Addressing Water Pollution: Government Strategies And Initiatives

Water pollution is a pressing issue that governments worldwide are working to address. While water quality has improved in some countries over the past few decades, emerging contaminants and increasing water demands continue to pose challenges. Governments play a crucial role in protecting water resources and ensuring safe drinking water for their citizens and the ecosystem. Local governments, in particular, are responsible for filling the gaps in state and federal regulations, especially in preventing groundwater contamination through zoning and addressing specific issues like algal blooms and chemical pollutants. At the federal level, agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the US have implemented the Clean Water Act (CWA) to regulate pollutant discharges and set wastewater standards. However, some pollutants, such as PFAS (forever chemicals), remain largely unregulated, and non-point source pollution from agricultural and industrial run-off continues to be a significant concern. To effectively address water pollution, governments must adopt coherent cross-sectoral policies, improve water management, and collaborate with local communities to protect and conserve this vital resource.

Local governments can play a role in protecting surface water, groundwater, drinking water and wetlands

Local governments play a crucial role in protecting surface water, groundwater, drinking water, and wetlands, often filling in the gaps left by state and federal regulations. While there are state and federal laws designed to protect water quality, these may not be sufficient on their own, and local governments are key to ensuring effective protection.

Local governments can employ zoning as a preventative measure, a characteristic that is not always present in state statutes. Zoning ordinances can be used to prevent groundwater contamination, with site plan review standards that require secondary containment and restrict the use of dry wells. Local governments should also coordinate with each other to ensure that their actions include the entire watershed or groundwater shed. This is because, in certain geographies like Michigan’s glacial geology, groundwater, surface water, and wetlands are interconnected, with water and any contaminants travelling back and forth between them. Therefore, a local approach must tackle all three together.

Local governments can also play a role in proactive protection of wetlands and surface water, which often involves how the shoreline is treated. This includes setbacks, vegetation belts or buffers, and density of development (parcel size and impervious surface). The specific standards used in zoning ordinances will depend on the goals of the community and must be based on research and defensible, science-based standards. For example, the goal might be to protect water from nutrients and other runoff, or to protect the natural habitat. Local governments can refer to resources like the GEM pilot project in Manistee County in 1995, which looked at county soils, lithology of water wells, groundwater movement, and various sources of peer-reviewed research.

In addition, local governments can refer to programs like the Tribal Wetland Program Development Grants (WPDGs) by the EPA, which assist tribal governments and intertribal consortia in developing and refining programs to protect, manage, and restore wetlands.

The Clean Water Act (CWA) regulates the discharge of pollutants into US waters

The Clean Water Act (CWA) is the primary federal statute regulating the protection and restoration of the nation's water in the United States. The CWA establishes the basic structure for regulating the discharge of pollutants into US waters and maintaining the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of these waters. The Act also sets quality standards for surface waters.

The CWA was enacted in 1948 as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, but it was significantly reorganised and expanded in 1972, with subsequent major amendments in 1977 and 1987. The 1972 amendments led to the Act's common name change to the Clean Water Act. Under the CWA, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has implemented pollution control programs and set wastewater standards for industries. The EPA has also developed national water quality criteria recommendations for pollutants in surface waters.

The CWA makes it unlawful to discharge any pollutant from a point source into US waters without a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The EPA issues technology-based effluent guidelines under the CWA, establishing discharge standards based on available and economically achievable treatment technologies. Each EPA region issues permits that meet or exceed these guidelines and standards. The Act also funds the construction of sewage treatment plants and addresses the critical problems posed by nonpoint source pollution.

The CWA identifies three broad categories of pollutants: conventional, toxic, and non-conventional. Toxic pollutants include disease-causing agents that can cause death, disease, cancer, genetic mutations, and physical deformities in organisms upon exposure, ingestion, inhalation, or assimilation. Non-conventional pollutants are those not included in the list of conventional or toxic pollutants, such as chemical oxygen demand, total organic carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus.

The EPA has undertaken watershed restoration efforts to protect aquatic ecosystems and wetlands

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has implemented several programs and initiatives to address water pollution and protect aquatic ecosystems and wetlands. One of their key approaches is through watershed restoration efforts.

Watershed restoration aims to restore the natural structure and function of river corridors, lakes, wetlands, and estuaries. This involves addressing issues such as habitat degradation, changes in flow regimes, and siltation caused by alterations to the channel form or other physical characteristics. By restoring the original physical attributes of these ecosystems, the EPA can improve water quality and bring back native biota. For example, restoring the bottom elevation in a wetland can help reestablish the hydrological regime, natural disturbance cycles, and nutrient fluxes.

