Testing River Water: Pollution Detection Methods And Practices

Water quality testing is essential to protect our water sources and ecosystems. There are many reasons to test river water quality, and various methods and equipment are used depending on the application. Testing for bacteria, such as E. coli, is crucial as it indicates the presence of fecal matter and is a significant health concern for recreational activities. Other common tests include measuring pH levels, temperature, salinity, oxygen levels, and nutrient pollution, such as nitrates and phosphates. More advanced equipment can detect specific conductance, identifying electrical conductivity changes caused by pollution. At-home test kits are also available to measure pH, lead, bacteria, nitrates, and chlorine. Understanding these parameters helps assess the ecological health of freshwater ecosystems and ensures the safety of human recreational activities.

Testing for bacteria, including E. coli, which indicates faecal matter

Testing for bacteria, including E. coli, is a crucial aspect of assessing river water pollution. E. coli is a type of fecal coliform bacteria commonly found in the intestines of animals and humans, and its presence in water indicates fecal contamination. Here are some detailed methods for testing river water for E. coli and other bacteria:

Conventional Methods:

The multiple tube fermentation technique is a conventional method to detect coliform bacteria in water samples. This technique involves the fermentation of lactose sugar, which is then followed by additional processes to identify specific bacteria like E. coli.

DipTest:

The DipTest is a novel, litmus paper-based method developed specifically for the detection of E. coli in water samples. It is easy to use and provides a simple testing process. To use the DipTest, one must dip the device into the water for a specified amount of time and then place it on a flat surface. The paper strip in the device attracts E. coli present in the water sample, and the bacteria react with custom-formulated chemical reagents, resulting in a pinkish-red color change on the paper. This color change indicates the presence of E. coli contamination. The DipTest is particularly useful in remote locations and for testing water quality in swimming pools, lakes, rivers, and beaches.

Molecular and Enzymatic Methods:

Molecular (PCR-based) and enzymatic methods offer rapid detection of bacterial indicators and other enteric isolates in water samples. These techniques can identify specific bacterial DNA or enzymes, providing quick and accurate results.

Standard Plate Count and Biochemical Oxygen Demand:

The Standard Plate Count (SPC) of heterotrophic bacteria and Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) techniques are used to determine the bacterial and organic pollution load in a water sample. These methods quantify the number of bacteria and the oxygen consumed by them, respectively, providing insights into the extent of bacterial pollution.

Water Testing Kits:

Organizations like Earthwatch Europe offer water testing kits that enable individuals to test the quality of their local rivers. These kits can detect nutrient pollution and various chemicals, providing a "fingerprint" of the water sample. This comprehensive analysis helps identify the types of pollution and their sources, such as distinguishing between treated and untreated sewage.

It is important to note that while most bacteria in rivers are harmless, certain bacteria, including E. coli, can cause sickness and diseases in humans and wildlife. Therefore, testing for bacteria, especially E. coli, is a vital step in ensuring the safety and potability of river water.

Measuring temperature and flow rate to identify thermal pollution

Water temperature is a critical factor in determining the quality of aquatic life and habitats. It is influenced by various natural and human factors, such as industry, development, dams, and climate change. To identify thermal pollution in a river, measuring temperature and flow rate is essential. Here is a step-by-step guide on how to do it:

Choose Measurement Locations:

Select two sections along the river that are approximately 1.6 kilometres apart and have similar conditions. These locations should be upstream and downstream of a potential source of thermal pollution, such as an industrial discharge point or a dam. Ensure that the measurements are taken at roughly the same time to control for diurnal variation.

Measure Water Temperature:

At the chosen locations, use a suitable temperature-measuring device, such as a thermometer or a temperature probe, to measure the water temperature. Take measurements at the same depth and ensure that the device has been calibrated correctly. Record the temperature readings for both locations.

Calculate Temperature Difference:

Compare the temperature readings from the two locations. If the difference is greater than 2 degrees Celsius, it indicates a significant temperature change and suggests the presence of thermal pollution. This method assumes that the river's natural temperature should be relatively consistent over a short distance if no external factors are influencing it.

Measure Flow Rate:

To determine the flow rate, select a buoyant object, such as an orange, and place it in the water at the upstream measurement location. Time how long it takes for the object to travel between the two measurement points. The flow rate can be calculated by dividing the distance between the two points (1.6 km) by the time taken for the object to travel that distance.

Analyse Results:

A faster flow rate suggests a higher volume of water passing through, which can be indicative of a source of thermal pollution upstream. Combine this information with the temperature measurements to identify potential sources of thermal pollution. For example, if the temperature difference is significant, and the flow rate has increased, it further supports the presence of thermal pollution.

By following these steps and analysing the data, you can identify thermal pollution in a river by measuring temperature and flow rate. This information can then be used to address the pollution source and implement mitigation strategies to improve water quality and protect the aquatic ecosystem.

Testing for ammonia, which can indicate contamination with pollutants

Testing for ammonia in river water is an important indicator of water quality. Ammonia is naturally present in water, but higher-than-natural levels can indicate contamination with pollutants. Ammonia is toxic to aquatic life and can cause eutrophication, promoting the growth of choking aquatic vegetation or algal blooms that reduce oxygen levels in the water. These algal blooms can limit the growth of other plants and lead to the water becoming hypoxic and uninhabitable.

Ammonia is used in the production of fertilisers, animal feed, plastics, paper, rubber, and other industrial applications. It is one of several forms of nitrogen that exist in aquatic environments. At elevated concentrations, ammonia can cause direct toxic effects on aquatic life, while other forms of nitrogen can cause indirect effects by causing nutrient over-enrichment of a water body.

