects between 1 cm and 10 cm. For objects between 1 mm and 1 cm, the count is some 128 million.

The sheer number of these objects currently in orbit, and their potential to slam into other objects at speeds of up to 5 miles per second, means that the risk of causing serious damage to functioning spacecraft is significant. A single collision can generate thousands of particles of space trash. This is known as the Kessler Syndrome, an idea proposed by NASA scientist Donald Kessler in 1978. He said that if there was too much space junk in orbit, it could result in a chain reaction where more and more objects collide and create new space junk in the process, to the point where Earth's orbit becomes unusable.

Several companies have come up with novel solutions to tackle this problem, including removing dead satellites from orbit and dragging them back into the atmosphere, where they will burn up. Ways to do this include using a harpoon to grab a satellite, catching it in a huge net, using magnets to grab it, or even firing lasers to heat up the satellite, increasing its atmospheric drag so that it falls out of orbit.

The risk of collisions is increasing

Since the 1950s, humans have launched thousands of rockets and satellites into orbit. Many of these are still orbiting the Earth, along with bits of debris from rockets and satellites that have been launched over the years. This debris, also known as space junk, poses a significant threat to future space missions and terrestrial communications.

Space junk can refer to large objects such as inactive satellites, or smaller objects like flecks of paint that have fallen off a rocket. The European Space Agency (ESA) estimates that there are about 900,000 objects over one centimetre in size orbiting the Earth, and around 34,000 larger than 10 centimetres. The danger of these objects lies in the speed at which they move—more than 28,000 kilometres per hour—turning them into projectiles.

The accumulation of space junk has led to an increased risk of collisions with functioning satellites. Since its launch in 1999, the International Space Station (ISS) has conducted 27 collision avoidance manoeuvres, a number that is trending upwards with time. These manoeuvres are performed to prevent damage to the ISS from incoming space junk and require significant planning and execution time.

The risk of collisions is further exacerbated by the potential for a cascading effect, known as the Kessler syndrome. Proposed by NASA scientist Donald J. Kessler in 1978, the Kessler syndrome describes a situation where the density of objects in low Earth orbit (LEO) becomes so high that collisions between objects create even more space debris, exponentially increasing the amount of debris over time. This proliferation of debris poses a significant threat to satellites, space missions, and the long-term viability of space exploration.

To mitigate the risk of collisions, effective space traffic management and collision avoidance strategies are essential. Several companies have proposed solutions such as removing dead satellites from orbit using methods like harpoons, nets, magnets, or lasers, and the development of self-removing satellites. However, there is currently no universally recognised solution to the problem of space junk, and the risk of collisions continues to increase as more objects are launched into orbit.

There are no easy solutions to the problem

Since the beginning of the space age in the 1950s, humans have been exploring space and creating a mess. This mess, known as "space junk" or "space debris", includes thousands of dead satellites, rocket debris, paint flecks, and even human-made junk left on the Moon. While it may seem harmless floating in the vastness of space, space debris poses a significant threat to both space exploration and the Earth's environment.

The problem of space debris is not new, but it is getting worse. With each launch, we add to the thousands of objects already orbiting the Earth, increasing the risk of collisions. These collisions can create even more debris, leading to a chain reaction known as the "Kessler Syndrome". Despite the rarity of direct collisions, the sheer number of objects in orbit and their high speeds of more than 28,000 kilometres per hour make the risk of damage to functioning spacecraft significant.

The accumulation of space junk endangers future missions and terrestrial communications. It also has the potential to cause serious damage to active satellites, as even small fragments like paint flakes or solidified antifreeze droplets can impact solar panels. Some space debris contains flammable or radioactive materials, which could explode and disperse pollutants into the atmosphere or cause dangerous contamination if they returned to Earth.

