Japan's Water Quality: A Pollution Crisis?

Japan's water pollution has been a cause for concern, with the country facing issues related to both marine and freshwater contamination. One of the most notable instances of water pollution in Japan is the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant disaster, which occurred in 2011 due to an earthquake and tsunami. The incident led to the release of contaminated water, which Japan started discharging into the ocean in 2023, sparking controversy and concerns about the potential environmental and health risks. Additionally, Japan's hot springs, known as onsens, have faced water shortages due to overtourism and aging infrastructure. Furthermore, historical cases of water pollution in Japan, such as the Itai-itai and Minamata diseases, resulted from industrial discharge of chemicals and heavy metals into water sources, leading to significant health issues among residents. While Japan has made efforts to address water pollution, including the enactment of the Water Pollution Control Act, the country continues to grapple with the challenges of ensuring clean and safe water resources.

Fukushima nuclear plant contaminated water release

In August 2023, Japan announced its decision to release treated water from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant into the Pacific Ocean. The plant, operated by the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), was severely damaged in the 2011 tsunami, which triggered a nuclear disaster. Since the accident, over 1.3 million tons of nuclear wastewater have been collected, treated, and stored in tanks at the plant. However, the storage space is running out, leaving Japan with no choice but to start dispensing the wastewater into the ocean gradually.

The decision to release the contaminated water has sparked controversy and opposition from neighbouring countries, local communities, and environmental groups. Critics argue that Japan is putting its interests above the wellbeing of the region and the public. China has been the most vocal opponent, accusing Japan of violating international obligations and treating the ocean as its "private sewer". South Korea has also expressed strong objections, with its government banning seafood from the waters near Fukushima and closely monitoring the radioactivity levels of salt farms.

TEPCO and the Japanese government maintain that the water is safe for release after being treated with the Advanced Liquid Processing System (ALPS), which removes most radioactive substances. However, critics argue that the potential risks of bioaccumulation of ruthenium, cobalt, strontium, and plutonium, which sometimes slip through the ALPS process, have not been adequately addressed. Additionally, there are concerns about the presence of tritium, a radioactive material that cannot be removed from the water but is considered safe in small amounts.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN's nuclear watchdog, has endorsed the plan, stating that it meets safety standards. However, some experts argue that more studies are needed, and the release should be halted until further assessments can be conducted. The controversy surrounding the Fukushima water release highlights the complex challenges of managing the aftermath of a nuclear disaster and balancing economic, environmental, and public health considerations.

Tritium and other radionuclides in the water

The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in Japan has been releasing radioactive water into the Pacific Ocean since 11 March 2011, following the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster triggered by the Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami. The plant's operator, Tokyo Electric Power (TEPCO), has been pumping water into the plant to cool down the Fukushima nuclear reactors' fuel rods, which produces contaminated water that is stored in massive tanks.

The water in the tanks contains radioactive materials, including tritium, a radioactive isotope that is not harmful in small amounts, and other radionuclides such as iodine-131, caesium-134, caesium-137, and strontium-90. TEPCO uses the Advanced Liquid Processing System (ALPS) to treat the water and remove radionuclides, but some radionuclides, like tritium and carbon-14, cannot be removed.

Tritium is a relative of hydrogen (H-3) and is produced naturally every day. It is present in tap water, rainwater, and even in our bodies. It is discharged into the seas from many nuclear power facilities around the world, and no adverse effects from tritium have been found in the surrounding areas. The concentration of tritium in the treated wastewater from Fukushima is minuscule relative to regulatory limits, and the Japanese government and TEPCO assert that the water will be diluted to meet drinkable standards before discharge.

However, critics argue that the presence of other harmful radionuclides, including strontium-90, iodine, ruthenium, rhodium, antimony, tellurium, cobalt, and carbon-14, will remain present even after filtration. The release of contaminated water has sparked protests and criticism from neighbouring countries, local communities, and environmental groups, who are concerned about the potential impact on marine ecosystems, human health, and the fishing industry in the region.

Impact on marine life and ocean currents

Japan's decision to release contaminated water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant into the Pacific Ocean has raised concerns about its potential impact on marine life and ocean currents. The water, contaminated with radioactive isotopes like tritium and possibly other radioactive traces, is a result of the ongoing cooling process for the damaged reactors. This process produces approximately 130 tons of contaminated water daily, and the release is expected to continue for decades.

The Japanese government and scientific organizations maintain that the water is safe, with tritium levels deemed harmless in small amounts and other radionuclides reduced to acceptable levels. They assert that the release complies with international standards and will have a negligible impact on the environment and people. However, critics argue that all possible consequences have not been thoroughly studied, and the biological impacts of the released substances have been overlooked.