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has published final national recommended water quality criteria for the protection of aquatic life from the toxic effects of ammonia in freshwater. The EPA's criteria reflect new data on sensitive freshwater mussels and snails, and the agency has also published supporting information to assist states, territories, and tribes in considering the adoption of these criteria into their water quality standards.

To test for ammonia in river water, you can use a sensor probe such as the ones offered by Aquaread. Their ammonium/ammonia sensor is an Ion Selective Electrode (ISE) that measures charged ammonium ions in the water. By using a complex calculation, the sensor can also measure the ammonia concentration. To use this sensor, you would first need to install it into your probe of choice and then perform a full calibration using dilutions from a stock calibration solution. Once calibrated, you can simply put the probe into the river, allow the reading to stabilise, and take your measurement.

Other factors that can affect ammonia toxicity to aquatic animals include pH and temperature. The ecological risk assessment of ammonia in the Shaying River Basin in China took these factors into account, and the results indicated that the risks were more severe during the wet and flat seasons due to higher temperatures and pH values. Therefore, when testing for ammonia in river water, it is important to also consider these environmental factors to fully understand the potential risks.

Measuring specific conductance to identify industrial pollution or urban runoff

Conductivity is a useful general measure of water quality. It is a measure of the ability of water to pass an electrical current. Conductivity is affected by the presence of dissolved solids such as chloride, nitrate, and phosphate ions. Organic compounds like oil, phenol, and alcohol do not conduct electrical currents well and have low conductivity when in water.

Conductivity is also affected by temperature: warmer water has higher conductivity. For this reason, conductivity is reported at 25 degrees Celsius. Conductivity in streams and rivers is primarily influenced by the geology of the surrounding area. Streams that flow through regions with granite bedrock tend to have lower conductivity because granite is composed of more inert materials that do not ionize.

Each water body tends to have a relatively constant range of conductivity that can be used as a baseline for comparison with regular conductivity measurements. Significant changes in conductivity could indicate that a discharge or some other source of pollution has entered the water. For example, human disturbance tends to increase the amount of dissolved solids in the water, resulting in increased conductivity.

To measure conductivity, you will need a conductivity meter, which costs about $350. Meters in this price range should also measure temperature and automatically compensate for temperature in the conductivity reading. You can measure conductivity in the field or in a lab. If you are collecting samples in the field for later measurement, use a glass or polyethylene bottle that has been washed in phosphate-free detergent and thoroughly rinsed with tap and distilled water. You can also use factory-prepared Whirl-pak® bags.

Before measuring, calibrate your meter using a conductivity standard solution (usually potassium chloride or sodium chloride). Rinse the probe with distilled or deionized water. Select the appropriate range, starting with the highest range and working down. Read the conductivity of the water sample. If the reading is in the lower 10% of the range, switch to the next lower range. If the conductivity of the sample exceeds the range of the instrument, you may dilute the sample according to the manufacturer's directions. Be sure to rinse the probe with distilled or deionized water and repeat until finished. Samples sent to a lab for analysis must be tested within 28 days of collection.

Testing for nitrates and phosphates, which can cause eutrophication

Nitrates and phosphates are nutrients required for plants and algae to grow. However, in high quantities, they can cause eutrophication or nutrient enrichment. Nitrates and phosphates are useful indicators of the ecological health of freshwater. This is the water's ability to support healthy, diverse communities of plants and wildlife. If a river has nutrient pollution and poor ecological health, it is unable to provide a healthy home for plants and animals.

Nitrates from land sources end up in rivers and streams more quickly than other nutrients like phosphorus because they dissolve in water more readily than phosphates, which have an attraction for soil particles. As a result, nitrates serve as a better indicator of the possibility of a source of sewage or manure pollution during dry weather. Water that is polluted with nitrogen-rich organic matter might show low nitrates. The decomposition of the organic matter lowers the dissolved oxygen level, which in turn slows the rate at which ammonia is oxidized to nitrite (NO2) and then to nitrate (NO3). Under such circumstances, it might be necessary to also monitor nitrites or ammonia, which are considerably more toxic to aquatic life than nitrate.

To measure nitrates and phosphates, samples of fresh water are added to the Kyoritsu tubes included in the test kit. After a few minutes, the samples will change colour depending on how much nitrogen or phosphorus is present. The higher the concentration of these nutrients in the water, measured in parts per million (ppm), the darker the colour. So, the darker the colour, the higher the level of nutrient pollution. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standard for nitrate in drinking water is 10 milligrams of nitrate (measured as nitrogen) per liter of drinking water (mg/L). 1 milligram per liter (mg/L) is the same as 1 part per million. In the UK, a common guideline for ecologically impacted surface waters is 1.0 mg NO3-N/L. Phosphate (P-PO4-) is naturally rare in freshwater environments, however, artificial sources of phosphate are often found in fertilizers and domestic wastewater. Run-off from agricultural land, soil erosion, and improperly managed sewage treatment works can have devastating effects on the health of water bodies. Government guidance recommends that rivers should not exceed annual mean phosphate concentrations of 0.1 mg PO4-P/L.

Nitrate is a compound that naturally occurs and has many human-made sources. It is present in some lakes, rivers, and groundwater. You cannot taste, smell, or see nitrate in water. Consuming too much nitrate can be harmful, especially to babies. Bottle-fed babies under six months old are at the highest risk of getting methemoglobinemia, also known as blue baby syndrome, which can result in serious illness or death. It can cause the lips and skin to turn a bluish colour but may be difficult to detect in infants.

Frequently asked questions