Animals' Resilience Against Air Pollution: Strategies For Survival

Animals are facing a new reality of life on Earth with humans, and evolution is marching on. Species are adapting to urban pollution, traffic, and shrinking habitats through changes in their genes. While some animals seem to be able to adapt to changing environments, others cannot. Animals that cannot adapt to changing environments are in danger. For example, young fish exposed to PCBs, oily chemicals, are severely deformed and may lack a jaw, causing them to starve. On the other hand, some fish have developed a genetic variant that shields them from the toxicity of PCBs.

Animals may adapt to air pollution through genetic changes

Animals are currently facing the challenge of adapting to the new reality of polluted habitats, largely caused by human activity. While some species are unable to adapt and are at risk of extinction, others are showing signs of genetic changes that enable them to survive in these challenging environments.

Genetic variations within species play a crucial role in their ability to adapt to air pollution. For instance, in response to increasing concentrations of sulphur dioxide, certain grasses, herbs, and lichens have evolved sulphur dioxide tolerance. This has allowed them to invade inner-city areas, demonstrating their successful adaptation to urban air pollution.

In another example, fish living in the Hudson River amidst PCB (polychlorinated biphenyl) pollution have developed a genetic variant in the AHR2 gene. This variant shields the fish from the toxic effects of PCBs, which are known to cause cancer in animals and pose risks to humans as well. The discovery of this genetic adaptation provides valuable insights into how certain fish populations are able to survive in highly contaminated environments.

Additionally, animals that are better able to cope with human-induced climate shifts are more likely to pass on their genes to the next generation. As exposure to heat and UV rays increases, the melanocytes in their skin produce more melanin, offering protection against these environmental stressors. This is an example of how genetic factors contribute to an animal's ability to adapt to changing conditions, including air pollution.

While animals may demonstrate remarkable genetic adaptations to air pollution, it is important to consider the potential evolutionary trade-offs. As biologist Wirgin notes, becoming less sensitive to a pollutant may lead to negative consequences in other areas, such as reproduction, life expectancy, or increased sensitivity to other stressors. These trade-offs highlight the complex nature of evolutionary changes and the potential long-term impacts on species survival and diversity.

Some animals may develop a tolerance to air pollutants

Animals are currently facing the challenge of adapting to the new reality of polluted habitats, with human activities being the world's greatest evolutionary force. While some animals are unable to adapt to changing environments and are at risk of extinction, others are demonstrating resilience and the ability to persist in polluted environments.

The concept of convergent evolution, where multiple independent lineages find the same solution to a problem, is observed in Poecilia fishes from sulfur-rich springs. These fishes have lower energetic demands, resulting in smaller sizes and reduced oxygen consumption rates compared to fish from uncontaminated sites. This adaptation allows them to thrive in toxic environments.

Additionally, animals in urban areas are also adapting to air pollution. For example, raccoons have learned to open garbage cans and navigate across power lines, demonstrating behavioral adaptations to city life. Genetic changes are also occurring in urban wildlife, as seen in the case of Chicago, where biologists have detected genetic accommodations in species surviving in congested landscapes.

While animals may develop tolerance to air pollutants, there are evolutionary trade-offs to consider. Becoming less sensitive to a pollutant may lead to reduced reproductive success or decreased life expectancy. Additionally, increased tolerance to one stressor may result in heightened sensitivity to others. As a result, even if animals can initially survive in polluted environments, they may still face unpredictable long-term consequences that could lead to their decline.

Animals may adapt by changing their behaviour

Animals may adapt to air pollution by changing their behaviour. For example, raccoons in cities have learned to unlatch garbage cans to search for food and move across power lines to get from one rooftop to another. This behaviour has been observed since humans started building cities thousands of years ago.

Biologists have also noted that some animals are adapting to city life in more fundamental ways. Their genes are changing, which influences how an organism looks and functions. For instance, fish in the Hudson River have been exposed to PCBs, oily chemicals that can cause cancer in animals and humans. Many young fish exposed to PCBs are severely deformed, and may lack a jaw, causing them to starve. However, some tomcod have developed a genetic variant in the AHR2 gene, which appears to protect them from the toxicity of PCBs.

In another example, killifish from polluted sites have made adjustments in their physiology to adapt to their extreme environment. They have become smaller and have lower oxygen consumption rates than fish from uncontaminated sites. This allows them to survive in environments with lower oxygen levels.

Additionally, animals that are able to cope with human-caused climate shifts are more likely to pass on their genes to the next generation. As exposure to heat and UV rays increases, the melanocytes in the skin produce more melanin. This adaptation can be observed in various species, including humans.

While animals may be able to adapt to polluted environments, these changes can have evolutionary trade-offs. For example, an animal that evolves to become less sensitive to a pollutant may experience reduced reproductive success or decreased life expectancy. These trade-offs can be challenging to predict and could ultimately lead to the decline of certain species.

Air pollution may cause evolutionary trade-offs

Animals are currently facing the challenge of adapting to the new reality of polluted habitats caused by human activities. While some animals are unable to adapt to changing environments and are at risk of extinction, others are evolving to cope with the onslaught of pollutants. This evolution comes at a cost, known as evolutionary trade-offs, which can have long-term consequences that are difficult to predict.

One example of an evolutionary trade-off can be seen in the fish from sulfurous springs, which have adapted to lower energetic demands by becoming smaller and reducing their oxygen consumption rates. While these adaptations may aid in survival in a toxic environment, they may also impact the fish's reproductive success or life expectancy. For instance, smaller fish may have a reduced ability to compete for mates or defend against predators, leading to potential declines in their population over time.

Another illustration of evolutionary trade-offs is observed in urban raccoons, which have become adept at scavenging for food in garbage cans and navigating across power lines. These behavioural adaptations to city life may increase their chances of survival in congested urban environments. However, the cost of these adaptations may include reduced reproductive success or increased sensitivity to other stressors. As a result, urban raccoons may face challenges in maintaining their population numbers over generations.

Additionally, plants are also susceptible to evolutionary trade-offs when adapting to atmospheric pollutants. Lichens and bryophytes, for instance, have undergone dramatic changes in urban and industrial areas, with some species invading inner-city areas due to their tolerance to sulphur dioxide. While these plants may benefit from reduced competition in polluted environments, they may face trade-offs in terms of growth rate, reproduction, or resilience to other environmental stressors.

The specific nature of these evolutionary trade-offs is complex and not yet fully understood by biologists. However, it is clear that as animals and plants adapt to human-induced pollution, they are navigating a delicate balance between survival in the present and potential consequences in the future. Further research is needed to unravel the full extent of these trade-offs and their long-term impact on the affected species.

Animals that cannot adapt to air pollution are at risk of extinction

Animals are facing a new challenge: adapting to life on a planet increasingly affected by human activities. As the world's greatest evolutionary force, humans are exposing animals to a cocktail of urban and industrial chemical by-products, and air pollution is one of the key concerns. While some animals are able to adapt to polluted environments, those that cannot are at risk of extinction.

The ability to adapt to air pollution varies among animals, and those that can adapt often face evolutionary trade-offs. For example, fish from sulfurous springs have adapted to lower energetic demands by evolving to become smaller and consume less oxygen. However, these adaptations may have negative consequences for their reproductive success or life expectancy, making them vulnerable to long-term decline.

In cities, animals are exposed to various pollutants, including nitrogen oxides from road vehicles. Some species may have made genetic accommodations to survive in these congested environments, but there can be costs that biologists are only beginning to understand. For instance, becoming less sensitive to a pollutant may lead to decreased reproductive success or increased sensitivity to other stressors.

Additionally, air pollution can cause physical deformities in animals, impacting their survival. For example, young fish exposed to PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls) may lack a jaw, leading to starvation. Local extinctions, where a species goes extinct in a particular area, are already occurring in a significant proportion of studied species.

The vulnerability of animals to air pollution is further exacerbated by their limited ability to avoid polluted areas. Unlike humans, who can protect themselves with masks or air filters, animals are directly exposed to the contaminated environment. As a result, their health and survival are at risk, and the long-term consequences for various species are difficult to predict.

Frequently asked questions