While the issue of space debris is widely recognized, finding a solution is challenging. Several companies have proposed innovative solutions, such as using harpoons, nets, magnets, or lasers to remove dead satellites and large pieces of debris. Other ideas include developing self-removing satellites and coating satellites in polymeric foam to facilitate their descent into the Earth's atmosphere. However, these solutions are not without their limitations and are yet to be universally adopted.

The lack of a binding international regulatory framework and commercial incentives also hinders progress. While the United Nations has asked companies to remove their satellites from orbit within 25 years of their mission end, enforcement is difficult due to satellite failures. Economists have suggested attaching an annual fee to satellites in orbit to discourage the accumulation of space junk, but a comprehensive approach involving various stakeholders is necessary to effectively address this complex issue.

Space junk can cause air pollution

Space junk refers to any piece of machinery or debris left by humans in space. This includes inactive satellites, rocket fragments, paint flecks, and even tools dropped by astronauts during space walks. Since the beginning of the space age in the 1950s, thousands of rockets and satellites have been launched, with many still orbiting the Earth.

The accumulation of space junk poses a significant threat to future space exploration and the environment. The risk of collisions with functioning satellites increases, which can result in the creation of more space debris. This can have detrimental effects on Earth's climate and environment, as objects left behind in space release various chemicals into the atmosphere and contribute to the depletion of the ozone layer.

The impact of space junk on the environment is twofold. Firstly, the burning of space debris during re-entry releases pollutants into the Earth's upper atmosphere, as detected by NASA aircraft. These pollutants, such as lithium, aluminum, copper, and lead, have been found in concentrations much higher than those from natural sources. Secondly, the presence of space junk can also hinder future space missions. The fuel used to launch spacecraft into space can contribute to air pollution if the mission is unsuccessful due to collisions with space debris.

To address the issue of space junk, several measures have been proposed, including the removal of large debris with instruments like harpoons and lasers, and the development of self-removing satellites. The United Nations has requested that companies remove their satellites from orbit within 25 years of their mission's end. However, enforcing this is challenging due to satellite failures. As space exploration continues to advance, it is crucial to prioritize sustainable practices to mitigate the negative impacts of space junk on the environment and future space endeavors.

Space junk is a threat to future space exploration

Since the beginning of the space age in the 1950s, thousands of rockets and satellites have been launched into space. Many of these are still in orbit, and the risk of collision increases with each new launch. This "space junk" or "space debris" includes dead satellites, rocket debris, paint flecks, and even human-made objects left on the Moon. While most space junk burns up upon re-entering the atmosphere, objects left at higher altitudes can remain in orbit for thousands of years.

The accumulation of space junk poses a significant threat to future space exploration. With approximately 34,000 pieces of space junk larger than 10 cm and millions of smaller pieces, the potential for collisions is very real. These collisions can generate thousands of new particles of space trash, leading to a chain reaction of objects colliding and creating more debris, as theorised by NASA scientist Donald Kessler in 1978. This could render Earth's orbit unusable and have catastrophic consequences for space exploration and ongoing missions.

The danger is not just to future missions but also to active satellites currently in orbit. These satellites must perform hundreds of collision avoidance manoeuvres each year to prevent damage or destruction. The International Space Station (ISS) is particularly vulnerable, and even tiny pieces of debris can cause significant harm, as evidenced by a 7mm chip in one of its windows caused by a microscopic piece of space debris.

The issue of space junk is not just limited to space. It can also have detrimental effects on Earth's environment and pose risks to people and property. Additionally, the release and destruction of certain space objects can disperse pollutants and toxic substances into the atmosphere, causing potential harm to the planet.

To address the problem of space junk, various solutions have been proposed, including removal methods such as harpoons, lasers, and giant nets. Other ideas include developing self-removing satellites, coating satellites in polymeric foam to facilitate their descent, and imposing fees on satellites put into orbit to discourage unnecessary accumulation. While there is no universally recognised solution yet, it is crucial for spaceflight companies to adhere to guidelines and actively work towards reducing future space junk accumulation.

Frequently asked questions