Boston's Air Quality: Is My House Safe?

how polluted is the air near my house boston

Boston's air quality has improved since 2003, with the number of unhealthy pollution days dropping from 26.1 to 1.3. However, air pollution remains a pressing issue, with Boston residents still breathing unhealthy air during an average of 1.3 days a year. The city's ozone pollution, in particular, has been a primary concern, with the American Lung Association ranking the Boston-Worcester-Providence metro area as the 38th most polluted city in the nation for ozone. The impact of air pollution on lung health is significant, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, and it is linked to multiple adverse health effects, including cardiovascular disease, stroke, lung cancer, and diabetes. While Boston's air quality is generally considered clean, meeting all US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) targets for criteria pollutants, the World Health Organization (WHO) warns that no level of pollution exposure is without health impacts.

Characteristics Values
Boston's air quality Generally considered clean
Meets EPA targets for PM2.5, PM10, ozone, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and sulphur dioxide (SO2)
Number of unhealthy pollution days 1.3 days per year
Boston's ranking in the US for ozone pollution 38th
Boston's ozone pollution ranking in Massachusetts 11th
Boston's 2018 PM2.5 concentration 10.1 μg/m3
Boston's population in 2005 520,000
Boston's population in 2021 680,000
Boston's Gross City Product (GCP) in 2005 *$91 billion
Boston's GCP in 2021 *$129 billion
Boston's emissions in 2005 15.0 metric tons per year
Boston's emissions in 2021 9.0 metric tons per year
Boston's goal Carbon-neutral community by 2050
Boston's Clean Air initiatives Bicycle and pedestrian safety improvements, HEPA filters in vulnerable households and community hubs, induction cooktops for residents with gas stoves and asthma
Air pollution-related deaths in Massachusetts in 2019 2,780

shunwaste

Boston's air pollution levels are generally considered clean

However, Boston still experiences unhealthy air pollution days, with ozone being the primary cause. The American Lung Association (ALA) rated Boston a "C" grade for ozone, as the city experienced an average of 1.3 unhealthy pollution days annually. The ALA's 2020 "State of the Air" report ranked the Boston metropolitan area as the 38th most polluted city in the nation for ozone. The COVID-19 pandemic has further highlighted the importance of improving air quality, as studies have linked air pollution to increased lung health risks and higher death rates among COVID-19 patients.

To address these concerns, Boston has various initiatives to improve air quality and reduce pollution. The Boston Air Pollution Control Commission is working towards making the city carbon-neutral by 2050. The Commission's programs and policies aim to improve knowledge and support community action to reduce air pollution and its contribution to global climate change. Additionally, Boston has deployed air quality sensors to monitor the impact of roadway reconstruction projects on air quality and public health.

The city also offers the Breathe Easy at Home (BEAH) program, a web-based referral system that provides home inspections to residents with asthma. Boston is also partnering with researchers, government agencies, and community groups to understand outdoor air quality and the impact of their work to reduce air pollution. These collaborative efforts include the installation of HEPA air filters and sensors in daycare centers and community hubs, as well as the distribution of induction cooktops to residents with gas stoves and asthma.

shunwaste

Ozone pollution is the primary cause of unhealthy pollution days

Boston's air quality is generally considered clean, as it meets all US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) targets for criteria pollutants. However, despite the city's success in achieving reduced pollution levels, residents still breathe in unhealthy air pollution during an average of 1.3 days a year. Of the criteria pollutants, PM2.5 and ozone are the most prevalent in US cities at dangerous levels and are of primary concern in Boston.

Ozone pollution is a key component of smog and is a highly corrosive gas pollutant. It is the primary cause of the average 1.3 unhealthy pollution days experienced in Boston every year. As a result of these unhealthy ozone days, the American Lung Association (ALA) rated Boston a "C" grade for ozone, indicating room for improvement. The Boston-Worcester-Providence area ranked 38th for high ozone days nationally, with more unhealthy days reported than in previous years.

Ozone is formed when volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) react with sunlight and heat. Sources of VOCs and NOx include vehicle emissions, industrial processes, and residential activities such as using cleaning products or painting. While Boston's air quality has improved since 2003, with significant reductions in commercial, industrial, and residential emissions, ozone pollution continues to be a concern.

Unhealthy levels of ozone pollution can have detrimental effects on human health. Ozone is a respiratory irritant, and exposure to high levels of ozone can cause coughing, throat irritation, and chest tightness. It can also worsen asthma and other respiratory conditions. Warmer temperatures brought by climate change are making ozone more likely to form and harder to clean up, increasing the risk to public health.

To address ozone pollution in Boston, efforts should focus on reducing emissions of VOCs and NOx. This can include implementing stricter emission standards for vehicles and industries, promoting the use of public transportation, and encouraging the use of low-VOC products and cleaner technologies. By taking these steps, Boston can improve its air quality and protect the health and well-being of its residents.

shunwaste

Boston's air pollution levels have seen drastic improvements since 2003

Boston's air pollution levels have seen a significant improvement since 2003, with the city making notable strides in reducing emissions and improving air quality for its residents.

One of the key indicators of air quality is the concentration of PM2.5 particles, which includes pollutants like soot, dust, dirt, metals, and chemicals. These particles are of particular concern due to their microscopic size, which allows them to be absorbed into the bloodstream when inhaled, leading to potential health issues such as cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, and even cancer. Boston's air quality is now generally considered clean, meeting all US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) targets for criteria pollutants, including PM2.5. This is a notable achievement, as Boston's PM2.5 concentration was above the recommended levels as recently as 2018.