The controversy surrounding the release has attracted international attention, with neighboring countries like China and South Korea expressing strong opposition. They accuse Japan of disregarding international safety and the interests of neighboring countries, treating the ocean as a "sewer," and not adequately addressing doubts and opposition. The discharge of contaminated water has also sparked protests from environmental activists and local fishing communities, who fear that consumers will avoid seafood from the region, affecting their livelihoods.

The potential impact on marine life is a significant concern. Radioactive isotopes released into the ocean could be carried by marine life and ocean currents across the Pacific Ocean, affecting a vast area. The long-term effects of the contaminated water on marine ecosystems and the potential entry of radioactive substances into the food chain are uncertain, and the complexity of ocean currents makes it challenging to predict the dispersion and accumulation of pollutants.

Additionally, the release of contaminated water from Fukushima adds to the existing environmental challenges in the region. The history of pollution in Japan, including the Minamata disease incident caused by methylmercury poisoning and the Yokkaichi asthma cases resulting from sulfur dioxide emissions, underscores the vulnerability of both human and marine health to industrial pollution and inadequate waste disposal practices. The Fukushima water release, while intended to address storage limitations, raises questions about the potential cumulative effects of pollutants in the ocean and their long-term implications for marine life and ocean ecosystems.

Japan's history of water pollution diseases

Japan's rapid economic growth and industrialization post-World War II led to severe environmental degradation, with incidents like the "four big pollution diseases" highlighting the country's struggle with intense environmental destruction. The four diseases were man-made and caused by environmental pollution due to the improper handling of industrial waste by Japanese corporations. The first occurred in 1912, with the other three occurring in the 1950s and 1960s.

The first of these diseases was Itai-itai, which means "it hurts-it hurts" in English. It occurred in 1912 within the Toyama Prefecture, caused by cadmium poisoning in the drinking water from the Jinzū River basin. Mitsui Mining and Smelting Company had been discharging cadmium into the river since 1910, contaminating the locals' water source. Those who drank the water or consumed food grown with the contaminated water, such as rice, would likely exhibit signs of Itai-itai disease.

The second and third of the four big pollution diseases were Minamata disease and Niigata Minamata disease, which were the same disease caused by the same poison (mercury) but in different locations and times. The disease was first identified in 1956 among residents of Minamata, Kumamoto Prefecture. The cause was traced back to severe mercury poisoning from contaminated wastewater released by an acetaldehyde plant operated by Chisso since 1932. This wastewater bioaccumulated in fish and shellfish, which were then consumed by locals. A second outbreak occurred in 1965 in Niigata Prefecture, this time caused by mercury-contaminated wastewater from an acetaldehyde plant operated by Shōwa Denkō in Kanose Village along the Agano River.

The fourth disease was Yokkaichi asthma, a form of asthma prevalent in Yokkaichi City. 5-10% of inhabitants aged 40 in the city were reported to have chronic bronchitis, compared to less than 3% in non-polluted areas.

These incidents of water pollution-related diseases caused by industrial runoff affected over 40,000 people and spurred some of the world's first stringent environmental regulations. The Japanese government enacted the Water Pollution Control Act in 1970, requiring all factories to regulate the disposal of dangerous chemicals. As a result, water pollutant loads dropped by 90% within 20 years due to progressively stricter standards. However, Japan continues to face modern pollution challenges, such as microplastic contamination and urban air quality issues.

The safety of Japan's hot springs

Japan's natural hot springs, or onsens, are highly popular among locals and tourists alike. The country has 27,000 natural hot spring sources, with at least one in every region. These hot springs are known for their relaxing and therapeutic effects, with different minerals dissolved in the water providing different health benefits.

However, in recent years, Japan's hot springs have faced challenges due to increasing tourism and ageing infrastructure. The surge in tourism, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic, has resulted in a higher demand for private onsen baths in hotels, requiring more water to be pumped to these facilities. This has led to a decrease in water supply levels in popular onsen areas such as Ureshino and Niseko. Local officials have expressed concerns about the sustainability of the hot spring sources and have urged hotels and ryokans (traditional Japanese inns) to limit the use of private in-room baths.

Additionally, there are concerns about the potential impact of water pollution on Japan's hot springs. In 2023, Japan began releasing treated wastewater from the Fukushima nuclear power plant into the ocean, a decision that sparked controversy and criticism from neighbouring countries and environmental groups. While the Japanese government and the plant operator, Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), assert that the water is treated to acceptable safety standards, some experts and activists remain skeptical, citing the presence of radioactive substances such as tritium. The potential ecological and health risks associated with the release of contaminated water have raised concerns among local communities, particularly those involved in the fishing industry.

Despite these challenges, Japan's hot springs continue to be a sought-after attraction for visitors seeking a zen experience and the therapeutic benefits of the mineral-rich waters. The country's strict onsen laws govern the minimum temperature and mineral content of onsen water, ensuring that visitors can experience the natural treasure safely and enjoy the relaxing atmosphere and health benefits that the hot springs offer.

Frequently asked questions