The EPA recognizes that each watershed restoration project is unique, with its own combination of characteristics, sources of stress, and restoration techniques. They emphasize the importance of monitoring before, during, and after implementation to ensure that projects are adaptable and that desired functions are successfully re-established. Bioengineering, a construction method that combines live plants with dead plants or inorganic materials, is one technique used to prevent erosion, control sediment and pollutants, and provide habitats.

The EPA also works collaboratively with various partners, including states, tribes, and local communities, to develop and implement watershed plans and protect aquatic ecosystems and wetlands. They encourage states to identify priority waters for assessment and the development of restoration plans. Additionally, the EPA is committed to addressing nitrogen and phosphorus pollution, recognized as serious and pervasive water quality problems.

Overall, the EPA's watershed restoration efforts are guided by principles that focus on scientific and technical issues while also considering community perspectives and values. By striving for ecological integrity and working within the broader landscape context, the EPA aims to protect and restore aquatic ecosystems and wetlands effectively.

Governments should consider their water footprint to understand their impact on water sustainability

Water footprint is a concept that measures the volume of freshwater used in the production and consumption of goods and services. It is an environmental indicator that helps us understand the impact of our actions on water sustainability. The concept, first introduced in 2002, aims to raise awareness about the significant amount of water required for our production processes and lifestyles, with the ultimate goal of promoting rational and sustainable water use.

Governments should consider their water footprint to address water pollution and understand their impact on water sustainability. By recognizing the water-intensive nature of certain industries, governments can implement policies to reduce water wastage and promote sustainable practices. For instance, agriculture and livestock farming are major contributors to water depletion, with a single 200-gram steak requiring an average of 3,000 liters of water to produce. Governments can encourage sustainable agriculture and responsible consumption by providing incentives for water-efficient practices and supporting local agriculture, cattle production, and fishing.

Additionally, governments can play a crucial role in protecting water quality at the local level. Local governments, in particular, can fill in the gaps in state and federal regulations by implementing preventative measures through zoning ordinances. This involves addressing issues within the same geography as the water resource being protected, considering the interconnectedness of groundwater, surface water, and wetlands. By collaborating with other local governments, they can ensure the protection of entire ecosystems rather than individual resources.

To further enhance water sustainability, governments can establish water footprint caps for all catchments worldwide. These caps would vary based on local water availability and the need to maintain minimum water volumes for ecosystems, biodiversity, and downstream communities. By setting limits on water usage and pollution levels, governments can ensure that water consumption and pollutant loads remain within sustainable boundaries.

Moreover, governments can promote greater transparency in product supply chains. By requiring companies to disclose whether minimum production criteria have been met, consumers and businesses can make more informed choices. This empowers consumers to support water-friendly products and businesses to source materials sustainably, ultimately reducing water depletion and pollution.

States manage water pollution from nonpoint sources, like farm or street runoff, and set water quality standards

In the United States, nonpoint source (NPS) water pollution is regulated at the federal, state, and local levels, although to a lesser extent than point sources. NPS pollution comes from a variety of diffuse sources, such as farm or street runoff, and is challenging to regulate due to its dynamic nature and the high cost of monitoring and control measures.

The Clean Water Act (CWA) is a federal law that provides the basic structure for regulating water pollution in the US. While the CWA does not directly regulate NPS pollution, it has been amended several times to address this issue. For example, Section 208 of the 1972 amendments required states to develop area-wide water quality management plans and identify "agriculturally and silviculturally related nonpoint sources of pollution" and "runoff from manure disposal areas, and from land used for livestock and crop production." However, Section 208 failed to effectively control NPS pollution due to insufficient funding.

To address this, Congress passed the Water Quality Act in 1987, which included a new Section 319. This section authorizes the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to fund demonstration programs and provide technical assistance to state and local governments. It also requires states to identify water bodies that cannot meet water quality standards without controlling nonpoint sources and develop implementation plans. While Section 319 provides some improvements, it has been criticized for its lack of enforcement mechanisms and the scarcity of funding for plan development.

States play a crucial role in managing NPS pollution and setting water quality standards. They are responsible for implementing NPS regulations and identifying best management practices (BMPs) for impaired water sources. Local governments also have an important role in filling the gaps in state and federal regulations and ensuring proactive protection of surface water, groundwater, drinking water, and wetlands through zoning and land-use planning.

Overall, addressing NPS pollution requires coordination between federal, state, and local governments, as well as the adoption of voluntary actions and financial incentives to encourage the implementation of effective management practices.

Frequently asked questions