Despite this success, Boston residents still experience unhealthy air pollution during an average of 1.3 days a year, with ozone pollution being the primary cause. This is a significant improvement from 2003, when the number of unhealthy pollution days stood at 26.1. The American Lung Association (ALA) has rated Boston a "C" grade for ozone, indicating room for further improvement. The ALA's report highlights that individual pollution exposure can vary within the city, with residents living near major pollution sources, such as construction sites, major roadways, transportation hubs, and industrial complexes, experiencing higher pollution levels.

Boston's success in reducing emissions is even more remarkable when considering the city's growth during the same period. Since 2005, Boston's population has increased from 520,000 to 680,000 residents, and its Gross City Product (GCP), a measure of economic growth, has risen from $91 billion to $129 billion. Despite this growth, Boston's emissions have fallen by 40%, from 15.0 to 9.0 metric tons per year. This reduction is attributed to a combination of local, state, and federal regulations that have implemented stricter limits and regulations on industry, transport, and personal activities.

Overall, Boston has made impressive progress in improving its air quality since 2003, and its efforts to reduce emissions and meet EPA targets are commendable. However, with residents still experiencing unhealthy air pollution days, there remains room for further improvement to ensure the health and well-being of all Boston residents.

shunwaste

Boston aims to be a carbon-neutral community by 2050

Boston's air quality is generally considered clean as it meets all US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) targets for criteria pollutants. However, the city still experiences around 1.3 days of unhealthy air pollution annually, which is primarily caused by ozone. As a result, the American Lung Association (ALA) rated Boston a "C" grade for ozone, indicating room for improvement.

To address this issue and combat climate change, Boston has pledged to become a carbon-neutral city by 2050. This means that by 2050, the Boston community can only release as much carbon pollution as the environment can safely absorb. To achieve this goal, the city has set targets for reducing emissions from buildings and transportation, which account for nearly 99% of Boston's carbon emissions. Strategies include transitioning to zero-net carbon new construction and implementing the Go Boston 2030 plan for sustainable transportation.

Boston has already made significant progress in reducing emissions, with a 40% decrease in emissions from 2005 to 2018, despite a growing population and job market. This reduction is attributed to local, state, and federal regulations, as well as a cleaner electric grid and buildings switching from fuel oil to natural gas.

To ensure a sustainable and equitable future for Boston, the city is taking a science-based, community-engaged approach to address the impacts of climate change. The 2030 Climate Action Plan, overseen by the Climate Council, will provide a detailed roadmap for carbon neutrality and climate resilience goals. The plan will focus on high-impact implementation measures and outline ambitious, achievable actions, with a commitment to climate justice.

By aiming for carbon neutrality by 2050, Boston is taking proactive steps to reduce carbon pollution, improve air quality, and create a resilient and sustainable future for its residents.

shunwaste

Air pollution is linked to multiple health issues, including cognitive loss in children

Boston's air quality is generally considered clean as it meets all US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) targets for criteria pollutants. However, despite the city's success in achieving reduced pollution levels, Boston residents still breathe unhealthy air during an average of 1.3 days a year. The World Health Organization (WHO) warns that no level of pollution exposure is safe, and the current EPA standards may still contribute to adverse health effects.

Air pollution is a pressing issue that affects everyone, but children are especially vulnerable. Their developing bodies, organs, and immune systems make them more susceptible to the harmful impacts of air pollution. The damage to their health can start as early as the prenatal period and continue through infancy and childhood.

Several studies have found a link between air pollution and cognitive impairment in children. For example, a study from California, US, found that prenatal exposure to air pollutants like NO2, PM2.5, PM10, and ozone was associated with impaired cognitive performance, adaptive functioning, and behavioral issues in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Additionally, Project Viva, a cohort study in eastern Massachusetts, found that children living within 50 meters of a major highway had lower nonverbal, verbal, and visual-motor IQ scores.

The impact of air pollution on cognitive development is not limited to Boston but is a global concern. A systematic review of 84 relevant studies concluded that exposure to air pollutants was associated with an increased risk of lower cognitive function in children and adolescents. Furthermore, MRI studies have shown that high concentrations of air pollutants are linked to changes in the brain's white matter and reduced functional integration in children's brain networks.

The adverse health effects of air pollution on children are not limited to cognitive impairment. Other health issues include respiratory infections, such as acute lower respiratory infections, pneumonia, and upper respiratory infections. Children are also at risk of experiencing asthma, reduced lung function, allergies, and an increased risk of developing chronic diseases later in life.

Given the vulnerability of children to air pollution and the potential for long-term health consequences, it is crucial to implement measures to improve air quality, especially in child-centric settings like schools and kindergartens.

Frequently asked questions

The air quality in Boston varies depending on your proximity to major emission sources. While Boston's air quality is generally considered clean, residents still breathe unhealthy air during an average of 1.3 days a year. You can check the real-time air pollution map to see the air quality near your house.

The primary cause of unhealthy pollution days in Boston is ozone. Other sources of air pollution in Boston include commercial, industrial, and large residential emissions, as well as construction, major roadways, transportation hubs, and industrial complexes.

Boston has implemented more stringent limits and regulations on industry, transport, and personal activities, which has helped reduce emissions. The city is also working towards becoming a carbon-neutral community by 2050 through various programs and policies.

Air pollution has been linked to multiple adverse health effects, including lung cancer, cardiovascular disease, stroke, and diabetes. It can also trigger asthma attacks and cause cognitive loss in children.

There are several ways to protect yourself from air pollution, such as using HEPA air filters at home and in community spaces, participating in the Breathe Easy at Home program if you have asthma, and avoiding areas near major emission sources if possible.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment